Join PrimeGrid
Returning Participants
Community
Leader Boards
Results
Other
drummers-lowrise
|
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Year of the Pig Challenge
Author |
Message |
RogerVolunteer developer Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 27 Nov 11 Posts: 1138 ID: 120786 Credit: 268,668,824 RAC: 0
                    
|
Welcome to the Year of the Pig Challenge
2019 is a Year of the Pig. In Chinese astrology, each year is related to a Chinese zodiac animal according to the 12-year cycle. The cycle of twelve corresponds to the twelve-year cycle of Jupiter. There are five types of Pigs, named after the Chinese elements. In order, they are: Metal, Water, Wood, Fire, and Earth. 2019 is an Earth Pig Year, starting on 5th February 2019 and ending on 24th January 2020. Earth Pigs are Communicative, popular among their friends, with a strong sense of time keeping. Famous Earth Pigs include Henry Ford and Arnold Schwarzenegger.
The second Challenge of the 2019 Challenge series is a 5 day challenge to celebrate the Year of the Pig. The challenge is being offered on the Generalized Cullen/Woodall Prime Search (LLR) application.
To participate in the Challenge, please select only the Generalized Cullen/Woodall Prime Search LLR (GCW) project in your PrimeGrid preferences section. The challenge will begin 5th March 2019 18:00 UTC and end at 10th March 2019 18:00 UTC.
Application builds are available for Linux 32 and 64 bit, Windows 32 and 64 bit and MacIntel. Intel CPUs with AVX capabilities (Sandy Bridge, Ivy Bridge, Haswell, Broadwell, Skylake, Kaby Lake, Coffee Lake) will have a very large advantage, and Intel CPUs with FMA3 (Haswell, Broadwell, Skylake, Kaby Lake, Coffee Lake) will be the fastest.
ATTENTION: The primality program LLR is CPU intensive; so, it is vital to have a stable system with good cooling. It does not tolerate "even the slightest of errors." Please see this post for more details on how you can "stress test" your computer. Tasks on one CPU core will take ~2 days on fast/newer computers and 10+ days on slower/older computers. If your computer is highly overclocked, please consider "stress testing" it. Sieving is an excellent alternative for computers that are not able to LLR. :)
Highly overclocked Haswell, Broadwell, Skylake, Kaby Lake or Coffee Lake (i.e., Intel Core i7, i5, and i3 -4xxx or better) computers running the application will see fastest times. Note that GCW is running the latest FMA3 version of LLR which takes full advantage of the features of these newer CPUs. It's faster than the previous LLR app and draws more power and produces more heat. If you have a Haswell, Broadwell, Skylake, Kaby Lake or Coffee Lake CPU, especially if it's overclocked or has overclocked memory, and haven't run the new FMA3 LLR before, we strongly suggest running it before the challenge while you are monitoring the temperatures.
Please, please, please make sure your machines are up to the task.
Multi-threading optimisation instructions
Those looking to maximise their computer's performance during this challenge, or when running LLR in general, may find this information useful.
- Your mileage may vary. Before the challenge starts, take some time and experiment and see what works best on your computer.
- If you have an Intel CPU with hyperthreading, either turn off the hyperthreading in the BIOS, or set BOINC to use 50% of the processors.
- If you're using a GPU for other tasks, it may be beneficial to leave hyperthreading on in the BIOS and instead tell BOINC to use 50% of the CPU's. This will allow one of the hyperthreads to service the GPU.
- Use LLR's multithreaded mode. It requires a little bit of setup, but it's worth the effort. Follow these steps:
Time zone converter:
The World Clock - Time Zone Converter
NOTE: The countdown clock on the front page uses the host computer time. Therefore, if your computer time is off, so will the countdown clock. For precise timing, use the UTC Time in the data section at the very top, above the countdown clock.
Scoring Information
Scores will be kept for individuals and teams. Only tasks issued AFTER 5th March 2019 18:00 UTC and received BEFORE 10th March 2019 18:00 UTC will be considered for credit. We will be using the same scoring method as we currently use for BOINC credits. A quorum of 2 is NOT needed to award Challenge score - i.e. no double checker. Therefore, each returned result will earn a Challenge score. Please note that if the result is eventually declared invalid, the score will be removed.
At the Conclusion of the Challenge
We kindly ask users "moving on" to ABORT their tasks instead of DETACHING, RESETTING, or PAUSING.
ABORTING tasks allows them to be recycled immediately; thus a much faster "clean up" to the end of an LLR Challenge. DETACHING, RESETTING, and PAUSING tasks causes them to remain in limbo until they EXPIRE. Therefore, we must wait until tasks expire to send them out to be completed.
Please consider either completing what's in the queue or ABORTING them. Thank you. :)
About the Generalized Cullen/Woodall Prime Search
A Cullen number (first studied by Reverend James Cullen in 1905) is a number of the form n * 2^n + 1. A Woodall number (first studied by Allan Cunningham and H.J. Woodall in 1917) is a number of the form n * 2^n - 1.
Generalized Cullen and Woodall numbers are of the form n * b^n + 1 and n * b^n - 1, respectively, where n + 2 > b.
A couple of years ago PrimeGrid moved its search for Generalized Cullen and Generalized Woodall primes from PRPNet to BOINC. A double-check of all ranges searched by PRPNet has been completed by PrimeGrid, and is continuing on with new work running multiple bases (b values) concurrently and incrementing through n values.
PrimeGrid is sieving to a much larger n than has been previously done. The largest candidates will be in excess of 15,000,000 digits, and will be the same size as the largest candidates in the Seventeen or Bust project.
Once PrimeGrid finds a Generalized Cullen or Woodall on a base, it stops looking for Generalized Cullen or Woodall primes on that base, depending on the type found. For all the current bases, PrimeGrid will initially be searching only for Generalized Cullen Primes. For detail about the bases PrimeGrid will be searching (and has searched), you can go here: http://www.primegrid.com/forum_thread.php?id=3008&nowrap=true#30718.
In addition to having found the largest known Cullen prime http://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=89536 and largest known Woodall prime http://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=124539, PrimeGrid has found the largest known Generalized Cullen prime, http://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=124515 and the 4th largest known Generalized Woodall prime http://primes.utm.edu/primes/page.php?id=98862.
For more information on Generalized Cullen and Woodall Numbers, you can go here: http://primes.utm.edu/top20/page.php?id=42 and here: http://primes.utm.edu/top20/page.php?id=45.
What is LLR?
The Lucas-Lehmer-Riesel (LLR) test is a primality test for numbers of the form N = k*2^n − 1, with 2^n > k. Also, LLR is a program developed by Jean Penne that can run the LLR-tests. It includes the Proth test to perform +1 tests and PRP to test non base 2 numbers. See also:
(Edouard Lucas: 1842-1891, Derrick H. Lehmer: 1905-1991, Hans Riesel: 1929-2014).
____________
| |
|
yodapSend message
Joined: 24 Jan 12 Posts: 28 ID: 128253 Credit: 525,030,933 RAC: 877,128
                   
