Author |
Message |
Michael Gutierrez Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project scientist
 Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17 Posts: 342 ID: 764476 Credit: 46,281,510 RAC: 0
                 
|
Welcome to the World Emoji Day Challenge
The fifth challenge of the 2021 Series will be a 3-day challenge in celebration of what is arguably the internet's most momentous and culturally significant holiday: World Emoji Day. The challenge will be offered on the GFN-17-Low subproject, beginning 17 July 22:00 UTC and ending 20 July 22:00 UTC.
As Obi-Wan almost π² said, emojis π surround us, penetrate π us, π½ and bind the internet ππ» together. In π total there are π’π» 3,521 emojis π in the π» Unicode Standard, as of π€π° September 2020. The most recent ππ emoji release is Emoji 13.1, which β added 217 new emojis. This π figure includes sequences for gender, ββ skin tone, flags, and the components that are used to π±π create π² keycap, flag, π³ and π other sequences.
World Emoji Day is celebrated annually on July 17th in honor π of the date π« shown on the calendar emoji π
, which ππ± itself was ππ¦ picked because it was the date that iCal for Mac was first π₯ announced at MacWorld Expo in 2002. One could argue it's π rather frivolous and ππ€ arbitrary in the scope of "World" holidays, but there's no π¦denying the scope of π impact that π«π emoji have had π© on internet culture. The #WorldEmojiDay hashtag alone ππ generates 4 billion impressions per year.
To participate in the Challenge, please select only the GFN-17-Low subproject in your PrimeGrid preferences section.
Application Builds
IMPORTANT: Overclocking -- including factory overclocking -- on Nvidia GPUs is very strongly discouraged. Even if your GPU can run other tasks without difficulty, it may be unable to run GFN tasks when overclocked.
Supported platforms:
- Windows: Nvidia GPU (OpenCL): 32 bit, AMD/ATI GPU (OpenCL): 32 bit, CPU: 64 bit, 32 bit
- Linux: Nvidia GPU (OpenCL): 32 bit, 64 bit, AMD/ATI GPU (OpenCL): 32 bit, 64 bit, CPU: 64 bit, 32 bit
- Mac: Nvidia GPU (OpenCL): 64 bit, AMD/ATI GPU (OpenCL): 64 bit, CPU: 64 bit, 32 bit
A Cautionary Reminder
ATTENTION: The primality programs Genefer (for CPUs) and GeneferOCL (for GPUs) are computationally intensive; so, it is vital to have a stable system with good cooling. It does not tolerate "even the slightest of errors." Please see this post for more details on how you can "stress test" your CPU, and please see this post for tips on running GFN on your GPU successfully.
As with all number crunching, excessive heat can potentially cause permanent hardware failure. Please ensure your cooling system is sufficient.
GFN-17-Low WU's are currently averaging 1 hour on CPU and 11 minutes on GPU.
For a general idea of how your GPU stacks up, you can have a look at the fastest GPUs list.
If your CPU is highly overclocked, please consider "stress testing" it. Overclocking your GPU is not recommended at all for GeneferCUDA. Sieving is an excellent alternative for computers that are not able to run Genefer. :)
Please, please, please make sure your machines are up to the task.
Time zone converter:
The World Clock - Time Zone Converter
NOTE: The countdown clock on the front page uses the host computer time. Therefore, if your computer time is off, so will the countdown clock. For precise timing, use the UTC Time in the data section to the left of the countdown clock.
Scoring information
Scores will be kept for individuals and teams. Only work units issued AFTER July 17th 22:00 UTC and received BEFORE July 20th 22:00 UTC will be considered for credit. A quorum of 2 is NOT needed to award Challenge score - i.e. no double checker. Therefore, each returned result will earn a Challenge score. Please note that if the result is eventually declared invalid, the score will be removed.
At the Conclusion of the Challenge
We kindly ask users "moving on" to ABORT their WU's instead of DETACHING, RESETTING, or PAUSING.
ABORTING WU's alows them to be recycled immediately; thus a much faster "clean up" to the end of a challenge. DETACHING, RESETTING, and PAUSING WU's causes them to remain in limbo until they EXPIRE. Therefore, we must wait until WU's expire to send them out to be completed.
Please consider either completing what's in the queue or ABORTING them. Thank you. :)
More information on Generalized Fermat Numbers and the Genefer program
Best of Luck to everyone!
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana.
|
|
|
|
I'll say 14 primes during the 3-day timeframe. It's wonderful how there's a drought now :)
____________
My lucky number is 6219*2^3374198+1
|
|
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 3171 ID: 130544 Credit: 2,233,028,411 RAC: 606,387
                           
