Author |
Message |
|
Welcome to the Perseid Shower Challenge
The night sky can offer some wonderful sights, like distant stars and planets, the milkyway but also meteor showers. The Perseids are a prolific meteor shower associated with the comet Swift-Tuttle. The Perseids are so-called because the point from which they appear to come, called the radiant, lies in the constellation Perseus. The name derives in part from the word Perseides (Περσείδες), a term found in Greek mythology referring to the sons of Perseus. [wiki] This shower has been observed for approximately 2000 years, so as themes for a challenge go: it's one with a few years of history. PrimeGrid is therefor offering a 48 hour Challenge on The Riesel Problem (Sieve).
To participate in the Challenge, please select only the TRP (Sieve) project in your PrimeGrid preferences section. The Challenge will begin 12 Aug 2013 18:00 UTC and end 14 Aug 2013 18:00 UTC. Application builds are available for MacIntel, Linux 32 & 64 bit and Windows 32 & 64 bit.
Note: 64 bit builds benefit from a 1.7X speed advantage over 32 bit...so 1.7X the credit. :)
NOTE: In your PrimeGrid preferences section, set "Send work from any subproject if selected projects have no work" to no to guarantee that no other work will be sent.
Recommendation: The TRP (Sieve) application requires a one time download of a 32.4MB sieve file. Please consider running a few TRP (Sieve) WU's before the Challenge begins so your client will already have the sieve file. This way, bandwidth can be used to deliver WU's instead of the sieve file. :) Thank you!
The World Clock - Time Zone Converter
NOTE: The countdown clock on the front page uses the host computer time. Therefore, if your computer time is off, so will the countdown clock. For precise timing, use the UTC Time in the data section to the left of the countdown clock.
Scoring Information
Scores will be kept for individuals and teams. Only work units issued AFTER 12 Aug 2013 18:00 UTC and received BEFORE 14 Aug 2013 18:00 UTC will be considered for credit. Since this is a fixed credit project, we'll be using BOINC credit for scoring. A quorum of 2 is NOT needed to award Challenge score - i.e. no double checker. Therefore, each returned result will earn a Challenge score. Please note that if the result is eventually declared invalid, the score will be removed.
Clean up
Since this is the first sieving challenge being run with double checking turned on for these type of projects there will be a clean up just like with LLR and GFN challenges.
At the Conclusion of the Challenge
We would prefer users "moving on" to finish those tasks they have downloaded, if not then please ABORT the WU's instead of DETACHING, RESETTING, or PAUSING.
ABORTING WU's allows them to be recycled immediately; thus a much faster "clean up" to the end of an LLR Challenge. DETACHING, RESETTING, and PAUSING WU's causes them to remain in limbo until they EXPIRE. Therefore, we must wait until WU's expire to send them out to be completed.
Please consider either completing what's in the queue or ABORTING them. Thank you. :)
About The Riesel Problem
Hans Ivar Riesel (born 1929 in Stockholm) is a Swedish mathematician. In 1956, he showed that there are an infinite number of positive odd integer k's such that k*2^n-1 is composite (not prime) for every integer n>=1. These numbers are now called Riesel numbers. He further showed that k=509203 was such one.
It is conjectured that 509203 is the smallest Riesel number. The Riesel problem consists in determining that 509203 is the smallest Riesel number. To show that it is the smallest, a prime of the form k*2^n-1 must be found for each of the positive integer k's less than 509203. As of June 2013, there remain 55 k's for which no primes have been found. They are as follows:
2293, 9221, 23669, 31859, 38473, 40597, 46663, 67117, 74699, 81041, 93839, 97139, 107347, 121889, 129007, 143047, 146561, 161669, 192971, 206039, 206231, 215443, 226153, 234343, 245561, 250027, 273809, 304207, 315929, 319511, 324011, 325123, 327671, 336839, 342847, 344759, 362609, 363343, 364903, 365159, 368411, 371893, 384539, 386801, 397027, 398023, 402539, 409753, 444637, 470173, 474491, 477583, 485557, 494743, 502573
For a more detailed history and status of the Riesel problem, please visit Wilfrid Keller's The Riesel Problem: Definition and Status.
Additional Information
Riesel Number (Wolfram MathWorld)
Riesel Number (Wiki)
Riesel Number (The Prime Glossary)
The Riesel problem is to k*2^n-1 as the Sierpinski problem is to k*2^n+1. There is no equivalent to the 'prime' Sierpinski problem since k=509203, the conjectured smallest Riesel number, is prime.
What is sieving?
Sieving is the first step to prime finding. In general, a sieve separates wanted/desired elements from unwanted material using a tool such as a mesh, net or other filtration or distillation methods. The word "sift" derives from this term. (Wikipedia - Sieve)
In PrimeGrid's case, the desired elements ultimately are prime numbers and the unwanted material are composite numbers. Our tool of choice for PSP/SoB sieve is Geoff Reynolds' sr2sieve program. It eliminates possible candidates by removing numbers that have small factors. As this process is much faster than primality testing, it is good to thoroughly sieve a data set before primality testing.
Sieving removes many candidates at the beginning. However, the deeper the sieve goes, the slower the rate of removal, till eventually sieving removes candidates at the same rate as primality testing. This is sometimes referred to as "optimal depth". Primality testing is recommended at this point.
There are many factors that determine how much time and how deep to sieve. After sieving, all the remaining candidates must be primality tested to determine their "prime" status.
32 bit OS with 64 bit CPU
This is for those who are "driving with the hand brake active" (running a 32 bit OS on a 64 bit machine) ;) Wubi is a very nice tool that installs Ubuntu as a dual boot to your 64 bit machine. It's as simple as adding a program to Windows. You can even uninstall it like you would any other program. :)
Wubi - Ubuntu Installer
After getting 64 bit OS running on your machine, here's a link to ALL BOINC clients (including Linux x64): http://boinc.berkeley.edu/download_all.php If you are new to Linux and need help getting set up, let us know.
It really is simple. :) With that said, check what installations WUBI will NOT work on: Unsupported set-ups
____________
PrimeGrid Challenge Overall standings --- Last update: From Pi to Paddy (2016)
|
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
This is the first sieve challenge since we adopted the new credit system, so the rules need to change just a little bit.
Some sieve tasks now require double checking, so there will be a cleanup phase for this challenge as we wait for some of the tasks to validate against the results from other computers.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
Hoping to do the Challenge, but some of my (faster!) computers don't seem to like TRP-Sieve tasks at all! - crash after a few seconds .. like -
467053779 345174851 26 Jul 2013 | 7:04:19 UTC 26 Jul 2013 | 12:29:18 UTC Error while computing 12.09 0.00 --- The Riesel Problem (Sieve) v1.12
467051060 345174845 26 Jul 2013 | 7:04:32 UTC 26 Jul 2013 | 12:29:18 UTC Error while computing 12.09 0.00 --- The Riesel Problem (Sieve) v1.12
467043868 345167058 26 Jul 2013 | 1:50:45 UTC 26 Jul 2013 | 9:28:35 UTC Error while computing 12.78 0.00 --- The Riesel Problem (Sieve) v1.12
- they are all fine on everything else. - I have tried resetting the project, but it didn't help..
____________
|
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
Hoping to do the Challenge, but some of my (faster!) computers don't seem to like TRP-Sieve tasks at all! - crash after a few seconds .. like -
467053779 345174851 26 Jul 2013 | 7:04:19 UTC 26 Jul 2013 | 12:29:18 UTC Error while computing 12.09 0.00 --- The Riesel Problem (Sieve) v1.12
467051060 345174845 26 Jul 2013 | 7:04:32 UTC 26 Jul 2013 | 12:29:18 UTC Error while computing 12.09 0.00 --- The Riesel Problem (Sieve) v1.12
467043868 345167058 26 Jul 2013 | 1:50:45 UTC 26 Jul 2013 | 9:28:35 UTC Error while computing 12.78 0.00 --- The Riesel Problem (Sieve) v1.12
- they are all fine on everything else. - I have tried resetting the project, but it didn't help..
The output shows that the sieve program aborted on a divide by 0 hardware exception. That shouldn't happen, and it didn't happen to the other computers crunching those workunits.
At this time I have no specific answer for you. I searched the database and you're the only person with this problem -- and you're seeing it on three different computers. (There's one other host with a single instance of an error like this, but no hosts are getting that error repeatedly like yours.)
So, I'd be looking for something wrong on those computers. Not sure what, but I'd try the normal tactics (in this order): 1) Reboot the computer, 2) detach from PrimeGrid and re-attach, and finally 3) uninstall boinc, erase its directories, and install from scratch. (For the last two, of course, make sure there's no in-progress tasks since they'll be lost.)
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
pschoefer Volunteer developer Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 05 Posts: 685 ID: 845 Credit: 2,886,413,454 RAC: 139,386
                              