|
Your app_config.xml file refers to an unknown application 'llrGCW'. Known applications: 'genefer17low', 'genefer16', 'gcw_sieve', 'genefer15', 'pps_sr2sieve', 'llrSOB', 'llrESP', 'llr321', 'llrPPSE', 'llrSR5', 'llrPPS', 'llrCUL', 'llrWOO', 'ap26', 'genefer'
3/2/2019 12:48:13 PM
This is the notice I receive trying to test this project. Appreciate any help you can give me.
| |
|
|
Your app_config.xml file refers to an unknown application 'llrGCW'. Known applications: 'genefer17low', 'genefer16', 'gcw_sieve', 'genefer15', 'pps_sr2sieve', 'llrSOB', 'llrESP', 'llr321', 'llrPPSE', 'llrSR5', 'llrPPS', 'llrCUL', 'llrWOO', 'ap26', 'genefer'
3/2/2019 12:48:13 PM
This is the notice I receive trying to test this project. Appreciate any help you can give me.
This is common to see when you set a config for a project you have not run yet. You need to run GCW in order for the BOINC client to know what you are referring to... The error should be resolved once you start your first GCW LLR task. | |
|
yodapSend message
Joined: 24 Jan 12 Posts: 28 ID: 128253 Credit: 525,030,933 RAC: 877,128
                   