|
I'd argue 29 October is a more significant dare in history. Nonetheless interesting to see what total 17-Low production will be personally. Cannot begin to guess how nany primes we'll find. |
|
|
|
My prediction is 7.
____________
Reno, NV
|
|
|
|
For those using CPU processing for GFN-17 Low, is multi-threading supported?
If not, we should set the Number of Threads value to 1, correct?
|
|
|
Monkeydee Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 8 Dec 13 Posts: 532 ID: 284516 Credit: 1,435,751,016 RAC: 1,834,804
                           
|
For those using CPU processing for GFN-17 Low, is multi-threading supported?
If not, we should set the Number of Threads value to 1, correct?
No multi-threading for GFN-17 low
Yeah, set the # of threads to 1 and you can control how many tasks to run at once by changing the "Use X% of CPUs" value.
____________
My Primes
Badge Score: 4*2 + 6*2 + 7*4 + 8*8 + 11*3 + 12*1 = 157
|
|
|
|
I'm hoping this challenge will advance the leading edge by at least 1M. We'll see how much progress we as a group can make towards catching GFN-17-Low up to where GFN-17-Mega started. It will hopefully be a good amount of progress.
____________
|
|
|
Monkeydee Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 8 Dec 13 Posts: 532 ID: 284516 Credit: 1,435,751,016 RAC: 1,834,804
                           
|
Just a friendly reminder for Windows 10 users. Don't forget to pause your updates for the challenge! Last thing you want is to have your computer(s) go offline due to an update reboot.
____________
My Primes
Badge Score: 4*2 + 6*2 + 7*4 + 8*8 + 11*3 + 12*1 = 157
|
|
|
Nick  Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 11 Posts: 2216 ID: 105020 Credit: 8,131,708,367 RAC: 1,401,049
                            
|
Just a friendly reminder for Windows 10 users. Don't forget to pause your updates for the challenge! Last thing you want is to have your computer(s) go offline due to an update reboot.
Cheers. That reminder cannot be said enough. |
|
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 3171 ID: 130544 Credit: 2,233,028,411 RAC: 606,387
                           
|
2 of mine are satisfied, one is dragging its heels. |
|
|
|
Any idea, why this host of mine is not getting WUs for the CPU?
I see in the log it is requesting for "CPU and AMD/ATI GPU" but only getting for GPU.
EDITH says: Is getting pps-LLR-tasks from another "location". |
|
|
Bur Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Feb 20 Posts: 515 ID: 1241833 Credit: 414,136,096 RAC: 40,600
                
|
I'm hoping this challenge will advance the leading edge by at least 1M. We'll see how much progress we as a group can make towards catching GFN-17-Low up to where GFN-17-Mega started. It will hopefully be a good amount of progress. The smallest b to yield mega digits would be 42.6E6. GFN-17low is at 25.3E6, i.e.17.3E6 behind. Judging from the reported primes, it took GFN-17low about 4 years to progress by that much.
PPS will take about 1-2 years to catch up to PPS-mega. So it won't be too long until both mega projects could be merged into the original subproject.
____________
1281979 * 2^485014 + 1 is prime ... no further hits up to: n = 5,700,000 |
|
|
|
It Appears that all of my openclatiGFN17LOW tasks are being reported as cpuGFN17LOW tasks. Anyone know why?
____________
Thanks,
Jim
|
|
|
|
It Appears that all of my openclatiGFN17LOW tasks are being reported as cpuGFN17LOW tasks. Anyone know why?
Are they really running as/at CPU?
See my post two beΔΊow: AMD Ryzen 3700x with AMD RX 580, only getting openclATI-Tasks and reporting as such?
Okay, my host is getting work now for GFN17low@CPU |
|
|
|
So I checked my preferences. For my CPU I have limit of one thread at 50% CPU, and Max # of simultaneous PrimeGrid tasks set to unlimited, and Multi-threading: Max # of threads for each task set to 1. For my gen17 preferences I have checked CPU and AMD/ATI GPU (OpenCL).
I have 6 CPU tasks running and many GPU task running. However, my results show its nothing but CPU tasks running.
What's happening?
____________
Thanks,
Jim
|
|
|
Nick  Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 11 Posts: 2216 ID: 105020 Credit: 8,131,708,367 RAC: 1,401,049
                            
