Join PrimeGrid
Returning Participants
Community
Leader Boards
Results
Other
drummers-lowrise
|
Message boards :
Generalized Fermat Prime Search :
GFN-14/13/... MEGA Prime Search on GFN Server
Author |
Message |
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Project description
The goal of GFN-MEGA project series is to find a MEGA prime for each GFN exponent, until software limits allows. MEGA Primes for GFN-17 and above were found or being searched on PrimeGrid. MEGA Primes for GFN-16 and GFN-15 were already found in these series. Now it's a time for GFN-14 MEGA, GFN-13 MEGA and so on. Last project in the series (when we hit software and math limits) is not determined yet, it can be either GFN-12 MEGA either GFN-11 MEGA.
These projects are exactly the same as previous GFN-15 project, so for detailed description and instructions please read top post in GFN-15 MEGA thread: https://www.primegrid.com/forum_thread.php?id=9198 . Everything is the same except:
GFN-14 MEGA:
- This is a GFN-14, so we're looking for MEGA Prime in form b16384+1
- Search will be started from bmin = 10841645805132531666786792405311319418846637043199917731144080
- Project name (for app_config.xml) is gfn14_mega
GFN-13 MEGA:
- Prime have form b8192+1
- Search will be started from bmin = 117541283763947820803514936063599937165870515987063348437723855381224452611844232886228245901292532817349347812678728888242
- Project name (for app_config.xml) is gfn13_mega
GFN-12 MEGA:
- Prime have form b4096+1
- Search will be started from bmin = 138159533888....097738460 (very long, 245 digits)
- Project name (for app_config.xml) is gfn12_mega
GFN-11 MEGA:
- Prime have form b2048+1
- Search will be started from bmin = 190880568043....910259838 (very long, 489 digits)
- Project name (for app_config.xml) is gfn11_mega
Duration of all projects will follow same rules as GFN-15 MEGA - one month after prime will be found. Minimal duration will be 3 months (even if prime will be found faster).
Note that running LLR multithreaded significantly improves performance of these tasks. Using 4 cores per task is usually a good start. Using more cores may lead to worse overall perfomance because penalty of threads synchronization rises with number of cores, but your mileage may vary. Instructions are in the GFN-15 thread mentioned above.
For new users, please note once again that this is not a PrimeGrid project. It's running on separate server. Instructions to join are in the post mentioned above.
Current project status
GFN-14 MEGA: (completed)
2020-12-05: Project started
2020-12-17: First GFN14-MEGA Prime found
2021-03-05: Work loading stopped, cleanup started.
2021-04-13: Last task returned, project completed at bmin+600000, 2 primes found.
GFN-13 MEGA: (completed)
2021-03-27: Project started
2021-04-03: First GFN13-MEGA Prime found
2021-06-27: No new work will be loaded after this date
2021-07-30: Last task returned, project completed at bmin+600000, 5 primes found.
GFN-12 MEGA: (completed)
2021-07-26: Project started
2021-08-03: First GFN12-MEGA Prime found
2021-10-26: No new work will be loaded after this date
2021-11-13: Last task returned, project completed at bmin+600000, 4 primes found.
GFN-11 MEGA: (completed)
2022-03-02: Start of project
2022-03-24: First GFN11-MEGA Prime found
2022-06-02: No new work will be loaded after this date
2022-06-11: Last task returned, project completed at bmin+900000, 3 primes found.
Good luck and happy crunching!
Unproven and unreported primes
The test we're running on Boinc only checks for "probable prime" status. Although it's almost impossible for PRP of such size to be a "false positive", we must get strong mathematical proof of primality anyway. Any number we found must be tested using second algorithm, which gives an exact answer, is it a prime or not.
A key point of this algorithm is that base must be factorized at least on 33%. It became a problem starting from GFN12-MEGA, where base is 245 digits long. We were lucky to factorize bases of first two primes quickly, but third and fourth bases were hard.
Unfactorized cofactors of bases will be posted here. On my side, most of these numbers received at least 21000 GMP-ECM curves at B1=110M, which is (according to GMP-ECM predictions) should be enough to find a factor up to 55 digits long (i.e. we may consider that this number has no factors of 55 digits or less). Exceptions are noted in description of corresponding number.
Numbers are posted in "bc" format (split on few lines, trailing backslash added to mark continuation).
1. GFN12-MEGA prime #3, by "PDW", at bmin+264748, 225 digits in cofactor
61607572665627716466267194947375202454728572568697314321650756978331\
66283319835201948467176887575789325908073477465546474542352681535472\
88584383907676703070335462013604241843269575861809459636096728646069\
366089914571285046613
2. GFN12-MEGA prime #4, by "Dr Who Fan", at bmin+377416, 233 digits in cofactor
16734808375533474856608510065546476172596886534128368435090583289106\
38178980843290925788335246633129479179093533087632738968382583290449\
28416176596662803608570380503905536104795813169435941311632424097942\
59520763893813455999844873823
3. GFN11-MEGA prime #2, by "robish", at bmin+522274, 464 digits in cofactor
17748921385169662079448182126563109680721022126713567989277507900878\
57016720423384677766689629347147984374396091110103142471635239294324\
70820583145040530609817464043293047796910170491904322445058842681480\
60778240892742794408254224764136940716949565356286369878179344020523\
31124713135648717187780428921779456230091647839292083834515734336524\
23228219750610454090022512142154396397452396207851666249975249181764\
72057627989734590544045115932608517494456106108505815339
4. GFN11-MEGA prime #3, by "Coleslaw", at bmin+720536, 446 digits in cofactor
(ECM tested up to 45 digits)
15124356119385150396058572113004532948102793734159337163423942599390\
60817880741371510132570469941210620458808895945749857642893658367913\
63015170199948753503396369635953589966792673198636504836183636614308\
25799594611928180237101132125729244048080211110581867436961772401546\
51802870311229507997500476268810633802439096858157429095334448247480\
09383041888148717977873042809369301551438323863404753512056073834025\
90180873995984242097687345950835226343
| |
|
Frank Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 17 Posts: 27 ID: 964965 Credit: 481,860,486 RAC: 659,477
                       
|
Looking forward to it! Thanks Stream for all your amazing effort :D | |
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,531,967,424 RAC: 3,351,164
                               
|
Looking forward to it! Thanks Stream for all your amazing effort :D
+1 :)
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
A misconfiguration of LLR2 parameters (they were tweaked in special way for more efficient processing of GFN tests) caused invalid tasks to be sent until (estimated) 15:00 UTC. These tasks cannot complete, they will fail during final "checkpoint compression" phase with error message "proof.xxx is missing or corrupt".
In most cases affected tasks should be aborted automatically when one of tasks completes and your computer connects to the server. If you don't wish to wait and you still have tasks sent before 2020-12-05 15:00 UTC (check "Sent" field in your list of tasks on the server), it's recommended to abort these tasks manually because they just will consume CPU time and fail.
| |
|
|
Hello!
So far running this new GFN_14 Mega units has resulted in 9 finished wu's on 4 different pc's has given me bad results/uploads.
All have errors like this:
Stderr output
<core_client_version>7.16.11</core_client_version>
<![CDATA[
<stderr_txt>
BOINC PrimeGrid wrapper 2.02 (Nov 23 2020 23:35:38)
running ../../projects/boincvm.proxyma.ru_30080_test4vm/llr2_win64_201114.exe -v
LLR2 Program - Version 1.1.0, using Gwnum Library Version 29.8
running ../../projects/boincvm.proxyma.ru_30080_test4vm/llr2_win64_201114.exe -oGerbicz=1 -oProofName=proof -oProofCount=64 -oProductName=prod -oPietrzak=1 -oCachePoints=1 -pSavePoints -q10841645805132531666786792405311319418846637043199917731151338^16384+1 -oPointsPerL2=8 -oGerbiczL=16 -oGerbiczL2=2048 -oSlidingWindow=7 -d -t4 -oDiskWriteTime=4
Gerbicz check is requested, switching to PRP.
Starting probable prime test of 10841645805132531666786792405311319418846637043199917731151338^16384+1
Using generic reduction AVX FFT length 336K, Pass1=448, Pass2=768, clm=2, 4 threads, a = 3, L2 = 16*128, M = 255
proof.8 is missing or corrupt.
14:45:02 (7212): called boinc_finish(0)
</stderr_txt>
<message>
upload failure: <file_xfer_error>
<file_name>llr2_843909_qkuzkj_336660752_r1036350543_4</file_name>
<error_code>-240 (stat() failed)</error_code>
</file_xfer_error>
<file_xfer_error>
<file_name>llr2_843909_qkuzkj_336660752_r1036350543_5</file_name>
<error_code>-240 (stat() failed)</error_code>
</file_xfer_error>
<file_xfer_error>
<file_name>llr2_843909_qkuzkj_336660752_r1036350543_6</file_name>
<error_code>-240 (stat() failed)</error_code>
</file_xfer_error>
<file_xfer_error>
<file_name>llr2_843909_qkuzkj_336660752_r1036350543_7</file_name>
<error_code>-240 (stat() failed)</error_code>
</file_xfer_error>
<file_xfer_error>
<file_name>llr2_843909_qkuzkj_336660752_r1036350543_8</file_name>
<error_code>-240 (stat() failed)</error_code>
</file_xfer_error>
<file_xfer_error>
<file_name>llr2_843909_qkuzkj_336660752_r1036350543_9</file_name>
<error_code>-240 (stat() failed)</error_code>
</file_xfer_error>
<file_xfer_error>
<file_name>llr2_843909_qkuzkj_336660752_r1036350543_10</file_name>
<error_code>-240 (stat() failed)</error_code>
</file_xfer_error>
<file_xfer_error>
<file_name>llr2_843909_qkuzkj_336660752_r1036350543_11</file_name>
<error_code>-240 (stat() failed)</error_code>
</file_xfer_error>
</message>
]]>
I've put my computers to no new work until problem is solved😏
With regards,
Hans Sveen
Oslo
PSS
My writing was too slow, problem is already explained !!
Sorry !!!
____________
MyStats
My Badges | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Update: you can just press "Update" button in Boinc client to force connection to server, and all affected tasks will be aborted.
| |
|
Yves Gallot Volunteer developer Project scientist Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 12 Posts: 820 ID: 164101 Credit: 305,989,513 RAC: 1,728

