WW 1.05 credits

Join PrimeGrid

Read our rules and policies.
Download, install and run the BOINC software used by PrimeGrid.
When prompted, enter the URL:
http://www.primegrid.com/
Select which subprojects to run via the PrimeGrid Preferences.

If you are not using graphics enabled BOINC client, you may use manual registration form.

Author

Message

tng

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 10
Posts: 459
ID: 66603
Credit: 44,688,138,676
RAC: 18,749,143

Did a little testing. Here's a comparison of the credit earned running WW 1.05 compared to PPS-Sieve on a couple of cardss:

Credits per second

PPS-Sieve
GTX 1660 6.36
RTX 2070 20.02 (3 simultaneous instances)
RTX 2070 14.85 (single instance)

WW 1.03
GTX 1660 4.04
RTX 2070 5.4

WW 1.05
GTX 1660 11.09
RTX 2070 14.7
____________

ID: 147255 |

Eudy Silva

Send message
Joined: 26 Aug 17
Posts: 2042
ID: 918937
Credit: 574,551,545
RAC: 269,139

Like this ?

Credits per second +-----------+----------------------------------+---------+---------+ | | PPS-Sieve | WW 1.03 | WW 1.05 | +-----------+----------------------------------+---------+---------+ | GTX 1660 | 6.36 | 4.04 | 11.09 | | RTX 2070 | 20.02 (3 simultaneous instances) | 5.4 | 14.7 | | RTX 2070 | 14.85 (single instance) | | | +-----------+----------------------------------+---------+---------+

Edit:
Tip: try enclosing text with [_pre_] and [_/pre_] (remove the underscore)
____________

"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment.

ID: 147256 |

Yves Gallot

Volunteer developer
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 12
Posts: 783
ID: 164101
Credit: 305,446,177
RAC: 4,631

WW 1.05
GTX 1660 11.09
RTX 2070 14.7

What I see on your computer is
RTX 2070: 2304 cores @ 1620MHz, 666 sec
GTX 1660 SUPER: 1408 cores @ 1785MHz, 1000 sec
core.freq ratio ~ 1.5, speed ratio 1.5

and 14.7/11.09 ~ 1.33...?

ID: 147267 |

tng

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 10
Posts: 459
ID: 66603
Credit: 44,688,138,676
RAC: 18,749,143

WW 1.05
GTX 1660 11.09
RTX 2070 14.7

What I see on your computer is
RTX 2070: 2304 cores @ 1620MHz, 666 sec
GTX 1660 SUPER: 1408 cores @ 1785MHz, 1000 sec
core.freq ratio ~ 1.5, speed ratio 1.5

and 14.7/11.09 ~ 1.33...?

Are you looking at this computer? that's the one I tested on?
____________

ID: 147272 |

Yves Gallot

Volunteer developer
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 12
Posts: 783
ID: 164101
Credit: 305,446,177
RAC: 4,631

Are you looking at this computer? that's the one I tested on?

But why WW is 25% faster on one of the two RTX 2070?

RTX 2070, driver 432.00, i7-6700K, Win10: 91M primes per second WW + Cullen (4 threads / 4 cores, L3: 8MB, HT off) RTX 2070, driver 441.08, i7-9700K, Win10: 114M primes per second WW + 2 * Cullen (2 * 4 threads / 8 cores, L3: 12MB)

The driver (I don't think so), HT on could help on the 6700, but it does not give an explanation.

ID: 147283 |

tng

Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 10
Posts: 459
ID: 66603
Credit: 44,688,138,676
RAC: 18,749,143

Are you looking at this computer? that's the one I tested on?

But why WW is 25% faster on one of the two RTX 2070?

RTX 2070, driver 432.00, i7-6700K, Win10: 91M primes per second WW + Cullen (4 threads / 4 cores, L3: 8MB, HT off) RTX 2070, driver 441.08, i7-9700K, Win10: 114M primes per second WW + 2 * Cullen (2 * 4 threads / 8 cores, L3: 12MB)
The driver (I don't think so), HT on could help on the 6700, but it does not give an explanation.

I can't answer that. Will need to investigate.
____________

ID: 147284 |

j.sheridan

Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 11
Posts: 817
ID: 91622
Credit: 2,686,055,085
RAC: 0

Are you looking at this computer? that's the one I tested on?

But why WW is 25% faster on one of the two RTX 2070?

