Author |
Message |
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
Well, do you?
EDIT: Follow this link to get to the real introduction to this project: https://www.primegrid.com/forum_thread.php?id=8422&nowrap=true#125716
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
In prime hunting ?
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. |
|
|
Monkeydee Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 8 Dec 13 Posts: 540 ID: 284516 Credit: 1,532,087,796 RAC: 728,455
                            
|
The question is, do you?
Also, the numerical representation of the date today DD/MM (29/01) is the same set of digits, in a different order, as the year YYYY (2019)
____________
My Primes
Badge Score: 4*2 + 6*2 + 7*3 + 8*10 + 11*3 + 12*1 = 166
|
|
|
Jay Send message
Joined: 27 Feb 10 Posts: 132 ID: 56067 Credit: 64,433,752 RAC: 10,168
                    
|
Well, do you?
Should I? Should someone? |
|
|
|
Well, do you?
TRP?
There are a couple of bases with no tasks waiting, but the fact that there is a couple probably means I am wrong.
EDIT: and they have very high N, so forget that idea. |
|
|
Tyler Project administrator Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 12 Posts: 1078 ID: 183129 Credit: 1,380,541,370 RAC: 158,173
                          
|
Oh yes. |
|
|
tng Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 10 Posts: 486 ID: 66603 Credit: 47,482,800,044 RAC: 27,388,358
                                                    
|
Well, do you?
Of course I do. Searching for large primes would be pretty boring if you didn't feel lucky.
____________
|
|
|
RafaelVolunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 22 Oct 14 Posts: 912 ID: 370496 Credit: 552,372,755 RAC: 457,337
                         
|
Yep, I'm pretty sure I just downloaded the next SR5 prime. Still haven't finished, though, or even started the task for that matter. |
|
|
dthonon Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 6 Dec 17 Posts: 435 ID: 957147 Credit: 1,750,478,198 RAC: 285,079
                                 
|
Sure : I found a PPSE before starting TdP! |
|
|
Vato Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 2 Feb 08 Posts: 851 ID: 18447 Credit: 720,662,163 RAC: 1,697,414
                           
|
So did I - first T5K prime for 6.5 years for me!
____________
|
|
|
Gelly Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 13 Nov 16 Posts: 49 ID: 468732 Credit: 2,397,279,885 RAC: 0
                  
|
Last year I got my first ever prime in TDP on a whim and I haven't achieved any other prime since, so, yeah, I'm guessing February is the best month for primes :D |
|
|
Monkeydee Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 8 Dec 13 Posts: 540 ID: 284516 Credit: 1,532,087,796 RAC: 728,455
                            
|
Given that we're three mega-primes behind where we were last year, maybe we aren't so lucky. Unless we find three more mega primes in the next two days.
I am also enjoying how such a short and vague post has sparked an emphatic reaction.
Also, a misquoted Dirty Harry approves of this thread.
____________
My Primes
Badge Score: 4*2 + 6*2 + 7*3 + 8*10 + 11*3 + 12*1 = 166
|
|
|
|
Dream BIG or go home! |
|
|
tng Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 10 Posts: 486 ID: 66603 Credit: 47,482,800,044 RAC: 27,388,358
                                                    
|
Dream BIG or go home!
He either fears his fate too much,
Or his deserts are small,
That dares not put it to the touch
To gain or lose it all.
____________
|
|
|
|
Come what may, all bad fortune is to be conquered by endurance. (well, except on the 19th, when you will need to sprint).
Good luck everyone!
____________
676754^262144+1 is prime |
|
|
Crun-chi Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09 Posts: 3233 ID: 50683 Credit: 151,443,349 RAC: 54,956
                         
|
Well, do you?
I assume that big prime is found :)
Only , does you feel lucky, or it just feeling :) ( and someone else is lucky)
I was lucky two days ago :)
Maybe this info has something with this thread :)
XGFN jobs pending 1
And that prime is not processed as usual, so it must be big one! ( base 2 , on plus side) if I am not wrong :)
Unbelievably, it looks like I sow this info at exact moment prime is going on XGFN verification :) so , it is not luck Mike is talking about: since his question is few hours old :)
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
App type: GPU only.
So either GFN15 or GFN22. I'm betting GFN22. Congrats to the finder if one was found!
OR: we didnt find anything, but instead we'll start solving GFN23 for b=20,000 to 44,720, since its right below GFN22 on the front page :P |
|
|
dukebgVolunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 21 Nov 17 Posts: 242 ID: 950482 Credit: 23,670,125 RAC: 0
                  
|
It's definitely GFN, it's in the GFN graphs in the server info - task status.
I'ld say my best guess is either a GFN-23 or starting from a big enough "b" – a GFN-22-100M-prime search (or just a GFN-22-WR, but you would still need to start from a solid point, not just random "wherever the WR is at right now"). Like we have GFN-17Low and GFN-17Mega.
"Do You Feel Lucky?" subproject is also mentioned on the editing your settings page in context that it doesn't have CPU apps. |
|
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 3209 ID: 130544 Credit: 2,288,183,124 RAC: 754,139
                           
|
I have no idea what's going on. 2.8M credit a task with 60% bonus? Just as I'm about to park @ 100M & do manual sving... |
|
|
|
I have no idea what's going on. 2.8M credit a task with 60% bonus? Just as I'm about to park @ 100M & do manual sving...
I think manual sieve will still give more credits. And in case it will be GFN23 project, GFN22 sieving results can be used for GFN23 for up to b=44,720. |
|
|
|
Luck does not exist.
____________
My DC mathematical side :)
|
|
|
Yves Gallot Volunteer developer Project scientist Send message
Joined: 19 Aug 12 Posts: 820 ID: 164101 Credit: 305,989,513 RAC: 1,728

|
Luck does not exist.
Then Robish doesn't exist ;-) |
|
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,528,390,594 RAC: 3,343,743
                               