|
Your app_config.xml file refers to an unknown application 'llrGCW'. Known applications: 'genefer17low', 'genefer16', 'gcw_sieve', 'genefer15', 'pps_sr2sieve', 'llrSOB', 'llrESP', 'llr321', 'llrPPSE', 'llrSR5', 'llrPPS', 'llrCUL', 'llrWOO', 'ap26', 'genefer'
3/2/2019 12:48:13 PM
This is the notice I receive trying to test this project. Appreciate any help you can give me.
This is common to see when you set a config for a project you have not run yet. You need to run GCW in order for the BOINC client to know what you are referring to... The error should be resolved once you start your first GCW LLR task.
Hmm I wasn't getting any tasks, so your saying dl tasks without the app_config in the projects folder then insert the app_config? I'll try that next chance I get. | |
|
|
Your app_config.xml file refers to an unknown application 'llrGCW'. Known applications: 'genefer17low', 'genefer16', 'gcw_sieve', 'genefer15', 'pps_sr2sieve', 'llrSOB', 'llrESP', 'llr321', 'llrPPSE', 'llrSR5', 'llrPPS', 'llrCUL', 'llrWOO', 'ap26', 'genefer'
3/2/2019 12:48:13 PM
This is the notice I receive trying to test this project. Appreciate any help you can give me.
Not to worry.
Just keep your app_config.xml as it is and let BOINC download an llrGCW task.
Everything should work out fine.
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14044 ID: 53948 Credit: 482,370,180 RAC: 568,853
                               
|
Your app_config.xml file refers to an unknown application 'llrGCW'. Known applications: 'genefer17low', 'genefer16', 'gcw_sieve', 'genefer15', 'pps_sr2sieve', 'llrSOB', 'llrESP', 'llr321', 'llrPPSE', 'llrSR5', 'llrPPS', 'llrCUL', 'llrWOO', 'ap26', 'genefer'
3/2/2019 12:48:13 PM
This is the notice I receive trying to test this project. Appreciate any help you can give me.
This is common to see when you set a config for a project you have not run yet. You need to run GCW in order for the BOINC client to know what you are referring to... The error should be resolved once you start your first GCW LLR task.
Hmm I wasn't getting any tasks, so your saying dl tasks without the app_config in the projects folder then insert the app_config? I'll try that next chance I get.
Ignore that "error". It doesn't mean anything is wrong.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
Hi.
I want to try the best multithreading settings for this challenge. What I need to run in command line? | |
|
|
Hi.
I want to try the best multithreading settings for this challenge. What I need to run in command line?
All the info is in the first post in this thread.
Gary | |
|
|
Hi.
I want to try the best multithreading settings for this challenge. What I need to run in command line?
Please read top post in thread for instructions on creating and using app_config.xml text file. Use plain text editor and make certain saved filename is as specified and not converted to *.txt upon saving. | |
|
|
Hi.
I want to try the best multithreading settings for this challenge. What I need to run in command line?
All the info is in the first post in this thread.
Gary
Oh. You said "best". You'll need to benchmark on your own machines to find that out. | |
|
|
We misunderstood each other. I'm aware of how to create app_config. | |
|
Sysadm@Nbg Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Project scientist
 Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 08 Posts: 1234 ID: 18646 Credit: 920,563,862 RAC: 394,130
                      
|
and here we go ...
good luck to all
may a lucky one find a GCW-prime!
____________
Sysadm@Nbg
my current lucky number: 113856050^65536 + 1
PSA-PRPNet-Stats-URL: http://u-g-f.de/PRPNet/
| |
|
xii5kuSend message
Joined: 17 Dec 16 Posts: 96 ID: 476505 Credit: 1,630,827,492 RAC: 2,222,739
                  