|
Here is a bit of probabilities.
The expected number of GF primes in [bmin; bmin + d] (where bmin >> d) is Cn · d / (2n log bmin).
The mean gap between two primes is (#primes = 1) Δb = log bmin · 2n / Cn.
With mega-numbers log bmin · 2n = log 10999999 = 2302582.79.
For GFN-14, we have C14 = 8.009684535 then Δb = 287475.
The range was sieved to pmax = 36·1018. The sieve removed 80% candidates.
If Δcand is the number of candidates for one prime, we have Δcand = (Δb / 2) · 20% = 28747.
Note that we could have used the estimate Δcand = e-γ log N / log pmax = 0.5614594836 x 2302582.79 / 45.03 = 28710.
The likelihood of success is L = 1 - e-λ where λ = #cand / Δcand.
L = 25%, #cand = 8264,
L = 50%, #cand = 19912,
L = 75%, #cand = 39824,
L = 97%, #cand = 100733. | |
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,531,967,424 RAC: 3,351,164
                               
|
Here is a bit of probabilities.
The expected number of GF primes in [bmin; bmin + d] (where bmin >> d) is Cn · d / (2n log bmin).
The mean gap between two primes is (#primes = 1) Δb = log bmin · 2n / Cn.
With mega-numbers log bmin · 2n = log 10999999 = 2302582.79.
For GFN-14, we have C14 = 8.009684535 then Δb = 287475.
The range was sieved to pmax = 36·1018. The sieve removed 80% candidates.
If Δcand is the number of candidates for one prime, we have Δcand = (Δb / 2) · 20% = 28747.
Note that we could have used the estimate Δcand = e-γ log N / log pmax = 0.5614594836 x 2302582.79 / 45.03 = 28710.
The likelihood of success is L = 1 - e-λ where λ = #cand / Δcand.
L = 25%, #cand = 8264,
L = 50%, #cand = 19912,
L = 75%, #cand = 39824,
L = 97%, #cand = 100733.
Thanks Yves
Nice to know :)
Cheers
Rob.
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 | |
|
Yves Gallot Volunteer developer Project scientist Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 12 Posts: 820 ID: 164101 Credit: 305,989,513 RAC: 1,728

|
1000 tasks/day, 4000 validated
Likelihood of success before Great Conjunction Challenge is
1 - exp(-(4000 + 11000) / 28747) = 40% !!! | |
|
|
It's really interesting to see how both 'normal' and 'mega' GFN14 are being tested at the same time...
____________
My lucky number is 6219*2^3374198+1
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
A quick success!
On 17 Dec 2020, 12:38:09 UTC, PDW found a prime 10841645805132531666786792405311319418846637043199917731150000^16384+1 (at bmin+5920). Congratulations!
As you can see, bmin is very small. If workunit wasn't timed out and aborted twice before PDW grabbed it, the prime could be found on the first day of the search.
Main goal of project is reached, first GFN-14 MEGA Prime found. Project will be active and new work will be loaded for 3 months since day of the start, until 05 March 2021.
| |
|
|
Congratulations! Nice one.
Not sure if I find it relevant to continue until March when the prime has already been found.
/JeppeSN | |
|
PDW Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 14 Posts: 33 ID: 373199 Credit: 2,690,731,408 RAC: 2,990,933
                     
|
A quick success!
On 17 Dec 2020, 12:38:09 UTC, PDW found a prime 10841645805132531666786792405311319418846637043199917731150000^16384+1 (at bmin+5920). Congratulations!
As you can see, bmin is very small. If workunit wasn't timed out and aborted twice before PDW grabbed it, the prime could be found on the first day of the search.
Main goal of project is reached, first GFN-14 MEGA Prime found. Project will be active and new work will be loaded for 3 months since day of the start, until 05 March 2021.
Thank you :)
3rd time lucky, 1st and 2nd would be kicking themselves if they knew who they were.
That's also my 2021 goals met a year early :D | |
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,531,967,424 RAC: 3,351,164
                               
|
Congrats PDW! Well done :)
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 | |
|
PDW Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 14 Posts: 33 ID: 373199 Credit: 2,690,731,408 RAC: 2,990,933
                     
|
Thank you, there's still that obligatory second one left to find, just waiting for stream to post that it is unlikely to happen first ! | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Not sure if I find it relevant to continue until March when the prime has already been found.
It's for WUProp hours. Although finding an exotic prime (even not a first one) can be a good goal itself too.
| |
|
Frank Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 17 Posts: 27 ID: 964965 Credit: 481,860,486 RAC: 659,477
                       
|
Congratulations PDW! | |
|
|
A quick success!
On 17 Dec 2020, 12:38:09 UTC, PDW found a prime 10841645805132531666786792405311319418846637043199917731150000^16384+1 (at bmin+5920). Congratulations!
As you can see, bmin is very small. If workunit wasn't timed out and aborted twice before PDW grabbed it, the prime could be found on the first day of the search.
Main goal of project is reached, first GFN-14 MEGA Prime found. Project will be active and new work will be loaded for 3 months since day of the start, until 05 March 2021.
Thank you :)
3rd time lucky, 1st and 2nd would be kicking themselves if they knew who they were.
That's also my 2021 goals met a year early :D
I tried to go back and check, but I don't think it was me. I only see one WU in Error state for me, from Dec 5. It was finally completed by Robish, and it was very close to this prime:
10841645805132531666786792405311319418846637043199917731151866^16384+1
____________
Proud member of Team Aggie the Pew
"Wir müssen wissen. Wir werden wissen."
"We must know, we shall know."
- David Hilbert, 1930 | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Thank you, there's still that obligatory second one left to find, just waiting for stream to post that it is unlikely to happen first !
Today, all candidates below bmin+5920 were returned as composites, so a prime found by PDW is an official first/lowest GFN-14 Mega Prime!
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
New prime at bmin+167796!
https://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=131496
Congratulations Pavel!
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
The GFN-14 MEGA prime search is close to planned finish, which will happen on March 05. After this day, no new work will be loaded and project will be shut down after cleanup of all currently loaded and pending tests. The goal of project has been successfully reached, finding 2 mega primes, and few last weeks project was run mostly for peoples who have own goals or need WuProp hours.
GFN-14 MEGA search will be replaced by next project in sequence, GFN-13 MEGA search. It's bmin will be much bigger, but still manageable and, I hope, we will be able to factor resulting b to prove that number is prime (otherwise, we can get mathematically proof only for PRP).
To avoid conflict with PrimeGrid activities (upcoming SoB challenge on March 14 and attempt to finish DIV project before SoB challenge), start of GFN-13 project will be delayed. Estimated start date of new project will be Saturday, March 27. It's possible that GFN-14 MEGA will be completely cleaned up before this point and no any GFN-MEGA tasks will be available for few days. In this case, feel free to join "LLR2 testing" subproject which is currently double-checking suspicious (single-residue) PrimeGrid PPS-MEGA tests and already found one missing PPS-MEGA prime.
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
GFN-13 MEGA will be started March 27, 2021 at 09:00 UTC
There are not much differences between GFN-14 MEGA and GFN-13 MEGA, so I combined all GFN-MEGA projects into single forum thread and wrote common top post.
GFN-13 MEGA task duration and granted credit will be very close to GFN-14 MEGA. The only difference is an application name for app_config.xml - it'll be gfn13_mega
Like in previous projects in series, mutlithreading (via app_config.xml) is highly recommended for most CPUs, but its efficiency is limited to 4 cores (i.e. using more then 4 cores will not give you noticeable boost, and extra cores will mostly stay idle). | |
|
|
GFN-13 MEGA will be started March 27, 2021 at 09:00 UTC
There are not much differences between GFN-14 MEGA and GFN-13 MEGA, so I combined all GFN-MEGA projects into single forum thread and wrote common top post.
GFN-13 MEGA task duration and granted credit will be very close to GFN-14 MEGA. The only difference is an application name for app_config.xml - it'll be gfn13_mega
Like in previous projects in series, mutlithreading (via app_config.xml) is highly recommended for most CPUs, but its efficiency is limited to 4 cores (i.e. using more then 4 cores will not give you noticeable boost, and extra cores will mostly stay idle).
Thank you stream and all other sievers and background people for making these MEGA searches possible!! Its been 3 searches now already!! Hope this one will be as fruitful as any!
____________
My lucky number is 6219*2^3374198+1
| |
|
|
GFN-13 MEGA will be started March 27, 2021 at 09:00 UTC
When I asked, "Would anyone find it interesting to locate the first megaprime for GFN16?", I had not expected this!
The numbers are becoming silly to even write. Should we change notations? For example, the first GFN-14 mega is:10841645805132531666786792405311319418846637043199917731150000^16384 + 1
This can in fact be written shorter if we allow:(floor(10^(999999/16384)) + 5922)^16384 + 1
For GFN-13, such a notation becomes even more economical.
What do you think? The Prime Pages do have a few entries where the function floor is used. Maybe we should ask Caldwell?
/JeppeSN | |
|
|
GFN-13 MEGA will be started March 27, 2021 at 09:00 UTC
There are not much differences between GFN-14 MEGA and GFN-13 MEGA, so I combined all GFN-MEGA projects into single forum thread and wrote common top post.
GFN-13 MEGA task duration and granted credit will be very close to GFN-14 MEGA. The only difference is an application name for app_config.xml - it'll be gfn13_mega
Like in previous projects in series, mutlithreading (via app_config.xml) is highly recommended for most CPUs, but its efficiency is limited to 4 cores (i.e. using more then 4 cores will not give you noticeable boost, and extra cores will mostly stay idle).
Is this correct to make them use 4 cores? I'd been running single core on the 14s, I didn't know you could multithread them (shouldn't it default to 4 if that's best, like the main primegrid ones do?):
<app_version>
<app_name>gfn13_mega</app_name>
<plan_class>mt</plan_class>
<avg_ncpus>4</avg_ncpus>
</app_version> | |
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,531,967,424 RAC: 3,351,164
                               