|
Luck does not exist.
Then Robish doesn't exist ;-)
Hahahaha, yes I'm here, I'm real, I promise :))))
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 |
|
|
Crun-chi Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09 Posts: 3233 ID: 50683 Credit: 151,443,349 RAC: 54,956
                         
|
Luck does not exist.
Then Robish doesn't exist ;-)
Hahahaha, yes I'm here, I'm real, I promise :))))
I am here for many years, but better statements I have not read before!
You make my day!
thanks!!!! :)
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
Crun-chi Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09 Posts: 3233 ID: 50683 Credit: 151,443,349 RAC: 54,956
                         
|
Well, do you?
Since XGFN jobs pending 1 still stand: I am sure that 321 Prime Search is found prime. :)
And since I didnot run it , I cannot be that lucky person :)
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
AndySend message
Joined: 27 Nov 17 Posts: 24 ID: 953480 Credit: 181,041,329 RAC: 52,634
       
|
Absolutely not. If I were lucky, SOB would have ended before this forsaken thing showed up over there <--- |
|
|
dukebgVolunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 21 Nov 17 Posts: 242 ID: 950482 Credit: 23,670,125 RAC: 0
                  
|
Well, do you?
Since XGFN jobs pending 1 still stand: I am sure that 321 Prime Search is found prime. :)
And since I didnot run it , I cannot be that lucky person :)
It was 0 when I looked after you first wrote.
If anyone still isn't sure what kind of thing this thread is about, I advise you to look closely at the list of the subprojects on the front page. |
|
|
Crun-chi Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09 Posts: 3233 ID: 50683 Credit: 151,443,349 RAC: 54,956
                         
|
Well, do you?
Since XGFN jobs pending 1 still stand: I am sure that 321 Prime Search is found prime. :)
And since I didnot run it , I cannot be that lucky person :)
It was 0 when I looked after you first wrote.
If anyone still isn't sure what kind of thing this thread is about, I advise you to look closely at the list of the subprojects on the front page.
I will never look at , until you say to look at that :)
So we will have new GPU subproject :)
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
I feel lucky about GCW and TRP. I also think that it is better to begin this subproject after TdP and GCW challenge. |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
Do You Feel Lucky?
In 2009, PrimeGrid started running GFN-15 and GFN-16 on PRPnet using Yves Gallot's Genefer program.
In 2010, GFN-18 and GFN-19 were also started on PRPNet. At that time, only one GFN-18 prime was known, and no GFN-19 primes were known. In February and March of 2011, PrimeGrid found the second and third known GFN-18 primes. Then, in October, we found the 4th known GFN-18 prime: 361658262144+1.
361658262144+1 is special: It's the first prime that we found using the new GeneferCUDA GPU program. The GPU version of Genefer was about 40 times faster than the CPU version, and represented a tremendous increase in computing power.
Right after that discovery, John challenged us to use GeneferCUDA to find a GFN-19. Nobody knew if a GFN-19 even existed. Certainly, none had ever been discovered.
"Why not?" said I. 4 days and just 16 tasks later, I discovered the world's first GFN-19 prime.
At that point I had been crunching at PrimeGrid for a bit less than two years. Somewhere during those two years I learned about GIMPS. Their Mersenne prime search had found all the largest primes. The primes found at PrimeGrid, as big as they were, were still much smaller than the Mersenne primes.
Seeing a chance to perhaps find primes as large as those found by GIMPS, I suggested that if we could make GeneferCUDA work on our BOINC server, where it would be more heavily utilized, we might start searching the GFN-22 range. All but the smallest potential GFN-22 primes would be larger than the then world record Mersenne prime, which was 12.9 million digits. Considering how fast GeneferCUDA was, we had a real shot at finding a world record prime. It was still a long shot, but there was a chance.
I offered to port Genefer and GeneferCUDA to be native BOINC programs, an idea to which the PrimeGrid admins were amenable. So I ported the programs and they made the necessary changes to PrimeGrid's servers. We started running GFN-18 on BOINC in January 2012, and started the world record prime search with GFN-22 in February 2012.
A year later, in February 2013, GFN-22 was searching numbers of about 16.5 million digits when GIMPS discovered a new world record Mersenne prime of 17.4 million digits.
Three years later they found a 22.3 million digit Mersenne prime.
Two years after that they found a 23.2 million digit Mersenne prime.
Eleven months later, in December of last year, they found a 24.8 million digit prime, which is the current largest known prime number.
GFN-22 is currently searching 21.6 million digit numbers.
It would appear that the opportunity to find a world record prime with GFN-22 has come and gone. Even though we have an excellent GPU program, Mersenne has the advantage of being inherently easier to search, and their numbers grow in size faster because their search increases n (size is proportional to n) whereas a GFN search increases b (size is proportional only to log(b)). In addition, they only need to search prime values of n whereas we need to search all even values of b. Even though we have a faster program, their search still progresses faster overall. We're behind, and they're pulling away.
After each of those 4 Mersenne discoveries, there were people here -- smart people -- who felt we should either increase b to be once again searching for a world record, or start an n=23 search, which would also be a world record search. The math, however, just doesn't make that a good bet. When we started GFN-22 it wasn't long before it was significantly larger than the current world record. We had some leeway. Starting a new world record search with larger numbers would have an even smaller chance of success. My uncle used to say, "Lotto is a tax on the mathematically challenged." I feel the same way about boosting GFN higher to be above GIMPS. It's not a good bet. They're more likely to find another prime before we find one of that size.
So after each Mersenne prime, we've thought about making another world record search, and each time, we decided not to do it.
Until now.
Let me start by saying this is a real long shot. It borders on stupidity. But a lot of people want to do it, and it's going to be fun.
We're starting up a new project called "Do You Feel Lucky?" It's going to be a GFN-22 search with b starting at 846,398. That's the first b not removed by sieving where b4194304+1 is greater than the current world record.
Like GFN-17, we'll now have two GFN-22 searches running concurrently. Unlike GFN-17, however, this new search will not be a contiguous search. If a new Mersenne prime is found, we will increase b again so that we continue to search for a world record. GFN-22 is sieved to b=100M, so we can continue doing this search up to about 33.5 million digits. If we have to search larger numbers, we'll either need to sieve GFN-22 above 100M, or sieve GFN-23.
"Lucky?" tasks will be slower than normal GFN-22 tasks because neither the OCL nor OCL4 transforms can be used. All GPUs should use OCL5.
CPU tasks will not be available. These tasks are beyond the range of the 64 bit CPU transforms, so the 80 bit x87 transform must be used. Not only is this about 10 times slower, but it can't use multi-threading like the AVX and FMA3 CPU transforms can. CPUs would take forever to run these tasks.
This project is a prime-finding project, so it will be available for TdP, or at least most of it. I'm not sure exactly when we'll turn it on.
The internal name is "genefer_extreme". That's what you would use in app_config.xml or app_info.xml. Should it ever be necessary, the next names would be genefer_ultimate, then genefer_ludicrous, then genefer_plaid.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Tyler Project administrator Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 12 Posts: 1078 ID: 183129 Credit: 1,380,541,370 RAC: 158,173
                          
