Join PrimeGrid
Returning Participants
Community
Leader Boards
Results
Other
drummers-lowrise
|
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Geminids Shower Challenge
| Author |
Message |
|---|
 Michael Gutierrez Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17
Posts: 348
ID: 764476
Credit: 46,281,510
RAC: 0
                 
|
|
Welcome to the Geminids Shower Challenge
The ninth and final challenge of the 2021 Series will be a 10-day challenge marking the yearly Geminids Meteor Shower. The challenge will be offered on the GFN-21, GFN-22, and GFN-DYFL subprojects, beginning 7 December 07:00 UTC and ending 17 December 07:00 UTC.
The Geminid meteor shower – always a favorite among the annual meteor showers – should peak in 2021 on the night of Monday, December 13 into Tuesday, December 14. The Geminids are a reliable shower for those who watch around 2 a.m. local time from a dark-sky location. This year, a waxing gibbous moon will hang around most of the night, washing out the fainter meteors. Regardless, it’s always worth a look!
For more info: https://earthsky.org/astronomy-essentials/everything-you-need-to-know-geminid-meteor-shower/
To participate in the Challenge, please select only the GFN-21 and/or GFN-22 and/or GFN-DYFL subprojects in your PrimeGrid preferences section.
Note: The deadline for these WUs is longer than ten days, so make sure your computer is able to return the WUs within the challenge time-frame. Only tasks issued AFTER the start time and returned BEFORE the finish time will be counted.
Application Builds
IMPORTANT: Overclocking -- including factory overclocking -- on Nvidia GPUs is very strongly discouraged. Even if your GPU can run other tasks without difficulty, it may be unable to run GFN tasks when overclocked.
Supported platforms:
- Windows: Nvidia GPU (OpenCL): 32 bit, AMD/ATI GPU (OpenCL): 32 bit, CPU: 64 bit, 32 bit
- Linux: Nvidia GPU (OpenCL): 32 bit, 64 bit, AMD/ATI GPU (OpenCL): 32 bit, 64 bit, CPU: 64 bit, 32 bit
- Mac: Nvidia GPU (OpenCL): 64 bit, AMD/ATI GPU (OpenCL): 64 bit, CPU: 64 bit, 32 bit
A Cautionary Reminder
ATTENTION: The primality programs Genefer (for CPUs) and GeneferOCL (for GPUs) are computationally intensive; so, it is vital to have a stable system with good cooling. It does not tolerate "even the slightest of errors." Please see this post for more details on how you can "stress test" your CPU, and please see this post for tips on running GFN on your GPU successfully.
As with all number crunching, excessive heat can potentially cause permanent hardware failure. Please ensure your cooling system is sufficient.
GFN-21 WU's are currently averaging 14 days on CPU and 13 hours on GPU.
GFN-22 WU's are currently averaging 49 hours on GPU.
GFN-DYFL WU's are currently averaging 43 hours on GPU (but they are significantly longer tasks, usually only taken by faster GPUs).
For a general idea of how your GPU stacks up, you can have a look at the fastest GPUs list.
If your CPU is highly overclocked, please consider "stress testing" it. Overclocking your GPU is not recommended at all for GeneferCUDA. Sieving is an excellent alternative for computers that are not able to run Genefer. :)
Please, please, please make sure your machines are up to the task.
Multi-threading optimization instructions (For GFN-21 only)
If you're running GFN-21 on a CPU and looking to maximize your computer's performance during this challenge, or when running LLR in general, you may find this information useful.
- Your mileage may vary. Before the challenge starts, take some time and experiment and see what works best on your computer.
- If you have an Intel CPU with hyperthreading, either turn off the hyperthreading in the BIOS, or set BOINC to use 50% of the processors.
[list]
- If you're using a GPU for other tasks, it may be beneficial to leave hyperthreading on in the BIOS and instead tell BOINC to use 50% of the CPU's. This will allow one of the hyperthreads to service the GPU.
Use GFN's multithreaded mode. It requires a little bit of setup, but it's worth the effort. Follow these steps:
Time zone converter:
The World Clock - Time Zone Converter
NOTE: The countdown clock on the front page uses the host computer time. Therefore, if your computer time is off, so will the countdown clock. For precise timing, use the UTC Time in the data section to the left of the countdown clock.
Scoring information
Scores will be kept for individuals and teams. Only work units issued AFTER December 7//thst 07:00:00 UTC and received BEFORE December 17th 07:00:00 UTC will be considered for credit.
In this challenge we will be using the same scoring algorithm as we use to determine BOINC credits, including bonuses! Because the score bonuses are included in the challenge score, it is advantageous to run the longer tasks if you can manage to finish them within the 10 day challenge window. This will land you a higher position in the leaderboard and therefor a higher score on the overall leaderboard.
At the Conclusion of the Challenge
We kindly ask users "moving on" to ABORT their WU's instead of DETACHING, RESETTING, or PAUSING.
ABORTING WU's alows them to be recycled immediately; thus a much faster "clean up" to the end of a challenge. DETACHING, RESETTING, and PAUSING WU's causes them to remain in limbo until they EXPIRE. Therefore, we must wait until WU's expire to send them out to be completed.
Please consider either completing what's in the queue or ABORTING them. Thank you. :)
More information on Generalized Fermat Numbers and the Genefer program
Best of Luck to everyone!
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
| |
|
|
|
|
For the same GPU, the GFN-22 must be faster than the GFN-DYFL, right?
____________
 | |
|
MonkeydeeVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 8 Dec 13
Posts: 540
ID: 284516
Credit: 1,523,041,031
RAC: 463,651
                           
|
For the same GPU, the GFN-22 must be faster than the GFN-DYFL, right?
Yes, it is faster and is also fewer credits because it is a smaller number
____________
My Primes
Badge Score: 4*2 + 6*2 + 7*4 + 8*9 + 11*3 + 12*1 = 165
 | |
|
Michael GoetzVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10
Posts: 14010
ID: 53948
Credit: 428,791,614
RAC: 1,095,553
                     
|
For the same GPU, the GFN-22 must be faster than the GFN-DYFL, right?
Yes, it is faster and is also fewer credits because it is a smaller number
That's entirely, 100% correct. But it's not the whole story.
GFN-22 is faster and fewer credits than DYFL, and although a part of that is because DYFL is a larger number, that doesn't explain it all.
Currently, at least on my GPU (a GTX 1060), DYFL runs about 32% longer than GFN-22. Calculating the run time based only upon the size of the numbers, I would expect only DYFL to be 26% longer.
That extra 6% is due to the difference in the speed of the transforms. OCL4 on GFN-22, and OCL5 on DYFL.
Because of the difference in transforms speeds, We decided to use a larger credit bonus for DYFL. You get an extra 25% bonus credit on DYFL.
You might ask why the bonus is 25% when the difference in transform speed is only 6%? The answer is... because Nvidia sucks.
When DYFL was started, Nvidia produced GPUs with amazing double precision floating point performance. DP speed is what is needed for scientific calculations. It's not so important for games. Which do you think is more critical for Nvidia's bottom line? The result is that over the years, DP speed has been sacrificed in later Nvidia architectures.
When DYFL was started, and the bonus was established, the benchmarking was done on an Nivida GTX 460, which had blazingly fast DP. The fastest transform made use of that. So the benchmark transform for GFN-22 is OCL, which is (or at least used to be) much, much faster than OCL4.
On a GTX 460, DYFL takes about 50% more time to run than GFN-22. 25% is due to the size of the numbers, and the other 25% is due to the speed difference between OCL and OCL5. To compensate, we gave DYFL 25% extra bonus credit.