|
GFN-13 MEGA will be started March 27, 2021 at 09:00 UTC
There are not much differences between GFN-14 MEGA and GFN-13 MEGA, so I combined all GFN-MEGA projects into single forum thread and wrote common top post.
GFN-13 MEGA task duration and granted credit will be very close to GFN-14 MEGA. The only difference is an application name for app_config.xml - it'll be gfn13_mega
Like in previous projects in series, mutlithreading (via app_config.xml) is highly recommended for most CPUs, but its efficiency is limited to 4 cores (i.e. using more then 4 cores will not give you noticeable boost, and extra cores will mostly stay idle).
Is this correct to make them use 4 cores? I'd been running single core on the 14s, I didn't know you could multithread them (shouldn't it default to 4 if that's best, like the main primegrid ones do?):
<app_version>
<app_name>gfn13_mega</app_name>
<plan_class>mt</plan_class>
<avg_ncpus>4</avg_ncpus>
</app_version>
<app_config>
<app_version>
<app_name>gfn13_mega</app_name>
<cmdline>-t 4</cmdline>
<avg_ncpus>4</avg_ncpus>
</app_version>
</app_config>
Yes 4 at most, try this 👍
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 | |
|
|
<app_config>
<app_version>
<app_name>gfn13_mega</app_name>
<cmdline>-t 4</cmdline>
<avg_ncpus>4</avg_ncpus>
</app_version>
</app_config>
Yes 4 at most, try this 👍
Thanks! That works. I accidentally downloaded loads of LLR2 tests, I had to change my prefs on the server as it seems the server prefers I do those.
My Ryzen 3900XT uses an average of a little over 3 cores when asked to use 4, and my Xeon X5650 uses 2.
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
New LLR2 application (LLR2 version 1.1.1 2021-02-04, Boinc version 116) is installed (Linux only, Windows will be updated soon)
This version includes major update of gwnum (version 30.4) so it may contain unpredictable bugs (although certification will catch any possible calculation errors). Please report here if you'll notice something unusual.
New version of gwnum has improved multithreading support - is about 10% faster on GFN-MEGA tests in multithreaded setup. Speed of single-code tests is unchanged. Time per iteration on my home PC (4 cores):
Old version: 930 ms/bit
New version: 825 ms/bit
CPU usage also increased from 3.1 to 3.5 (on 4 cores).
Speed of Proth testing, most probably, was not changed, but I didn't tested much.
Also this version should read checkpoint files for tests with b <> 2 significantly faster. This improves speed of checkpoint compression at the end of test, but only in cases when LLR was restarted and checkpoint data had to be read again from disk. (It'll not affect cases when test was run continuously from beginning to end without interruption, because in this case checkpoint data is kept cached in memory and no need to read anything). A function which reads checkpoint data was completely rewritten by gwnum author, it may contain any new bugs, so please report everything unexpected.
| |
|
|
Congratulations to mmonnin (@PrimeGrid) with the GFN-13 Mega. I hope you answer Stream's messages soon so we can add you and the prime on The PrimePages. /JeppeSN | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Yes, we have a prime! And it's proven. The base was successfully factorized in about a hour using yafu, and prime was proven by pfgw.
It seems to be a first T5K prime for mmonnin. Congratulations! mmonnin, please follow instructions I sent you in GFN Server PM. In short, the best way is just to edit your prime reporting preferences here on PrimeGrid. | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
The GFN-13 MEGA Prime is on T5K.
https://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=132212
| |
|
Yves Gallot Volunteer developer Project scientist Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 12 Posts: 820 ID: 164101 Credit: 305,989,513 RAC: 1,728

|
The GFN-13 MEGA Prime is on T5K.
https://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=132212
Therefore this is 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000094467612695698498...
:-)
Congratulations to Marc Monnin and robish who sieved the range. | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
And we have second GFN-13 MEGA prime! Congratulations PDW!
Since T5K site is currently under maintenance and reporting is broken, prime was not reported yet. All what I can say now is that base was factorized without any problems in a fraction of a second using YAFU, it had few small and one very big factor (109 digits).
| |
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,531,967,424 RAC: 3,351,164
                               
|
Congrats PDW! ...and could be the 1000th Mega recorded on T5K too? ;)
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 | |
|
PDW Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 14 Posts: 33 ID: 373199 Credit: 2,690,731,408 RAC: 2,990,933
                     
|
Thanks.
Could depend on how long T5K stays down and not accepting finds.
I could be wrong but I think the time/date of reporting on T5K dictates the order rather than the time/date actually found ?
If that's the case it might be reported as the 1000th when it wasn't ;) | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Wow! Third GFN-13 MEGA prime, very close to previous one! Congratulations [SG-FC] dingdong! Very lucky find - according to stats, this user currently did only 64 tasks!
Again, base was factorized without problems. It had only two factors, first very small and second everything else.
| |
|
Frank Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 17 Posts: 27 ID: 964965 Credit: 481,860,486 RAC: 659,477
                       
|
Nice! Congratulations all! | |
|
|
Does the "LLR2 testing" subproject do multithreading aswell? | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Does the "LLR2 testing" subproject do multithreading aswell?
Yes, and it's currently recommended (at least until we drop down below n=2M). Application name for app_config.xml is llr2
| |
|
|
Does the "LLR2 testing" subproject do multithreading aswell?
Yes, and it's currently recommended (at least until we drop down below n=2M). Application name for app_config.xml is llr2
Thanks, shall I use 3 threads as per the MEGA?
And is this right?
<app_config>
<app_version>
<app_name>llr2</app_name>
<cmdline>-t 3</cmdline>
<avg_ncpus>3</avg_ncpus>
</app_version>
</app_config> | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Thanks, shall I use 3 threads as per the MEGA?
It depends on CPU. This is a Proth test and it scales well, so Intel is OK with 4 cores. I think that there is no need to go higher - when we finish k=7, tasks will be shorter and multithreading will be less efficient. On Ryzen, number of cores must match chip structure to keep task within single CPU block.
And is this right?
Yes, it's fine. Everything is same for all apps, just change application name.
| |
|
|
Thanks, shall I use 3 threads as per the MEGA?
It depends on CPU. This is a Proth test and it scales well, so Intel is OK with 4 cores. I think that there is no need to go higher - when we finish k=7, tasks will be shorter and multithreading will be less efficient. On Ryzen, number of cores must match chip structure to keep task within single CPU block.
And is this right?
Yes, it's fine. Everything is same for all apps, just change application name.
I can't find Ryzen chip structure anywhere, I've seen it before somewhere. Google is not working! Any mention of "block" gives me water cooling blocks. And structure just gives me general specs and gaming benchmarks. It's a Ryzen 3900XT if anyone knows how they look inside. All my other machines are Intel, from an i5 8600K to an ancient DDR2 thing. | |
|
|
Thanks, shall I use 3 threads as per the MEGA?
It depends on CPU. This is a Proth test and it scales well, so Intel is OK with 4 cores. I think that there is no need to go higher - when we finish k=7, tasks will be shorter and multithreading will be less efficient. On Ryzen, number of cores must match chip structure to keep task within single CPU block.
And is this right?
Yes, it's fine. Everything is same for all apps, just change application name.
I can't find Ryzen chip structure anywhere, I've seen it before somewhere. Google is not working! Any mention of "block" gives me water cooling blocks. And structure just gives me general specs and gaming benchmarks. It's a Ryzen 3900XT if anyone knows how they look inside. All my other machines are Intel, from an i5 8600K to an ancient DDR2 thing.
For the 3900XT, your best throughput right now will still be single-threaded. The second best would probably be 3 threads per task; but only if you are using some software like Affinity Watcher or Process Lasso to keep the tasks on adjacent cores in the CPU. The 3900XT can be thought of as 4 separate CPUs with 3 cores each. They can communicate with each other, but relatively slowly, so if you keep the tasks in each mini-CPU (CCX is the proper term in this case), you will see the best performance for multi-threading LLR tasks, as long as you stay under the 16MB cache limit.
Ultimately, for the 3900XT, for the remainder of the 100,000,000+ tasks on LLR2 Testing on Stream's server; single-threaded is your best bet. | |
|
|
Thanks, shall I use 3 threads as per the MEGA?
It depends on CPU. This is a Proth test and it scales well, so Intel is OK with 4 cores. I think that there is no need to go higher - when we finish k=7, tasks will be shorter and multithreading will be less efficient. On Ryzen, number of cores must match chip structure to keep task within single CPU block.
And is this right?
Yes, it's fine. Everything is same for all apps, just change application name.
I can't find Ryzen chip structure anywhere, I've seen it before somewhere. Google is not working! Any mention of "block" gives me water cooling blocks. And structure just gives me general specs and gaming benchmarks. It's a Ryzen 3900XT if anyone knows how they look inside. All my other machines are Intel, from an i5 8600K to an ancient DDR2 thing.
For the 3900XT, your best throughput right now will still be single-threaded. The second best would probably be 3 threads per task; but only if you are using some software like Affinity Watcher or Process Lasso to keep the tasks on adjacent cores in the CPU. The 3900XT can be thought of as 4 separate CPUs with 3 cores each. They can communicate with each other, but relatively slowly, so if you keep the tasks in each mini-CPU (CCX is the proper term in this case), you will see the best performance for multi-threading LLR tasks, as long as you stay under the 16MB cache limit.
Ultimately, for the 3900XT, for the remainder of the 100,000,000+ tasks on LLR2 Testing on Stream's server; single-threaded is your best bet.
Thanks. Sorry to ask, but can you give me an estimation of what's best for my other machines? They're all Intels. i5 8600K (6 core), Xeon X5650 (6 core + HT) x 2 CPUs per machine, and 3 older ones: N3700 (4 core), Q8400 (4 core), i3 350M (2 core + HT).
Also I'm assuming it's best to turn the HT off?
Do these estimates apply to the MEGA project? | |
|
|
Thanks. Sorry to ask, but can you give me an estimation of what's best for my other machines? They're all Intels. i5 8600K (6 core), Xeon X5650 (6 core + HT) x 2 CPUs per machine, and 3 older ones: N3700 (4 core), Q8400 (4 core), i3 350M (2 core + HT).
Also I'm assuming it's best to turn the HT off?
Do these estimates apply to the MEGA project?
I would guess that the i5-8600k and Xeon X5650 would do best running 3 tasks with 2 cores each, and that the N3700, Q8400 and i3-350M would do best running a single task with all cores, due to their smaller cache sizes.
You can turn hyperthreading off in the BIOS if you want, or you can tell BOINC to only use 50% of the CPUs if you leave hyperthreading on. For the dual Xeon system, it will also be important to use a program like Affinity Watcher or Process Lasso to make sure that the tasks are staying on the same CPU.
These estimates might apply to the MEGA project, but LLR2 Testing is well above that point right now in terms of test size, so they might be a bit off, but they'd probably be close.
Enjoy :) | |
|
|
I would guess that the i5-8600k and Xeon X5650 would do best running 3 tasks with 2 cores each, and that the N3700, Q8400 and i3-350M would do best running a single task with all cores, due to their smaller cache sizes.
You can turn hyperthreading off in the BIOS if you want, or you can tell BOINC to only use 50% of the CPUs if you leave hyperthreading on. For the dual Xeon system, it will also be important to use a program like Affinity Watcher or Process Lasso to make sure that the tasks are staying on the same CPU.
These estimates might apply to the MEGA project, but LLR2 Testing is well above that point right now in terms of test size, so they might be a bit off, but they'd probably be close.
Enjoy :)
Thanks very much. I run other projects, but I've started concentrating on one at a time (well one for CPU and another for GPU sometimes). Some projects don't care if HT is on, most go faster with HT, but Prime goes slower. So I'll set Boinc to 100% or 50% accordingly when I change project.
I'll take your word for it on the number of cores per task for each computer, as I don't feel like running a load of tests all day! | |
|
|
Since T5K site is currently under maintenance and reporting is broken, prime was not reported yet.
Everything seems to be working again. | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Two pending primes reported, status page updated - it'll now show links to T5K pages.
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Another prime found! What a productive N, 4 primes in just a 350K range! (all previous searches were stopped with just two primes)
Congratulations LCB001!
| |
|
Frank Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 17 Posts: 27 ID: 964965 Credit: 481,860,486 RAC: 659,477
                       