|
Still saying it would be nice if CPU and GPU were separate stats on tasks retuned in last 24 hours within same project. I get that it would be one form of neat vs another form of not so quite neat. |
|
|
Nick  Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 11 Posts: 2216 ID: 105020 Credit: 8,131,708,367 RAC: 1,401,049
                            
|
This is cool ( UTC time right now - may be accurate)
https://time.is/UTC |
|
|
Nick  Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 11 Posts: 2216 ID: 105020 Credit: 8,131,708,367 RAC: 1,401,049
                            
|
Or if you want accurate time in the computer world:
https://www.lagado.com/tools/time |
|
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 3171 ID: 130544 Credit: 2,233,028,411 RAC: 606,387
                           
|
Or if you want accurate time in the computer world:
https://www.lagado.com/tools/time
Ty, useful.
Bear in mind what also matters, especially for a challenge, is the server time on our homepage. |
|
|
Nick  Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 11 Posts: 2216 ID: 105020 Credit: 8,131,708,367 RAC: 1,401,049
                            
|
I have a crap load of GPU tasks that won't run
Sorry my bad. I sorted it the wrong way |
|
|
|
Nice 3090 there Nick!
I was surprised to see the lack of 1st it's was getting but I'm sure there's a good reason for that.
I was interested to see that a 3060Ti is about 60sec slower than the 3090.
Looks a bit painful when the 3090 is more than double the price for a 60 second gain though.
I guess the 3090 excels in many areas though.
Goodluck in the challenge? (I'm not a fan of calling this a challenge but I can think of no other term right now :)
Goodluck anyway mate!
____________
Π‘Π»Π°Π²Π° Π£ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½Ρ! |
|
|
Bur Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Feb 20 Posts: 515 ID: 1241833 Credit: 414,136,096 RAC: 40,600
                
|
Nice 3090 there Nick!
I was surprised to see the lack of 1st it's was getting but I'm sure there's a good reason for that. I got 84% 1st with a 1660 super, so a 3090 should be abve 90%?
____________
1281979 * 2^485014 + 1 is prime ... no further hits up to: n = 5,700,000 |
|
|
|
Nice 3090 there Nick!
I was surprised to see the lack of 1st it's was getting but I'm sure there's a good reason for that. I got 84% 1st with a 1660 super, so a 3090 should be abve 90%?
I think Nick had work queued. The wu's were sent at around the same time but even a CPU has returned the work before the 3090's blindingly, fast time.
____________
Π‘Π»Π°Π²Π° Π£ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½Ρ! |
|
|
Nick  Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 11 Posts: 2216 ID: 105020 Credit: 8,131,708,367 RAC: 1,401,049
                            
|
Nice 3090 there Nick!
I was surprised to see the lack of 1st it's was getting but I'm sure there's a good reason for that.
I was interested to see that a 3060Ti is about 60sec slower than the 3090.
Looks a bit painful when the 3090 is more than double the price for a 60 second gain though.
I guess the 3090 excels in many areas though.
Goodluck in the challenge? (I'm not a fan of calling this a challenge but I can think of no other term right now :)
Goodluck anyway mate!
Thanks man.
I really shouldn't have bought it but I did and it is in a system now.
I couldn't believe it was available - the exact one I would buy with choice - Asus Rog Strix.
I had a 2080Ti that was un-well and I thought it may be done.
Just got news that it is fixed under warranty and I can't help myself - it will be installed in 'Cake'
Lack of firsts - my priority in challenges is for my systems to have work.
So I have about 8 hours worth - whatever that may be.
It looks about right.
The work you get assigned is dependant on initial guess by BOINC of how long it may take.
I just want my systems crunching. Cake isn't being used because I'm getting a small renovation done and out of the house.
Shake is going to retire when it hits 1 billion in a week or 2 and will have a new CPU and will be then 'wake'
|
|
|
|
Nice 3090 there Nick!
I was surprised to see the lack of 1st it's was getting but I'm sure there's a good reason for that. I got 84% 1st with a 1660 super, so a 3090 should be abve 90%?
LOL... a 1660 is faster than my Radeon VII :D
____________
Π‘Π»Π°Π²Π° Π£ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½Ρ! |
|
|
Nick  Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 11 Posts: 2216 ID: 105020 Credit: 8,131,708,367 RAC: 1,401,049
                            