|
Hoping to do the Challenge, but some of my (faster!) computers don't seem to like TRP-Sieve tasks at all! - crash after a few seconds .. like -
467053779 345174851 26 Jul 2013 | 7:04:19 UTC 26 Jul 2013 | 12:29:18 UTC Error while computing 12.09 0.00 --- The Riesel Problem (Sieve) v1.12
467051060 345174845 26 Jul 2013 | 7:04:32 UTC 26 Jul 2013 | 12:29:18 UTC Error while computing 12.09 0.00 --- The Riesel Problem (Sieve) v1.12
467043868 345167058 26 Jul 2013 | 1:50:45 UTC 26 Jul 2013 | 9:28:35 UTC Error while computing 12.78 0.00 --- The Riesel Problem (Sieve) v1.12
- they are all fine on everything else. - I have tried resetting the project, but it didn't help..
'Divide by Zero' might be caused by bad computing preferences. Make sure that "Write to disk at most every" is not 0 in global prefs or local prefs in BOINC Manager.
____________
|
|
|
|
I had a PC do that to me in the 90s, due to (pathetically) overclocked SDRAM, so if you're trying any sort of overclocking, and not necessarily with the CPU, that would be another possible cause. I know it sounds obvious when mentioned, but sometimes non-CPU tweaks can fail to show up on the error-radar. |
|
|
|
Curiouser and Curiouser - as Alice would say -
I tried to find some 'common-link' between those 3 PCs - and came up empty. Different procs - 2 Core-i5 notebooks, and a Core-i7 Desktop - different flavors of Win7 - different versions of BOINC even!
I use BAM manager on all my PCs and generally don't touch the settings otherwise, so I'm pretty sure it's not a settings-problem - and NONE of them are overclocked in ANY way - and have run all other BOINC tasks faultlessly for many months!
So I took one of them (Computer number 259651) and 'went the whole hog' ..
I uninstalled (MSSE) Antivirus completely (often a cause of these kind of weird errors), then proceeded to abort all tasks, reset, detach, and finally completely uninstall BOINC and delete the Program Data folder entirely, before rebooting and doing a complete re-install.
Result? - Absolutely no difference whatsoever!
- I Do have some further Info though.. - It appears the task processes are not stopped after being aborted, and carry on running, taking up CPU resources and eventually grinding Windows to a halt unless they are manually deleted in the Task Manager.
So is this some sort of a Wrapper-fault?
I am open to any more suggestions... ?
____________
|
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
I'm stumped. I don't have any reasonable explanation for what's happening.
If you want, you could try running them under Linux, either in a dual boot, WUBI, or VM. I'm not sure what it will prove if that works, or if it doesn't work, except that maybe there will be an answer coming from an unexpected source if you try enough alternatives.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Tyler Project administrator Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 12 Posts: 1078 ID: 183129 Credit: 1,376,122,338 RAC: 8,547
                         
|
Curiouser and Curiouser - as Alice would say -
I tried to find some 'common-link' between those 3 PCs - and came up empty. Different procs - 2 Core-i5 notebooks, and a Core-i7 Desktop - different flavors of Win7 - different versions of BOINC even!
I use BAM manager on all my PCs and generally don't touch the settings otherwise, so I'm pretty sure it's not a settings-problem - and NONE of them are overclocked in ANY way - and have run all other BOINC tasks faultlessly for many months!
So I took one of them (Computer number 259651) and 'went the whole hog' ..
I uninstalled (MSSE) Antivirus completely (often a cause of these kind of weird errors), then proceeded to abort all tasks, reset, detach, and finally completely uninstall BOINC and delete the Program Data folder entirely, before rebooting and doing a complete re-install.
Result? - Absolutely no difference whatsoever!
- I Do have some further Info though.. - It appears the task processes are not stopped after being aborted, and carry on running, taking up CPU resources and eventually grinding Windows to a halt unless they are manually deleted in the Task Manager.
So is this some sort of a Wrapper-fault?
I am open to any more suggestions... ?
Though my tasks didn't abort, I did see something similar happen on my PC. I have an i5 2500k running windows 7 pro x64. There were 4 trp sv tasks running in boinc manager, yet 5 processes fighting each for a full core in task manager. Sure enough when i suspended BOINC, there was a sieve process using a full core. I killed that and then my tasks ran faster. that is the part that seems similar to yours, the process still using a full CPU core after it finishes in BOINC.
____________
275*2^3585539+1 is prime!!! (1079358 digits)
Proud member of Aggie the Pew
|
|
|
|
I'm stumped. I don't have any reasonable explanation for what's happening.
If you want, you could try running them under Linux, either in a dual boot, WUBI, or VM. I'm not sure what it will prove if that works, or if it doesn't work, except that maybe there will be an answer coming from an unexpected source if you try enough alternatives.
I had VirtualBox running a Win-XP virtual machine installed on that Core-i7 box, so I installed BOINC (Computer No 405498) and it appears to be running a TRP Sieve task OK.. (or at least it has managed to keep running a few minutes so far without crashing!) - so, if nothing else, I do appear to have a way to make these PCs productive during the Challenge!
____________
|
|
|
Ken_g6 Volunteer developer
 Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 06 Posts: 938 ID: 3110 Credit: 258,404,132 RAC: 84,123
                            