|
toms83 wrote: I want to try the best multithreading settings for this challenge. What I need to run in command line?
If you run a task in BOINC, the LLR program (primegrid_llr) is being run as a child of primegrid_llr_wrapper which in turn is run as a child of boinc. For standalone tests, you don't need the wrapper, only primegrid_llr.
In addition, you need an ini file and an input file. (Perhaps it's possible to run without the ini file by giving a few more command line parameters to the LLR program; I haven't tried.)
While you run a task in BOINC, you can check how primegrid_llr_wrapper constructed the command line parameters for primegrid_llr. On Linux, you can for example use the command "ps afx" to check. I don't recall how to check this out on Windows.
Furthermore, look up in which slot number the task is running (e.g. boincmgr -> tasks tab -> select task -> "Properties"). Then go into the respective slots subdirectory in the BOINC data directory and check the contents of it. You will notice that several of the files in there are renamed copies of files in the projects/www.primegrid.com directory. Now you know which files to copy in order to construct your own offline "slot" directory to run your own instance of primegrid_llr in.
If you have a large processor on which it makes sense to launch two or more instances of primegrid_llr simultaneously, you need respectively many copies of the slot directory.
(I do have such processors. In order to simplify testing of lots of different combinations of number of simultaneous tasks x number of threads per task, I wrote a shell script which automates the copying of the required files, the parallel launching of tasks, and the run time logging. I also enabled the script to kill the primegrid_llr tasks after a chosen percentage is completed, such that I don't need to wait for hours or days for results.) | |
|
|
i wish this would run better on a amd thread ripper.... | |
|
|
and here we go ...
good luck to all
may a lucky one find a GCW-prime!
How Big is this Prime? | |
|
mackerel Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 2 Oct 08 Posts: 2652 ID: 29980 Credit: 570,442,335 RAC: 5,621
                              
|
i wish this would run better on a amd thread ripper....
In what way? I see you have a 1950X but I don't see any GCW work listed on it currently. AMD decided to not implement as strong a FPU compared to Intel which is used heavily in this type of work. Still, with 16 cores you could probably run two tasks of 8 threads each, if Windows doesn't mess up scheduling, it should perform comparably in throughput to a lower clocked 8 core Intel. A single task of 16 cores is probably worse, but could be tested to be sure.
When the Zen2 ones come out, then things get really exciting. | |
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2223 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,973,124,568 RAC: 5,430,423
                               
|
and here we go ...
good luck to all
may a lucky one find a GCW-prime!
How Big is this Prime?
Main page, 3,580,944 digits at the moment. Potentially.
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 | |
|
tng Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 10 Posts: 500 ID: 66603 Credit: 50,926,324,921 RAC: 26,135,723
                                                    
|
and here we go ...
good luck to all
may a lucky one find a GCW-prime!
How Big is this Prime?
Main page, 3,580,944 digits at the moment. Potentially.
And the 23rd largest prime ever found (soon will be 22d)(*if* one is found).
____________
| |
|
|
xii5ku wrote: ...
While you run a task in BOINC, you can check how primegrid_llr_wrapper constructed the command line parameters for primegrid_llr.
On Linux, you can for example use the command "ps afx" to check.
I don't recall how to check this out on Windows.
...
There might be other ways, but one way to do it, in Windows 10, is to open the Task Manager, choose the "Details" tab, right click on any column header, choose "Select columns" and check the "Command line" checkbox.
https://www.techrepublic.com/article/how-to-get-more-information-on-window-10s-details-tab-by-enabling-additional-columns/
For example, I have (llrGCW):
primegrid_cllr.exe -d -oDiskWriteTime=1 -oThreadsPerTest=4 llr.in
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14044 ID: 53948 Credit: 482,370,180 RAC: 568,853
                               
|
The first day is done!
Challenge: Year of the Pig
App: 30 (GCW-LLR)
(As of 2019-03-06 19:46:40 UTC)
8844 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 8844 (100%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
1476 (17%) were aborted. [1476 (17%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
144 (2%) came back with some kind of an error. [144 (2%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
2187 (25%) have returned a successful result. [2187 (25%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
5037 (57%) are still in progress. [5037 (57%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
1462 (67%) are pending validation. [1462 (67%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
718 (33%) have been successfully validated. [718 (33%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
2 (0%) were invalid. [2 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
5 (0%) are inconclusive. [5 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is n=5146028. The leading edge was at n=5089561 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 1.11% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
8800 tasks sent out, and 2100 completed in the first day, compared to about 230 tasks completed on a normal day.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14044 ID: 53948 Credit: 482,370,180 RAC: 568,853
                               