While modern Nvidia GPUs are much faster than legacy GPUs, their DP speed isn't proportionally as fast as it used to be. OCL4 is actually faster today than OCL, because DP, and thus OCL, sucks on today's Nvidia GPUs. So instead of comparing a blazingly fast OCL vs OCL5, today, it's OCL4 vs OCL5, and the difference is only 6%.
The bottom line is that DYFL is larger and uses a slower transform, and both make it take longer. Credit is proportionally higher for the size of the number, but currently the difference in transform speed seems to be a lot less than the extra credit bonus. DYFL should therefore do somewhat better than GFN-22 when you look at credit per hour.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
|
|
So Michael, if it's all about DP, why doesn't the Radeon VII perform better than NVIDIA cards?
Radeon VII - FP64 (double) performance
3.360 TFLOPS (1:4)
GTX 3090 - FP64 (double) performance
556.0 GFLOPS (1:64)
Hopfully that question isn't too broad. Because I know my Radeon VII gets whooped by NVIDIA cards.
I plan on running DYFL but have no idea if GFN-21, 22 or DYFL is best for a Radeon VII. There won't be many 1st's though, that's for sure lol.
Edit - I found this comment by you.... so perhaps I shouldn't bother with DYFL?
"Remember, FP64 is ONLY used on GFN 21 and GFN 22, and then only if it's faster than OCL4.
FP64 performance is useless for Lucky."
____________
Слава Україні! | |
|
Michael GoetzVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10
Posts: 14010
ID: 53948
Credit: 428,791,614
RAC: 1,095,553
|
So Michael, if it's all about DP, why doesn't the Radeon VII perform better than NVIDIA cards?
I don’t know enough about AMD GPUs to answer that question, but my guess is that Nvidia’s other performance is much better than AMD’s. Remember, because its DP performance is so weak, it’s using non-DP math.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
|
|
Hello, it looks like the stats are not up to date.
Have reported https://www.primegrid.com/result.php?resultid=1279229733 this morning and it does not appear.
Thank You
EDIT : My Mistake. Started to early. Sorry | |
|
Michael GutierrezVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17
Posts: 348
ID: 764476
Credit: 46,281,510
RAC: 0
|
|
Stats for Day 1 of the challenge! Separated by project:
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 16 (GFN-21)
(As of 2021-12-08 00:21:43 UTC)
12068 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 10990 (91%) / 1072 (9%) / 6 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
1783 (15%) were aborted. [1750 (15%) / 33 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
209 (2%) came back with some kind of an error. [1 (0%) / 208 (2%) / 0 (0%)]
239 (2%) have returned a successful result. [93 (1%) / 146 (1%) / 0 (0%)]
9837 (82%) are still in progress. [9146 (76%) / 685 (6%) / 6 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
215 (90%) are pending validation. [80 (33%) / 135 (56%) / 0 (0%)]
24 (10%) have been successfully validated. [13 (5%) / 11 (5%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) were invalid. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) are inconclusive. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=757708. The leading edge was at b=731200 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 3.63% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 17 (GFN-22)
(As of 2021-12-08 00:21:44 UTC)
308 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 0 (0%) / 308 (100%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
16 (5%) were aborted. [0 (0%) / 16 (5%) / 0 (0%)]
100 (32%) came back with some kind of an error. [0 (0%) / 100 (32%) / 0 (0%)]
2 (1%) have returned a successful result. [0 (0%) / 2 (1%) / 0 (0%)]
190 (62%) are still in progress. [0 (0%) / 190 (62%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
2 (100%) are pending validation. [0 (0%) / 2 (100%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) have been successfully validated. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) were invalid. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) are inconclusive. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=214810. The leading edge was at b=214620 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 0.09% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 31 (DYFL)
(As of 2021-12-08 00:21:44 UTC)
1623 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 0 (0%) / 1623 (100%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
586 (36%) were aborted. [0 (0%) / 586 (36%) / 0 (0%)]
430 (26%) came back with some kind of an error. [0 (0%) / 430 (26%) / 0 (0%)]
16 (1%) have returned a successful result. [0 (0%) / 16 (1%) / 0 (0%)]
591 (36%) are still in progress. [0 (0%) / 591 (36%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
16 (100%) are pending validation. [0 (0%) / 16 (100%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) have been successfully validated. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) were invalid. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) are inconclusive. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=950008. The leading edge was at b=947408 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 0.27% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. | |
|
Dave
Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12
Posts: 3202
ID: 130544
Credit: 2,283,474,229
RAC: 1,030,077
               
|
|
7 hrs early. | |
|
Ravi FernandoProject administrator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 19
Posts: 211
ID: 1108183
Credit: 13,795,467
RAC: 7,906
              
|
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=950008. The leading edge was at b=947408 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 0.27% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
I think that percentage is inaccurate, since DYFL didn't start at b=0. | |
|
Michael GutierrezVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17
Posts: 348
ID: 764476
Credit: 46,281,510
RAC: 0
|
|
Day 2 stats!
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 16 (GFN-21)
(As of 2021-12-09 04:42:52 UTC)
15331 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 12521 (82%) / 2804 (18%) / 6 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
2414 (16%) were aborted. [2136 (14%) / 278 (2%) / 0 (0%)]
1240 (8%) came back with some kind of an error. [3 (0%) / 1237 (8%) / 0 (0%)]
1243 (8%) have returned a successful result. [521 (3%) / 722 (5%) / 0 (0%)]
10434 (68%) are still in progress. [9861 (64%) / 567 (4%) / 6 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
1062 (85%) are pending validation. [429 (35%) / 633 (51%) / 0 (0%)]
178 (14%) have been successfully validated. [90 (7%) / 88 (7%) / 0 (0%)]
1 (0%) were invalid. [0 (0%) / 1 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
2 (0%) are inconclusive. [2 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=762006. The leading edge was at b=731200 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 4.21% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 17 (GFN-22)
(As of 2021-12-09 04:42:53 UTC)
581 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 0 (0%) / 581 (100%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
34 (6%) were aborted. [0 (0%) / 34 (6%) / 0 (0%)]
253 (44%) came back with some kind of an error. [0 (0%) / 253 (44%) / 0 (0%)]
71 (12%) have returned a successful result. [0 (0%) / 71 (12%) / 0 (0%)]
223 (38%) are still in progress. [0 (0%) / 223 (38%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
54 (76%) are pending validation. [0 (0%) / 54 (76%) / 0 (0%)]
17 (24%) have been successfully validated. [0 (0%) / 17 (24%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) were invalid. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) are inconclusive. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=215064. The leading edge was at b=214620 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 0.21% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 31 (DYFL)
(As of 2021-12-09 04:42:53 UTC)
2068 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 0 (0%) / 2068 (100%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
615 (30%) were aborted. [0 (0%) / 615 (30%) / 0 (0%)]
550 (27%) came back with some kind of an error. [0 (0%) / 550 (27%) / 0 (0%)]
232 (11%) have returned a successful result. [0 (0%) / 232 (11%) / 0 (0%)]
671 (32%) are still in progress. [0 (0%) / 671 (32%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
199 (86%) are pending validation. [0 (0%) / 199 (86%) / 0 (0%)]
33 (14%) have been successfully validated. [0 (0%) / 33 (14%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) were invalid. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) are inconclusive. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=950008. The leading edge was at b=947408 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 0.27% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. | |
|
|
|
|
Is your rank based on tasks completed or tasks validated?
I've got a few GFN22's pending validation.
____________
Слава Україні! | |
|
|
|
|
Chooka wrote: Is your rank based on tasks completed or tasks validated?