|
Nice one! | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
And we have a fifth prime! Unbelievable! Congratulations PDW, it's a his second prime in GFN-13-MEGA project!
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Three months passed, no new work will be loaded, cleanup of remaining work started. Currently work is loaded up to bmin+600000, and about 7000 tasks left. Participation is varying, with current rates cleanup may take from 3 to 6 weeks.
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
GFN-13 MEGA is coming to the end. About 4 days of new work left at current rate. After that, only occasional resent tasks will be available.
Next project, GFN-12 MEGA, will be started shortly after the end of PrimeGrid challenge. Exact date will be announced later.
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
We're ready to continue!
GFN-12 MEGA will be started on Monday, July 26, at 09:00 UTC.
It should be not much difference on client side. All GFN-MEGA tasks have same FFT size and same runtime. Multithreading is recommended.
It's not decided yet, but this project can be last in the series. To prove found number as a prime, we must factorize 'b'. In GFN-12 MEGA, 'b' is 245 digits long. Factorizing such number will be quite a challenge. 'b' for GFN-11 MEGA will be two times longer.
| |
|
|
Looking forward to this next search. Thanks for the announcement stream.
____________
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Well, it didn't take long...
First GFN-12 MEGA prime found by PDW!
(Not surprised at all, considering that he is #1 in charts :-)
Congratulations!
Additional information will be posted later, when I'll finish factorization of the base and verification of the prime.
| |
|
|
It sounds like you believe the factorization of b will finish. /JeppeSN
Edit: I see it is submitted as https://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=132584.
Edit 2: Also see the b is submitted as http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000002638706977. | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
It sounds like you believe the factorization of b will finish.
May be I was very lucky, but it took only few minutes before two last factors (including huge one) popped out during one of ECM passes of YAFU, and factorization was complete. I didn't believed it first, but tested big number and it was prime. Well, so be it.
I had more problems with few GFN-13-MEGA b's, where nothing was found during ECM and trivial stages, so YAFU used quadratic sieve, which took few hours.
Edit 2: Also see the b is submitted as http://factordb.com/index.php?id=1100000002638706977.
Hmm... Not me.
| |
|
|
If we are unlucky and hit a base with two prime factors over 100 decimal digits, then it will be extremely hard to factor. I think it was lucky that second-largest prime factor had no more than 29 digits. /JeppeSN | |
|
Yves Gallot Volunteer developer Project scientist Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 12 Posts: 820 ID: 164101 Credit: 305,989,513 RAC: 1,728

|
If we are unlucky and hit a base with two prime factors over 100 decimal digits, then it will be extremely hard to factor. I think it was lucky that second-largest prime factor had no more than 29 digits. /JeppeSN
The probabilities can be computed with the Dickman function.
For the largest prime factor we have alpha = log(1617...0401)/log(b) ~ 0.861. The probability that alpha >= 0.861 is about 15%.
For the second largest prime factor we have alpha = log(39002209166721466412601474313)/log(b) ~ 0.136. The probability that alpha <= 0.136 is about 28.4%. | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
And second prime, at bmin+136684, was found by robish. Congratulations with this well-deserved discovery! (Robish is #2 in project stats).
No problem with factorization again - less then two seconds of ECM testing. Are we still extremely lucky?
| |
|
|
This time the second-largest prime factor has only 11 digits. /JeppeSN | |
|
Bur Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Feb 20 Posts: 515 ID: 1241833 Credit: 414,524,889 RAC: 4,016
                
|
How long would the primality test take if the base isn't factored?
With numbers that size it isn't unlikely that you're left with a 190 or more digit co-factor that isn't acessible by ECM. And NFS would take more than a year on a single computer.
On the other hand, I think highly composite bases are more likely to produce a prime within a given range. On yet another hand, they could have a lot of small, 10 digit factors and still have a 210 digit co-factor that's very hard to factor.
____________
1281979 * 2^485014 + 1 is prime ... no further hits up to: n = 5,700,000 | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
The third prime is found! Congratulations PDW (again :)
Factorization and verification is still in progress. The prime will be visible when done (or considered to be impossible)
| |
|
|
NM. I see my answer is in the OP. D'oh!
____________
Reno, NV
| |
|
|
The third prime is found! Congratulations PDW (again :)
Factorization and verification is still in progress. The prime will be visible when done (or considered to be impossible)
Over eight days have passed? Maybe we really found a prime whose base is "impossible" to factor sufficiently? /JeppeSN | |
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,531,967,424 RAC: 3,351,164
                               
|
The third prime is found! Congratulations PDW (again :)
Factorization and verification is still in progress. The prime will be visible when done (or considered to be impossible)
Over eight days have passed? Maybe we really found a prime whose base is "impossible" to factor sufficiently? /JeppeSN
I was wondering the same thing 🤔
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Over eight days have passed? Maybe we really found a prime whose base is "impossible" to factor sufficiently?
Yes, this beast is hard.
After preliminary factorization and some quick ECM, it ended up with 225-digits composite.
Pavel attacked it with his new ECM factorization program, but no luck yet.
I'm also running it in background using YAFU ECM, it's slow because YAFU is running ECM single-threaded, and I didn't understand is it possible to make it multithreaded or not. Anyway, YAFU (if I understood its output correctly) should reach optimal point for 50-digits factor within next week.
08/25/21 21:35:25 v1.34.5 @ ubuntu18, current ECM pretesting depth: 40.63
08/25/21 21:35:25 v1.34.5 @ ubuntu18, scheduled 4480 curves at B1=11000000 toward target pretesting depth of 69.23
08/28/21 05:40:57 v1.34.5 @ ubuntu18, Finished 4480 curves using Lenstra ECM method on C225 input, B1=11M, B2=gmp-ecm default
08/28/21 05:40:57 v1.34.5 @ ubuntu18, current ECM pretesting depth: 45.73
08/28/21 05:40:57 v1.34.5 @ ubuntu18, scheduled 7553 curves at B1=43000000 toward target pretesting depth of 69.23
As far I understand, on each step it advanced "pretesting depth" by 5 digits and schedules optimal set of curves (choosing new B1 and number of curves) for this point. It seems that even next step of 55 digits will require many weeks on single thread, and target depth of 69 digits is far out of reach.
I don't know how deep Pavel get (and is it applicable to his method or not).
I tried to learn NFS, and have cado-nfs server up and running. Everything is on default settings, using 230-digits profile supplied with cado. Look like I can build a polynomial in reasonable time even with my office computers, but have no idea yet how long sieving phase will take.
| |
|
|
Exciting.
I think we need to factor at least 33%, so a composite cofactor can have at most ~163 digits (given that the full b is 245 digits). If the current cofactor is 225 digits, we need to shave off about 62 digits.
I guess someone somewhere would know of a way to attack the factorization of a single number with a distributed approach (maybe even BOINC). There have been famous numbers, including those from the RSA challenge, which people have wanted to factor.
/JeppeSN | |
|
Nick  Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 11 Posts: 2298 ID: 105020 Credit: 8,437,065,522 RAC: 6,813,916
                            