|
I got a prime and first! - even with my 8 hour addition to time. |
|
|
|
Excellent! |
|
|
|
Nice 3090 there Nick!
I was surprised to see the lack of 1st it's was getting but I'm sure there's a good reason for that. I got 84% 1st with a 1660 super, so a 3090 should be abve 90%?
LOL... a 1660 is faster than my Radeon VII :D
Same here GTX 1650 faster then AMD RX 580. o_O
I knew this from AP27, but i would have thought the AMD was faster here. |
|
|
|
I got a prime and first! - even with my 8 hour addition to time.
So nice !
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. |
|
|
Michael Gutierrez Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project scientist
 Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17 Posts: 342 ID: 764476 Credit: 46,281,510 RAC: 0
                 
|
One day in -- here are the stats!
Challenge: World Emoji Day
App: 24 (GFN-17-Low)
(As of 2021-07-19 01:08:00 UTC)
451130 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 198686 (44%) / 252444 (56%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
14877 (3%) were aborted. [10338 (2%) / 4539 (1%) / 0 (0%)]
5788 (1%) came back with some kind of an error. [330 (0%) / 5458 (1%) / 0 (0%)]
369255 (82%) have returned a successful result. [156211 (35%) / 213048 (47%) / 0 (0%)]
61235 (14%) are still in progress. [31818 (7%) / 29416 (7%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
46960 (13%) are pending validation. [18071 (5%) / 28893 (8%) / 0 (0%)]
322280 (87%) have been successfully validated. [138130 (37%) / 184150 (50%) / 0 (0%)]
16 (0%) were invalid. [12 (0%) / 4 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
2 (0%) are inconclusive. [1 (0%) / 1 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=28069820. The leading edge was at b=26442546 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 6.15% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. |
|
|
Ken_g6 Volunteer developer
 Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 06 Posts: 938 ID: 3110 Credit: 258,641,428 RAC: 91,586
                            
|
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=28069820. The leading edge was at b=26442546 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 6.15% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
From sub-project life expectancy:
Generalized Fermat Number 17-Low will be tested until b reaches the starting point of 17-Mega.
And that point, from GFN status by range, is 42,597,774
Therefore, GFN-17-Low is 65.9% complete. It was 62.1% complete yesterday. So we completed 3.8% of the entire (sub-)project yesterday! |
|
|
|
What happened to Boss? Is he playing Ninja or has he broken his ISP?
____________
|
|
|
|
Somehow i found my RX 580 crunching on this WU for 1 day and 10 hours, i aborted it.
Next picked WU exhibits normal runtime.
Curious. |
|
|
Michael Gutierrez Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project scientist
 Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17 Posts: 342 ID: 764476 Credit: 46,281,510 RAC: 0
                 
|
Day 2 stats!
Challenge: World Emoji Day
App: 24 (GFN-17-Low)
(As of 2021-07-20 06:46:20 UTC)
980763 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 402342 (41%) / 578421 (59%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
20457 (2%) were aborted. [14634 (1%) / 5823 (1%) / 0 (0%)]
15099 (2%) came back with some kind of an error. [451 (0%) / 14651 (1%) / 0 (0%)]
881591 (90%) have returned a successful result. [358777 (37%) / 522911 (53%) / 0 (0%)]
63703 (6%) are still in progress. [28559 (3%) / 35126 (4%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
53334 (6%) are pending validation. [19788 (2%) / 33643 (4%) / 0 (0%)]
828235 (94%) have been successfully validated. [338975 (38%) / 489260 (55%) / 0 (0%)]
25 (0%) were invalid. [17 (0%) / 8 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
0 (0%) are inconclusive. [0 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=30025416. The leading edge was at b=26442546 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 13.55% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. |
|
|
Nick  Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 11 Posts: 2216 ID: 105020 Credit: 8,131,708,367 RAC: 1,401,049
                            
|
Who has only ever used their own computers?
|
|
|
Monkeydee Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 8 Dec 13 Posts: 532 ID: 284516 Credit: 1,435,751,016 RAC: 1,834,804
                           