|
Anybody had any success getting Android to run this work? I tried installing BOINC on my Android device, but it said PrimeGrid didn't support Android. I then tried NativeBoinc, but I keep getting "Unable to authorize access" errors.
____________
|
|
|
|
Anybody had any success getting Android to run this work? I tried installing BOINC on my Android device, but it said PrimeGrid didn't support Android. I then tried NativeBoinc, but I keep getting "Unable to authorize access" errors.
I have run it from NativeBOINC a few times. Plan on running it during the challenge.
If you installed BOINC first, maybe it's somehow interfering with the NativeBOINC? Did you download the PrimeGrid application from NativeBOINC website before trying to initialize it?
____________
My lucky numbers are 121*2^4553899-1 and 3756801695685*2^666669±1
My movie https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/502242 |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
Do you think it would be helpful if the android app(s) were available as normal apps on the server?
Yes, I know I've been completely against that in the past, but it's becoming more mainstream. There's an official boinc client now, and lots of android/arm talk on the mailing lists.
I'm not promising this will happen, and certainly not when. I'm just asking if it would be helpful.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
NativeBoinc devs have been doing a nice job porting primegrid ans other projects to the android environement.
Nevertheless, I think it would be useful to have android apps available, now that we have an official android boinc app.
I also propose an android-only subproject or subproject division, with shorter WUs (some sort of sieves, wich allow arbitrary lenght of work, like those running on PSA - I'm not sure if TRPsieve tasks can can be shortened; if they can, we could.start with them).
____________
676754^262144+1 is prime |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
NativeBoinc devs have been doing a nice job porting primegrid ans other projects to the android environement.
Nevertheless, I think it would be useful to have android apps available, now that we have an official android boinc app.
I also propose an android-only subproject or subproject division, with shorter WUs (some sort of sieves, wich allow arbitrary lenght of work, like those running on PSA - I'm not sure if TRPsieve tasks can can be shortened; if they can, we could.start with them).
So noted. I'm against having a separate app just for android because, despite having a bigger, better, server, there's limitiations to the way the boinc scheduler works that makes temporary "no work" errors more likely as you increase the number of apps. I wouldn't want to make a new app just for Android.
There's no obvious way to have one app have different size tasks, at least not if you require validation against another computer's result. (Rosetta lets you set the task size, but they don't validate against another host.)
So if we make tasks shorter (easy to do with sieves), it's for everyone.
Feel free to keep discussing this; if there's a lot more discussion I'll move this into its own thread at some point.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
I tried installing BOINC on my Android device, but it said PrimeGrid didn't support Android.
I've configured Android (with ARM processor) support into PrimeGrid, so you shouldn't get that error message anymore. Now, you'll get some variation of "no work available" instead.
There's no Android apps so far, so you can't get work from the server. Yet.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
That was exceptionally easy. TRP sieve on Android is now available directly from the server. Or at least it should be. I have no way of testing it, so I don't actually know if it works or not. Feel free to try it and let me know.
I'm using the binaries from the nativeboinc site.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
Gives a whole new meaning to "Hot Pocket"
____________
|
|
|
Ken_g6 Volunteer developer
 Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 06 Posts: 938 ID: 3110 Credit: 258,404,132 RAC: 84,123
                            
|
BOINC says it's 0.1% done with 2 WUs on my Android tablet. I'll let you know if it finishes. Thanks for setting this up!
____________
|
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
BOINC says it's 0.1% done with 2 WUs on my Android tablet. I'll let you know if it finishes. Thanks for setting this up!
Those have been completing with an average cpu time of about 21.5 hours on Android.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
Curiouser and Curiouser - as Alice would say -
I tried to find some 'common-link' between those 3 PCs - and came up empty. Different procs - 2 Core-i5 notebooks, and a Core-i7 Desktop - different flavors of Win7 - different versions of BOINC even!
I use BAM manager on all my PCs and generally don't touch the settings otherwise, so I'm pretty sure it's not a settings-problem - and NONE of them are overclocked in ANY way - and have run all other BOINC tasks faultlessly for many months!
So I took one of them (Computer number 259651) and 'went the whole hog' ..
I uninstalled (MSSE) Antivirus completely (often a cause of these kind of weird errors), then proceeded to abort all tasks, reset, detach, and finally completely uninstall BOINC and delete the Program Data folder entirely, before rebooting and doing a complete re-install.
Result? - Absolutely no difference whatsoever!
- I Do have some further Info though.. - It appears the task processes are not stopped after being aborted, and carry on running, taking up CPU resources and eventually grinding Windows to a halt unless they are manually deleted in the Task Manager.
So is this some sort of a Wrapper-fault?
I am open to any more suggestions... ?
Though my tasks didn't abort, I did see something similar happen on my PC. I have an i5 2500k running windows 7 pro x64. There were 4 trp sv tasks running in boinc manager, yet 5 processes fighting each for a full core in task manager. Sure enough when i suspended BOINC, there was a sieve process using a full core. I killed that and then my tasks ran faster. that is the part that seems similar to yours, the process still using a full CPU core after it finishes in BOINC.
I have been having computation errors for a couple of days on 1 computer only. A check of task manager with BOINC suspended showed 2 tasks running that were not real. I ended the tasks and will see how it goes.
I have never had a similar error. It is a long while since I last ran TRP SV, the laptop is now turning on and off more often and I have set the "suspend while in use" flag. With so many changes and I do not know which has caused the error yet.
____________
Member team AUSTRALIA
My lucky number is 9291*2^1085585+1 |
|
|
Ken_g6 Volunteer developer
 Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 06 Posts: 938 ID: 3110 Credit: 258,404,132 RAC: 84,123
                            