|
Exciting.
I think we need to factor at least 33%, so a composite cofactor can have at most ~163 digits (given that the full b is 245 digits). If the current cofactor is 225 digits, we need to shave off about 62 digits.
I guess someone somewhere would know of a way to attack the factorization of a single number with a distributed approach (maybe even BOINC). There have been famous numbers, including those from the RSA challenge, which people have wanted to factor.
/JeppeSN
Isn't this why RSA cryptography works?
Only with sheer brute force you can factorise? | |
|
|
Isn't this why RSA cryptography works?
Only with sheer brute force you can factorise?
Yes, RSA is secure because the semiprimes (public keys) are so huge that nobody knows how to factor them.
For the 225-digit number we ran into here, we do not know if it is a semiprime (has exactly two prime factors) or not. And if it is a semiprime, we do not know if one factor is much much smaller than the other. Therefore, we do not know how hard it will be to break down. For RSA, I guess, once you know how large the key is, you know more or less how hard it will be to factor (assuming you know what factorization tools you possess).
/JeppeSN | |
|
Nick  Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 11 Posts: 2298 ID: 105020 Credit: 8,437,065,522 RAC: 6,813,916
                            
|
And if it is a semiprime, we do not know if one factor is much much smaller than the other. Therefore, we do not know how hard it will be to break down.
/JeppeSN
It must make a difference that semiprimes be nearly the same size for better cryptography purposes?
(Thankyou for your defn of semiprimes - only 2 primes - do the primes need to be only used once? I mean as an example 2 x 3 vs 2 x 2 x 3) | |
|
|
(Thankyou for your defn of semiprimes - only 2 primes - do the primes need to be only used once? I mean as an example 2 x 3 vs 2 x 2 x 3)
The definition says two primes when counted with multiplicity. So 2×3 and 2×2 and 3×3 would all be semiprimes, but 2×2×3 and 2×3×3 are not since for this purpose they have three prime factors (2, 2, 3; respectively 2, 3, 3).
The semiprimes used in RSA must have distinct prime factors. The two primes should not be extremely close to each other (then people could guess them, starting from the square root of the semiprime).
/JeppeSN | |
|
Nick  Send message
Joined: 11 Jul 11 Posts: 2298 ID: 105020 Credit: 8,437,065,522 RAC: 6,813,916
                            
|
(Thankyou for your defn of semiprimes - only 2 primes - do the primes need to be only used once? I mean as an example 2 x 3 vs 2 x 2 x 3)
The definition says two primes when counted with multiplicity. So 2×3 and 2×2 and 3×3 would all be semiprimes, but 2×2×3 and 2×3×3 are not since for this purpose they have three prime factors (2, 2, 3; respectively 2, 3, 3).
The semiprimes used in RSA must have distinct prime factors. The two primes should not be extremely close to each other (then people could guess them, starting from the square root of the semiprime).
/JeppeSN
Yes I think I may understand why you wouldn't choose 2 primes close together for RSA.
I need more confirmation as what a semi-prime is.
Right now, I think it would be only 2 primes multiplied together and they can be the same prime? Sorry this probably is dogged stupidity. | |
|
|
(Thankyou for your defn of semiprimes - only 2 primes - do the primes need to be only used once? I mean as an example 2 x 3 vs 2 x 2 x 3)
The definition says two primes when counted with multiplicity. So 2×3 and 2×2 and 3×3 would all be semiprimes, but 2×2×3 and 2×3×3 are not since for this purpose they have three prime factors (2, 2, 3; respectively 2, 3, 3).
The semiprimes used in RSA must have distinct prime factors. The two primes should not be extremely close to each other (then people could guess them, starting from the square root of the semiprime).
/JeppeSN
Yes I think I may understand why you wouldn't choose 2 primes close together for RSA.
I need more confirmation as what a semi-prime is.
Right now, I think it would be only 2 primes multiplied together and they can be the same prime? Sorry this probably is dogged stupidity.
You are correct. Take any two prime numbers, multiply them, and poof! Semiprime.
____________
Eating more cheese on Thursdays. | |
|
|
I have several GFN-12 MEGA Prime task results that won't upload. A batch from 20 August has been stuck for almost a week. I tried crunching a new batch yesterday to "flush them through," but now those results are stuck too:
15756 PRIVATE GFN SERVER 9/5/2021 4:32:06 PM Started upload of llr2_1717963_qyn8br_765778086_r1399372121_7
15757 PRIVATE GFN SERVER 9/5/2021 4:32:06 PM Started upload of llr2_1717963_qyn8br_765778086_r1399372121_8
15758 PRIVATE GFN SERVER 9/5/2021 4:32:07 PM Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
15759 PRIVATE GFN SERVER 9/5/2021 4:32:07 PM Temporarily failed upload of llr2_1717963_qyn8br_765778086_r1399372121_7: transient HTTP error
15760 PRIVATE GFN SERVER 9/5/2021 4:32:07 PM Backing off 05:00:33 on upload of llr2_1717963_qyn8br_765778086_r1399372121_7
Any clue as to why I can connect to download WUs, but not connect to upload results?
____________
Proud member of Team Aggie the Pew
"Wir müssen wissen. Wir werden wissen."
"We must know, we shall know."
- David Hilbert, 1930 | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
I have several GFN-12 MEGA Prime task results that won't upload. A batch from 20 August has been stuck for almost a week. I tried crunching a new batch yesterday to "flush them through," but now those results are stuck too:
15756 PRIVATE GFN SERVER 9/5/2021 4:32:06 PM Started upload of llr2_1717963_qyn8br_765778086_r1399372121_7
15757 PRIVATE GFN SERVER 9/5/2021 4:32:06 PM Started upload of llr2_1717963_qyn8br_765778086_r1399372121_8
15758 PRIVATE GFN SERVER 9/5/2021 4:32:07 PM Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
15759 PRIVATE GFN SERVER 9/5/2021 4:32:07 PM Temporarily failed upload of llr2_1717963_qyn8br_765778086_r1399372121_7: transient HTTP error
15760 PRIVATE GFN SERVER 9/5/2021 4:32:07 PM Backing off 05:00:33 on upload of llr2_1717963_qyn8br_765778086_r1399372121_7
[Sun Sep 05 08:08:57.054231 2021] [fcgid:warn] [pid 29890:tid 139938397898496] (104)Connection reset by peer: [client 79.140.###.###:18873] mod_fcgid: can't get data from http client
It seems to be a problem in Internet link between you and me only - there are only about 10 similar error messages in Apache logs per 24 hours. There were few talks about similar problems in previous threads (starting from GFN16-MEGA search). Their reasons were very complicated errors in ISP equipment configuration or even glitches in interconnections between different countries. Unless something was changed in your home or office router recently, not much can be done on user side. A common confirmed reason was too small MTU somewhere on the path between client and my server, and blocking of ICMP packets (they're required for automatic MTU selection, but some ISP/routers/antivirus could block them for absurd "security").
After that discussion, I reduced MSS (maximum TCP packet size on my server) to 1400 to let data pass through shortened MTU, it fixed all problems at that time. Now I reduced MSS to 1300, lets see if it fixes the problem. If yes, something in really broken on the way.
Any clue as to why I can connect to download WUs, but not connect to upload results?
These types of configuration errors are often missed by ISP / office sysadmins because most users are only downloading pages. During web browsing, they're rarely sending something large then a kilobyte. The problem exposes when user is uploading more then 1.5 Kbytes of data in one piece. Such packet will never reach the server, and server gives up with timeout or other error. | |
|
|
I have several GFN-12 MEGA Prime task results that won't upload. A batch from 20 August has been stuck for almost a week. I tried crunching a new batch yesterday to "flush them through," but now those results are stuck too:
15756 PRIVATE GFN SERVER 9/5/2021 4:32:06 PM Started upload of llr2_1717963_qyn8br_765778086_r1399372121_7
15757 PRIVATE GFN SERVER 9/5/2021 4:32:06 PM Started upload of llr2_1717963_qyn8br_765778086_r1399372121_8
15758 PRIVATE GFN SERVER 9/5/2021 4:32:07 PM Project communication failed: attempting access to reference site
15759 PRIVATE GFN SERVER 9/5/2021 4:32:07 PM Temporarily failed upload of llr2_1717963_qyn8br_765778086_r1399372121_7: transient HTTP error
15760 PRIVATE GFN SERVER 9/5/2021 4:32:07 PM Backing off 05:00:33 on upload of llr2_1717963_qyn8br_765778086_r1399372121_7
[Sun Sep 05 08:08:57.054231 2021] [fcgid:warn] [pid 29890:tid 139938397898496] (104)Connection reset by peer: [client 79.140.###.###:18873] mod_fcgid: can't get data from http client
It seems to be a problem in Internet link between you and me only - there are only about 10 similar error messages in Apache logs per 24 hours. There were few talks about similar problems in previous threads (starting from GFN16-MEGA search). Their reasons were very complicated errors in ISP equipment configuration or even glitches in interconnections between different countries. Unless something was changed in your home or office router recently, not much can be done on user side. A common confirmed reason was too small MTU somewhere on the path between client and my server, and blocking of ICMP packets (they're required for automatic MTU selection, but some ISP/routers/antivirus could block them for absurd "security").
After that discussion, I reduced MSS (maximum TCP packet size on my server) to 1400 to let data pass through shortened MTU, it fixed all problems at that time. Now I reduced MSS to 1300, lets see if it fixes the problem. If yes, something in really broken on the way.
Any clue as to why I can connect to download WUs, but not connect to upload results?
These types of configuration errors are often missed by ISP / office sysadmins because most users are only downloading pages. During web browsing, they're rarely sending something large then a kilobyte. The problem exposes when user is uploading more then 1.5 Kbytes of data in one piece. Such packet will never reach the server, and server gives up with timeout or other error.
I am sorry, it turns out I was the problem.
I manage this host through BoincTasks, but I decided to remote into the actual host so that I could try rebooting it. There I saw that Symantec Network Threat Protection was actually blocking the traffic every time BOINC tried to upload the results to the server...
I disabled Symantec, and the WUs all uploaded OK.
____________
Proud member of Team Aggie the Pew
"Wir müssen wissen. Wir werden wissen."
"We must know, we shall know."
- David Hilbert, 1930 | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Fourth prime found by Dr Who Fan! Congratulations! Incredible luck, considering that he did only 93 tasks at the moment I'm writing this post.
The base resisted quick factorization, but I'll do more ECM testing at least for a week.
| |
|
|
Fourth prime found by Dr Who Fan! Congratulations! Incredible luck, considering that he did only 93 tasks at the moment I'm writing this post.
The base resisted quick factorization, but I'll do more ECM testing at least for a week.
Thanks! Must be my lucky day today :)
____________
| |
|
|
Nice. Not sure what I like more: bases that can be factored, or bases that cannot be factored. /JeppeSN | |
|
Bur Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Feb 20 Posts: 515 ID: 1241833 Credit: 414,524,889 RAC: 4,016
                