|
The internal name is "genefer_extreme".
Very nice. Looking forward to seeing if my 760 has *any* chance of completing a task reasonably! |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
I'd like to offer special thanks to two people.
The first is, of course, Yves Gallot, without whom none of this would be possible. Not only did Yves write the original Genefer program, but his subsequent Genefer OCL and improved CPU programs made it possible for us to expand the Genefer searches in ways that were previously impossible.
The second person is Robish, who is simply the luckiest GFN searcher on the planet. If anyone is going to find a GFN-22, it's going to be him. Yes, this is actually the reason we said yes this time. We're going to need a ridiculous amount of luck to find a world record prime, and Robish seems to have the market cornered.
No pressure, Rob. :)
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Crun-chi Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09 Posts: 3233 ID: 50683 Credit: 151,443,349 RAC: 54,956
                         
|
I'd like to offer special thanks to three people.
The second person is Robish, who is simply the luckiest GFN searcher on the planet. If anyone is going to find a GFN-22, it's going to be him. Yes, this is actually the reason we said yes this time. We're going to need a ridiculous amount of luck to find a world record prime, and Robish seems to have the market cornered.
No pressure, Rob. :)
Rob, what are you waiting :)))
Go go go :)
Lets find that prime!
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
I'd like to offer special thanks to three people.
The second person is Robish, who is simply the luckiest GFN searcher on the planet. If anyone is going to find a GFN-22, it's going to be him. Yes, this is actually the reason we said yes this time. We're going to need a ridiculous amount of luck to find a world record prime, and Robish seems to have the market cornered.
No pressure, Rob. :)
Rob, what are you waiting :)))
Go go go :)
Lets find that prime!
I found the GFN-19 in 16 tasks. Can he find the GFN-22 in 15 or fewer tasks?
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
Wow, just wow! I dont feel lucky (although I'm somewhat mathematically challenged), but my brain is telling to get a faster GPU asap...
On a side note, Michael, do you you mind if I quote your uncle's wise words elsewhere?
____________
676754^262144+1 is prime |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
Wow, just wow! I dont feel lucky (although I'm somewhat mathematically challenged), but my brain is telling to get a faster GPU asap...
On a side note, Michael, do you you mind if I quote your uncle's wise words elsewhere?
By all means you can quote it. It's a really good quote. :) If you want to attribute it (you do not have to), his name was Martin Metsch.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,528,390,594 RAC: 3,343,743
                               
|
I'm in! Absolutely!
:)
Is it unlikely?..... Yes. Is it impossible? Eh no. Mike proved that after only 16 units on gfn19.
If you're on the fence, just imagine the thrill of getting one!
Lotto ticket?, yes, but for the PG community, massive cudos and that's why we're all here I think. To contribute to the community that is PG. And hopefully break a few records on the way :)
I look forward to congratulating anyone who finds one :)
This is going to be fun.
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 |
|
|
|
The internal name is "genefer_extreme".
EXTREME!!!! I'll get the mountain dew ready :) Maybe it will max out a 2080. :) Awesome project, with the newer and faster hardware coming out everyday it's a grand idea! Good luck everyone. |
|
|
tng Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 10 Posts: 486 ID: 66603 Credit: 47,482,800,044 RAC: 27,388,358
                                                    
|
Bring it on!
Let us know if more sieving is needed.
____________
|
|
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,528,390,594 RAC: 3,343,743
                               
|
I'd like to offer special thanks to three people.
The second person is Robish, who is simply the luckiest GFN searcher on the planet. If anyone is going to find a GFN-22, it's going to be him. Yes, this is actually the reason we said yes this time. We're going to need a ridiculous amount of luck to find a world record prime, and Robish seems to have the market cornered.
No pressure, Rob. :)
Rob, what are you waiting :)))
Go go go :)
Lets find that prime!
I found the GFN-19 in 16 tasks. Can he find the GFN-22 in 15 or fewer tasks?
Most probably not but sure it's worth a shot ;)
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 |
|
|
|
Should it ever be necessary, the next names would be ... then genefer_ludicrous, then genefer_plaid.
Someone's been watching Spaceballs.
____________
|
|
|
mikey Send message
Joined: 17 Mar 09 Posts: 1788 ID: 37043 Credit: 793,513,261 RAC: 1,209,755
                     
|
Do You Feel Lucky?
This project is a prime-finding project, so it will be available for TdP, or at least most of it. I'm not sure exactly when we'll turn it on.
The internal name is "genefer_extreme". That's what you would use in app_config.xml or app_info.xml. Should it ever be necessary, the next names would be genefer_ultimate, then genefer_ludicrous, then genefer_plaid.
Will it be added to the existing GFN badge or will there be a new badge created? |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
Do You Feel Lucky?
This project is a prime-finding project, so it will be available for TdP, or at least most of it. I'm not sure exactly when we'll turn it on.
The internal name is "genefer_extreme". That's what you would use in app_config.xml or app_info.xml. Should it ever be necessary, the next names would be genefer_ultimate, then genefer_ludicrous, then genefer_plaid.
Will it be added to the existing GFN badge or will there be a new badge created?
It will use the existing badge.
Also, we're increasing the long job bonus from 50% to 75% for Lucky.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,528,390,594 RAC: 3,343,743
                               