|
Well, my two Android work units completed successfully. 36 hours seems to be the average time for devices like this.
____________
|
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
Well, my two Android work units completed successfully. 36 hours seems to be the average time for devices like this.
Just barely fast enough for the challenge.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
The "Official" BOINC client is much, much better than NativeBOINC on my phone. Cheers for making me aware of it, I'd uninstalled NativeBOINC and given up when it kept leaving tasks erroring out or... whatever else it did with them. I recommend that anyone who has tried using their phone to crunch, but been put off, should try the official BOINC client. |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
Well, my two Android work units completed successfully. 36 hours seems to be the average time for devices like this.
We've made the TRP sieve tasks 5 times shorter, so once you get one of the new tasks the run time should be in the vicinity of 7 hours. On a CPU it should average about 45 minutes.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
Well, my two Android work units completed successfully. 36 hours seems to be the average time for devices like this.
We've made the TRP sieve tasks 5 times shorter, so once you get one of the new tasks the run time should be in the vicinity of 7 hours. On a CPU it should average about 45 minutes.
The new tasks take about 7:50 CPU time on my Android tablet.
____________
607*2^1790196+1 |
|
|
|
NativeBOINC has worked best for me. When I try to attach PrimeGrid to the official BOINC client, it says that PrimeGrid does not support Android. NativeBOINC also allows you to view the message log.
____________
607*2^1790196+1 |
|
|
|
NativeBOINC has worked best for me. When I try to attach PrimeGrid to the official BOINC client, it says that PrimeGrid does not support Android. NativeBOINC also allows you to view the message log.
official BOINC shows message log to and no problem with connecting and getting work.
____________
|
|
|
Sysadm@Nbg Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Project scientist
 Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 08 Posts: 1216 ID: 18646 Credit: 858,500,351 RAC: 175,372
                      
|
when do we get the first stats filled?
____________
Sysadm@Nbg
my current lucky number: 113856050^65536 + 1
PSA-PRPNet-Stats-URL: http://u-g-f.de/PRPNet/
|
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
NativeBOINC has worked best for me. When I try to attach PrimeGrid to the official BOINC client, it says that PrimeGrid does not support Android. NativeBOINC also allows you to view the message log.
I've got a Droid 4 crunching PrimeGrid using the official BOINC client. PrimeGrid doesn't come up on the list of supported projects (yet), but it works if you type in "www.primegrid.com" directly as the URL for the project.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
when do we get the first stats filled?
Stats are working now.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Sysadm@Nbg Volunteer moderator Volunteer tester Project scientist
 Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 08 Posts: 1216 ID: 18646 Credit: 858,500,351 RAC: 175,372
                      
|
when do we get the first stats filled?
Stats are working now.
thanks for this! (and the other stuff, too. Indeed!)
____________
Sysadm@Nbg
my current lucky number: 113856050^65536 + 1
PSA-PRPNet-Stats-URL: http://u-g-f.de/PRPNet/
|
|
|
Scott Brown Volunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer tester Project scientist
 Send message
Joined: 17 Oct 05 Posts: 2380 ID: 1178 Credit: 17,890,923,347 RAC: 9,413,222
                                                
|
Samsung Galaxy SII is about 6 hours for one work unit.
ASUS Transformer Prime is about 6 hours 20 minutes.
|
|
|
|
There are some long wus being recicled. Not sure how will they be credited (not complaining, just sharing factoid and doubt...).
____________
676754^262144+1 is prime |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
There are some long wus being recicled. Not sure how will they be credited (not complaining, just sharing factoid and doubt...).
We only shortened the WU size a few days ago. Many long WUs are still active, and if they error out, or miss their deadline, they need to be sent out again.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
There are some long wus being recicled. Not sure how will they be credited (not complaining, just sharing factoid and doubt...).
This one is long and it will give 600 points.
http://www.primegrid.com/workunit.php?wuid=348015452
____________
|
|
|
|
NativeBOINC has worked best for me. When I try to attach PrimeGrid to the official BOINC client, it says that PrimeGrid does not support Android. NativeBOINC also allows you to view the message log.
I've got a Droid 4 crunching PrimeGrid using the official BOINC client. PrimeGrid doesn't come up on the list of supported projects (yet), but it works if you type in "www.primegrid.com" directly as the URL for the project.
Things must have changed since I tried it a few weeks ago. I'll have to try it again.
____________
607*2^1790196+1 |
|
|
|
I've a problem with the project settings, I can't delete this settings in my preferences
Proth Prime Search (Sieve) CUDA, AMD (ATI)
I've tried this some times, Firefox and IE.
For CPU I could change my project settings only to TRP (Sieve) without a problem.
Edit: just checked one more way: after clearing the checkmark for CUDA GPU and ATI GPU I was able clear the project settings for Proth Prime Search (Sieve)
____________
Matthias
|
|
|
|
You can't have nothing selected. If you want to disable your GPU you have to deselect "Use ATI/Nvidia GPU" at the top.
____________
PrimeGrid Challenge Overall standings --- Last update: From Pi to Paddy (2016)
|
|
|
|
I nee an ID for this Projekt for my IPhone 5
Can I take the BoinC Bam CP- ID ?
____________
|
|
|
|
No stats for participants?
____________
|
|
|
|
Hi
is the TRP sieve app AVX enabled ?
My 64bit i7 3930x boxes are taking on av 18 mins per 6 cores.
My 2 much older 980x 6 core are 23 mins.
normally with LLR apps the 980s take twice the time.
Cheers
Ross*
____________
|
|
|
|
No stats for participants?
Yes there are. See here for participants and here for teams
____________
PrimeGrid Challenge Overall standings --- Last update: From Pi to Paddy (2016)
|
|
|
|
Hi
is the TRP sieve app AVX enabled ?
My 64bit i7 3930x boxes are taking on av 18 mins per 6 cores.
My 2 much older 980x 6 core are 23 mins.
normally with LLR apps the 980s take twice the time.
Cheers
Ross*
Nope, no AVX for sieve apps, only for LLR and GFN.
____________
PrimeGrid Challenge Overall standings --- Last update: From Pi to Paddy (2016)
|
|
|
Ken_g6 Volunteer developer
 Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 06 Posts: 938 ID: 3110 Credit: 258,404,132 RAC: 84,123
                            