I've got a few GFN22's pending validation.
Based on tasks completed.
I believe that if a completed task turns out to be invalid, then it will have its credit points removed from you.
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
|
|
|
Thank you.
____________
Слава Україні! | |
|
Michael GutierrezVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17
Posts: 348
ID: 764476
Credit: 46,281,510
RAC: 0
|
|
Day 3 Stats:
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 16 (GFN-21)
(As of 2021-12-10 07:10:08 UTC)
17719 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 13631 (77%) / 4082 (23%) / 6 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
3565 (20%) were aborted. [3261 (18%) / 304 (2%) / 0 (0%)]
1819 (10%) came back with some kind of an error. [6 (0%) / 1813 (10%) / 0 (0%)]
2429 (14%) have returned a successful result. [1052 (6%) / 1377 (8%) / 0 (0%)]
9906 (56%) are still in progress. [9312 (53%) / 588 (3%) / 6 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
1722 (71%) are pending validation. [742 (31%) / 980 (40%) / 0 (0%)]
698 (29%) have been successfully validated. [307 (13%) / 391 (16%) / 0 (0%)]
2 (0%) were invalid. [1 (0%) / 1 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
7 (0%) are inconclusive. [2 (0%) / 5 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=765514. The leading edge was at b=731200 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 4.69% a
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 17 (GFN-22)
(As of 2021-12-10 07:10:08 UTC)
803 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 0 (0%) / 803 (100%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
37 (5%) were aborted. [0 (0%) / 37 (5%) / 0 (0%)]
378 (47%) came back with some kind of an error. [0 (0%) / 378 (47%) / 0 (0%)]
136 (17%) have returned a successful result. [0 (0%) / 136 (17%) / 0 (0%)]
252 (31%) are still in progress. [0 (0%) / 252 (31%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
100 (74%) are pending validation. [0 (0%) / 100 (74%) / 0 (0%)]
36 (26%) have been successfully validated. [0 (0%) / 36 (26%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) were invalid. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) are inconclusive. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=215380. The leading edge was at b=214620 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 0.35% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 31 (DYFL)
(As of 2021-12-10 07:10:08 UTC)
2823 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 0 (0%) / 2823 (100%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
632 (22%) were aborted. [0 (0%) / 632 (22%) / 0 (0%)]
891 (32%) came back with some kind of an error. [0 (0%) / 891 (32%) / 0 (0%)]
500 (18%) have returned a successful result. [0 (0%) / 500 (18%) / 0 (0%)]
800 (28%) are still in progress. [0 (0%) / 800 (28%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
318 (64%) are pending validation. [0 (0%) / 318 (64%) / 0 (0%)]
180 (36%) have been successfully validated. [0 (0%) / 180 (36%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) were invalid. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
2 (0%) are inconclusive. [0 (0%) / 2 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=950134. The leading edge was at b=947408 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 0.29% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. | |
|
Michael GutierrezVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17
Posts: 348
ID: 764476
Credit: 46,281,510
RAC: 0
|
|
Day 4 Stats:
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 16 (GFN-21)
(As of 2021-12-11 05:33:14 UTC)
19989 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 14524 (73%) / 5459 (27%) / 6 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
4761 (24%) were aborted. [4444 (22%) / 317 (2%) / 0 (0%)]
2566 (13%) came back with some kind of an error. [12 (0%) / 2554 (13%) / 0 (0%)]
3384 (17%) have returned a successful result. [1458 (7%) / 1926 (10%) / 0 (0%)]
9278 (46%) are still in progress. [8610 (43%) / 662 (3%) / 6 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
1877 (55%) are pending validation. [820 (24%) / 1057 (31%) / 0 (0%)]
1491 (44%) have been successfully validated. [635 (19%) / 856 (25%) / 0 (0%)]
4 (0%) were invalid. [1 (0%) / 3 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
12 (0%) are inconclusive. [2 (0%) / 10 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=765592. The leading edge was at b=731200 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 4.70% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 17 (GFN-22)
(As of 2021-12-11 05:33:14 UTC)
982 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 0 (0%) / 982 (100%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
42 (4%) were aborted. [0 (0%) / 42 (4%) / 0 (0%)]
455 (46%) came back with some kind of an error. [0 (0%) / 455 (46%) / 0 (0%)]
221 (23%) have returned a successful result. [0 (0%) / 221 (23%) / 0 (0%)]
264 (27%) are still in progress. [0 (0%) / 264 (27%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
139 (63%) are pending validation. [0 (0%) / 139 (63%) / 0 (0%)]
81 (37%) have been successfully validated. [0 (0%) / 81 (37%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) were invalid. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
1 (0%) are inconclusive. [0 (0%) / 1 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=215498. The leading edge was at b=214620 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 0.41% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 31 (DYFL)
(As of 2021-12-11 05:33:15 UTC)
3265 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 0 (0%) / 3265 (100%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
684 (21%) were aborted. [0 (0%) / 684 (21%) / 0 (0%)]
1042 (32%) came back with some kind of an error. [0 (0%) / 1042 (32%) / 0 (0%)]
737 (23%) have returned a successful result. [0 (0%) / 737 (23%) / 0 (0%)]
802 (25%) are still in progress. [0 (0%) / 802 (25%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
381 (52%) are pending validation. [0 (0%) / 381 (52%) / 0 (0%)]
354 (48%) have been successfully validated. [0 (0%) / 354 (48%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) were invalid. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
2 (0%) are inconclusive. [0 (0%) / 2 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=950630. The leading edge was at b=947408 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 0.34% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. | |
|
|
|
|
Ref:
Use GFN's multithreaded mode. It requires a little bit of setup, but it's worth the effort. Follow these steps:
Create a app_config.xml file in the directory C:\ProgramData\BOINC\projects\www.primegrid.com\ (or wherever your BOINC data directory is located). For a quad core CPU, the file should contain the following contents. Change the two occurrences of "4" to the number of actual cores your computer has.
<app_config>
<app_version>
<app_name>genefer</app_name>
<cmdline>-nt 4</cmdline>
<plan_class>cpuGFN21</plan_class>
<avg_ncpus>4</avg_ncpus>
</app_version>
</app_config>
After creating the file, click on "Options/Read config files". You should then restart BOINC or reboot.
The first time BOINC downloads a GFN task, it may act a little strange and download 4 tasks instead of 1. The run times on this first set of tasks may look a bit strange too. This is normal. This will also occur anytime BOINC downloads more than one task at a time. This can be avoided by setting "Use at most [ 1 ] % of the CPUs" before you download GFN tasks. After one task was downloaded, increase the percentage.
Some people have observed that when using multithreaded GFN, hyperthreading is actually beneficial. We encourage you to experiment and see what works best for you.
Is this running MT?
Showing 3 to 5 days to complete tasks.
CPU Usage is less than 10%
I am not seeing MT as like with LLR CPU Tasks
My stderr.txt file
genefer 3.3.4 (Windows/CPU/64-bit)
Copyright 2001-2018, Yves Gallot
Copyright 2009, Mark Rodenkirch, David Underbakke
Copyright 2010-2012, Shoichiro Yamada, Ken Brazier
Copyright 2011-2014, Michael Goetz, Ronald Schneider
Copyright 2011-2018, Iain Bethune
Genefer is free source code, under the MIT license.
Supported transform implementations: fma3 avx sse4 sse2 x87
Command line: projects/www.primegrid.com/genefer_windows64_3.3.4.exe -boinc -q 749206^2097152+1
Low priority change succeeded.
Using FMA3 transform
Starting initialization...