|
After (a bit more than) two days:
Challenge: Year of the Pig
App: 30 (GCW-LLR)
(As of 2019-03-08 00:05:41 UTC)
13971 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 13971 (100%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
2055 (15%) were aborted. [2055 (15%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
336 (2%) came back with some kind of an error. [336 (2%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
5898 (42%) have returned a successful result. [5898 (42%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
5682 (41%) are still in progress. [5682 (41%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
2676 (45%) are pending validation. [2676 (45%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
3187 (54%) have been successfully validated. [3187 (54%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
17 (0%) were invalid. [17 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
18 (0%) are inconclusive. [18 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is n=5181812. The leading edge was at n=5089561 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 1.81% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
We're doing in excess of 10 times the normal amount of GCW tasks each day!
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
Michael Goetz wrote:
We're doing in excess of 10 times the normal amount of GCW tasks each day!
That's great !
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14044 ID: 53948 Credit: 482,370,180 RAC: 568,853
                               
|
After three days:
Challenge: Year of the Pig
App: 30 (GCW-LLR)
(As of 2019-03-08 19:48:12 UTC)
17214 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 17214 (100%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
2337 (14%) were aborted. [2337 (14%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
475 (3%) came back with some kind of an error. [475 (3%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
8734 (51%) have returned a successful result. [8734 (51%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
5668 (33%) are still in progress. [5668 (33%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
3158 (36%) are pending validation. [3158 (36%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
5502 (63%) have been successfully validated. [5502 (63%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
31 (0%) were invalid. [31 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
43 (0%) are inconclusive. [43 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is n=5203868. The leading edge was at n=5089561 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 2.25% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
I am afraid to ask but is this the Norm?
2337 (14%) were aborted. [2337 (14%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
2055 (15%) were aborted. [2055 (15%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)] | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14044 ID: 53948 Credit: 482,370,180 RAC: 568,853
                               
|
With a bit less than one day to go...
Challenge: Year of the Pig
App: 30 (GCW-LLR)
(As of 2019-03-09 22:32:42 UTC)
22026 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 22026 (100%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
2750 (12%) were aborted. [2750 (12%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
707 (3%) came back with some kind of an error. [707 (3%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
12824 (58%) have returned a successful result. [12824 (58%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
5745 (26%) are still in progress. [5745 (26%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
3499 (27%) are pending validation. [3499 (27%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
9224 (72%) have been successfully validated. [9224 (72%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
52 (0%) were invalid. [52 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
49 (0%) are inconclusive. [49 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is n=5237712. The leading edge was at n=5089561 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 2.91% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14044 ID: 53948 Credit: 482,370,180 RAC: 568,853
                               
|
I am afraid to ask but is this the Norm?
2337 (14%) were aborted. [2337 (14%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
2055 (15%) were aborted. [2055 (15%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
Good question. It's a relatively new statistic, so there isn't much to compare it to. Previously, this was bundled in with "Errors".
Over the four days so far, it's 17, 15, 14, and 12%.
The SoB challenge was as high as 20%.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
Scott Brown Volunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer tester Project scientist
 Send message
Joined: 17 Oct 05 Posts: 2420 ID: 1178 Credit: 20,175,556,434 RAC: 23,180,039
                                                
|
I am afraid to ask but is this the Norm?
2337 (14%) were aborted. [2337 (14%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
2055 (15%) were aborted. [2055 (15%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
Don't forget that with a challenge, many users may be modifying their approaches to multi-threading. This often leads to downloading extra unwanted tasks initially that sit idle, which may often be aborted leading to higher than usual rates of aborted tasks compared to non-challenge periods.
| |
|
Vato Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 2 Feb 08 Posts: 862 ID: 18447 Credit: 881,847,900 RAC: 1,396,099
                           
|
This is definitely true - I've aborted 20+ WUs since moving to multithreading, compared to approx zero over the previous few years. BOINC client behaviour leads to unexpected trends sometimes.
____________
| |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14044 ID: 53948 Credit: 482,370,180 RAC: 568,853
                               