|
I nee an ID for this Projekt for my IPhone 5
Can I take the BoinC Bam CP- ID ?
I don't think there's an iPhone app for this. Only Android. Even if there is a binary, there's no officially supported iPhone BOINC client.
____________
|
|
|
|
I nee an ID for this Projekt for my IPhone 5?
There is no BOINC crunching program for Apple iOS. There is a BOINC Stats program that allows you to review your stats. It uses the Cross Project ID to gather the stats.
____________
My lucky numbers are 121*2^4553899-1 and 3756801695685*2^666669±1
My movie https://vimeo.com/manage/videos/502242 |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
I nee an ID for this Projekt for my IPhone 5
Can I take the BoinC Bam CP- ID ?
I don't think there's an iPhone app for this. Only Android. Even if there is a binary, there's no officially supported iPhone BOINC client.
The reason there's no iPhone BOINC client is that Apple's licensing is incompatible with BOINC. If you think about it, they keep everything inside their "walled-garden" app store, where they have to approve every app before it can be distributed to people.
With BOINC, the app in the app store would be the BOINC client, but it would download the actual crunching apps from the project websites. I've never heard of Apple permitting anything like that.
I personally own an iPhone, so I'd be all for having an iOS version of BOINC, but I don't see it ever happening.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
any explanation for 109.22 points per WU - i thought boinc-credits would be counted? |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
any explanation for 109.22 points per WU - i thought boinc-credits would be counted?
You may have missed where the tasks were made 5 times shorter, and therefore get 1/5th the credit. 109.22 is the BOINC credit per task, unless you happen to get one of the old, longer tasks that are still floating around the system.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
any explanation for 109.22 points per WU - i thought boinc-credits would be counted?
You may have missed where the tasks were made 5 times shorter, and therefore get 1/5th the credit. 109.22 is the BOINC credit per task, unless you happen to get one of the old, longer tasks that are still floating around the system.
nope - didn't miss it.
i see 120.14 boinc-credits for the short ones.
most likely no effect for the challenge, but weird. ;) |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
any explanation for 109.22 points per WU - i thought boinc-credits would be counted?
You may have missed where the tasks were made 5 times shorter, and therefore get 1/5th the credit. 109.22 is the BOINC credit per task, unless you happen to get one of the old, longer tasks that are still floating around the system.
nope - didn't miss it.
i see 120.14 boinc-credits for the short ones.
most likely no effect for the challenge, but weird. ;)
Oops. My mistake.
109.22 is the "official" credit rate for TRP Sieve, so that's what you see on the challenge leader boards.
When it comes to actually counting credit, there's a 10% "conjecture bonus" added to the credit, which brings you to 120.14.
For sieve challenges, since all sieves are fixed credit, perhaps we should switch the challenge scoring to simply be a count of the tasks completed. "Long" tasks would count as 5, and short tasks would count as 1. The credit is irrelevant in a challenge with fixed credit.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
Oops. My mistake.
109.22 is the "official" credit rate for TRP Sieve, so that's what you see on the challenge leader boards.
When it comes to actually counting credit, there's a 10% "conjecture bonus" added to the credit, which brings you to 120.14.
For sieve challenges, since all sieves are fixed credit, perhaps we should switch the challenge scoring to simply be a count of the tasks completed. "Long" tasks would count as 5, and short tasks would count as 1. The credit is irrelevant in a challenge with fixed credit.
well - or my mistake to forget about the bonus.
anyway - a point per task sounds logical in this case. |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
Mid-Point Update:
We're just past the halfway point of the challenge, with 24 hours to go.
Challenge tasks sent out: 694,181
Challenge tasks successfully completed so far: 398,386
EDIT: Adjusting for the shorter WU size, on a normal day, we do about 35,000 tasks per day, so we've increased throughput by more than 10 times! Well done!
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
Randy (cncr04s) has more than 40% of the entire challenge! Wow - some going!
He has an order of magnitude more than Ray (second place).
http://afxr.net/pg/PerseidShowerChallenge_180219.png
____________
Warped
|
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
More fun numbers for you:
Given the number of tasks completed in the first day, we've done an estimated combined processing rate of 33 TeraFlops per second. That number is actually too low because it's only counting tasks sent after the challenge started and that have already been returned. Many tasks that have been crunched won't be returned until later.
To put things in perspective, if I'm reading their server status page correctly, Einstein@Home did 879 TFlops of CPU crunching in the last week. We're doing that every 26 seconds.
(These calculations are based on the BOINC benchmarks.)
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
Randy (cncr04s) has more than 40% of the entire challenge! Wow - some going!
He has an order of magnitude more than Ray (second place).
http://afxr.net/pg/PerseidShowerChallenge_180219.png
What I find very interesting about that chart is how huge the "Everyone else" slice is. It's not just the people with access to a gazillion servers that are doing this. It's lots and lots of "little people" like myself with just one or two computers.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
+1 for "everyone else". Especially for those with little credit who write, build, and test the apps that we run.
--Gary |
|
|
Tyler Project administrator Volunteer tester Send message
Joined: 4 Dec 12 Posts: 1078 ID: 183129 Credit: 1,376,122,338 RAC: 8,547
                         
|
An apple iOS one could be made available for jailbroken ipods/iphones/ipads through cydia, if someone had the time, energy, etc to make it work. I'd jailbreak my ipod and iphone to have boinc on them.
____________
275*2^3585539+1 is prime!!! (1079358 digits)
Proud member of Aggie the Pew
|
|
|
|
What I find very interesting about that chart is how huge the "Everyone else" slice is. It's not just the people with access to a gazillion servers that are doing this. It's lots and lots of "little people" like myself with just one or two computers.
As definitely one of the "other contributors", I'm having an absolute blast with my first challenge. I was hoping for a top 200 place finish (and getting a bite of the leaderboard credit), but it looks like I'm going to have to work damned hard to manage a top-300. My i5 laptop and Q6700 work machine are doing their best, though ;) |
|
|
|
What I find very interesting about that chart is how huge the "Everyone else" slice is. It's not just the people with access to a gazillion servers that are doing this. It's lots and lots of "little people" like myself with just one or two computers.
As definitely one of the "other contributors", I'm having an absolute blast with my first challenge. I was hoping for a top 200 place finish (and getting a bite of the leaderboard credit), but it looks like I'm going to have to work damned hard to manage a top-300. My i5 laptop and Q6700 work machine are doing their best, though ;)
Warm welcome to PrimeGrid!
--Gary
____________
"I am he as you are he as you are me and we are all together"
87*2^3496188+1 is prime! (1052460 digits)
4 is not prime! (1 digit) |
|
|
|
Randy (cncr04s) has more than 40% of the entire challenge! Wow - some going!
He has an order of magnitude more than Ray (second place).
http://afxr.net/pg/PerseidShowerChallenge_180219.png
What I find very interesting about that chart is how huge the "Everyone else" slice is. It's not just the people with access to a gazillion servers that are doing this. It's lots and lots of "little people" like myself with just one or two computers.
Yes, Mike,
but 2 days is a little bit smal, 4 or 5 days for this schallenge are better. I know, its a 48 hour Challenge on The Riesel Problem (Sieve). But I love The Riesel Problem (Sieve) and the shower come 6 days. Perhaps next Year ?
____________
|
|
|
|
The end is nigh!
With about 4 hours left to crunch we would like to request the following
At the Conclusion of the Challenge
We would prefer users "moving on" to finish those tasks they have downloaded, if not then please ABORT the WU's instead of DETACHING, RESETTING, or PAUSING.
ABORTING WU's allows them to be recycled immediately; thus a much faster "clean up" to the end of a Challenge. DETACHING, RESETTING, and PAUSING WU's causes them to remain in limbo until they EXPIRE. Therefore, we must wait until WU's expire to send them out to be completed.
Please consider either COMPLETING what's in the queue or ABORTING them. Thank you. :)
____________
PrimeGrid Challenge Overall standings --- Last update: From Pi to Paddy (2016)
|
|
|
|
The end is nigh!
With about 4 hours left to crunch we would like to request the following
At the Conclusion of the Challenge
We would prefer users "moving on" to finish those tasks they have downloaded, if not then please ABORT the WU's instead of DETACHING, RESETTING, or PAUSING.
ABORTING WU's allows them to be recycled immediately; thus a much faster "clean up" to the end of a Challenge. DETACHING, RESETTING, and PAUSING WU's causes them to remain in limbo until they EXPIRE. Therefore, we must wait until WU's expire to send them out to be completed.
Please consider either COMPLETING what's in the queue or ABORTING them. Thank you. :)
I have one question,
Why I got many many pending credits?
If the chanllenge is over, how to implement those credits to your chanllenge system, meant credit-accumulator?
Update:
I have been listed with 71,539.10 credits, however,
I got extra credits 16,699.74 in my pending credit list..... :(((((
thanks.
____________
|
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
I have one question,
Why I got many many pending credits?
If the chanllenge is over, how to implement those credits to your chanllenge system, meant credit-accumulator?
thanks.
As with most BOINC projects, all results must be validated, and that does not happen immediately. All the results for the challenge must be matched against the result from another computer before validation can occur, and it's also possible there may be a backlog of tasks waiting for validation. Validation can happen immediately, or it can take weeks. Or anything in between. Most of the tasks for this challenge will be validated within a couple of hours or days.
Pending credit is not unusual.
Challenge points, however, are awarded without the need for validation, so scoring is quicker. However, should a task eventually fail validation and be declared invalid, the challenge points will be removed.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
Emm, I got your idea.
Thank you so much... :))))
btw: This is a really exciting chanllenge in prime number i have ever done in my life for the first time.
____________
|
|
|
Crun-chi Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09 Posts: 3208 ID: 50683 Credit: 135,132,479 RAC: 103,832
                         
