Here you have 321 remaining WU in realtime

/Lennart

Our progress has slowed considerably. We are now showing a 11 June date for reaching n=5M but rest assured that will change. :(

We are currently trudging through many, many aborted WU's from the end of the Challenge. Our daily rate has dropped by half from 1000 WU's/day to about 500.

We'll be updating this thread with the remaining WU's. Also, 321 Search (manual reservation system) may be delivering more WU's. After we reach n=5M, we'll still have WU's remaining as we help clean up some of the unfinished manual reservations.

As of this post, 3158 WU's remain until n=5M.

Thanks again to everyone who continue to help! But please don't forget the next Challenge. I believe we can switch for 24 hours to have another healthy competition. :)
____________

A bunch of my computers are still churning away the 321's so you can count on me to help till we hit n=5m :)
____________


John M. Johnson "Novex"

Ditto.

Other than the TPS Challenge, I'll leave everything on 321 + TPS - I don't like having only one project defined in case it runs out of work, and given we are actually trying to finish 321 up to 5M, that will eventually happen (unless you're ready to start handing out 32+1 WUs at that point - I hope so!)

John,

Are you going to add a seperate project for the 3*2^n+1 on the

preferences . Would be nice to select so that when 3*2^2-1 Finishes we

can start asap.

Steve

John,

Are you going to add a seperate project for the 3*2^n+1 on the

preferences . Would be nice to select so that when 3*2^2-1 Finishes we

can start asap.

Steve

It's going to be a single project.

So does that mean that the +1 and -1 are going to be together in 1 option to run them under the choices for projects? And if so, I take it the -1 will be starting at n=5m but what is the +1 starting at?? Thanks a ton :)

Dose anyone know how many n's there are per work unit?

Since the remaining stats are now gone off the front page can you continue to post daily how many WU's we have left till n= 5m please :)
____________


John M. Johnson "Novex"

Since the remaining stats are now gone off the front page can you continue to post daily how many WU's we have left till n= 5m please :)

I assume at n=4800k we have moved up to the next FFT length?

Expiring WU's from the end of the Challenge are weighing heavily on the current progress. While we're doing an incredible rate of around 950 WU's a day, over 1/2 of them are expired WU's from the Challenge.

We had hoped for a better completion rate towards the end of the Challenge, but that doesn't appear to be the case.

The new n=5M date is 14 June 2008. Once we get past all these expiring WU's, we should see a nice jump in daily progress.

Thanks for hanging in there.


____________

Yeah I can sure tell now that were getting up there, they used to take 12 hours on one of my dual cores, now they take 35 hours. But at least we can see progress:)
____________


John M. Johnson "Novex"

UPDATE: We have passed the 1000 WU mark. As of this post, there's only 963 WU's left to n=5M. While the rate has dropped drastically, we continue to make progress. The new n=5M date is th 16th.

We expect the rate to pick up again after today's Challenge. :)
____________

Oh awesome! Were getting very close now.
____________


John M. Johnson "Novex"

Good News. The day after the Birthday Challenge, 450 WU's were completed leaving only 420 left to n=5M.

If we keep this same rate, 14 June will be the day!!! :) Check here for live stats of WU's remaning: 321 WU's
____________

Good News. The day after the Birthday Challenge, 450 WU's were completed leaving only 420 left to n=5M.

If we keep this same rate, 14 June will be the day!!! :) Check here for live stats of WU's remaning: 321 WU's

Come on now girls/guy's There is only 134 left !!

:)
:=)

/Lennart
____________

What exactly does "Unprepared Tasks" mean?

Come on now girls/guy's There is only 134 left !!

:)
:=)

/Lennart

Says 50035 Done Tasks, Total Tasks 51592 and 50 Unprepared Tasks. So wouldn't there be 51592-50035 = 1557 WU left??

The last task has been prepared. As soon as the buffer runs dry, all WU's below n=5M will be in progress or already completed.