Initialization complete (7.803 seconds).
Testing 749206^2097152+1...
Estimated time for 749206^2097152+1 is 76:40:00
Thank you
My settings.
<app>
<name>genefer</name>
<app_version>
<cmdline>-nt 8</cmdline>
<plan_class>cpuGFN21</plan_class>
<avg_ncpus>8</avg_ncpus>
</app_version>
<gpu_versions>
<gpu_usage>1.0</gpu_usage>
<cpu_usage>0.1</cpu_usage>
</gpu_versions>
</app> | |
|
|
|
|
@bcavnaugh,
the syntax for an app_config which configures both the CPU version and the GPU version should look like this:
<app_config>
<app_version>
<app_name>genefer</app_name>
<plan_class>cpuGFN21</plan_class>
<cmdline>-nt 8</cmdline>
<avg_ncpus>8</avg_ncpus>
</app_version>
<app_version>
<app_name>genefer</app_name>
<plan_class>OCLcudaGFN</plan_class>
<avg_ncpus>0.658690</avg_ncpus>
<ngpus>1</ngpus>
</app_version>
</app_config>
However, most people don't need an app_version block for the GPU version.
Additional app names and plan_class identifiers can be looked up at apps.php. E.g., Genefer 22 on an AMD card would have genefer_wr as app_name and openclatiGFN22 as plan_class. | |
|
|
|
@bcavnaugh,
the syntax for an app_config which configures both the CPU version and the GPU version should look like this:
<app_config>
<app_version>
<app_name>genefer</app_name>
<plan_class>cpuGFN21</plan_class>
<cmdline>-nt 8</cmdline>
<avg_ncpus>8</avg_ncpus>
</app_version>
<app_version>
<app_name>genefer</app_name>
<plan_class>OCLcudaGFN</plan_class>
<avg_ncpus>0.658690</avg_ncpus>
<ngpus>1</ngpus>
</app_version>
</app_config>
However, most people don't need an app_version block for the GPU version.
Additional app names and plan_class identifiers can be looked up at apps.php. E.g., Genefer 22 on an AMD card would have genefer_wr as app_name and openclatiGFN22 as plan_class.
No <app> </app>
Thanks, I was going by the first post.
<app_config>
<app_version>
<app_name>genefer</app_name>
<cmdline>-nt 4</cmdline>
<plan_class>cpuGFN21</plan_class>
<avg_ncpus>4</avg_ncpus>
</app_version>
</app_config>
This is now working for me.
<app_config>
<app>
<name>genefer</name>
<gpu_versions>
<gpu_usage>1.0</gpu_usage>
<cpu_usage>0.1</cpu_usage>
</gpu_versions>
</app>
<app_version>
<app_name>genefer</app_name>
<plan_class>cpuGFN21</plan_class>
<cmdline>-nt 8</cmdline>
<avg_ncpus>8</avg_ncpus>
</app_version>
</app_config> | |
|
|
|
|
Well, both the <app> and the <app_version> variants work for the basic purpose of specifying just the CPU count and GPU count per task. One or the other (or both) need to be used if more than that is desired. E.g. <app> for concurrency, <app_version> for command line arguments. | |
|
|
|
|
One of my i7-2600k running GFN-21 under Win7 is actually crunching on two full and two half threads while the app_config.xml is telling the machine to run on four threads.
The file itself is ok, it's just that the machine is using its resources that way.
When doing multi-threaded PrimeGrid stuff on my Linux machines using the same file, everything is fine.
But when doing multi-threaded PrimeGrid stuff on my Intel Mac Minis set to leave threads free, I get to see interesting kinds of use as well. ;-)
I'm not complaining or searching for clues, I'm just reporting strange behaviour.
____________
Greetings, Jens
147433824^131072+1 | |
|
Michael GutierrezVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17
Posts: 348
ID: 764476
Credit: 46,281,510
RAC: 0
|
|
Day 5 Stats:
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 16 (GFN-21)
(As of 2021-12-13 07:33:05 UTC)
23690 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 15813 (67%) / 7871 (33%) / 6 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
4965 (21%) were aborted. [4627 (20%) / 338 (1%) / 0 (0%)]
3197 (13%) came back with some kind of an error. [21 (0%) / 3176 (13%) / 0 (0%)]
5781 (24%) have returned a successful result. [2510 (11%) / 3271 (14%) / 0 (0%)]
9747 (41%) are still in progress. [8655 (37%) / 1086 (5%) / 6 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
2909 (50%) are pending validation. [1254 (22%) / 1655 (29%) / 0 (0%)]
2846 (49%) have been successfully validated. [1251 (22%) / 1595 (28%) / 0 (0%)]
8 (0%) were invalid. [2 (0%) / 6 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
18 (0%) are inconclusive. [3 (0%) / 15 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=771354. The leading edge was at b=731200 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 5.49% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 17 (GFN-22)
(As of 2021-12-13 07:33:06 UTC)
1461 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 0 (0%) / 1461 (100%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
50 (3%) were aborted. [0 (0%) / 50 (3%) / 0 (0%)]
697 (48%) came back with some kind of an error. [0 (0%) / 697 (48%) / 0 (0%)]
403 (28%) have returned a successful result. [0 (0%) / 403 (28%) / 0 (0%)]
311 (21%) are still in progress. [0 (0%) / 311 (21%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
207 (51%) are pending validation. [0 (0%) / 207 (51%) / 0 (0%)]
194 (48%) have been successfully validated. [0 (0%) / 194 (48%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) were invalid. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
2 (0%) are inconclusive. [0 (0%) / 2 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=216002. The leading edge was at b=214620 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 0.64% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 31 (DYFL)
(As of 2021-12-13 07:33:06 UTC)
4128 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 0 (0%) / 4128 (100%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
831 (20%) were aborted. [0 (0%) / 831 (20%) / 0 (0%)]
1323 (32%) came back with some kind of an error. [0 (0%) / 1323 (32%) / 0 (0%)]
1281 (31%) have returned a successful result. [0 (0%) / 1281 (31%) / 0 (0%)]
693 (17%) are still in progress. [0 (0%) / 693 (17%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
466 (36%) are pending validation. [0 (0%) / 466 (36%) / 0 (0%)]
811 (63%) have been successfully validated. [0 (0%) / 811 (63%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) were invalid. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
4 (0%) are inconclusive. [0 (0%) / 4 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=951648. The leading edge was at b=947408 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 0.45% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. | |
|
|
|
|
Wow... this card is insane! NVIDIA A100-SXM4-40GB (an insane price tag to match now doubt.)
It smashes out GFN21 at 6K-7K run time vs my Radeon VII @ 26K-30K.
Best of the best I guess.
____________
Слава Україні! | |
|
Michael GutierrezVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17
Posts: 348
ID: 764476
Credit: 46,281,510
RAC: 0
|
|
One more day left in the challenge!