|
I'm also running it in background using YAFU ECM, it's slow because YAFU is running ECM single-threaded, and I didn't understand is it possible to make it multithreaded or not. Anyway, YAFU (if I understood its output correctly) should reach optimal point for 50-digits factor within next week. The -threads n argument does that, where n is number of threads. You can also add that in yafu.ini.
I tried to learn NFS, and have cado-nfs server up and running. Everything is on default settings, using 230-digits profile supplied with cado. Look like I can build a polynomial in reasonable time even with my office computers, but have no idea yet how long sieving phase will take. It's impossible on a single computer. My i9-10900 10 cores takes about 14 days for sieving for a 167 digits number. And sieving time doubles approximately every 5 digits. RSA-250 was only recently factored by a team with access to university level computing power.
230 digits is really a lot for amateurs, even with distributed NFS as NFS@home offers. I don't know if they ever did something that big. The problem is also in the linear algebra part which cannot efficiently be distributed and requires a lot of memory. It alone might take weeks even on specialized equipment.
You could post the problem at the mersenneforum Factoring subforum, there are a lot of knowledgable users there with the ressources to help factoring it. I am pretty sure they's be excited to help with these numbers. You will need someone who is able to set the right parameters for that search as well.
____________
1281979 * 2^485014 + 1 is prime ... no further hits up to: n = 5,700,000 | |
|
|
230 digits is really a lot for amateurs,
In the worst case where the second-largest prime factor is huge (can be up to 115 digits), it is hard! But of course the bases b we run into here, might be quite easy; we do not know in advance (unlike the situation where you try to break an RSA key). /JeppeSN
| |
|
Bur Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Feb 20 Posts: 515 ID: 1241833 Credit: 414,524,889 RAC: 4,016
                
|
Yes, I meant when ECM was finished without success and NFS is required. You can't do that on your own. There is btw also a distributed project for ECM (yoyo@home).
I'd really go ahead and post those numbers at mersenneforum, they'd surely like to give that a try. Though I'm not sure if some of those numbers are too large anyway.
____________
1281979 * 2^485014 + 1 is prime ... no further hits up to: n = 5,700,000 | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Yes, I meant when ECM was finished without success and NFS is required. You can't do that on your own. There is btw also a distributed project for ECM (yoyo@home).
Yes I see. I read a bit about how difficult RSA-768 factoring was (in particular, an incredible amount of memory required on server for linear algebra part). Our numbers are less then 768 bits but not much, one is C225 and second is C233.
I'd really go ahead and post those numbers at mersenneforum, they'd surely like to give that a try. Though I'm not sure if some of those numbers are too large anyway.
Me and Pavel will try to push ECM up to "optimal point" for 55 digits - either testing 21000 GMP-ECM curves at B1=110M (numbers chosen according to GMP-ECM predictions), either using Pavel's software up to similar testing depth. If nothing will be found, primes will be published and the problem will be open for everybody. First candidate (C225) is already tested up to 50 digits "optimal point" with YAFU, where it gave up and suggested to switch to NFS.
09/11/21 21:22:07 v1.34.5 @ ubuntu18, Finished 7553 curves using Lenstra ECM method on C225 input, B1=43M, B2=gmp-ecm default
09/11/21 21:22:07 v1.34.5 @ ubuntu18, final ECM pretested depth: 50.86
Second candidate (C233) received only minor YAFU ECM (up to 45 digits). I'm playing with Pavel's software on it.
| |
|
|
Yes, I meant when ECM was finished without success and NFS is required. You can't do that on your own. There is btw also a distributed project for ECM (yoyo@home).
Yes I see. I read a bit about how difficult RSA-768 factoring was (in particular, an incredible amount of memory required on server for linear algebra part). Our numbers are less then 768 bits but not much, one is C225 and second is C233.
I'd really go ahead and post those numbers at mersenneforum, they'd surely like to give that a try. Though I'm not sure if some of those numbers are too large anyway.
Me and Pavel will try to push ECM up to "optimal point" for 55 digits - either testing 21000 GMP-ECM curves at B1=110M (numbers chosen according to GMP-ECM predictions), either using Pavel's software up to similar testing depth. If nothing will be found, primes will be published and the problem will be open for everybody. First candidate (C225) is already tested up to 50 digits "optimal point" with YAFU, where it gave up and suggested to switch to NFS.
Sorry if I am repeating myself, but there is a difference between RSA factoring and factoring of our number, because with RSA one knows in advance that the number consist of exactly two very large primes, whereas with our numbers one knows less.
Can anyone say if that makes a difference for the strategy you would use? Clearly, for an RSA number with 232 digits, you are not really searching for a 45-digit or 50-digits factor.
Also, we do not necessarily need a full factorization of our C225. If it happened to be C225 = P65*P75*P85, say, then it would be sufficient, for our purpose, to find the small factor, i.e. be able to write C225 = P65*C160, and we would have factored over 33% of the original 245-digit b.
However, a 50-digit or 55-digit factor (the ECM limits you mentioned) alone would not suffice, in case the cofactor is still composite :-(
/JeppeSN | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Sorry if I am repeating myself, but there is a difference between RSA factoring and factoring of our number, because with RSA one knows in advance that the number consist of exactly two very large primes, whereas with our numbers one knows less.
Can anyone say if that makes a difference for the strategy you would use?
I think there is no difference for NFS. It's "all or nothing" method - it'll reveal all factors at once in given time. But resourced required for numbers of our size are too high.
Also, we do not necessarily need a full factorization of our C225. If it happened to be C225 = P65*P75*P85, say, then it would be sufficient, for our purpose, to find the small factor, i.e. be able to write C225 = P65*C160, and we would have factored over 33% of the original 245-digit b.
Correct, but we must be very very lucky to find a P65 with current ECM settings and required computing power also grows exponentially when you're adjusting ECM setting for higher expected number of digits.
However, a 50-digit or 55-digit factor (the ECM limits you mentioned) alone would not suffice, in case the cofactor is still composite :-(
Really, this IS a current strategy - if a factor between 50-55 digits will be found, remaining C170 is a manageable target for NFS.
| |
|
PDW Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 14 Posts: 33 ID: 373199 Credit: 2,690,731,408 RAC: 2,990,933
                     
|
The server has been unreachable for a couple of hours, any idea when it will be back please ? | |
|
|
Project web site is reachable but just about everything on server status page is RED.
Server status
Task data as of 21 Sep 2021, 12:08:52 UTC
Program Host Status
Download server boincvm.proxyma.ru Running
Upload server boincvm.proxyma.ru Running
Scheduler boinc-server Not Running
feeder boinc-server Not Running
transitioner boinc-server Not Running
file_deleter boinc-server Not Running
genefer_validator (gfn1x_small) boinc-server Not Running
genefer_validator (llr2) boinc-server Not Running
genefer_validator (gfn12_mega) boinc-server Not Running
genefer_assimilator_12 (gfn1x_small) boinc-server Not Running
genefer_assimilator (gfn12_mega) boinc-server Not Running
genefer_assimilator (llr2) boinc-server Not Running
db_purge (gfn1x_small) boinc-server Not Running
db_purge (llr2) boinc-server Not Running
db_purge (gfn12_mega) boinc-server Not Running
run_in_ops_exec ./trickle_handler.php boinc-server Not Running
llr2_cluster_server boinc-server Not Running
____________
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
The server has been unreachable for a couple of hours, any idea when it will be back please ?
No power in the building for few hours (planned maintenance of city electricity network)
Project web site is reachable but just about everything on server status page is RED.
Boinc was "turned off" before shutdown, it was some delay before I turned it back on (it must be done manually).
| |
|
|
stream, Thank for the update. All appears to be alive & well again. | |
|
PDW Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 14 Posts: 33 ID: 373199 Credit: 2,690,731,408 RAC: 2,990,933
                     