When you see the buffer on the front page at 0, please add another subproject to your preferences so your computer does not run idle. However, please consider leaving 321 selected as expired, aborted, and errored WU's will continue to come in. Also, we may further help out the manual effort by cleaning up some of their ranges as well.

Although it's taken a little longer to get here...the main thing is that we're finally here! :) Thank you everyone for making this possible.
____________

The buffer has been emptied. Now 321 work will be sporadic as WU's come in expired, aborted, or errored. Please keep 321 checked in your preferences so these can be picked up as soon as they come in.

Also, we'll be receiving some "clean up" work from 321 Manual. These will be inserted as soon as they are received. We'll post when this is done.
____________

I'm getting a reasonable number of 321 tests through, so we should be gradually knocking this on the head - just over 1000 tests to complete according to the Server Status.

How many tests and what n range is covered by the 'clean up'?

And approximately when will 32+1 start ticking?

I'm getting a reasonable number of 321 tests through, so we should be gradually knocking this on the head - just over 1000 tests to complete according to the Server Status.

How many tests and what n range is covered by the 'clean up'?

And approximately when will 32+1 start ticking?

We have recevied the first file from the manual effort.

Number of candidates: 2259
n range: 3.70M-3.74M

We'll probably receive a few more files, but we're not expecting more than another 500 WU's. We will post again when the last are inserted.

Thank you for all your help! :)

321 Status
____________

Guess I'll keep most of my computers crunching the 321's then until were completely done at 5m plus the added manuals that were now adding. More details on the manuals and us taking them on would be great though.
____________


John M. Johnson "Novex"

I have now done some new wu They are on n=3M-4M

The old one was 4.8M-5M


The new one inserted today take 4hr 30 min on my C2Q 2,4Ghz
Compare to the old one 4,8M-5M they did take 9hr 40 min.

This new one is down to less then half time.

/Lennart

So how did we go from 0 WU's on the home page of 321 now to 97 more WU's? And when will we be done now? Thought today was the last day but now it looks like with more added it will be even longer. Care to explain, my good friends?
____________


John M. Johnson "Novex"

So how did we go from 0 WU's on the home page of 321 now to 97 more WU's? And when will we be done now? Thought today was the last day but now it looks like with more added it will be even longer. Care to explain, my good friends?

less than 50 WUs still outstanding on 4M-5M, and only a couple of unprepared tasks in the 3M-4M catchup - things are ticking along nicely...

less than 50 WUs still outstanding on 4M-5M, and only a couple of unprepared tasks in the 3M-4M catchup - things are ticking along nicely...

and that's the queue empty now!

time to load up the last of those manual catchups....

... and with >1900 unprepared tasks again, it looks like it has been done.

Are these the last batch?
Or are there more to come?

... and with >1900 unprepared tasks again, it looks like it has been done.

Are these the last batch?
Or are there more to come?

I have to ask John I thought it was 500-700 left but i can be wrong

So there is value in me being nosy and watching the queues then?! :-)

I thought the numbers were dropping a bit quickly!

... and with >1900 unprepared tasks again, it looks like it has been done.

Are these the last batch?
Or are there more to come?

I have to ask John I thought it was 500-700 left but i can be wrong.

/Lennart

So once we finish these 400 or so 321 WU's then were all done with them completely?
____________


John M. Johnson "Novex"

So once we finish these 400 or so 321 WU's then were all done with them completely?

So once we finish these 400 or so 321 WU's then were all done with them completely?

All 32-1 up to 5M is clear when all is recived.
I think we have ~ 200 Unprepared Tasks + them in the buffer. When all these have being returned OK. We have done all on 32-1 up to 5M.


/Lennart

I have 4 of my 11 computers churning away at the 321 Work Units but once they all are returned Ok, then what sort of thing will happen next? Will we go from 5m to 6m or something else my friend?

I have 4 of my 11 computers churning away at the 321 Work Units but once they all are returned Ok, then what sort of thing will happen next? Will we go from 5m to 6m or something else my friend?