|
Emm, I got your idea.
Thank you so much... :))))
btw: This is a really exciting chanllenge in prime number i have ever done in my life for the first time.
This is not challenge in prime numbers , this is challenge in sieving, here you cannot find prime :)
____________
92*10^1439761-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
Crun-chi Volunteer tester
 Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09 Posts: 3208 ID: 50683 Credit: 135,132,479 RAC: 103,832
                         
|
Michael , can you , when challenge over give us how many factors are found during challenge?
____________
92*10^1439761-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
Emm, I got your idea.
Thank you so much... :))))
btw: This is a really exciting chanllenge in prime number i have ever done in my life for the first time.
This is not challenge in prime numbers , this is challenge in sieving, here you cannot find prime :)
Oh, right, you exactly correct my mad head... bow~
____________
|
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
Michael , can you , when challenge over give us how many factors are found during challenge?
Not easily.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
What about telling us just how much was sieved during the challenge?
____________
|
|
|
|
What about telling us just how much was sieved during the challenge?
I got 6 in total, but possibly 5 during challenge.
____________
|
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
What about telling us just how much was sieved during the challenge?
About two months ago, the hosting company where our servers have been since February imposed disk IO rate limits -- effectively making the disks much slower than they actually are.
Because of this, the server is having trouble keeping up with the load. The situation may not improve until I can purge the challenge tasks from the database. I can't purge the database until the results are finalized. And the process of determining whether the results are finalized is incredibly database intensive. Sort of a Catch-22.
We're likely going to move the servers to RackSpace before the next challenge in November.
Anyway, I'm not running any queries I don't have to, so for now the only answer I can give you is "a whole lot".
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
There were 897646 challenge tasks returned. Assuming they were all the newer shorter sieve tasks, they each did 2G worth of sieving. (Most were new short tasks, so we can ignore the fact that some were actually 5 times as long.)
We're double checking sieves now, and since two tasks are required for each 2G increment, effectively P was advanced by 1G for each tasks.
Therefore, P was increased by approximately 897,646G, or 898T, or 0.9P.
The current value of P is approximately 29P. In two days, we increased the amount of TRP sieving ever done, anywhere, by approximately 3%. That's pretty incredible.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
A difficult, but ultimately rewarding challenge for me. Mad rush to get 3 Ubuntu VPC's configured on the boxes that (still) crash these tasks after a few seconds.
Pleased to see my two little Android boxes added around 8 (of the 240-odd) thousand credits to my (yet to be verified!) score, allowing me to jump two places on the leader-board.
My Samsung-Galaxy-mini phone spent a lot of the time 'roasting' in my pocket - crunching continuously on both cores. - I was expecting (almost hoping?) it would melt-down to become the first 'proof' that 'pocket-crunching' can be dangerous.. but it appeared to come through unscathed!
So all those not wishing to fall behind (on the next TRP-sieve challenge, that is!), better get those phones and tablets crunching!
____________
|
|
|
|
A difficult, but ultimately rewarding challenge for me. Mad rush to get 3 Ubuntu VPC's configured on the boxes that (still) crash these tasks after a few seconds.
Pleased to see my two little Android boxes added around 8 (of the 240-odd) thousand credits to my (yet to be verified!) score, allowing me to jump two places on the leader-board.
My Samsung-Galaxy-mini phone spent a lot of the time 'roasting' in my pocket - crunching continuously on both cores. - I was expecting (almost hoping?) it would melt-down to become the first 'proof' that 'pocket-crunching' can be dangerous.. but it appeared to come through unscathed!
So all those not wishing to fall behind (on the next TRP-sieve challenge, that is!), better get those phones and tablets crunching!
What is the difference between running TRP-sieving in real machine and the box (what is the box, virtual box or else)?
My PC is built with one quad-core cpu, namely xeon w5590. for 8 TRP jobs simultaneously it takes 50 mins to finish....
other 3 machines are laptops, but cpu lag far behind this huge machine...
In your message, it seems to me that your VPCs (actually i don't get it. what is that?) complete jobs much quickly. Am i correct? |
|
|
|
You may have missed where the tasks were made 5 times shorter, and therefore get 1/5th the credit. 109.22 is the BOINC credit per task, unless you happen to get one of the old, longer tasks that are still floating around the system.
Question, are you planning on increasing the size of the tasks now that the challenge is over?
____________
@AggieThePew
|
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
You may have missed where the tasks were made 5 times shorter, and therefore get 1/5th the credit. 109.22 is the BOINC credit per task, unless you happen to get one of the old, longer tasks that are still floating around the system.
Question, are you planning on increasing the size of the tasks now that the challenge is over?
No.
The size of the tasks was reduced to make the tasks more reasonable for Android devices to process. It had nothing to do with the challenge.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Ken_g6 Volunteer developer
 Send message
Joined: 4 Jul 06 Posts: 938 ID: 3110 Credit: 258,404,132 RAC: 84,123
                            