|
Who has only ever used their own computers?
So far I have used no cloud and no borrowed hardware
Well, there's a fine line I've walked in the past in regards to disposed of work hardware that I was allowed to take possession of instead of sending it to the recycle depot.
____________
My Primes
Badge Score: 4*2 + 6*2 + 7*4 + 8*8 + 11*3 + 12*1 = 157
|
|
|
|
Who has only ever used their own computers?
I have only used my very own computer.
Though sometimes temptation strikes, my son's i5 8400 + GTX 1070 has never crunched. :)
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. |
|
|
|
Who has only ever used their own computers?
Me!
I'm just a family guy, at home with my own pc's. That's why I pay little attention to my rank with these "challenges". It's not apples vs apples and the results are usually the same.
I find it a bit of shame that cloud based stats are lumped in with people like myself.... but I guess it's hard to distinguish. (Cloud, vs a university, vs business computers, vs school, vs personal pc ownership etc)
BOINC is just one of those hobbies...... those with the deepest pockets win. Whether it be hardware or running costs. :)
____________
Π‘Π»Π°Π²Π° Π£ΠΊΡΠ°ΡΠ½Ρ! |
|
|
|
Agree...I use two iMacs at home, that's it. I do this because its fun, I enjoy badges I may find a prime. |
|
|
|
Who has only ever used their own computers?
Me :)
____________
My lucky number is 6219*2^3374198+1
|
|
|
|
Who has only ever used their own computers?
A long time ago I would run PPSE on PRPNet off of a USB drive when I was in computer labs during college. Since then I have only used my own hardware at home.
____________
|
|
|
|
Me
1x1800x + gtx1030 and 1x2700x without gpu
____________
|
|
|
|
Who has only ever used their own computers?
Me. That's why I usually place in the 200s. |
|
|
|
I miss the "at the conclusion of the challenge" posts ;)
____________
My lucky number is 6219*2^3374198+1
|
|
|
Michael Gutierrez Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project scientist
 Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17 Posts: 342 ID: 764476 Credit: 46,281,510 RAC: 0
                 
|
And we're done! Here are the final stats. And I do apologize for missing the end reminder -- I literally slept through my alarm :') Cleanup tasks are available now, should take about 2 weeks.
Challenge: World Emoji Day
App: 24 (GFN-17-Low)
(As of 2021-07-21 03:40:34 UTC)
1226801 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 493941 (40%) / 732860 (60%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
34554 (3%) were aborted. [20250 (2%) / 14304 (1%) / 0 (0%)]
19385 (2%) came back with some kind of an error. [455 (0%) / 18930 (2%) / 0 (0%)]
1129491 (92%) have returned a successful result. [455033 (37%) / 674458 (55%) / 0 (0%)]
21815 (2%) are still in progress. [8556 (1%) / 13257 (1%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
21418 (2%) are pending validation. [8385 (1%) / 13013 (1%) / 0 (0%)]
1108037 (98%) have been successfully validated. [446622 (40%) / 661435 (59%) / 0 (0%)]
41 (0%) were invalid. [28 (0%) / 13 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
1 (0%) are inconclusive. [1 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is b=30891232. The leading edge was at b=26442546 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 16.82% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. |
|
|
|
Who has only ever used their own computers?
I've only used my own, but I will confess to having in the past taken advantage of free (to me) electricity at work when I was a teacher and brought my own rigs instead of using the garbage PCs provided by IT. I had official permission, and brought in old obsolete equipment during the cold months because my classroom didn't have heat.
____________
Eating more cheese on Thursdays. |
|
|
|
Looking into the final stats - it seems like if we had a ~10 Day challenge, we could have almost ended the GFN-17-Low subproject. :)
____________
My lucky number is: 129448306^65536+1 |
|
|
|
Just my luck. My ISP decided to do maintenance during the last hour of the challenge, so about 30 WUs didn't upload in time. Oh well.
____________
5912891284485*2^1290000-1
(Sophie Germain Prime Search) |
|
|
|
All of the computers I am using to crunch I built for me personally - 2 have moved to friends homes for them to use (they contribute electricity for the cause!).
Does that kind-of count? |
|
|
Nick  Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 11 Posts: 2216 ID: 105020 Credit: 8,131,708,367 RAC: 1,401,049
                            