|
Do You Feel Lucky?
This project is a prime-finding project, so it will be available for TdP, or at least most of it. I'm not sure exactly when we'll turn it on.
The internal name is "genefer_extreme". That's what you would use in app_config.xml or app_info.xml. Should it ever be necessary, the next names would be genefer_ultimate, then genefer_ludicrous, then genefer_plaid.
Will it be added to the existing GFN badge or will there be a new badge created?
It will use the existing badge.
Also, we're increasing the long job bonus from 50% to 75% for Lucky.
Niiiiiice bonus, 👍
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 |
|
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,528,390,594 RAC: 3,343,743
                               
|
Do You Feel Lucky?
This project is a prime-finding project, so it will be available for TdP, or at least most of it. I'm not sure exactly when we'll turn it on.
The internal name is "genefer_extreme". That's what you would use in app_config.xml or app_info.xml. Should it ever be necessary, the next names would be genefer_ultimate, then genefer_ludicrous, then genefer_plaid.
Will it be added to the existing GFN badge or will there be a new badge created?
It will use the existing badge.
Also, we're increasing the long job bonus from 50% to 75% for Lucky.
Niiiiiice bonus, 👍
Almost a million per task! Now we're talking! Hell yeah!!!!
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 |
|
|
|
Almost a million per task! Now we're talking! Hell yeah!!!!
I may have to buy that Volta after all. Who needs food, anyway?
____________
|
|
|
Ken_g6 Volunteer developer
 Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 06 Posts: 940 ID: 3110 Credit: 261,913,874 RAC: 8,863
                            
|
They say it's better to be lucky than good. But I think it's better to be good. Last year I felt lucky because I was good at aborting WUs a wingman had finished. But some people thought that was evil, not good, and put a stop to it.
So, no, I don't feel lucky this year. :(
However, if PrimeGrid comes up in either the Pentathlon or a Formula BOINC sprint this year, I want to be good again. So, which will get better points, this project with its 75% bonus or PPS Sieve?
I suppose it's PPS Sieve anyway, because I wouldn't be lucky enough to finish a WU with a wingman before whatever external challenge ended. |
|
|
dukebgVolunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 21 Nov 17 Posts: 242 ID: 950482 Credit: 23,670,125 RAC: 0
                  
|
This project is a prime-finding project, so it will be available for TdP, or at least most of it. I'm not sure exactly when we'll turn it on.
What is currently holding it from being turned on? |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
This project is a prime-finding project, so it will be available for TdP, or at least most of it. I'm not sure exactly when we'll turn it on.
What is currently holding it from being turned on?
Testing.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,528,390,594 RAC: 3,343,743
                               
|
I'd like to offer special thanks to two people.
The first is, of course, Yves Gallot, without whom none of this would be possible. Not only did Yves write the original Genefer program, but his subsequent Genefer OCL and improved CPU programs made it possible for us to expand the Genefer searches in ways that were previously impossible.
The second person is Robish, who is simply the luckiest GFN searcher on the planet. If anyone is going to find a GFN-22, it's going to be him. Yes, this is actually the reason we said yes this time. We're going to need a ridiculous amount of luck to find a world record prime, and Robish seems to have the market cornered.
No pressure, Rob. :)
A big thanks to both Mike and Jim for setting this up. Going to be fun!
Fingers crossed :)
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 |
|
|
|
For GFN 21 - 22 and Ultimate 22, is it still required to have high DP computing power ? (HD 7950 / 7970 / Titan Black etc) or are GTX 10xx / RTX 20xx running faster ? Thank You. |
|
|
Scott Brown Volunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer tester Project scientist
 Send message
Joined: 17 Oct 05 Posts: 2394 ID: 1178 Credit: 18,680,830,069 RAC: 6,903,927
                                                
|
For GFN 21 - 22 and Ultimate 22, is it still required to have high DP computing power ? (HD 7950 / 7970 / Titan Black etc) or are GTX 10xx / RTX 20xx running faster ? Thank You.
The fastest cards will have big, modern DP like the Titan V or Tesla V100. Just behind them will be the RTX 20xx cards. The speed of the lower RTX cards (2070 and 2060) will be similar to just a bit faster than the GTX 1080 Ti and 1080, respectively. After that, it is a mix with GTX 10xx cards doing well.
|
|
|
|
From Michael's post above:
"Lucky?" tasks will be slower than normal GFN-22 tasks because neither the OCL nor OCL4 transforms can be used. All GPUs should use OCL5.
So DP is out, and a 2080ti might be on par with a Titan V (individual clocks and cooling would determine the difference).
____________
Eating more cheese on Thursdays. |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
For GFN 21 - 22 and Ultimate 22, is it still required to have high DP computing power ? (HD 7950 / 7970 / Titan Black etc) or are GTX 10xx / RTX 20xx running faster ? Thank You.
Grebuloner's answer (right before mine) is correct: DP won't matter for Lucky, or Extreme, or whatever we end up calling it.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
Sure : I found a PPSE before starting TdP!
As the doublechecker of that PPSE, I don't feel as lucky |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
Unless there's any more problems, this project is live.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
Michael Goetz wrote: Unless there's any more problems, this project is live.
I understand these tasks will take a long time to crunch.
Any idea on how much longer than a "normal" GFN-22 ?
It's been a while since I last crunched a GFN-22 and it took around 75 hours on a GTX 1060 3GB.
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. |
|
|
Azmodes Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 30 Dec 16 Posts: 184 ID: 479275 Credit: 2,197,541,354 RAC: 252
                       