|
My Samsung-Galaxy-mini phone spent a lot of the time 'roasting' in my pocket - crunching continuously on both cores. - I was expecting (almost hoping?) it would melt-down to become the first 'proof' that 'pocket-crunching' can be dangerous.. but it appeared to come through unscathed!
My ASUS Transformer started flaking out towards the end: It had five "code 9" errors. Anyone else see those? Any chance those are due to the WUs instead of hardware problems?
____________
|
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
My Samsung-Galaxy-mini phone spent a lot of the time 'roasting' in my pocket - crunching continuously on both cores. - I was expecting (almost hoping?) it would melt-down to become the first 'proof' that 'pocket-crunching' can be dangerous.. but it appeared to come through unscathed!
My ASUS Transformer started flaking out towards the end: It had five "code 9" errors. Anyone else see those? Any chance those are due to the WUs instead of hardware problems?
I got a bunch of those App 9 errors on both of my desktop computers. I don't know what that means.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
My Samsung-Galaxy-mini phone spent a lot of the time 'roasting' in my pocket - crunching continuously on both cores. - I was expecting (almost hoping?) it would melt-down to become the first 'proof' that 'pocket-crunching' can be dangerous.. but it appeared to come through unscathed!
My ASUS Transformer started flaking out towards the end: It had five "code 9" errors. Anyone else see those? Any chance those are due to the WUs instead of hardware problems?
Boinc for android default settings allocate low RAM. I had one code 9 error while testing before challenge. No further errors after increasing RAM allowed to Boinc to 80%. The failed WU was a long one though, so I'm not sure if code 9 is a memory related error.
____________
676754^262144+1 is prime |
|
|
Scott Brown Volunteer moderator Project administrator Volunteer tester Project scientist
 Send message
Joined: 17 Oct 05 Posts: 2380 ID: 1178 Credit: 17,890,923,347 RAC: 9,413,222
                                                
|
My Samsung-Galaxy-mini phone spent a lot of the time 'roasting' in my pocket - crunching continuously on both cores. - I was expecting (almost hoping?) it would melt-down to become the first 'proof' that 'pocket-crunching' can be dangerous.. but it appeared to come through unscathed!
My ASUS Transformer started flaking out towards the end: It had five "code 9" errors. Anyone else see those? Any chance those are due to the WUs instead of hardware problems?
Boinc for android default settings allocate low RAM. I had one code 9 error while testing before chalenge. No further errors after increasing RAM allowed to Boinc to 80%. The failed WU was a long one though, so I'm not suré if code 9 is a memory related error.
No errors on my ASUS Transformer, but I did only run on 2 of the 4 cores.
|
|
|
|
Thanks to all who participated!
I browse some of the team message boards, and some wonder how I have such power.
The answer: The cloud.
I've since been able to scale up my compute capacity from the last challenge.
The next challenge: Who knows, I may or may not have the capacity then, managing/ monitoring hundreds of servers takes much of my free time.
____________
|
|
|
|
Yup, well done to everyone.
My Android phone didn't produce any valid results - confusingly on my phone, all of the tasks during the first half or so of the challenge, were reported by the official Boinc as complete, no sign of any errors. But all of them were pretty much instantly reported as "error while computing". Towards the end, the Boinc client on my phone did stat telling me it was producing errors. So I gave up on it then, because by that stage it was annoying as obviously I still wanted to use it as a phone occasionally, and I had to keep one eye on the battery status too.
If I had a tablet or whatever, in addition to my phone, then things would have been a lot different - I could leave that exclusively crunching, whilst having my phone to use properly too. |
|
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 3171 ID: 130544 Credit: 2,232,559,901 RAC: 676,290
                           