|
I'm pretty sure most of the aborts are related to multi-tasking. This chart shows the abort percentage by sub project. Projects where you don't use multitasking have very low abort ratios.
In particular, SGS and PPSE and GFN have low percentages, so the aborts aren't related to prime searching.
+-------+-----------------+--------+-------+---------+
| appid | name | all | abort | percent |
+-------+-----------------+--------+-------+---------+
| 2 | llrTPS | 97830 | 2052 | 2.0975 |
| 3 | llrWOO | 3177 | 1129 | 35.5367 |
| 4 | llrCUL | 2100 | 492 | 23.4286 |
| 7 | llr321 | 2467 | 303 | 12.2821 |
| 8 | llrPSP | 2828 | 517 | 18.2815 |
| 9 | pps_sr2sieve | 342037 | 5209 | 1.5229 |
| 10 | llrPPS | 19636 | 297 | 1.5125 |
| 11 | ap26 | 52210 | 664 | 1.2718 |
| 13 | llrSOB | 50479 | 8756 | 17.3458 |
| 15 | llrTRP | 2284 | 157 | 6.8739 |
| 16 | genefer | 86199 | 10891 | 12.6347 |
| 17 | genefer_wr | 3107 | 122 | 3.9266 |
| 18 | llrPPSE | 45284 | 1154 | 2.5484 |
| 19 | llrSR5 | 1872 | 169 | 9.0278 |
| 20 | llrESP | 1169 | 161 | 13.7725 |
| 21 | llrMEGA | 18301 | 1044 | 5.7046 |
| 22 | genefer15 | 58846 | 216 | 0.3671 |
| 23 | genefer16 | 52838 | 453 | 0.8573 |
| 24 | genefer17low | 21285 | 59 | 0.2772 |
| 25 | genefer17mega | 30384 | 143 | 0.4706 |
| 26 | genefer18 | 16619 | 266 | 1.6006 |
| 27 | genefer19 | 7546 | 169 | 2.2396 |
| 28 | genefer20 | 5956 | 186 | 3.1229 |
| 29 | gcw_sieve | 252456 | 12278 | 4.8634 |
| 30 | llrGCW | 21261 | 4088 | 19.2277 |
| 31 | genefer_extreme | 2522 | 139 | 5.5115 |
+-------+-----------------+--------+-------+---------+
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14044 ID: 53948 Credit: 482,370,180 RAC: 568,853
                               
|
The challenge just ended, so it's time to remind everyone...
(Actually, it's a bit late, but it's still important.)
At the Conclusion of the Challenge
When the challenge completes, we would prefer users "moving on" to finish those tasks they have downloaded, if not then please ABORT the WU's (and then UPDATE the PrimeGrid project) instead of DETACHING, RESETTING, or PAUSING.
ABORTING WU's allows them to be recycled immediately; thus a much faster "clean up" to the end of a Challenge. DETACHING, RESETTING, and PAUSING WU's causes them to remain in limbo until they EXPIRE. Therefore, we must wait until WU's expire to send them out to be completed. Thank you!
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14044 ID: 53948 Credit: 482,370,180 RAC: 568,853
                               
|
Final statistics:
Challenge: Year of the Pig
App: 30 (GCW-LLR)
(As of 2019-03-10 18:26:08 UTC)
26313 tasks have been sent out. [CPU/GPU/anonymous_platform: 26313 (100%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
Of those tasks that have been sent out:
3733 (14%) were aborted. [3733 (14%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
865 (3%) came back with some kind of an error. [865 (3%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
16121 (61%) have returned a successful result. [16121 (61%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
5524 (21%) are still in progress. [5524 (21%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
Of the tasks that have been returned successfully:
3421 (21%) are pending validation. [3421 (21%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
12563 (78%) have been successfully validated. [12563 (78%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
71 (0%) were invalid. [71 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
66 (0%) are inconclusive. [66 (0%) / 0 (0%) / 0 (0%)]
The current leading edge (i.e., latest work unit for which work has actually been sent out to a host) is n=5263641. The leading edge was at n=5089561 at the beginning of the challenge. Since the challenge started, the leading edge has advanced 3.42% as much as it had prior to the challenge!
We did over 3000 tasks per day, which is more than ten times normal. Fantastic job everyone!
We have a bit of a break until the next challenge, a one week TRP challenge at the end of May. We'll be restarting the 321-sieve soon, so you'all will have time to work on that new (or old) 321-sieve badge before worrying about another challenge.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14044 ID: 53948 Credit: 482,370,180 RAC: 568,853
                               
|
The cleanup starts now. I expect the cleanup to take about a month.
Year of the Pig Challenge Cleanup:
Mar 10: Year of the Pig: 3464 tasks outstanding; 3307 affecting individual (252) scoring positions; 1646 affecting team (56) scoring positions.
Mar 11: Year of the Pig: 2787 tasks outstanding; 2668 affecting individual (245) scoring positions; 1319 affecting team (53) scoring positions.
Mar 12: Year of the Pig: 2294 tasks outstanding; 2125 affecting individual (231) scoring positions; 744 affecting team (47) scoring positions.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
compositeVolunteer tester Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 10 Posts: 1172 ID: 55391 Credit: 1,221,586,795 RAC: 1,513,610
                        