|
Mike said in the chat that they're about a third longer on his 1060.
I'm currently running one on a 2080 and it should take 29-30 hours.
____________
Long live the sievers.
+ Encyclopaedia Metallum: The Metal Archives + |
|
|
|
Thanks, Azmodes.
Then I guess it'll take me around 4 days and 4 hours.
I´'ll give it a try, after I finish a current GFN-20 task.
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. |
|
|
|
On a side note, Michael, do you you mind if I quote your uncle's wise words elsewhere?
Be aware that similar things have been said many times, both before and after it was said by Michael Goetz's uncle. See e.g. https://quoteinvestigator.com/2017/10/21/lottery/. /JeppeSN |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
On a side note, Michael, do you you mind if I quote your uncle's wise words elsewhere?
Be aware that similar things have been said many times, both before and after it was said by Michael Goetz's uncle. See e.g. https://quoteinvestigator.com/2017/10/21/lottery/. /JeppeSN
I never said uncle Manny invented the quote himself!
But I'm pretty sure I heard it from him in the 70's or 80's, so at least that predates many (but certainly not all) of the documented prior versions of the quote.
Regardless of what version, or from whom it originated, I really like that quote.
Especially as I hand over money to buy Lotto tickets!
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
GFN-22 is sieved to b=100M, so we can continue doing this search up to about 33.5 million digits. If we have to search larger numbers, we'll either need to sieve GFN-22 above 100M, or
Apparently the Genefer software can go only to b=400M, or 36 million digits. So when/if the world record prime exceeds that size, GFN-23 would be required (assuming that Genefer still has the same limitation). /JeppeSN
|
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
GFN-22 is sieved to b=100M, so we can continue doing this search up to about 33.5 million digits. If we have to search larger numbers, we'll either need to sieve GFN-22 above 100M, or
Apparently the Genefer software can go only to b=400M, or 36 million digits. So when/if the world record prime exceeds that size, GFN-23 would be required (assuming that Genefer still has the same limitation). /JeppeSN
My understanding is that's an arbitrary limit, and could be raised if we need to do it.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
dukebgVolunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 21 Nov 17 Posts: 242 ID: 950482 Credit: 23,670,125 RAC: 0
                  
|
Be aware that similar things have been said many times, both before and after it was said by Michael Goetz's uncle. See e.g. https://quoteinvestigator.com/2017/10/21/lottery/. /JeppeSN
I never said uncle Manny invented the quote himself!
But I'm pretty sure I heard it from him in the 70's or 80's, so at least that predates many (but certainly not all) of the documented prior versions of the quote.
Just in case, JeppeSN's link has the oldest mention of that / similair quote for 1662, then 1733, 1884. It's a fairly old saying! |
|
|
|
Unless there's any more problems, this project is live.
Trivial item: On the Preferences page, CPU should be changed to GPU since it is a GPU-only based project. ("Recent average CPU time: 0:00:00")
Eagerly waiting for some stats in relation to the average GPU elapsed time with these units. |
|
|
|
28 "Do You Feel Lucky?" tasks are currently under work.
I'm trying my luck.
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
Trivial item: On the Preferences page, CPU should be changed to GPU since it is a GPU-only based project. ("Recent average CPU time: 0:00:00")
Thanks, I missed that. I also have removed the CPU stats from the three projects that don't have CPU tasks.
Eagerly waiting for some stats in relation to the average GPU elapsed time with these units.
The first tasks to be finished will be from RTX 2080 or 2080 Ti GPUs, so the first numbers you're going to see will probably "average" around 24 hours.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
27 "Do You Feel Lucky?" tasks are currently under work.
I mentioned on the WUProp forums that we had a new app running. That should bring in some players. They're always desperate for more apps.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
tng Send message
Joined: 29 Aug 10 Posts: 486 ID: 66603 Credit: 47,482,800,044 RAC: 27,388,358
                                                    
|
27 "Do You Feel Lucky?" tasks are currently under work.
I mentioned on the WUProp forums that we had a new app running. That should bring in some players. They're always desperate for more apps.
Is WUProp still being updated -- I thought it was dead?
____________
|
|
|
|
Here from the WUProp post. It's not dead. Shared this thread on OCN forums. |
|
|
|
I've got a GFN-22 running right now and I've set it to download Lucky for the next GPU task. Ill post 1080 Ti time here when its finished (probably early Monday?)
____________
|
|
|
|
Now after Robish was that much hyped I looked at Robish's Badges... What the? TdP 2019 has just started yesterday and Robish ALREADY found a prime? Put him into the Lucky Project. 2 Tasks, world record prime done.
____________
|
|
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,528,390,594 RAC: 3,343,743
                               
|
Now after Robish was that much hyped I looked at Robish's Badges... What the? TdP 2019 has just started yesterday and Robish ALREADY found a prime? Put him into the Lucky Project. 2 Tasks, world record prime done.
:) 3 luckys crunching away, fingers crossed :)
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 |
|
|
Crun-chi Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09 Posts: 3233 ID: 50683 Credit: 151,443,349 RAC: 54,956
                         
|
Now after Robish was that much hyped I looked at Robish's Badges... What the? TdP 2019 has just started yesterday and Robish ALREADY found a prime? Put him into the Lucky Project. 2 Tasks, world record prime done.
:) 3 luckys crunching away, fingers crossed :)
I will take one task, hope to finish it in 7 days or 161 hours :)
This is run time on Geforce 1050Ti
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
Crun-chi Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09 Posts: 3233 ID: 50683 Credit: 151,443,349 RAC: 54,956
                         
|
Now after Robish was that much hyped I looked at Robish's Badges... What the? TdP 2019 has just started yesterday and Robish ALREADY found a prime? Put him into the Lucky Project. 2 Tasks, world record prime done.
Be friend with him: maybe some of his luck pass on you :)
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
Crun-chi Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09 Posts: 3233 ID: 50683 Credit: 151,443,349 RAC: 54,956
                         
|
Mike, can you tell credits per WU with 75% bonus?
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
SpearVolunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 29 Mar 09 Posts: 148 ID: 37675 Credit: 1,345,069,159 RAC: 6,892
                        