RTX 2070, driver 432.00, i7-6700K, Win10: 91M primes per second WW + Cullen (4 threads / 4 cores, L3: 8MB, HT off) RTX 2070, driver 441.08, i7-9700K, Win10: 114M primes per second WW + 2 * Cullen (2 * 4 threads / 8 cores, L3: 12MB)
The driver (I don't think so), HT on could help on the 6700, but it does not give an explanation.

There seems to be a big variation in a number of TNG's gpus - some of the 2070 supers are running even slower than the above. Is there a cooling problem resulting in downclocking?

ID: 147287 |

Scott Brown

Volunteer moderator
Project administrator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Avatar

Send message
Joined: 17 Oct 05
Posts: 2353
ID: 1178
Credit: 17,572,841,257
RAC: 5,042,926

Are you looking at this computer? that's the one I tested on?

But why WW is 25% faster on one of the two RTX 2070?

RTX 2070, driver 432.00, i7-6700K, Win10: 91M primes per second WW + Cullen (4 threads / 4 cores, L3: 8MB, HT off) RTX 2070, driver 441.08, i7-9700K, Win10: 114M primes per second WW + 2 * Cullen (2 * 4 threads / 8 cores, L3: 12MB)
The driver (I don't think so), HT on could help on the 6700, but it does not give an explanation.

There seems to be a big variation in a number of TNG's gpus - some of the 2070 supers are running even slower than the above. Is there a cooling problem resulting in downclocking?

1) Different clocks... (clocks are visible in the work unit outputs for the GFN work done on these).

2) Dual GPU systems only report the device -0 type. Some of tng's dual GPU machines have a 2070 with a 2070 super.

ID: 147290 |

j.sheridan

Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 11
Posts: 817
ID: 91622
Credit: 2,686,055,085
RAC: 0

Are you looking at this computer? that's the one I tested on?

But why WW is 25% faster on one of the two RTX 2070?

RTX 2070, driver 432.00, i7-6700K, Win10: 91M primes per second WW + Cullen (4 threads / 4 cores, L3: 8MB, HT off) RTX 2070, driver 441.08, i7-9700K, Win10: 114M primes per second WW + 2 * Cullen (2 * 4 threads / 8 cores, L3: 12MB)
The driver (I don't think so), HT on could help on the 6700, but it does not give an explanation.

There seems to be a big variation in a number of TNG's gpus - some of the 2070 supers are running even slower than the above. Is there a cooling problem resulting in downclocking?

1) Different clocks... (clocks are visible in the work unit outputs for the GFN work done on these).

2) Dual GPU systems only report the device -0 type. Some of tng's dual GPU machines have a 2070 with a 2070 super.

Well it's all very confusing.
this pc reports as a 2070 super but the tasks identify as a 2080 and yet they're running 800-1600s/task.

this one reports as a 2070 super but has tasks running as 2070s + 2080 and both running 500-700s/task.

ID: 147293 |

Michael Goetz

Volunteer moderator
Project administrator

Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10
Posts: 13893
ID: 53948
Credit: 384,280,505
RAC: 129,451

Are you looking at this computer? that's the one I tested on?

But why WW is 25% faster on one of the two RTX 2070?

RTX 2070, driver 432.00, i7-6700K, Win10: 91M primes per second WW + Cullen (4 threads / 4 cores, L3: 8MB, HT off) RTX 2070, driver 441.08, i7-9700K, Win10: 114M primes per second WW + 2 * Cullen (2 * 4 threads / 8 cores, L3: 12MB)
The driver (I don't think so), HT on could help on the 6700, but it does not give an explanation.

There seems to be a big variation in a number of TNG's gpus - some of the 2070 supers are running even slower than the above. Is there a cooling problem resulting in downclocking?

1) Different clocks... (clocks are visible in the work unit outputs for the GFN work done on these).

2) Dual GPU systems only report the device -0 type. Some of tng's dual GPU machines have a 2070 with a 2070 super.

Well it's all very confusing.
this pc reports as a 2070 super but the tasks identify as a 2080 and yet they're running 800-1600s/task.

this one reports as a 2070 super but has tasks running as 2070s + 2080 and both running 500-700s/task.

If there's more than one GPU, and the task is paused and resumed, it may resume on a different GPU. Pretty much, all bets are off in a multi-GPU system with heterogeneous GPUs.
____________
My lucky number is 75898⁵²⁴²⁸⁸+1

ID: 147298 |

Toggle Menu

Join PrimeGrid

Returning Participants

Community

Leader Boards

Results

Other