Task stats so far:
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 16 (GFN-21)
(As of 2021-12-16 01:31:06 UTC)
28931 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 17846 (62%) / 11079 (38%) / 6 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
7046 (24%) were aborted. [6399 (22%) / 647 (2%) / 0 (0%)]
3946 (14%) came back with some kind of an error. [26 (0%) / 3920 (14%) / 0 (0%)]
9163 (32%) have returned a successful result. [3925 (14%) / 5238 (18%) / 0 (0%)]
8776 (30%) are still in progress. [7496 (26%) / 1274 (4%) / 6 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
3659 (40%) are pending validation. [1626 (18%) / 2033 (22%) / 0 (0%)]
5458 (60%) have been successfully validated. [2287 (25%) / 3171 (35%) / 0 (0%)]
21 (0%) were invalid. [5 (0%) / 16 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
25 (0%) are inconclusive. [7 (0%) / 18 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=779122. The leading edge was at b=731200 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 6.55% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 17 (GFN-22)
(As of 2021-12-16 01:31:07 UTC)
2280 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 0 (0%) / 2280 (100%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
119 (5%) were aborted. [0 (0%) / 119 (5%) / 0 (0%)]
1120 (49%) came back with some kind of an error. [0 (0%) / 1120 (49%) / 0 (0%)]
671 (29%) have returned a successful result. [0 (0%) / 671 (29%) / 0 (0%)]
370 (16%) are still in progress. [0 (0%) / 370 (16%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
278 (41%) are pending validation. [0 (0%) / 278 (41%) / 0 (0%)]
389 (58%) have been successfully validated. [0 (0%) / 389 (58%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) were invalid. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
4 (1%) are inconclusive. [0 (0%) / 4 (1%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=216722. The leading edge was at b=214620 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 0.98% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 31 (DYFL)
(As of 2021-12-16 01:31:07 UTC)
5061 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 0 (0%) / 5061 (100%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
905 (18%) were aborted. [0 (0%) / 905 (18%) / 0 (0%)]
1647 (33%) came back with some kind of an error. [0 (0%) / 1647 (33%) / 0 (0%)]
1948 (38%) have returned a successful result. [0 (0%) / 1948 (38%) / 0 (0%)]
561 (11%) are still in progress. [0 (0%) / 561 (11%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
411 (21%) are pending validation. [0 (0%) / 411 (21%) / 0 (0%)]
1527 (78%) have been successfully validated. [0 (0%) / 1527 (78%) / 0 (0%)]
2 (0%) were invalid. [0 (0%) / 2 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
8 (0%) are inconclusive. [0 (0%) / 8 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=952982. The leading edge was at b=947408 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 0.59% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. | |
|
Michael GutierrezVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17
Posts: 348
ID: 764476
Credit: 46,281,510
RAC: 0
|
|
Just over an hour left in the challenge! Some friendly reminders... :)
At the Conclusion of the Challenge
When the challenge completes, we would prefer users "moving on" to finish those tasks they have downloaded, if not then please ABORT the WU's (and then UPDATE the PrimeGrid project) instead of DETACHING, RESETTING, or PAUSING.
ABORTING WU's allows them to be recycled immediately; thus a much faster "clean up" to the end of a Challenge. DETACHING, RESETTING, and PAUSING WU's causes them to remain in limbo until they EXPIRE. Therefore, we must wait until WU's expire to send them out to be completed.
Likewise, if you're shutting down the computer for an extended period of time, or deleting the VM (Virtual Machine), please ABORT all remaining tasks first. Also, be aware that merely shutting off a cloud server doesn't stop the billing. You have to destroy/delete the server if you don't want to continue to be charged for it.
Thank you!
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. | |
|
MonkeydeeVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 8 Dec 13
Posts: 540
ID: 284516
Credit: 1,523,041,031
RAC: 463,651
|
|
Excellent challenge everyone!
As far as challenges go this one was certainly a little more challenging than most
____________
My Primes
Badge Score: 4*2 + 6*2 + 7*4 + 8*9 + 11*3 + 12*1 = 165
| |
|
Michael GutierrezVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17
Posts: 348
ID: 764476
Credit: 46,281,510
RAC: 0
|
|
And we're done! Thanks everyone for making this a great final challenge of 2021! Cleanup is starting now. Here are the final stats:
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 16 (GFN-21)
(As of 2021-12-17 07:18:57 UTC)
31680 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 18290 (58%) / 13384 (42%) / 6 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
8142 (26%) were aborted. [6986 (22%) / 1156 (4%) / 0 (0%)]
4468 (14%) came back with some kind of an error. [26 (0%) / 4442 (14%) / 0 (0%)]
11568 (37%) have returned a successful result. [4478 (14%) / 7090 (22%) / 0 (0%)]
7485 (24%) are still in progress. [6793 (21%) / 686 (2%) / 6 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
3665 (32%) are pending validation. [1390 (12%) / 2275 (20%) / 0 (0%)]
7843 (68%) have been successfully validated. [3074 (27%) / 4769 (41%) / 0 (0%)]
28 (0%) were invalid. [6 (0%) / 22 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
32 (0%) are inconclusive. [8 (0%) / 24 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=780536. The leading edge was at b=731200 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 6.75% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 17 (GFN-22)
(As of 2021-12-17 07:18:58 UTC)
2491 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 0 (0%) / 2491 (100%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
140 (6%) were aborted. [0 (0%) / 140 (6%) / 0 (0%)]
1268 (51%) came back with some kind of an error. [0 (0%) / 1268 (51%) / 0 (0%)]
794 (32%) have returned a successful result. [0 (0%) / 794 (32%) / 0 (0%)]
282 (11%) are still in progress. [0 (0%) / 282 (11%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
288 (36%) are pending validation. [0 (0%) / 288 (36%) / 0 (0%)]
501 (63%) have been successfully validated. [0 (0%) / 501 (63%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) were invalid. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
5 (1%) are inconclusive. [0 (0%) / 5 (1%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=216874. The leading edge was at b=214620 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 1.05% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
Challenge: Geminids Shower
App: 31 (DYFL)
(As of 2021-12-17 07:18:58 UTC)
5297 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 0 (0%) / 5297 (100%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
936 (18%) were aborted. [0 (0%) / 936 (18%) / 0 (0%)]
1758 (33%) came back with some kind of an error. [0 (0%) / 1758 (33%) / 0 (0%)]
2225 (42%) have returned a successful result. [0 (0%) / 2225 (42%) / 0 (0%)]
377 (7%) are still in progress. [0 (0%) / 377 (7%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
396 (18%) are pending validation. [0 (0%) / 396 (18%) / 0 (0%)]
1813 (81%) have been successfully validated. [0 (0%) / 1813 (81%) / 0 (0%)]
2 (0%) were invalid. [0 (0%) / 2 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
14 (1%) are inconclusive. [0 (0%) / 14 (1%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=953146. The leading edge was at b=947408 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 0.61% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. | |
|
|
|
|
Thank you for organising this focus on the GFN sub projects.
Time next time :)
____________
Слава Україні! | |
|
chr80Send message
Joined: 27 Jul 20
Posts: 2
ID: 1285727
Credit: 153,827,465
RAC: 114,389
        
|
|
Also, thank you for organizing the challenges in 2021.
I have a question: Where can I find the challenge calendar for 2022?
Because I can see that the clock is counting down to the Heptadecagenarian challenge, and I don't know the details. | |
|
|
|
Also, thank you for organizing the challenges in 2021.
I have a question: Where can I find the challenge calendar for 2022?
Because I can see that the clock is counting down to the Heptadecagenarian challenge, and I don't know the details.
I do not think it is quite public yet. At one point, the following was posted on Discord:
Tentative plan for the January challenge, then TdP in February:
Heptadecagenarian Challenge:
-17 Low/Mega
-3 days
-17 January 17:17 UTC thru 20 January 17:17 UTC
Whether 17-low is still around at the end, or even the start, of that challenge is up to you guys and gals.
We'll probably be releasing the whole schedule soon.
/JeppeSN | |
|
robishVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12
Posts: 2206
ID: 126266
Credit: 7,499,015,211
RAC: 3,557,546
                
|
|
That was a fun challenge.
Thanks for organising it and all the others this year @Admins.