|
Be friend with him: maybe some of his luck pass on you :)
It doesn't.
And given that I haven't found a prime in a year, it seems to be the opposite.
|
|
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,528,390,594 RAC: 3,343,743
                               
|
Be friend with him: maybe some of his luck pass on you :)
It doesn't.
And given that I haven't found a prime in a year, it seems to be the opposite.
😥😔
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
Mike, can you tell credits per WU with 75% bonus?
I haven't figured it out. We'll all just have to wait and see!
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,528,390,594 RAC: 3,343,743
                               
|
Mike, can you tell credits per WU with 75% bonus?
I haven't figured it out. We'll all just have to wait and see!
My guess, just over 800k.
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 |
|
|
mikey Send message
Joined: 17 Mar 09 Posts: 1788 ID: 37043 Credit: 793,513,261 RAC: 1,209,755
                     
|
I've got a GFN-22 running right now and I've set it to download Lucky for the next GPU task. Ill post 1080 Ti time here when its finished (probably early Monday?)
I have a Lucky wu running on my 1080Ti, it's using 98% of the gpu and 0.282% of a cpu core and estimates it will finish in 1 day 21+ hours after running just under 30 minutes. |
|
|
|
Think I need to buy a RTX before giving a try.
100 hours on my P5000 |
|
|
|
Unless it spees up a bit, the estimated time here is around 4.5 days for the Extreme GFN-22 task.
This is a 2.5 year old Galax GTX 1060 3G (small overclock).
Running simultaneously, are 4 PPSE (single threaded = -t 1), averaging 12 minutes each task.
HT is on, computing preferences set at use at most 50% of the CPUs (in BOINC Manager).
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
An RTX 2080 Ti has returned the first Lucky task.
90057 seconds.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
Mike, can you tell credits per WU with 75% bonus?
I haven't figured it out. We'll all just have to wait and see!
Now I have: 943977.2426 is the minimum credit for the smallest WU.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
An RTX 2080 Ti has returned the first Lucky task.
90057 seconds.
This is seriously impressive! |
|
|
|
AA wrote: An RTX 2080 Ti has returned the first Lucky task.
90057 seconds.
This is seriously impressive!
Indeed !
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. |
|
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,528,390,594 RAC: 3,343,743
                               
|
Mike, can you tell credits per WU with 75% bonus?
I haven't figured it out. We'll all just have to wait and see!
Now I have: 951700.8277
Wow!!!
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
AA wrote: An RTX 2080 Ti has returned the first Lucky task.
90057 seconds.
This is seriously impressive!
Indeed !
Yeah, but nobody is running it on a V100 yet. :)
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Crun-chi Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09 Posts: 3233 ID: 50683 Credit: 151,443,349 RAC: 54,956
                         
|
So even with 1050Ti, and with 6,7 days per WU in month 4.25 M of credit
WOW!
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
Dad Send message
Joined: 28 Feb 18 Posts: 284 ID: 984171 Credit: 182,080,291 RAC: 0
                 
|
I wonder if I should try one on my GTX 550ti???
____________
Tonight's lucky numbers are
555*2^3563328+1 (PPS-MEGA)
and
58523466^131072+1 (GFN-17 MEGA) |
|
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,528,390,594 RAC: 3,343,743
                               
|
I wonder if I should try one on my GTX 550ti???
Up to you but chances are miniscule so try for smaller ones to get your p badge maybe.
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 |
|
|
Dad Send message
Joined: 28 Feb 18 Posts: 284 ID: 984171 Credit: 182,080,291 RAC: 0
                 
|
Yep, I'll wait till after TdP for that
____________
Tonight's lucky numbers are
555*2^3563328+1 (PPS-MEGA)
and
58523466^131072+1 (GFN-17 MEGA) |
|
|
|
Greetings to everybody!!!
my 12 rtx 2080 version ti nad oc tubro and 2 gtx 1080 are ready!!!
good luck to every Volunteer….
let's set a period of time, in which we should win a World Record???
will 5 years period to find a most lucky numer be enough???
regards and sincerely…
Grzegorz Roman Granowski.... Boinc@Poland
____________
|
|
|
robish Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 7 Jan 12 Posts: 2213 ID: 126266 Credit: 7,528,390,594 RAC: 3,343,743
                               
|
Greetings to everybody!!!
my 12 rtx 2080 version ti nad oc tubro and 2 gtx 1080 are ready!!!
good luck to every Volunteer….
let's set a period of time, in which we should win a World Record???
will 5 years period to find a most lucky numer be enough???
regards and sincerely…
Grzegorz Roman Granowski.... Boinc@Poland
12? ......12? What!!!! 12 x 2080ti's? Awesome ;)
____________
My lucky number 10590941048576+1 |
|
|
|
Michael Goetz wrote: I mentioned on the WUProp forums that we had a new app running. That should bring in some players. They're always desperate for more apps.
"Desperate" is a harsh word to say. ;-)
You wouldn't have to mention it on WUProp because I believe PrimeGrid-apps are being intaken automatically there.
But not putting the new app in a news item was rather mean from my point of view because I follow almost every project with an RSS feed. ;-)
Dad wrote: I wonder if I should try one on my GTX 550ti???
Well, I bet it won't work without having the system extremly lagging - if it works anyway. I remember I wanted to update my early 550Ti years ago with a modern CUDA version - wasn't even possible for an unknown reason...
I have one task running on a GTX 960 and it makes my host a bit sluggy. Cannot play without stopping the task and even doing other work is slighty hard, so I let it run for now.
At the current rate it will finish with a 7-day runtime - good that the deadline is long enough because at the end of this week I have to turn the host out for a few days.
____________
Life is Science, and Science rules. To the universe and beyond
Proud member of BOINC@Heidelberg
|
|
|
XAVER Send message
Joined: 21 Jun 16 Posts: 17 ID: 450130 Credit: 103,837,237 RAC: 122,021
                      