|
Me and Pavel will try to push ECM up to "optimal point" for 55 digits - either testing 21000 GMP-ECM curves at B1=110M (numbers chosen according to GMP-ECM predictions), either using Pavel's software up to similar testing depth. If nothing will be found, primes will be published and the problem will be open for everybody. First candidate (C225) is already tested up to 50 digits "optimal point" with YAFU, where it gave up and suggested to switch to NFS.
Second candidate (C233) received only minor YAFU ECM (up to 45 digits). I'm playing with Pavel's software on it.
Still not there yet ? | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Me and Pavel will try to push ECM up to "optimal point" for 55 digits - either testing 21000 GMP-ECM curves at B1=110M (numbers chosen according to GMP-ECM predictions), either using Pavel's software up to similar testing depth. If nothing will be found, primes will be published and the problem will be open for everybody. First candidate (C225) is already tested up to 50 digits "optimal point" with YAFU, where it gave up and suggested to switch to NFS.
Second candidate (C233) received only minor YAFU ECM (up to 45 digits). I'm playing with Pavel's software on it.
Still not there yet ?
No luck with second number yet. It was ECM-tested up to 50 digits but nothing was found. So same policy (as with first number) will be applied - it'll be tested up to 55 digits with GMP-ECM (21000 curves at B1=110M), then both prime and cofactor will be opened for public. Unfortunately, these two primes cannot be submitted to T5K because technically, they're not proven as primes (only as PRP).
I'm running this slowly in background on one 4-cores box, so ECM of each number will require about 20 days. First number is more then half-way done.
| |
|
PDW Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 14 Posts: 33 ID: 373199 Credit: 2,690,731,408 RAC: 2,990,933
                     
|
Okay, thanks for the update and explanation.
I'll go and change my settings to get easier ones. | |
|
|
If we are unlucky and hit a base with two prime factors over 100 decimal digits, then it will be extremely hard to factor. I think it was lucky that second-largest prime factor had no more than 29 digits. /JeppeSN
The probabilities can be computed with the Dickman function.
For the largest prime factor we have alpha = log(1617...0401)/log(b) ~ 0.861. The probability that alpha >= 0.861 is about 15%.
For the second largest prime factor we have alpha = log(39002209166721466412601474313)/log(b) ~ 0.136. The probability that alpha <= 0.136 is about 28.4%.
OK, status by now:
First GFN-12 mega and second GFN-12 mega were both very easy to prove.
Third GFN-12 mega and fourth GFN-12 mega are both hard to prove because by chance their b are hard to factor sufficiently deeply.
Will the fifth GFN-12 mega be found before the subproject ends?
/JeppeSN | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Another maintenance of power lines scheduled tomorrow, September 27. The server will be offline for few hours.
Power company don't giving us exact timing details, all works will be "during a work day" - from 05:30 UTC to 15:00 UTC, but usually power is cut for much shorter internal.
| |
|
PDW Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 14 Posts: 33 ID: 373199 Credit: 2,690,731,408 RAC: 2,990,933
                     
|
Another maintenance of power lines scheduled tomorrow, September 27. The server will be offline for few hours.
Power company don't giving us exact timing details, all works will be "during a work day" - from 05:30 UTC to 15:00 UTC, but usually power is cut for much shorter internal.
Thanks, I'll go back to stocking up. | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
The maintenance will be continued tomorrow, September 28. Look like electric company worked on another cable today (there are two big cables which need mainteance) - the power in the offices was stable, but ISP equipment on the roof of our building was offline for few hours. So expecting some disruptions tomorrow.
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
ECM testing of first unproven prime is finished. No factors up to 55 digits were found. The prime is now open. First post updated, unfactorized part published (factoring this number is a separate open public problem now).
| |
|
Frank Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 17 Posts: 27 ID: 964965 Credit: 481,860,486 RAC: 659,477
                       
|
Is it an idea to post it to prplist instead?
For partial factorization see factordb | |
|
|
Is it an idea to post it to prplist instead?
Maybe we should "advertise" the number first, since there is some possibility that someone with huge computing power could finish it? Has this been mentioned elsewhere, like on Mersenneforum.org?
This could be a collective effort now, if enough people are interested and can find out a way to set up a distributed project.
Many numbers in PRP Top require factoring numbers with many thousand digits, which is much more "impossible" than factoring our 225-digit number.
For partial factorization see factordb
That is nice. People will add new factors there, if any are ever found.
/JeppeSN | |
|
|
Has any decision been made regarding GFN-11 MEGA?
____________
Werinbert is not prime... or PRPnet keeps telling me so.
Badge score: 2x3 + 5x4 + 5x5 + 5x7 + 1x9 + 3x10 = 125 | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Has any decision been made regarding GFN-11 MEGA?
I think yes. Mostly because peoples like to crunch new applications for WuProp badges. Also we'll have some results as examples for this kind of primes. But cons are also great:
- Results are expected to be non-reportable PRP. We failed to factorize half of GFN-12 MEGA bases (245 digits). It'll be much worse with GFN-11 bases which will be 489 digits. ECM can find only 55-digits factors in reasonable time (1 month on standard 4-core PC). We must be extremely lucky to find a base which either consist of small factors only either have one extremely large prime factor (so each remaining part will not exceed 55 digits).
- I have to rewrite few things on my server. Earlier, everything was controlled from LLR command line and my work to setup new project was just to copy/paste some lines changing necessary constants. GFN-11 MEGA candidates will exceed LLR(2) command line limit of 300 characters in the tested expression, so I have to write new file-based work generation and task distribution system for this project (and check that nothing will overflow inside LLR even in this case). | |
|
Ravi FernandoProject administrator Volunteer tester Project scientist Send message
Joined: 21 Mar 19 Posts: 211 ID: 1108183 Credit: 13,860,596 RAC: 6,886
              
|
It'll be much worse with GFN-11 bases which will be 353 digits.
Shouldn't that be 489? | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
It'll be much worse with GFN-11 bases which will be 353 digits.
Shouldn't that be 489?
Yes. I've edited the post.
| |
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,531,967,424 RAC: 3,351,164
                               
|
- I have to rewrite few things on my server. Earlier, everything was controlled from LLR command line and my work to setup new project was just to copy/paste some lines changing necessary constants. GFN-11 MEGA candidates will exceed LLR(2) command line limit of 300 characters in the tested expression, so I have to write new file-based work generation and task distribution system for this project (and check that nothing will overflow inside LLR even in this case).
Stream,
I got a GFN11Mega running at the command line with LLR2
Maybe the 300 limit was extended but not documented?
llr2_win64_201114.exe -oGerbicz=1 -q"190880568043619196745858710869199340262739739165297541288860261919231300520637026081673196260251764084730572923821680257242954091061185112017397561405538291724020883036948742802421424996617325672792384599992465072078363947893924389415971637971808774155203727981089411000649170854300413901434140444900342387223814335592581094310231761182487216832411502606252990491877497417433401295278390481355152602752881480793450415494981527508763542994910431110043260406153080710064791100275825917011840^2048+1" -d -t1
Base factorized as : 2^7*5*13*223*76448451695393*360292159509743250046414411104393113659377537099329061510561904751085784963368426014952343384488383211538269463167694707150019914453257701309563655813016506741265922099410871669970565712862792499387464631940040814503253292070181164758778477342522798569202987507241292499215977940628606675366444024963699698944937117587210697409484783201301858383395120179760015678309247406857667378816656707067776153709996940043021241578835873020753397069984675534265873339928399
Base prime factor(s) taken : 360292159509743250046414411104393113659377537099329061510561904751085784963368426014952343384488383211538269463167694707150019914453257701309563655813016506741265922099410871669970565712862792499387464631940040814503253292070181164758778477342522798569202987507241292499215977940628606675366444024963699698944937117587210697409484783201301858383395120179760015678309247406857667378816656707067776153709996940043021241578835873020753397069984675534265873339928399
Resuming N-1 prime test of 190880568043619196745858710869199340262739739165297541288860261919231300520637026081673196260251764084730572923821680257242954091061185112017397561405538291724020883036948742802421424996617325672792384599992465072078363947893924389415971637971808774155203727981089411000649170854300413901434140444900342387223814335592581094310231761182487216832411502606252990491877497417433401295278390481355152602752881480793450415494981527508763542994910431110043260406153080710064791100275825917011840^2048+1 at bit 889 [0.02%]
Using generic reduction FMA3 FFT length 336K, Pass1=448, Pass2=768, clm=4, a = 3
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
I got a GFN11Mega running at the command line with LLR2
Maybe the 300 limit was extended but not documented?
It will not refuse such test, it has no error checking at all and just silently overrides adjacent memory regions.
To be exact, each component of the test (k, b, n, c) should not exceed 299 characters. So whole test expression can be longer but it'll not help us because we have very long b.
| |
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,531,967,424 RAC: 3,351,164
                               