I think I speak for all participants, it's much appreciated 🙂
____________
My lucky numbers 10590941048576+1 and 224584605939537911+81292139*23#*n for n=0..26 | |
|
|
|
That was a fun challenge.
Thanks for organising it and all the others this year @Admins.
I think I speak for all participants, it's much appreciated 🙂
You do speak for me, @robish !
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
tngSend message
Joined: 29 Aug 10
Posts: 483
ID: 66603
Credit: 47,224,509,517
RAC: 26,843,710
                                                
|
That was a fun challenge.
Thanks for organising it and all the others this year @Admins.
I think I speak for all participants, it's much appreciated 🙂
You do speak for me, @robish !
and for me.
____________
 | |
|
Michael GutierrezVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17
Posts: 348
ID: 764476
Credit: 46,281,510
RAC: 0
|
|
Cleanup Status:
Dec 21: 3699 tasks outstanding; 3531 affecting individual (270) scoring positions; 2403 affecting team (79) scoring positions.
Dec 22: 3588 tasks outstanding; 3422 affecting individual (268) scoring positions; 2326 affecting team (76) scoring positions.
Dec 23: 3468 tasks outstanding; 3305 affecting individual (266) scoring positions; 2252 affecting team (75) scoring positions.
Dec 24: 3425 tasks outstanding; 3265 affecting individual (265) scoring positions; 2228 affecting team (75) scoring positions.
Dec 25: 3310 tasks outstanding; 3148 affecting individual (260) scoring positions; 2152 affecting team (75) scoring positions.
Dec 26: 3265 tasks outstanding; 3105 affecting individual (260) scoring positions; 2123 affecting team (75) scoring positions.
Dec 27: 3265 tasks outstanding; 3105 affecting individual (260) scoring positions; 2123 affecting team (75) scoring positions.
Dec 28: 3229 tasks outstanding; 3072 affecting individual (259) scoring positions; 2102 affecting team (74) scoring positions.
Dec 29: 3148 tasks outstanding; 2997 affecting individual (257) scoring positions; 2051 affecting team (72) scoring positions.
Dec 30: 3013 tasks outstanding; 2863 affecting individual (254) scoring positions; 1952 affecting team (71) scoring positions.
Dec 31: 2862 tasks outstanding; 2717 affecting individual (254) scoring positions; 1850 affecting team (71) scoring positions.
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. | |
|
|
|
I have a question: Where can I find the challenge calendar for 2022?
Because I can see that the clock is counting down to the Heptadecagenarian challenge, and I don't know the details.
http://www.primegrid.com/prefs.php?subset=project
The PrimeGrid preferences page now lists two projects for the upcoming Heptadecagenarian Challenge project. I'm sure an announcement will be forthcoming well in advance of the start. | |
|
|
|
I have a question: Where can I find the challenge calendar for 2022?
Because I can see that the clock is counting down to the Heptadecagenarian challenge, and I don't know the details.
http://www.primegrid.com/prefs.php?subset=project
The PrimeGrid preferences page now lists two projects for the upcoming Heptadecagenarian Challenge project. I'm sure an announcement will be forthcoming well in advance of the start.
There is a page not linked from anywhere.
Hence, I suppose it's not official yet:
http://www.primegrid.com/challenge/2022_challenge.php
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
Michael GutierrezVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17
Posts: 348
ID: 764476
Credit: 46,281,510
RAC: 0
|
|
Cleanup Status:
Jan 1: 2713 tasks outstanding; 2571 affecting individual (254) scoring positions; 1747 affecting team (70) scoring positions.
Jan 2: 2611 tasks outstanding; 2474 affecting individual (254) scoring positions; 1654 affecting team (68) scoring positions.
Jan 3: 2518 tasks outstanding; 2381 affecting individual (251) scoring positions; 1263 affecting team (67) scoring positions.
Jan 4: 2428 tasks outstanding; 2280 affecting individual (249) scoring positions; 1103 affecting team (66) scoring positions.
Jan 5: 2367 tasks outstanding; 2215 affecting individual (248) scoring positions; 1075 affecting team (65) scoring positions.
Jan 6: 2286 tasks outstanding; 2133 affecting individual (244) scoring positions; 1026 affecting team (63) scoring positions.
Jan 9: 2086 tasks outstanding; 1909 affecting individual (227) scoring positions; 924 affecting team (55) scoring positions.
Jan 10: 2005 tasks outstanding; 1723 affecting individual (221) scoring positions; 895 affecting team (54) scoring positions.
Jan 11: 1930 tasks outstanding; 1655 affecting individual (218) scoring positions; 838 affecting team (53) scoring positions.
Jan 12: 1847 tasks outstanding; 1582 affecting individual (215) scoring positions; 771 affecting team (49) scoring positions.
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. | |
|
|
|
|
I may be interested in helping with cleanup of DYFL tasks however I am not able to find this name listed in any of the subprojects. Can I please ask what subproject "DYFL" so I can select it in my properties. TIA | |
|
|
|
I may be interested in helping with cleanup of DYFL tasks however I am not able to find this name listed in any of the subprojects. Can I please ask what subproject "DYFL" so I can select it in my properties. TIA
It's called Do You Feel Lucky ?.
It appears as Do You Feel Lucky? (GFN World Record) in your account page->PrimeGrid preferences (https://www.primegrid.com/prefs.php?subset=project).
When you click on Edit PrimeGrid preferences, it'll show up as Do You Feel Lucky? (Genefer World Record Attempt)
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
|
|
I may be interested in helping with cleanup of DYFL tasks however I am not able to find this name listed in any of the subprojects. Can I please ask what subproject "DYFL" so I can select it in my properties. TIA
Do You Feel Lucky? (GFN World Record)
____________
My lucky numbers are 121*2^4553899-1 and 3756801695685*2^666669±1
My movie https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/502242 | |
|
|
|
I may be interested in helping with cleanup of DYFL tasks however I am not able to find this name listed in any of the subprojects. Can I please ask what subproject "DYFL" so I can select it in my properties. TIA
It's called Do You Feel Lucky ?.
It appears as Do You Feel Lucky? (GFN World Record) in your account page->PrimeGrid preferences (https://www.primegrid.com/prefs.php?subset=project).
When you click on Edit PrimeGrid preferences, it'll show up as Do You Feel Lucky? (Genefer World Record Attempt)
Pooh Bear
Do You Feel Lucky? (GFN World Record)
Thank you both for your assistance. Would a RTX 2070 no over clock be after the task running around 12 hours a day? | |
|
|
|
|
It takes my RTX 2060 something between 41 and 42 hours to crunch a DYFL task.
I doubt an RTX 2070 would be more than twice as fast.
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
WezHSend message
Joined: 9 Jun 11
Posts: 126
ID: 101605
Credit: 779,009,166
RAC: 1,029,745
       
|
|
Update for cleanup status?
Cleanup Status:
Jan 1: 2713 tasks outstanding; 2571 affecting individual (254) scoring positions; 1747 affecting team (70) scoring positions.
Jan 2: 2611 tasks outstanding; 2474 affecting individual (254) scoring positions; 1654 affecting team (68) scoring positions.
Jan 3: 2518 tasks outstanding; 2381 affecting individual (251) scoring positions; 1263 affecting team (67) scoring positions.
Jan 4: 2428 tasks outstanding; 2280 affecting individual (249) scoring positions; 1103 affecting team (66) scoring positions.
Jan 5: 2367 tasks outstanding; 2215 affecting individual (248) scoring positions; 1075 affecting team (65) scoring positions.
Jan 6: 2286 tasks outstanding; 2133 affecting individual (244) scoring positions; 1026 affecting team (63) scoring positions.
