Join PrimeGrid
Returning Participants
Community
Leader Boards
Results
Other
drummers-lowrise
|
Message boards :
Generalized Fermat Prime Search :
All WR WUs now really are World Record numbers
Author |
Message |
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14037 ID: 53948 Credit: 476,993,571 RAC: 281,271
                               
|
Yesterday, on August 8th, a minor milestone was passed. The last of the early long WUs which were below world record size finally was validated by a wingman. That WU was initially sent out on March 4th, and the initial result has been waiting for verification since March 11th.
With that WU out of the way, the smallest outstanding WU is now larger than the current largest known prime number, so any prime found with the WR WUs is guaranteed to be a new world record prime and not "merely" a world record GFN prime.
Good luck everyone!
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
Wow, amazing news!
Sadly, I (currently) cannot participate..
But good luck to everybody who is!
Hope we'll finally kick Gimps off the top spot! | |
|
Dave  Send message
Joined: 13 Feb 12 Posts: 3253 ID: 130544 Credit: 2,430,797,782 RAC: 4,052,239
                           
|
I'm doing my cache of them in quorum order, so I've got _37 & _26 going atm, then it'll be the _24, then _23 etc. | |
|
|
At first I thought you were referring to this tortured WU, which I put out of its misery a couple of days ago. It had been waiting almost as long.
Thanks for the encouraging news though! Good luck to all.
--Gary | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14037 ID: 53948 Credit: 476,993,571 RAC: 281,271
                               
|
The first post talked about the 'trailing edge', i.e., the smallest WU that was still in progress. Here's the "leading edge", i.e., the largest WU currently being worked on:
As of right now, the leading edge of the GFN-WR search is at b=5774.
5774^4194304+1 is 15,776,778 digits long. This WU is worth 342,298.37 credits. The estimated amount of computation required to test this number is 369,682,242 GFLOPS. (369 million billion floating point operations)
The current largest known prime number is 2^43112609-1, which is 12,978,189 digits long.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
axnVolunteer developer Send message
Joined: 29 Dec 07 Posts: 285 ID: 16874 Credit: 28,027,106 RAC: 0
            
|
The estimated amount of computation required to test this number is 369,682,242 GFLOPS. (369 million billion floating point operations)
This sounds a little too high. How did you calculate this figure? | |
|
Michael Goetz Volunteer moderator Project administrator
 Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10 Posts: 14037 ID: 53948 Credit: 476,993,571 RAC: 281,271
                               
|
The estimated amount of computation required to test this number is 369,682,242 GFLOPS. (369 million billion floating point operations)
This sounds a little too high. How did you calculate this figure?
It might be...
That number is T * G, where T is the estimated time and G is the GLFOPS per second. Numbers are based upon my stock GTX 460.
T is very accurate. It's almost exactly 10 days for that number.
G is NVidia's number for the GFLOPS for that card. Since the GPU runs at 99%, it seemed like a good estimate.
However, since the GPU has fewer DP units that shaders, although it's running at "99%", it's likely only running at fraction of that. So the actual number may be 4 or 6 or 12 times lower (whatever the penalty on DP vs SP is on 400 and 500 series GPUs).
To be honest, that number's purpose was to make sure BOINC didn't abort the tasks because they ran too long. I wasn't all that concerned about it being accurate. It was only important that it not be too small.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 | |
|
|
However, since the GPU has fewer DP units that shaders, although it's running at "99%", it's likely only running at fraction of that. So the actual number may be 4 or 6 or 12 times lower (whatever the penalty on DP vs SP is on 400 and 500 series GPUs).
it's 1/8 isn't it? so 46,210,280GFLOPS.
but it still doesn't sound right. My last completed task took 362,731.31s on a 580 at stock speed.Which is (in theory) 362,731.31 * 1536 / 8 = 68,057,462GFLOPS.
| |
|
Message boards :
Generalized Fermat Prime Search :
All WR WUs now really are World Record numbers |