|
Waiting for a wingman... Wow, talk about diminishing returns! This host is using 72 threads per llrGCW task, so over 1,000,000 CPU seconds @ 3 GHz on a high-end CPU and not getting good throughput. Also running running 69 tasks in parallel, which doesn't help. At least there's enough RAM.
This is not the only host configured this way. Someone needs to make a YT video on multithreading LLR tasks efficiently (for max both throughput or min runtime) and link it to the main PG page. The PG forums contain valuable info but the signal-to-noise ratio is really low. | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14044 ID: 53948 Credit: 482,370,180 RAC: 568,853
                               
|
Year of the Pig Challenge Cleanup:
Mar 10: Year of the Pig: 3464 tasks outstanding; 3307 affecting individual (252) scoring positions; 1646 affecting team (56) scoring positions.
Mar 11: Year of the Pig: 2787 tasks outstanding; 2668 affecting individual (245) scoring positions; 1319 affecting team (53) scoring positions.
Mar 12: Year of the Pig: 2294 tasks outstanding; 2125 affecting individual (231) scoring positions; 744 affecting team (47) scoring positions.
Mar 13: Year of the Pig: 2000 tasks outstanding; 1825 affecting individual (221) scoring positions; 649 affecting team (46) scoring positions.
Mar 14: Year of the Pig: 1777 tasks outstanding; 1558 affecting individual (212) scoring positions; 539 affecting team (40) scoring positions.
Mar 15: Year of the Pig: 1592 tasks outstanding; 1404 affecting individual (207) scoring positions; 495 affecting team (38) scoring positions.
Mar 16: Year of the Pig: 1468 tasks outstanding; 1294 affecting individual (196) scoring positions; 461 affecting team (37) scoring positions.
Mar 17: Year of the Pig: 1367 tasks outstanding; 1201 affecting individual (191) scoring positions; 427 affecting team (36) scoring position
Mar 18: Year of the Pig: 1223 tasks outstanding; 1034 affecting individual (184) scoring positions; 387 affecting team (34) scoring positions.
Mar 19: Year of the Pig: 1143 tasks outstanding; 970 affecting individual (180) scoring positions; 335 affecting team (32) scoring positions.
Mar 20: Year of the Pig: 1055 tasks outstanding; 904 affecting individual (177) scoring positions; 311 affecting team (32) scoring positions.
Mar 21: Year of the Pig: 970 tasks outstanding; 843 affecting individual (173) scoring positions; 296 affecting team (32) scoring positions.
Mar 22: Year of the Pig: 909 tasks outstanding; 743 affecting individual (168) scoring positions; 278 affecting team (31) scoring positions.
Mar 23: Year of the Pig: 822 tasks outstanding; 643 affecting individual (161) scoring positions; 257 affecting team (31) scoring positions.
Mar 24: Year of the Pig: 760 tasks outstanding; 580 affecting individual (151) scoring positions; 225 affecting team (26) scoring positions.
Mar 25: Year of the Pig: 677 tasks outstanding; 487 affecting individual (145) scoring positions; 197 affecting team (24) scoring positions.
Mar 26: Year of the Pig: 590 tasks outstanding; 428 affecting individual (132) scoring positions; 175 affecting team (22) scoring positions.
Mar 27: Year of the Pig: 503 tasks outstanding; 355 affecting individual (122) scoring positions; 94 affecting team (17) scoring positions.
Mar 28: Year of the Pig: 418 tasks outstanding; 280 affecting individual (110) scoring positions; 74 affecting team (14) scoring positions.
Mar 29: Year of the Pig: 350 tasks outstanding; 216 affecting individual (97) scoring positions; 61 affecting team (13) scoring positions.
Mar 30: Year of the Pig: 288 tasks outstanding; 182 affecting individual (87) scoring positions; 46 affecting team (12) scoring positions.
Mar 31: Year of the Pig: 244 tasks outstanding; 130 affecting individual (69) scoring positions; 36 affecting team (7) scoring positions.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14044 ID: 53948 Credit: 482,370,180 RAC: 568,853
                               