|
It was a quip at people not owning hardware but also a bit jealous.
So much easier! (And a bit harder)
Maybe the thing truly frustrating is the number of PC identity numbers we go through. |
|
|
|
I miss the "at the conclusion of the challenge" posts ;)
In the initial post above, there are some "at the conclusion of the challenge" requests. With relatively short tasks like in this one, in my opinion it does not matter what people do with their extra tasks. /JeppeSN |
|
|
|
My goal was to break the top 200 of this challenge. Finished at 199 :)
This was done using a single 1080Ti running non-stop (except while I was using it to play games one evening). Could have been a bit higher had I not played a little GTA5.
|
|
|
Nick  Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 11 Posts: 2216 ID: 105020 Credit: 8,131,708,367 RAC: 1,401,049
                            
|
My goal was to break the top 200 of this challenge. Finished at 199 :)
This was done using a single 1080Ti running non-stop (except while I was using it to play games one evening). Could have been a bit higher had I not played a little GTA5.
Nice. Really great. |
|
|
|
My goal was to break the top 200 of this challenge. Finished at 199 :)
This was done using a single 1080Ti running non-stop (except while I was using it to play games one evening). Could have been a bit higher had I not played a little GTA5.
Nice! If I had 3 more hours you'd have been no200 :)
____________
My lucky number is 6219*2^3374198+1
|
|
|
|
How many primes were found? I lost track after 7. |
|
|
|
How many primes were found? I lost track after 7.
27
____________
My lucky number is 6219*2^3374198+1
|
|
|
Michael Gutierrez Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project scientist
 Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17 Posts: 342 ID: 764476 Credit: 46,281,510 RAC: 0
                 
|
Cleanup Status:
Jul 21: 13331 tasks outstanding; 3938 affecting individual (144) scoring positions; 521 affecting team (20) scoring positions.
Jul 22: 8745 tasks outstanding; 2063 affecting individual (101) scoring positions; 241 affecting team (14) scoring positions.
Jul 23: 6112 tasks outstanding; 793 affecting individual (76) scoring positions; 77 affecting team (9) scoring positions.
Jul 24: 3671 tasks outstanding; 317 affecting individual (49) scoring positions; 20 affecting team (5) scoring positions.
Jul 25: 2380 tasks outstanding; 111 affecting individual (31) scoring positions; 12 affecting team (4) scoring positions.
Jul 26: 483 tasks outstanding; 14 affecting individual (9) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Jul 27: 92 tasks outstanding; 1 affecting individual (1) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. |
|
|
Michael Gutierrez Volunteer moderator Project administrator Project scientist
 Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 17 Posts: 342 ID: 764476 Credit: 46,281,510 RAC: 0
                 
|
The results are final!
During these 5 days, we completed over 1.1 MILLION tasks!!! We found a whopping 27 new GFN-17-Low primes, boosting the project's average output to more than 100 times typical.
The challenge created a seriously impressive dent in the remaining GFN-17-Low work, advancing the leading edge by 16%, or from ~970,000 digits to ~980,000. One or two more challenges like this would complete the project!
114 teams and 504 individuals participated in the Challenge.
Top Three Individuals:
1. Skillz
2. boss
3. tng
Top Three Teams:
1. TeAm AnandTech
2. SETI.Germany
3. Antarctic Crunchers
The next Challenge is the Once In A Blue Moon Challenge, which starts August 12. We hope to see you there! Thank you again to everyone. We really appreciate your *phenomenal* participation and hope you had fun!
____________
Time flies like an arrow. Fruit flies like a banana. |
|
|
|
That's good news.
We'll be there. Giving it our all in the "Once In A Blue Moon Challenge".
____________
|
|
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 3171 ID: 130544 Credit: 2,233,028,411 RAC: 606,387
                           
|
Hopefully I'll have finished my 'most' phase by then. At least i hope that's what my processing plan says. |
|
|
|
Current Overall Standings in PrimeGrid's Challenge Series updated accordingly.
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. |
|
|
|
Here is a chart showing how the leading edge for GFN-17 Low has progressed since I began tracking it. The challenge was definitely quite the boost.
____________
|
|
|
|
Here is a chart showing how the leading edge for GFN-17 Low has progressed since I began tracking it. The challenge was definitely quite the boost. ...
Quite impressive !
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. |
|
|
Yves Gallot Volunteer developer Project scientist Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 12 Posts: 802 ID: 164101 Credit: 305,681,183 RAC: 5,377

|
Nice and impressive. I extended the chart with the list of primes (http://www.primegrid.com/primes/primes.php).
|
|
|
|
Charting based on the primes that were actually found was a great idea. Unfortunately a strategy that only works well for projects that regularly produce primes.
____________
|
|
|