Jan 9: 2086 tasks outstanding; 1909 affecting individual (227) scoring positions; 924 affecting team (55) scoring positions.
Jan 10: 2005 tasks outstanding; 1723 affecting individual (221) scoring positions; 895 affecting team (54) scoring positions.
Jan 11: 1930 tasks outstanding; 1655 affecting individual (218) scoring positions; 838 affecting team (53) scoring positions.
Jan 12: 1847 tasks outstanding; 1582 affecting individual (215) scoring positions; 771 affecting team (49) scoring positions.
| |
|
Michael GutierrezVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17
Posts: 348
ID: 764476
Credit: 46,281,510
RAC: 0
|
|
Cleanup Status:
Jan 18: 1404 tasks outstanding; 1035 affecting individual (186) scoring positions; 457 affecting team (40) scoring positions.
Jan 19: 1360 tasks outstanding; 1000 affecting individual (182) scoring positions; 440 affecting team (40) scoring positions.
Jan 20: 1330 tasks outstanding; 973 affecting individual (180) scoring positions; 419 affecting team (38) scoring positions.
Jan 21: 1136 tasks outstanding; 786 affecting individual (169) scoring positions; 318 affecting team (35) scoring positions.
Jan 22: 980 tasks outstanding; 670 affecting individual (158) scoring positions; 277 affecting team (33) scoring positions.
Jan 23: 921 tasks outstanding; 620 affecting individual (152) scoring positions; 262 affecting team (31) scoring positions.
Jan 24: 871 tasks outstanding; 521 affecting individual (144) scoring positions; 249 affecting team (30) scoring positions.
Jan 25: 839 tasks outstanding; 495 affecting individual (139) scoring positions; 242 affecting team (30) scoring positions.
Jan 26: 795 tasks outstanding; 462 affecting individual (134) scoring positions; 224 affecting team (29) scoring positions.
Jan 27: 743 tasks outstanding; 415 affecting individual (128) scoring positions; 160 affecting team (28) scoring positions.
Jan 28: 712 tasks outstanding; 396 affecting individual (125) scoring positions; 154 affecting team (28) scoring positions.
Jan 29: 700 tasks outstanding; 391 affecting individual (124) scoring positions; 153 affecting team (28) scoring positions.
Jan 30: 651 tasks outstanding; 362 affecting individual (117) scoring positions; 141 affecting team (26) scoring positions.
Jan 31: 630 tasks outstanding; 351 affecting individual (116) scoring positions; 136 affecting team (26) scoring positions.
Feb 1: 604 tasks outstanding; 333 affecting individual (114) scoring positions; 133 affecting team (26) scoring positions.
Feb 2: 590 tasks outstanding; 323 affecting individual (113) scoring positions; 130 affecting team (26) scoring positions.
Feb 3: 567 tasks outstanding; 314 affecting individual (112) scoring positions; 126 affecting team (25) scoring positions.
Feb 4: 544 tasks outstanding; 285 affecting individual (107) scoring positions; 118 affecting team (25) scoring positions.
Feb 5: 519 tasks outstanding; 277 affecting individual (106) scoring positions; 115 affecting team (25) scoring positions.
Feb 6: 507 tasks outstanding; 266 affecting individual (103) scoring positions; 113 affecting team (25) scoring positions.
Feb 7: 489 tasks outstanding; 257 affecting individual (99) scoring positions; 110 affecting team (24) scoring positions.
Feb 8: 475 tasks outstanding; 243 affecting individual (96) scoring positions; 107 affecting team (24) scoring positions.
Feb 9: 450 tasks outstanding; 223 affecting individual (92) scoring positions; 103 affecting team (23) scoring positions.
Feb 10: 433 tasks outstanding; 213 affecting individual (87) scoring positions; 98 affecting team (22) scoring positions.
Feb 11: 413 tasks outstanding; 199 affecting individual (84) scoring positions; 95 affecting team (22) scoring positions.
Feb 12: 390 tasks outstanding; 166 affecting individual (79) scoring positions; 88 affecting team (22) scoring positions.
Feb 13: 378 tasks outstanding; 158 affecting individual (77) scoring positions; 86 affecting team (22) scoring positions.
Feb 14: 348 tasks outstanding; 145 affecting individual (71) scoring positions; 81 affecting team (22) scoring positions.
Feb 15: 340 tasks outstanding; 141 affecting individual (71) scoring positions; 78 affecting team (21) scoring positions.
Feb 16: 325 tasks outstanding; 131 affecting individual (67) scoring positions; 75 affecting team (21) scoring positions.
Feb 17: 305 tasks outstanding; 104 affecting individual (64) scoring positions; 69 affecting team (21) scoring positions.
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. | |
|
Michael GutierrezVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17
Posts: 348
ID: 764476
Credit: 46,281,510
RAC: 0
|
|
Cleanup Status:
Feb 20: 263 tasks outstanding; 84 affecting individual (55) scoring positions; 56 affecting team (19) scoring positions.
Feb 21: 257 tasks outstanding; 83 affecting individual (55) scoring positions; 55 affecting team (18) scoring positions.
Feb 22: 250 tasks outstanding; 81 affecting individual (53) scoring positions; 54 affecting team (18) scoring positions.
Feb 23: 243 tasks outstanding; 80 affecting individual (52) scoring positions; 53 affecting team (18) scoring positions.
Feb 24: 238 tasks outstanding; 78 affecting individual (51) scoring positions; 51 affecting team (17) scoring positions.
Feb 25: 224 tasks outstanding; 71 affecting individual (46) scoring positions; 42 affecting team (15) scoring positions.
Feb 26: 202 tasks outstanding; 62 affecting individual (41) scoring positions; 37 affecting team (14) scoring positions.
Feb 27: 198 tasks outstanding; 62 affecting individual (41) scoring positions; 35 affecting team (13) scoring positions.
Feb 28: 193 tasks outstanding; 59 affecting individual (40) scoring positions; 20 affecting team (12) scoring positions.
Mar 1: 190 tasks outstanding; 59 affecting individual (40) scoring positions; 20 affecting team (12) scoring positions.
Mar 2: 186 tasks outstanding; 58 affecting individual (39) scoring positions; 20 affecting team (12) scoring positions.
Mar 3: 169 tasks outstanding; 55 affecting individual (36) scoring positions; 18 affecting team (10) scoring positions.
Mar 4: 165 tasks outstanding; 53 affecting individual (36) scoring positions; 17 affecting team (10) scoring positions.
Mar 5: 163 tasks outstanding; 48 affecting individual (35) scoring positions; 17 affecting team (10) scoring positions.
Mar 6: 158 tasks outstanding; 46 affecting individual (34) scoring positions; 17 affecting team (10) scoring positions.
Mar 7: 145 tasks outstanding; 40 affecting individual (30) scoring positions; 12 affecting team (8) scoring positions.
Mar 8: 134 tasks outstanding; 38 affecting individual (28) scoring positions; 10 affecting team (7) scoring positions.
Mar 9: 129 tasks outstanding; 35 affecting individual (27) scoring positions; 9 affecting team (7) scoring positions.
Mar 10: 122 tasks outstanding; 32 affecting individual (25) scoring positions; 8 affecting team (6) scoring positions.
Mar 11: 112 tasks outstanding; 30 affecting individual (25) scoring positions; 8 affecting team (6) scoring positions.
Mar 12: 101 tasks outstanding; 28 affecting individual (25) scoring positions; 8 affecting team (6) scoring positions.
Mar 13: 100 tasks outstanding; 28 affecting individual (25) scoring positions; 8 affecting team (6) scoring positions.