|
I got a GFN11Mega running at the command line with LLR2
Maybe the 300 limit was extended but not documented?
It will not refuse such test, it has no error checking at all and just silently overrides adjacent memory regions.
To be exact, each component of the test (k, b, n, c) should not exceed 299 characters. So whole test expression can be longer but it'll not help us because we have very long b.
Ah ok thanks, I just expected an error message when trying to run it.
Over-riding adjacent memory regions is worrying to say the least. 😞
Cheers
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 | |
|
|
Over-writing adjacent memory regions is worrying to say the least. 😞
Is that how semi-primes are born?
____________
Werinbert is not prime... or PRPnet keeps telling me so.
Badge score: 2x3 + 5x4 + 5x5 + 5x7 + 1x9 + 3x10 = 125 | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
GFN-12 Mega is coming to the end.
2021-10-26: No new work will be loaded after this date
And today is October 28. Only about 500 tasks are currently unsent, and it'll be over in a day or two.
Also, second unreported prime is now open (no luck with ECM).
| |
|
|
Also, second unreported prime is now open (no luck with ECM).
Yes, b_min + 377416 is on factordb.com. /JeppeSN | |
|
|
As suggested above, i made a thread on Mersenneforum.org to try to make people there interested in attacking the two hard b from GFN-12 Mega. /JeppeSN | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
GFN-12 MEGA is finished!
Last task returned today.
Honestly, I expected that fifth prime will eventually pop up (a gap between last prime and leading edge is too high) but no luck. So we finished with 4 primes, two of them were successfully confirmed (base factorized) and reported.
GFN-11 MEGA is theoretically possible, but it'll require new LLR program which will be released soon and server software update. So no exact dates yet, stay tuned for updates in this thread!
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
GFN-11 MEGA is ready to go.
The last project in GFN-MEGA series, GFN-11 MEGA, will be started March 02, at 09:00 UTC.
The "b" in this project will be huge (489 digits). It'll be almost impossible to factorize to prove the number as true prime. It can be possible that all our finding will stay in PRP (probable prime) state. But lets hope for the best. At least, it'll be new WuProp application for those who is interested.
Everything else should be same as in previous projects. See top post for technical details. Please pay attention on how to setup multithreaded LLR, it significantly improves performance on most processors.
| |
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,531,967,424 RAC: 3,351,164
                               
|
Great!
Thanks Stream. Looking forward to it.
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 | |
|
|
My computers have just warmed up for the month of February so they're raring to go on the GFN-11 Mega chase. Thank you for setting this up Stream.
____________
| |
|
|
CPU only? Preferences lets me also check GPU.
____________
Reno, NV
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
CPU only? Preferences lets me also check GPU.
Fixed.
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
GFN-11 MEGA Prime found!
March 25 2022, a GFN-11 MEGA prime was found by PDW. Congratulations!
Technically, it is not a first mega prime yet because there are untested candidates below this number, they must be completed first. But with high probability it is.
What was really unexpected is that base was easily factorized and the number is not just a PRP but a proven prime! The base had a 22-digits factor which was quickly found by ECM and remaining 463-digits part also was prime. It was a lot of luck involved!
Unfortunately, currently T5K cannot handle so long primes (its standard form, b^2048+1, is 496 characters long!) I wrote Chris about this issue hoping that limit can be increased.
| |
|
compositeVolunteer tester Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 10 Posts: 1150 ID: 55391 Credit: 1,100,724,559 RAC: 825,939
                        
|
Unfortunately, currently T5K cannot handle so long primes (its standard form, b^2048+1, is 496 characters long!) I wrote Chris about this issue hoping that limit can be increased.
It's likely to be listed with a form like <first 20 digits of b>"...(445 other digits)..."<last 20 digits of b>^2048+1 | |
|
PDW Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 14 Posts: 33 ID: 373199 Credit: 2,690,731,408 RAC: 2,990,933
                     
|
I wrote Chris about this issue hoping that limit can be increased.
Has Chris not replied about fixing this limitation so that the prime can be added to his list ?
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
I wrote Chris about this issue hoping that limit can be increased.
Has Chris not replied about fixing this limitation so that the prime can be added to his list ?
Yes, he replied that he'll look on the site code but nothing changed yet, "Number too long".
| |
|
PDW Send message
Joined: 14 Nov 14 Posts: 33 ID: 373199 Credit: 2,690,731,408 RAC: 2,990,933
                     
|
Okay, thanks, I'll wait some more before asking him about it. | |
|
|
Hello!
Thank You Stream again for setting up this site and all the projects 😄
Deja vu;
when looking back at GFN-12 Mega search PDW and robish seems to be on the finders list again, congratulation both of you ☺
PDW deserves a very spesial badge(King of GFN-(11-15) 🤴🏻)!
Hope we can find some more (1 or 2?) primes the last 15 days before it closes.
As Stream says in first post:
[quote]Duration of all projects will follow same rules as GFN-15 MEGA - one month after prime will be found. Minimal duration will be 3 months (even if prime will be found faster).
PDW did find his prime March 25 .
With regards,
Hans Sveen
Oslo, Norway
____________
MyStats
My Badges | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Hope we can find some more (1 or 2?) primes the last 15 days before it closes.
As Stream says in first post:
[quote]Duration of all projects will follow same rules as GFN-15 MEGA - one month after prime will be found. Minimal duration will be 3 months (even if prime will be found faster).
PDW did find his prime March 25 .
"Minimal duration will be 3 months (even if prime will be found faster).". So new work for those who still interested will available until June, see top post.
Also an update on status of the primes.
First prime is not submitted yet. Chris replied me that he changed something on T5K but unfortunately it didn't fixed our problem, I got same error - "Number is too long". Waiting for his next reply.
Second prime resisted quick ECM tests (up to 40 digits). The number left to factorize is huge - 464 digits. Next stop will be ECM up to 50 digits in factor, it requires about 62 CPU days and should be finished in about 2,5 weeks (I'm running it on a single 4-core PC). That's all what can be done with ECM; next attempt (at 55 digits) will require 1,15 CPU years and not worth the effort. Most probably, this number will be left unfactorized and published here as is.
| |
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,531,967,424 RAC: 3,351,164
                               
|
Hope we can find some more (1 or 2?) primes the last 15 days before it closes.
As Stream says in first post:
[quote]Duration of all projects will follow same rules as GFN-15 MEGA - one month after prime will be found. Minimal duration will be 3 months (even if prime will be found faster).
PDW did find his prime March 25 .
"Minimal duration will be 3 months (even if prime will be found faster).". So new work for those who still interested will available until June, see top post.
Also an update on status of the primes.
First prime is not submitted yet. Chris replied me that he changed something on T5K but unfortunately it didn't fixed our problem, I got same error - "Number is too long". Waiting for his next reply.
Second prime resisted quick ECM tests (up to 40 digits). The number left to factorize is huge - 464 digits. Next stop will be ECM up to 50 digits in factor, it requires about 62 CPU days and should be finished in about 2,5 weeks (I'm running it on a single 4-core PC). That's all what can be done with ECM; next attempt (at 55 digits) will require 1,15 CPU years and not worth the effort. Most probably, this number will be left unfactorized and published here as is.
Stream,
I'll have a go at it if you like.
I have never done it, so if you could DM some instructions on how to do it, that would be great.
I have a server I could use with 36 cores. Might speed it up and free up your computer for something else.
Let me know what you think on discord DM maybe.
Cheers
Rob
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 | |
|
|
Past 4 hours cant access web site / get/receive work
PRIVATE GFN SERVER | [http] [ID#1271] Info: Failed to connect to boincvm.proxyma.ru port 30080: Timed out
____________
| |
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 3209 ID: 130544 Credit: 2,288,656,524 RAC: 709,349
                           
|
Server power issue as per Discord discussion. Looks ok now. | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Well, it seems that I forgot to officially announce our second prime here. If was discussed on Discord, but not on the forum. Sorry.
So, April 08 robish found our second GFN-11 MEGA! Congratulations once again! :)
During these 20 days, me and robish tried to factorize this base. robish himself did a great job and run ECM testing for factors up to 55 digits. Unfortunately, nothing was found. According to my prime publishing policy, this prime is now visible on project status page. Unfactored 464-digits composite cofactor is added to first post of thread.
About 35 days left until the end of project, and it's quite likely that third prime will be found in these days.
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
As I predicted, third GFN-11 MEGA prime was discovered quickly. Congratulations to Coleslaw! He did just a bit more than 100 tasks before this find. Very lucky!
This time I didn't spent much time on ECM testing, I run relatively quick test up to 45 digits and nothing was found. Composite cofactor is 446 digits long. The prime is open now.
| |
|
|
The first GFN-11 mega is seen on Top 5000 as ((sqrtnint(10^999999,2048)+2)+364176)^2048+1 now! /JeppeSN | |
|
Yves Gallot Volunteer developer Project scientist Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 12 Posts: 820 ID: 164101 Credit: 305,989,513 RAC: 1,728

|
(⌊(10^999999)^(1/65536)⌋ + 1 + 284148)^65536 + 1 = 1000010...
(⌊(10^999999)^(1/32768)⌋ + 2 + 364268)^32768 + 1 = 10000000000000000000036...
(⌊(10^999999)^(1/16384)⌋ + 2 + 5920)^16384 + 1 = 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000089...
(⌊(10^999999)^(1/8192)⌋ + 1 + 135544)^8192 + 1 = 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000094...
(⌊(10^999999)^(1/4096)⌋ + 2 + 102242)^4096 + 1 = 1000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000030...
(⌊(10^999999)^(1/2048)⌋ + 2 + 364176)^2048 + 1 = 10000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000039... | |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
Three months passed and, according to project plan, GFN-11 MEGA project has entered cleanup phase. No new work will be loaded. When all remaining workunits will be finished, project will be over.
It's expected then project will run of work in 3-5 days.
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
                         
|
All GFN-11 MEGA tasks has been sent.
| |
|
streamVolunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer developer Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 1 Mar 14 Posts: 1033 ID: 301928 Credit: 543,624,271 RAC: 5,083
        |
|