|
150,775 sec on my GTX 1080 Ti for one Lucky WU |
|
|
TimT  Send message
Joined: 2 Dec 11 Posts: 504 ID: 121414 Credit: 2,588,152,112 RAC: 1,555,502
                            
|
I just started one of these tasks on a GTX1060 3gb, and it seems to have instantly used up an entire CPU core... anyone else seeing this, or is there a known commandline necessary to minimize CPU? (this is based on what boinctasks reports, I saw near 100% CPU on an 8-core processor, and saw the CPU usage of the PPSE tasks that were also running start to decline)
...I do feel lucky still. |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
Michael Goetz wrote: I mentioned on the WUProp forums that we had a new app running. That should bring in some players. They're always desperate for more apps.
"Desperate" is a harsh word to say. ;-)
Well, I was speaking of myself mostly!
You wouldn't have to mention it on WUProp because I believe PrimeGrid-apps are being intaken automatically there.
True, but it takes a day or two for that, and I wanted to give you'all a head start.
But not putting the new app in a news item was rather mean from my point of view because I follow almost every project with an RSS feed. ;-)
That's coming. There's just been too many things on my plate between starting this project and TdP.
Dad wrote: I wonder if I should try one on my GTX 550ti???
Well, I bet it won't work without having the system extremly lagging - if it works anyway.
It will definitely work, but even my GTX 1060 is laggy.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
I just started one of these tasks on a GTX1060 3gb, and it seems to have instantly used up an entire CPU core... anyone else seeing this, or is there a known commandline necessary to minimize CPU? (this is based on what boinctasks reports, I saw near 100% CPU on an 8-core processor, and saw the CPU usage of the PPSE tasks that were also running start to decline)
...I do feel lucky still.
Same here in Linux. Normal for an OCL app in Linux. |
|
|
|
TimT wrote: I just started one of these tasks on a GTX1060 3gb, and it seems to have instantly used up an entire CPU core... anyone else seeing this, or is there a known commandline necessary to minimize CPU? (this is based on what boinctasks reports, I saw near 100% CPU on an 8-core processor, and saw the CPU usage of the PPSE tasks that were also running start to decline)
...I do feel lucky still.
I can't see this here.
Under Win 10 Home 64 bits, running simultaneously 4 PPSE (each one single threaded) and one GFN-22 Extreme (HT is on, but use at most 50% of the CPUs is set in BOINC Manager):
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. |
|
|
Crun-chi Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09 Posts: 3233 ID: 50683 Credit: 151,443,349 RAC: 54,956
                         
|
I wonder if I should try one on my GTX 550ti???
I look at all of your three computer you have. All three have CPU with GPU.
So why you dont you use Intel GPU for video output, and GTX 550ti got GFN23?
In that case output will not be problem since GPU on CPU working nothing, just show image on your monitor. And on the oder side GTX 550ti will not do anything else then computing GFN 23 :)
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
Crun-chi wrote: ... So why you dont you use Intel GPU for video output, and GTX 550ti got GFN23? ...
I asked once about something similar:
https://www.primegrid.com/forum_thread.php?id=8141&nowrap=true#119351
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. |
|
|
Crun-chi Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09 Posts: 3233 ID: 50683 Credit: 151,443,349 RAC: 54,956
                         
|
I never so any difference in speed using iGPU on Intel processors: maybe it is just me, .
And for me it is very efficient solution.
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
Estimated time for xxxxxxx^4194304+1 is 98:40:00 (GeForce GTX 1060 6GB).
____________
676754^262144+1 is prime |
|
|
|
Greetings to everybody!!!
my 12 rtx 2080 version ti nad oc tubro and 2 gtx 1080 are ready!!!
good luck to every Volunteer….
let's set a period of time, in which we should win a World Record???
will 5 years period to find a most lucky numer be enough???
regards and sincerely…
Grzegorz Roman Granowski.... Boinc@Poland
12? ......12? What!!!! 12 x 2080ti's? Awesome ;)
Yes … 12 x rtx 2080 |
|
|
Crun-chi Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09 Posts: 3233 ID: 50683 Credit: 151,443,349 RAC: 54,956
                         