Mar 14: 99 tasks outstanding; 28 affecting individual (25) scoring positions; 8 affecting team (6) scoring positions.
Mar 15: 98 tasks outstanding; 28 affecting individual (25) scoring positions; 8 affecting team (6) scoring positions.
Mar 16: 98 tasks outstanding; 28 affecting individual (25) scoring positions; 8 affecting team (6) scoring positions.
Mar 17: 92 tasks outstanding; 24 affecting individual (21) scoring positions; 8 affecting team (6) scoring positions.
Mar 18: 91 tasks outstanding; 24 affecting individual (21) scoring positions; 8 affecting team (6) scoring positions.
Mar 19: 86 tasks outstanding; 24 affecting individual (21) scoring positions; 5 affecting team (5) scoring positions.
Mar 20: 86 tasks outstanding; 24 affecting individual (21) scoring positions; 5 affecting team (5) scoring positions.
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. | |
|
Michael GutierrezVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17
Posts: 348
ID: 764476
Credit: 46,281,510
RAC: 0
|
|
Cleanup Status:
Mar 21: 86 tasks outstanding; 24 affecting individual (21) scoring positions; 5 affecting team (5) scoring positions.
Mar 22: 84 tasks outstanding; 23 affecting individual (20) scoring positions; 4 affecting team (4) scoring positions.
Mar 23: 84 tasks outstanding; 23 affecting individual (20) scoring positions; 4 affecting team (4) scoring positions.
Mar 24: 84 tasks outstanding; 23 affecting individual (20) scoring positions; 4 affecting team (4) scoring positions.
Mar 25: 75 tasks outstanding; 21 affecting individual (18) scoring positions; 4 affecting team (4) scoring positions.
Mar 26: 74 tasks outstanding; 21 affecting individual (18) scoring positions; 4 affecting team (4) scoring positions.
Mar 27: 74 tasks outstanding; 21 affecting individual (18) scoring positions; 4 affecting team (4) scoring positions.
Mar 28: 65 tasks outstanding; 18 affecting individual (16) scoring positions; 3 affecting team (3) scoring positions.
Mar 29: 64 tasks outstanding; 17 affecting individual (15) scoring positions; 3 affecting team (3) scoring positions.
Mar 30: 59 tasks outstanding; 17 affecting individual (15) scoring positions; 3 affecting team (3) scoring positions.
Mar 31: 55 tasks outstanding; 14 affecting individual (13) scoring positions; 2 affecting team (2) scoring positions.
Apr 1: 54 tasks outstanding; 14 affecting individual (13) scoring positions; 2 affecting team (2) scoring positions.
Apr 2: 49 tasks outstanding; 12 affecting individual (11) scoring positions; 2 affecting team (2) scoring positions.
Apr 3: 49 tasks outstanding; 12 affecting individual (11) scoring positions; 2 affecting team (2) scoring positions.
Apr 4: 49 tasks outstanding; 12 affecting individual (11) scoring positions; 2 affecting team (2) scoring positions.
Apr 5: 48 tasks outstanding; 12 affecting individual (11) scoring positions; 2 affecting team (2) scoring positions.
Apr 6: 45 tasks outstanding; 11 affecting individual (10) scoring positions; 1 affecting team (1) scoring positions.
Apr 7: 44 tasks outstanding; 11 affecting individual (10) scoring positions; 1 affecting team (1) scoring positions.
Apr 8: 42 tasks outstanding; 11 affecting individual (10) scoring positions; 1 affecting team (1) scoring positions.
Apr 9: 39 tasks outstanding; 10 affecting individual (9) scoring positions; 1 affecting team (1) scoring positions.
Apr 10: 39 tasks outstanding; 10 affecting individual (9) scoring positions; 1 affecting team (1) scoring positions.
Apr 11: 34 tasks outstanding; 7 affecting individual (7) scoring positions; 1 affecting team (1) scoring positions.
Apr 12: 33 tasks outstanding; 7 affecting individual (7) scoring positions; 1 affecting team (1) scoring positions.
Apr 13: 31 tasks outstanding; 6 affecting individual (6) scoring positions; 1 affecting team (1) scoring positions.
Apr 14: 30 tasks outstanding; 6 affecting individual (6) scoring positions; 1 affecting team (1) scoring positions.
Apr 15: 29 tasks outstanding; 6 affecting individual (6) scoring positions; 1 affecting team (1) scoring positions.
Apr 16: 28 tasks outstanding; 6 affecting individual (6) scoring positions; 1 affecting team (1) scoring positions.
Apr 17: 26 tasks outstanding; 5 affecting individual (5) scoring positions; 1 affecting team (1) scoring positions.
Apr 18: 23 tasks outstanding; 4 affecting individual (4) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 19: 23 tasks outstanding; 4 affecting individual (4) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 20: 23 tasks outstanding; 4 affecting individual (4) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. | |
|
Michael GutierrezVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17
Posts: 348
ID: 764476
Credit: 46,281,510
RAC: 0
|
|
Cleanup Status:
Apr 21: 22 tasks outstanding; 4 affecting individual (4) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 22: 22 tasks outstanding; 4 affecting individual (4) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 23: 22 tasks outstanding; 4 affecting individual (4) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 24: 20 tasks outstanding; 4 affecting individual (4) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 25: 19 tasks outstanding; 4 affecting individual (4) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 26: 15 tasks outstanding; 4 affecting individual (4) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 27: 14 tasks outstanding; 3 affecting individual (3) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 28: 14 tasks outstanding; 3 affecting individual (3) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 29: 13 tasks outstanding; 3 affecting individual (3) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 30: 11 tasks outstanding; 3 affecting individual (3) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 1: 9 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 2: 9 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 3: 8 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 4: 8 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 5: 8 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 6: 7 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 7: 7 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 8: 7 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 9: 7 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 10: 7 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 11: 7 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 12: 7 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 13: 6 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 14: 5 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 15: 5 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 16: 5 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 17: 5 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 18: 5 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 19: 5 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 20: 5 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. | |
|
Michael GutierrezVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17
Posts: 348
ID: 764476
Credit: 46,281,510
RAC: 0
|
|
Cleanup Status:
May 21: 5 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 22: 5 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 23: 5 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 24: 5 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 25: 4 tasks outstanding; 1 affecting individual (1) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
May 26: 4 tasks outstanding; 1 affecting individual (1) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. | |
|
Michael GutierrezVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17
Posts: 348
ID: 764476
Credit: 46,281,510
RAC: 0
|
|
The results are FINALLY final!
FIVE MONTHS after this 10 day challenge, the tally has finally settled on a total of 15,000 tasks completed! No new primes were found sadly. The challenge boosted the projects' average output to 50 times typical at the peak.
101 teams and 447 individuals participated in the Challenge.
Top Three Individuals:
1. tng
2. Tuna Ertemalp
3. vaughan
Top Three Teams:
1. TeAm AnandTech
2. Czech National Team
3. Antarctic Crunchers
This message was supposed to go out at the end of 2021, but here we are in the middle of 2022! Wild. This challenge marked the end of my SECOND year as your intrepid challenge coordinator, and it's been a blast. Thank you all for sticking with me, and here's to many more!
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. | |
|
WezHSend message
Joined: 9 Jun 11
Posts: 126
ID: 101605
Credit: 779,009,166
RAC: 1,029,745
|
|
WOOOHOO!!! Finally! | |
|
|
|
|
I guess it is normal for the cleanup to take a long time when the tasks involved are extremely long. /JeppeSN | |
|
Post to thread
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Geminids Shower Challenge |