|
.
My Samsung-Galaxy-mini phone spent a lot of the time 'roasting' in my pocket - crunching continuously on both cores. - I was expecting (almost hoping?) it would melt-down to become the first 'proof' that 'pocket-crunching' can be dangerous.. but it appeared to come through unscathed!
Dangerous. Placing my Note II near a USB desk fan and seeing it only 54C on 2 cores, I turned all 4 cores on but it required the fan to face it to prevent it going over 67. Battery only lasted 2.5 hours on 4 cores tho.
I'm continuing TRP sv expecting clean-up, but is there any clean-up given it's a sieving challenge? |
|
|
|
.
My Samsung-Galaxy-mini phone spent a lot of the time 'roasting' in my pocket - crunching continuously on both cores. - I was expecting (almost hoping?) it would melt-down to become the first 'proof' that 'pocket-crunching' can be dangerous.. but it appeared to come through unscathed!
Dangerous. Placing my Note II near a USB desk fan and seeing it only 54C on 2 cores, I turned all 4 cores on but it required the fan to face it to prevent it going over 67. Battery only lasted 2.5 hours on 4 cores tho.
I'm continuing TRP sv expecting clean-up, but is there any clean-up given it's a sieving challenge?
Yes, these days we also double check sieves.
____________
PrimeGrid Challenge Overall standings --- Last update: From Pi to Paddy (2016)
|
|
|
|
The end is nigh!
With about 4 hours left to crunch we would like to request the following
At the Conclusion of the Challenge
We would prefer users "moving on" to finish those tasks they have downloaded, if not then please ABORT the WU's instead of DETACHING, RESETTING, or PAUSING.
ABORTING WU's allows them to be recycled immediately; thus a much faster "clean up" to the end of a Challenge. DETACHING, RESETTING, and PAUSING WU's causes them to remain in limbo until they EXPIRE. Therefore, we must wait until WU's expire to send them out to be completed.
Please consider either COMPLETING what's in the queue or ABORTING them. Thank you. :)
I have one question,
Why I got many many pending credits?
If the chanllenge is over, how to implement those credits to your chanllenge system, meant credit-accumulator?
Update:
I have been listed with 71,539.10 credits, however,
I got extra credits 16,699.74 in my pending credit list..... :(((((
thanks.
[DPC]Pyrus
how is the Deadline for the Tasks ?
I have 787 tasks from 1906 tasks in processing
130 Pendings
look :http://www.primegrid.com/results.php?hostid=374938
there are more as 4 Days where you see in " Settings" ???? Please write it, thanX
officially, There remain 29 hours for this Tasks, we have more time or not ??
Armstrong
____________
|
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
how is the Deadline for the Tasks ?
I have 787 tasks from 1906 tasks in processing
130 Pendings
look :http://www.primegrid.com/results.php?hostid=374938
there are more as 4 Days where you see in " Settings" ???? Please write it, thanX
officially, There remain 29 hours for this Tasks, we have more time or not ??
Armstrong
The challenge is only two days long, which is shorter than any task's deadline. The shortest deadline on any task at PrimeGrid is 3 days and TRP Sieve tasks have a deadline of 4 days. The task deadlines are longer than the challenge.
Even if the deadlines were shorter, tasks downloaded near the end of the challenge would, of course, have a deadline after the end of the challenge.
You have to make sure your completed tasks get returned before the end of the challenge to make sure you get challenge points for them. The easiest way to do that is to put <report_results_immediately>1</report_results_immediately> into cc_config.xml. That's a good idea anyway since generally at PrimeGrid you want to return results quickly so as to increase the chance that you will be credited with discovering a new prime number.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
how is the Deadline for the Tasks ?
I have 787 tasks from 1906 tasks in processing
130 Pendings
look :http://www.primegrid.com/results.php?hostid=374938
there are more as 4 Days where you see in " Settings" ???? Please write it, thanX
officially, There remain 29 hours for this Tasks, we have more time or not ??
Armstrong
The challenge is only two days long, which is shorter than any task's deadline. The shortest deadline on any task at PrimeGrid is 3 days and TRP Sieve tasks have a deadline of 4 days. The task deadlines are longer than the challenge.
Even if the deadlines were shorter, tasks downloaded near the end of the challenge would, of course, have a deadline after the end of the challenge.
You have to make sure your completed tasks get returned before the end of the challenge to make sure you get challenge points for them. The easiest way to do that is to put <return_results_immediately>1</return_results_immediately> into cc_config.xml. That's a good idea anyway since generally at PrimeGrid you want to return results quickly so as to increase the chance that you will be credited with discovering a new prime number.
OK Mike,
and Thanks
____________
|
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
Cleanup Update:
15-Aug: 94291 tasks outstanding; 38632 in individual (195) scoring positions; 15735 in team (66) scoring positions.
Doing these updates is more difficult than in the past because of the slow disk problem. I can't do this analysis on the PrimeGrid server; Jim did it for me on his computers using last night's backup. That's not something we're going to do every day.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
Michael , can you , when challenge over give us how many factors are found during challenge?
Jim says that 7180 factors were found between 04:00 on Monday and this morning. That covers slightly more than three days, so it's slightly more than what was found during the challenge itself, but the since participation was so fantastic during the challenge most of those were certainly found during the challenge.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
<return_results_immediately>1</return_results_immediately>
I don't know if the above is an accepted alternative?, but the BOINC website
http://boinc.berkeley.edu/wiki/Client_configuration
uses report_results_immediately
Ian
|
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
<return_results_immediately>1</return_results_immediately>
I don't know if the above is an accepted alternative?, but the BOINC website
http://boinc.berkeley.edu/wiki/Client_configuration
uses report_results_immediately
Ian
Oops, that's a typo on my part. It should have been report.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
Cleanup Status Update:
15-Aug: 94291 tasks outstanding; 38632 in individual (195) scoring positions; 15735 in team (66) scoring positions.
16-Aug: 56850 tasks outstanding; 22723 in individual (190) scoring positions; 9539 in team (59) scoring positions.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
Mike,
UPDATE
72490467 346921262 12 Aug 2013 | 18:39:01 UTC 16 Aug 2013 | 20:59:46 UTC ready 7,621.88 7,462.73**** 600.71*** The Riesel Problem (Sieve) v1.12
472490465 346921228 12 Aug 2013 | 18:39:00 UTC 16 Aug 2013 | 20:44:28 UTC ready 7,486.93 7,316.11 ***600.71**** The Riesel Problem (Sieve) v1.12
Take a look at here - the first 2 Tasks: http://www.primegrid.com/results.php?hostid=374938&offset=0&show_names=0&state=3&appid=
Are this new calculations ? 5 Times more Credit ? 2 and a half hour`s for one Task ??
Thanks for your help and Answer : >
Armstrong
____________
|
|
|
|
Mike,
UPDATE
72490467 346921262 12 Aug 2013 | 18:39:01 UTC 16 Aug 2013 | 20:59:46 UTC ready 7,621.88 7,462.73**** 600.71*** The Riesel Problem (Sieve) v1.12
472490465 346921228 12 Aug 2013 | 18:39:00 UTC 16 Aug 2013 | 20:44:28 UTC ready 7,486.93 7,316.11 ***600.71**** The Riesel Problem (Sieve) v1.12
Take a look at here - the first 2 Tasks: http://www.primegrid.com/results.php?hostid=374938&offset=0&show_names=0&state=3&appid=
Are this new calculations ? 5 Times more Credit ? 2 and a half hour`s for one Task ??
Thanks for your help and Answer : >
Armstrong
There is still some long tasks circling around. Run time and granted credit is normal.
____________
|
|
|
|
Tarmo Ilves
Thanks
Armstrong
____________
|
|
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 13954 ID: 53948 Credit: 392,026,444 RAC: 163,305
                               
|
Cleanup Status Update:
15-Aug: 94291 tasks outstanding; 38632 in individual (195) scoring positions; 15735 in team (66) scoring positions.
16-Aug: 56850 tasks outstanding; 22723 in individual (190) scoring positions; 9539 in team (59) scoring positions.
17-Aug: 34080 tasks outstanding; 9932 in individual (178) scoring positions; 4243 in team (41) scoring positions.
18-Aug: 14907 tasks outstanding; 2249 in individual (115) scoring positions; 826 in team (20) scoring positions.
19-Aug: 4075 tasks outstanding; 429 in individual (49) scoring positions; 17 in team (11) scoring positions.
20-Aug: 2772 tasks outstanding; 215 in individual (32) scoring positions; 15 in team (11) scoring positions.
21-Aug: 1445 tasks outstanding; 65 in individual (19) scoring positions; 6 in team (10) scoring positions.
22-Aug: 702 tasks outstanding; 45 in individual (13) scoring positions; 3 in team (9) scoring positions.
23-Aug: 347 tasks outstanding; 35 in individual (10) scoring positions; 0 in team (8) scoring positions.
24-Aug: 300 tasks outstanding; 34 in individual (9) scoring positions; 0 in team (8) scoring positions.
25-Aug: 83 tasks outstanding; 1 in individual (7) scoring positions; 0 in team (8) scoring positions.
For those of your paying attention, the obvious question in the results starting with 21 August is caused by a tie in the standings -- a situation that can only occur when all the tasks have the same credit. Since this is the first time we've ever had a cleanup phase with a sieve challenge, and therefore the first challenge cleanup involving tasks having a fixed credit value, this is a situation that has never happened before.
The process that tracks the cleanup doesn't handle ties correctly, and is over-reporting the number of scoring positions that are still subject to change. I'll correct it in the coming days.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
With the finalization of the stats the overall standings have also been updated. Thanks for participating everyone! :)
____________
PrimeGrid Challenge Overall standings --- Last update: From Pi to Paddy (2016)
|
|
|