|
Greetings to everybody!!!
my 12 rtx 2080 version ti nad oc tubro and 2 gtx 1080 are ready!!!
good luck to every Volunteer….
let's set a period of time, in which we should win a World Record???
will 5 years period to find a most lucky numer be enough???
regards and sincerely…
Grzegorz Roman Granowski.... Boinc@Poland
12? ......12? What!!!! 12 x 2080ti's? Awesome ;)
Yes … 12 x rtx 2080
I can count ( or visible is only ) 6 of them :)
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
Greetings to everybody!!!
my 12 rtx 2080 version ti nad oc tubro and 2 gtx 1080 are ready!!!
good luck to every Volunteer….
let's set a period of time, in which we should win a World Record???
will 5 years period to find a most lucky numer be enough???
regards and sincerely…
Grzegorz Roman Granowski.... Boinc@Poland
12? ......12? What!!!! 12 x 2080ti's? Awesome ;)
Yes … 12 x rtx 2080
I can count ( or visible is only ) 6 of them :)
welcome again ... 2 computers with 4 x 2080 we have in the service and we are currently exchanging ... and 1 computer with 2 x 2080 will be replaced next week ... our computer specialist has unfortunately only one service station available, but around Wednesday everything will work and 12 x 2080 will only count to Do You Feel Lucky
|
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
First validated WU:
http://www.primegrid.com/workunit.php?wuid=595577196
846650^4194304+1 is composite. (RES=8cdee21219048946) (24862593 digits) (err = 0.0000) (time = 23:34:46)
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
Run time 86,706.48
https://www.primegrid.com/result.php?resultid=964977409
Edit: i dont think , first tasks will give us more "luck" ... there is only hope))
i just want test performance my 2080Ti on this big tasks, witch was PG team introduced and its very good .. can help drag people to PG crunching.. Biggest prime is really amazing achievment for people ... but be carefull becouse on some GFN task we must wait years for it..)
As we see there is possible get about 80 000+ second per task on some hi clocked cpu and custom nvidia Gf.cards with max clocked from factory.
V100 theroretical 65K..? -) |
|
|
|
Run time 86,706.48
https://www.primegrid.com/result.php?resultid=964977409
The link you provided results in "You can't view this result yet."
But I can see using this link:
http://www.primegrid.com/results.php?hostid=946371&offset=0&show_names=0&state=0&appid=31
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. |
|
|
|
First validated WU:
http://www.primegrid.com/workunit.php?wuid=595577196
846650^4194304+1 is composite. (RES=8cdee21219048946) (24862593 digits) (err = 0.0000) (time = 23:34:46)
Impressive times !
One would have to be Extremely Lucky to find a prime in the very first WU.
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
Good news: After one day, I have a wingman for my Lucky task. I won't have to wait forever for credit.
Bad news: Even though I had a 1 day head start, my wingman's probably going to finish 2 days before me.
1060 vs 2080 Ti :)
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
Good news: After one day, I have a wingman for my Lucky task. I won't have to wait forever for credit.
Bad news: Even though I had a 1 day head start, my wingman's probably going to finish 2 days before me.
1060 vs 2080 Ti :)
:(
Almost no chance against those mighty GPUs.
A normal user wouldn't be able to see that information, right ?
If click for details on the current task I'm crunching, I get "tasks in progress suppressed pending completion".
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
Good news: After one day, I have a wingman for my Lucky task. I won't have to wait forever for credit.
Bad news: Even though I had a 1 day head start, my wingman's probably going to finish 2 days before me.
1060 vs 2080 Ti :)
:(
Almost no chance against those mighty GPUs.
A normal user wouldn't be able to see that information, right ?
If click for details on the current task I'm crunching, I get "tasks in progress suppressed pending completion".
Right. We had some issues last year that caused us to suppress certain information to maintain fairness for all.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
Right. We had some issues last year that caused us to suppress certain information to maintain fairness for all.
I remember that.
I believe it was a decision made (taken?) during last year TdP.
Lots of interesting things happened then.
I learned not to assume, ha, ha, ha
Also the idea of putting (1st) in the task list was given by composite and you quickly implemented it.
____________
"Accidit in puncto, quod non contingit in anno."
Something that does not occur in a year may, perchance, happen in a moment. |
|
|
compositeVolunteer tester Send message
Joined: 16 Feb 10 Posts: 1150 ID: 55391 Credit: 1,099,799,817 RAC: 814,087
                        
|
Right. We had some issues last year that caused us to suppress certain information to maintain fairness for all.
I remember that.
I believe it was a decision made (taken?) during last year TdP.
Lots of interesting things happened then.
I learned not to assume, ha, ha, ha
Also the idea of putting (1st) in the task list was given by composite and you quickly implemented it.
Some days are better than others for me. Full credit to Mike for having the inspiration for that concise representation.
EDIT: Ah, there's the one
Whereupon Mike said...
Wrong page. I'm thinking of changing the page that shows 20 tasks at a time. |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
There's now 21 completed tasks. Two validated WUs. Fastest times for GPU types:
GTX TITAN X: 258473
GTX 1080: 202288
GTX 1080 Ti: 150775
RTX 2070 : 126196
RTX 2080: 105610
TITAN V: 81992
RTX 2080 Ti: 80129
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
EDIT: Ah, there's the one
Whereupon Mike said...
Wrong page. I'm thinking of changing the page that shows 20 tasks at a time.
Actually, my response to you was...
Michael Goetz wrote: I'll look into it.
"Be careful what you ask for."
You've definitely let the genie out of the bottle now. :)
That sure came true!
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
There's now 21 completed tasks. Two validated WUs. Fastest times for GPU types:
GTX TITAN X: 258473
GTX 1080: 202288
GTX 1080 Ti: 150775
RTX 2070 : 126196
RTX 2080: 105610
TITAN V: 81992
RTX 2080 Ti: 80129
There's an interesting benchmark here. How come a 2080 Ti with 420 FP64 flops complete the wu quicker than a Titan V with 7.450 FP64 flops? |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
There's now 21 completed tasks. Two validated WUs. Fastest times for GPU types:
GTX TITAN X: 258473
GTX 1080: 202288
GTX 1080 Ti: 150775
RTX 2070 : 126196
RTX 2080: 105610
TITAN V: 81992
RTX 2080 Ti: 80129
There's an interesting benchmark here. How come a 2080 Ti with 420 FP64 flops complete the wu quicker than a Titan V with 7.450 FP64 flops?
Lucky doesn't use DP because B is beyond the OCL limit, which is approximately 610K for N=22.
Only the original OCL transform (and the similar and obsolete CUDA transform) use DP. All the other OCL transforms (OCL2, OCL3, OCL4, and OCL5) exist to circumvent the B limit when using DP.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14011 ID: 53948 Credit: 435,567,510 RAC: 868,496
                               
|
There's now 38 completed tasks and 4 validated WUs. The 1070s now have had time to finish.
Fastest times for GPU types:
GTX TITAN X: 258473
GTX 1070 Ti: 228190 *
GTX 1070: 210488
GTX 1080: 195014
GTX 1080 Ti: 135879
RTX 2070 : 120520
RTX 2080: 105610
TITAN V: 81992
RTX 2080 Ti: 78627
* I don't know why that 1070 Ti (it's a single result) was slower than a 1070.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Dad Send message
Joined: 28 Feb 18 Posts: 284 ID: 984171 Credit: 182,080,291 RAC: 0
                 
|
That 1070ti is mine Michael, it's running with no O/C, maybe that's it or maybe it's the +40*C temps we've had in Oz????
____________
Tonight's lucky numbers are
555*2^3563328+1 (PPS-MEGA)
and
58523466^131072+1 (GFN-17 MEGA) |
|
|
Dad Send message
Joined: 28 Feb 18 Posts: 284 ID: 984171 Credit: 182,080,291 RAC: 0
        |