1)
Message boards :
Project Staging Area :
LLRCUDA on Port 12001
(Message 35176)
Posted 3459 days ago by Pilgrim
yes, my computers are in a warm environment and
even though they are dust free, have 6-8 fans each
and are air cooled with the Noctura 14 my RealTemp
runs about 75 degrees with four cores. 8 threads
pushes the temperature into the mid 80's unless
I cut back on the O/C.
I will start running 6 threads soon and find I lose only about
20% throughput versus 8 threads. The law of diminshing returns
with the HT feature.
|
2)
Message boards :
Project Staging Area :
LLRCUDA on Port 12001
(Message 35149)
Posted 3460 days ago by Pilgrim
GPU not running:
CPU running 4 cores ---17192 seconds average
CPU % utilization:50%
==================================
GPU running:
EVGA GTX570 SC -------5722 seconds.
CPU running 4 cores ---17192 seconds average
CPU % Utilization: 57%
|
3)
Message boards :
Project Staging Area :
LLRCUDA on Port 12001
(Message 35140)
Posted 3460 days ago by Pilgrim
p.s....the numbers in previous post are when
all four cores AND GPU are running...just to clear that up.
|
4)
Message boards :
Project Staging Area :
LLRCUDA on Port 12001
(Message 35139)
Posted 3460 days ago by Pilgrim
The GPU always runs a unit in the same amount of time
regarless of the load on the CPU.
I am not sure what you mean about "both processors"
because I have an i7-920 but I am not using HT.
And to add the excitement, while Folding at home uses
less than 10% of a CPU core LLRCUDA uses around 60-70%
of a core.
The GPU always finishes around 5700 seconds.
The CPU's (4) are now taking over 17,000 seconds
for 4 cores/units. Of course, divide by four and it seems/is
the GPU is energy inefficient BUT I could never get
below 12000 seconds/unit running just one Core/unit
(without GPU) so it seems to my brain dead mind
that even though the GPU is a power hog it still beats
One CPU core in a race, even considering the power usage
of the GPU. What am I missing?
I think the GPU might have a better comparison on
REALLY big numbers, like 14 million digits?
Let me know what else you need.
Cheers
|
5)
Message boards :
Project Staging Area :
LLRCUDA on Port 12001
(Message 35118)
Posted 3460 days ago by Pilgrim
Kill-A-Watt says 200 watts with idle mode.
|
6)
Message boards :
Project Staging Area :
LLRCUDA on Port 12001
(Message 35089)
Posted 3461 days ago by Pilgrim
sorry for the delay Carlos....
i7/920 o/c'd to 3.75Ghz
running only 4 CPU's (4 threads)...290 watts 15,000 seconds/unit
running only GTX570 SC ...............360 watts 5,700 seconds/unit
running all 5 above ......................460 watts
Cheers
|
7)
Message boards :
Project Staging Area :
LLRCUDA on Port 12001
(Message 34603)
Posted 3472 days ago by Pilgrim
o.k.
I was away for a few days so will get you the info......
|
8)
Message boards :
Project Staging Area :
LLRCUDA on Port 12001
(Message 34563)
Posted 3474 days ago by Pilgrim
I agree.
But remember I was running the older drivers, so not
a true test.
LLRCUDA is in it's earliest forms.
Remember that about a year ago people
where saying that LLR would never run on a GPU.
We are still in the earliest code.
My Kill--A-Watt meter says 442 watts
running the GTX and 4 Cores at once.
By the way, final timing was
EVGA GTX570 SC -------5522 seconds.
CPU -----------------------10494 seconds.
CPU running 4 cores ---14792 seconds average
There should be a better result running an SoB unit
which I will try to do.
Cheers.
|
9)
Message boards :
Project Staging Area :
LLRCUDA on Port 12001
(Message 34469)
Posted 3477 days ago by Pilgrim
GTX570 SC (running on 266.xx drivers against instructions)
running 121*2^4207281-1 Time per iteration: 1.303ms.
currently at 40% completion
same # running on one cpu/1thread======>.2.437ms.
i7-920 @ 3.75Gz
the 570 is using about 33% of one cpu
|
10)
Message boards :
Project Staging Area :
Port 9000
(Message 34051)
Posted 3491 days ago by Pilgrim
up, down, up, down......
|