We will start 32+1 work up to 5M, and then we'll merge the searches.

What is 32+1 up to now?

I have 4 of my 11 computers churning away at the 321 Work Units but once they all are returned Ok, then what sort of thing will happen next? Will we go from 5m to 6m or something else my friend?

We will start 32+1 work up to 5M, and then we'll merge the searches.

What is 32+1 up to now?

I have 4 of my 11 computers churning away at the 321 Work Units but once they all are returned Ok, then what sort of thing will happen next? Will we go from 5m to 6m or something else my friend?

We will start 32+1 work up to 5M, and then we'll merge the searches.

What is 32+1 up to now?

There is ~60 numbers (pairs) left to n=650k

/Lennart

So am I understanding this right when I say that 32+1 is just about n=1m??

... and again, "Unprepared Tasks" = 0, ~1200 outstanding for 3M-4M, queue ticking down ...

only 30 left for 4M-5M ...

UPDATE: As of this post, 26 WU's remain for 321 Search.

19 WU's remain for 3M<n<4M
7 WU's remain for 4M<n<5M
____________

And more WU's are in the queue! - might need slightly more than 100 prepared WUs in the queue until n is a bit bigger though.

And more WU's are in the queue! - might need slightly more than 100 prepared WUs in the queue until n is a bit bigger though.

Why that? The Linux wrapper I worte has progress reporting. Or is it the LLR-version wich does not report it's current progress?

oh - i got progress reporting using manual LLR on linux for 3*2^n+1 and for the +1 primesearch - though not for SG...

I guess the settings in llr.ini for OutputIterations is set higher than these WU's actually run for...

i guess it would have been on stdout

UPDATE: As of this post, 10 WU's remain for 321 Search.

6 WU's remain for 3M<n<4M
4 WU's remain for 4M<n<5M
____________

Having swopped from Windoze to 64 bit linux I find that my machine grinds away at LLR3*2^n+1 task quite happily. The estimated processing time is about 40mins. However no progress ever seems to be made and the task is never completed.

Is there anything I can do about this?

Thanks

T

Having swopped from Windoze to 64 bit linux I find that my machine grinds away at LLR3*2^n+1 task quite happily. The estimated processing time is about 40mins. However no progress ever seems to be made and the task is never completed.

Is there anything I can do about this?

Thanks

T

One thing to note: Linux will not have progress reporting, it's a known bug.

UPDATE: As of this post, 10 WU's remain for 321 Search.
6 WU's remain for 3M<n<4M
4 WU's remain for 4M<n<5M

And both ranges are green and complete!

Well done all!

Thanks Lennart. The other tasks seem to give progress reports on Linux by the way.

... and also thanks to someone for the neat avatar thingy. Must get round to a proper one soon.

I quite fancy one of a bulldog roughing up a pug...

Cheers!

T

Having swopped from Windoze to 64 bit linux I find that my machine grinds away at LLR3*2^n+1 task quite happily. The estimated processing time is about 40mins. However no progress ever seems to be made and the task is never completed.

Is there anything I can do about this?

Thanks

T

http://www.primegrid.com/forum_thread.php?id=941&nowrap=true#9385

One thing to note: Linux will not have progress reporting, it's a known bug.

/Lennart

according to the range statistics, we're out of 321 for n = 1M-2M, with no unprepared tasks and 15077 out of 20689 WUs returned.
is that really the case? it seems a little fast to me :-)
front page shows >8k 321 WUs in the queue, which is a little higher than usual and higher than the number of tasks outstanding in the range statistics.

so what's going on, and when do we need 2M-3M loading up? :-)
____________

according to the range statistics, we're out of 321 for n = 1M-2M, with no unprepared tasks and 15077 out of 20689 WUs returned.
is that really the case? it seems a little fast to me :-)
front page shows >8k 321 WUs in the queue, which is a little higher than usual and higher than the number of tasks outstanding in the range statistics.

so what's going on, and when do we need 2M-3M loading up? :-)