|
Year of the Pig Challenge Cleanup:
Mar 10: Year of the Pig: 3464 tasks outstanding; 3307 affecting individual (252) scoring positions; 1646 affecting team (56) scoring positions.
Apr 1: Year of the Pig: 201 tasks outstanding; 112 affecting individual (63) scoring positions; 21 affecting team (6) scoring positions.
Apr 2: Year of the Pig: 168 tasks outstanding; 87 affecting individual (54) scoring positions; 16 affecting team (5) scoring positions.
Apr 3: Year of the Pig: 138 tasks outstanding; 65 affecting individual (45) scoring positions; 13 affecting team (4) scoring positions.
Apr 4: Year of the Pig: 116 tasks outstanding; 53 affecting individual (40) scoring positions; 11 affecting team (3) scoring positions.
Apr 5: Year of the Pig: 102 tasks outstanding; 49 affecting individual (37) scoring positions; 11 affecting team (3) scoring positions.
Apr 6: Year of the Pig: 80 tasks outstanding; 41 affecting individual (33) scoring positions; 10 affecting team (3) scoring positions.
Apr 7: Year of the Pig: 67 tasks outstanding; 30 affecting individual (28) scoring positions; 8 affecting team (3) scoring positions.
Apr 8: Year of the Pig: 62 tasks outstanding; 27 affecting individual (25) scoring positions; 7 affecting team (3) scoring positions.
Apr 9: Year of the Pig: 58 tasks outstanding; 25 affecting individual (24) scoring positions; 5 affecting team (2) scoring positions.
Apr 10: Year of the Pig: 53 tasks outstanding; 25 affecting individual (24) scoring positions; 5 affecting team (2) scoring positions.
Apr 11: Year of the Pig: 48 tasks outstanding; 22 affecting individual (22) scoring positions; 4 affecting team (2) scoring positions.
Apr 12: Year of the Pig: 45 tasks outstanding; 21 affecting individual (21) scoring positions; 4 affecting team (2) scoring positions.
Apr 13: Year of the Pig: 42 tasks outstanding; 18 affecting individual (18) scoring positions; 4 affecting team (2) scoring positions.
Apr 14: Year of the Pig: 29 tasks outstanding; 8 affecting individual (8) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 15: Year of the Pig: 25 tasks outstanding; 5 affecting individual (5) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 16: Year of the Pig: 21 tasks outstanding; 5 affecting individual (5) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 17: Year of the Pig: 18 tasks outstanding; 4 affecting individual (4) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 18: Year of the Pig: 15 tasks outstanding; 3 affecting individual (3) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 19: Year of the Pig: 8 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 20: Year of the Pig: 4 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 21: Year of the Pig: 3 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 22: Year of the Pig: 3 tasks outstanding; 2 affecting individual (2) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 23: Year of the Pig: 1 tasks outstanding; 1 affecting individual (1) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
Apr 24: Year of the Pig: 0 tasks outstanding; 0 affecting individual (0) scoring positions; 0 affecting team (0) scoring positions.
The cleanup is completed!
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
... The cleanup is completed!
Are the results final already?
I mean, can I update the Challenge Series results ?
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14044 ID: 53948 Credit: 482,370,180 RAC: 568,853
                               
|
... The cleanup is completed!
Are the results final already?
I mean, can I update the Challenge Series results ?
Yes
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
... The cleanup is completed!
Are the results final already?
I mean, can I update the Challenge Series results ?
Yes
OK, thanks.
Results updated.
As usual, if anyone notices anything wrong with the figures, please let me know.
PrimeGrid's Challenge Series Current Overall Standings
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. | |
|
RogerVolunteer developer Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 27 Nov 11 Posts: 1138 ID: 120786 Credit: 268,668,824 RAC: 0
                    
|
The results are final!
Top 3 individuals:
1: zunewantan
2: Scott Brown
3: DeleteNull
Top 3 teams:
1: Czech National Team
2: Aggie The Pew
3: SETI.Germany
Congratulations to the winners, and well done to everyone who participated.
See you at the Hans Ivar Riesel's 90th Birthday Challenge!
____________
| |
|
Message boards :
Number crunching :
Year of the Pig Challenge |