1)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Riemann's 196th Birthday Challenge
(Message 157016)
Posted 185 days ago by  motqalden
The links for individual and team stats is going to the Pi challenge instead of REiemann's
Edit> fixed now thanks
|
2)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Great Conjunction Challenge
(Message 146931)
Posted 819 days ago by motqalden
Yeah i am trying for the same 37.5% which is 6 and 12 respectively.
|
3)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Great Conjunction Challenge
(Message 146929)
Posted 819 days ago by motqalden
Hmm thanks for clarifying and confirming what i figured was the case. Its a shame how this basically hamstrings my 3950x I also think my first gen Ryzen is having similar struggles do you happen to have recommended task numbers for Ryzen 7 (1700 / 1700x / 1950x)
|
4)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Great Conjunction Challenge
(Message 146927)
Posted 819 days ago by motqalden
I am finding myself hitting a very hard cache wall on some of my CPU tasks running GFN 18's
For example when i set it to run 50% with boinc on a 3950x i was seeing task times that were almost twice as long as on my 3900x tasks. I am pretty sure this is a cache wall because i lowered this to 37.5% boinc usage and with 12 tasks running the task times improved by almost 50% faster. This however means i am leaving 4 cores idle which is not ideal. I am wondering if it would be possible to specify 2 cores per tasks in an app_info.xml or similar? If so does someone have the details of the commands needed. Thanks!
|
5)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Évariste Galois's Birthday Challenge
(Message 144612)
Posted 880 days ago by motqalden
I wasn't getting these errors because of boosting it was because my ram timings were too tight.
All errors went away as soon as i re-enabled basic XMP and i did not change any system voltages or boost behaviour.
|
6)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Évariste Galois's Birthday Challenge
(Message 144514)
Posted 881 days ago by motqalden
Yeah I actually already attempted to correct it.
Seems like I was still running the "tweaked" ram setting from a different memory kit.
Updated to a much newer bios and removed all traced of negative voltage offset I was running and set it to basic XMP for the ram. I will keep an eye on it and see how it goes. If it keeps getting warnings at stock settings I will try fiddling with the boost as you mentioned. Interestingly both of my 3900x chips have not seen any of these warnings, so it was just this 3950x which actually boost a bit less from what i have seen. Interesting that you mention mouse over :D I am pretty sure i looked for something like that when i first saw the warning but now that i know it is there it actually took a full second to come up and I sure as heck didn't wait that long before.
|
7)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Évariste Galois's Birthday Challenge
(Message 144509)
Posted 881 days ago by motqalden
Thanks that makes sense. I won't worry too much about it right now since they are not really failing. Could be a number of things since i pretty much rebuilt this computer with some different parts / ram etc. last week and haven't fully dialed it all in yet.
|
8)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Évariste Galois's Birthday Challenge
(Message 144505)
Posted 881 days ago by motqalden
I have a task that says "Completed and validated WARNING!" but can't figure out what it is warning me about? I only have 1 failed result out of ~500 validated so just kind of curious about this one and what the warning is.
|
9)
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Oktoberfest Challenge
(Message 133087)
Posted 1277 days ago by motqalden
Grats!
|
