| Author |
Message |
|---|
 Crun-chi Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3250
ID: 50683
Credit: 152,646,050
RAC: 10,054
                         
|
|
Tell me, does any PSA project have ratio 20:1 when converted to Boinc points?
Thanks!
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
Michael GoetzVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10
Posts: 14044
ID: 53948
Credit: 481,635,749
RAC: 528,281
                          
|
Tell me, does any PSA project have ratio 20:1 when converted to Boinc points?
Thanks!
For PRPNet, most ports have a 20:1 ratio, except for wwww, which is 10:1.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3250
ID: 50683
Credit: 152,646,050
RAC: 10,054
|
|
Ah, that was part I missed :)
Thanks a lot for answer!
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3250
ID: 50683
Credit: 152,646,050
RAC: 10,054
|
|
I have one more question .
I sow that one MEGA WU gives aprox. 10.000 PSA credits, but one SR5 gives aprox 3.300 PSA credits.
Run time for MEGA WU is about 3200-4600 seconds but run time for SR5 is 1600-2400 seconds.
Is is obvious that run time for SR5 is near double shorter, but gives three time less PSA credits.
Can this be equalized?
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
|
I have one more question .
I sow that one MEGA WU gives aprox. 10.000 PSA credits, but one SR5 gives aprox 3.300 PSA credits.
Run time for MEGA WU is about 3200-4600 seconds but run time for SR5 is 1600-2400 seconds.
Is is obvious that run time for SR5 is near double shorter, but gives three time less PSA credits.
Can this be equalized?
Thats not correct. SR5 need now around 3000-3600s on my i5-2500k@4Ghz |
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3250
ID: 50683
Credit: 152,646,050
RAC: 10,054
|
|
I am sorry R.
This is small part of my test results .log
[2012-11-23 22:08:52 CEST] Server: MEGA, Candidate: 99*2^3427042+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: E238E41E8F89E956 Time: 4552 seconds
[2012-11-23 23:01:28 CEST] Server: MEGA, Candidate: 15*2^3427045+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: F442B5AF280B8A73 Time: 3155 seconds
[2012-11-24 00:13:07 CEST] Server: MEGA, Candidate: 81*2^3427044+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 3A912B5BB427DB05 Time: 4298 seconds
[2012-11-24 01:11:38 CEST] Server: MEGA, Candidate: 37*2^3427372+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 3DF456F57A96C8C6 Time: 3506 seconds
[2012-11-24 02:10:57 CEST] Server: MEGA, Candidate: 37*2^3427374+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 36912D377AB04AF3 Time: 3558 seconds
[2012-11-24 03:26:51 CEST] Server: MEGA, Candidate: 95*2^3427373+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 280D5B10EFF65679 Time: 4554 seconds
[2012-11-24 04:44:01 CEST] Server: MEGA, Candidate: 73*2^3427700+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 7A0EE95442B2790F Time: 4627 seconds
[2012-11-28 09:45:51 CEST] Server: SR5, Candidate: 90056*5^803191+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 1575E3234ABD2A25. Time: 1820 seconds
[2012-11-28 10:16:20 CEST] Server: SR5, Candidate: 41738*5^803193+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 4DCD10D3F5F8DC58. Time: 1829 seconds
[2012-11-28 10:46:51 CEST] Server: SR5, Candidate: 84284*5^803199+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 250050B80F559428. Time: 1831 seconds
[2012-11-28 11:17:08 CEST] Server: SR5, Candidate: 55154*5^803201+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: FB64839CA727F696. Time: 1817 seconds
[2012-11-28 11:46:13 CEST] Server: SR5, Candidate: 83936*5^803357+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 6CE883EB678FB325. Time: 1739 seconds
[2012-11-28 12:15:21 CEST] Server: SR5, Candidate: 36412*5^803358+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 85DF52F2290AA1AD. Time: 1747 seconds
[2012-11-28 12:45:13 CEST] Server: SR5, Candidate: 31712*5^803359+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: BED19EA922FDF073. Time: 1792 seconds
[2012-11-28 13:14:49 CEST] Server: SR5, Candidate: 41738*5^803361+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 898536EA1466662C. Time: 1776 seconds
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
|
I am sorry R.
This is small part of my test results .log
[2012-11-23 22:08:52 CEST] Server: MEGA, Candidate: 99*2^3427042+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: E238E41E8F89E956 Time: 4552 seconds
[2012-11-23 23:01:28 CEST] Server: MEGA, Candidate: 15*2^3427045+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: F442B5AF280B8A73 Time: 3155 seconds
[2012-11-24 00:13:07 CEST] Server: MEGA, Candidate: 81*2^3427044+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 3A912B5BB427DB05 Time: 4298 seconds
[2012-11-24 01:11:38 CEST] Server: MEGA, Candidate: 37*2^3427372+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 3DF456F57A96C8C6 Time: 3506 seconds
[2012-11-24 02:10:57 CEST] Server: MEGA, Candidate: 37*2^3427374+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 36912D377AB04AF3 Time: 3558 seconds
[2012-11-24 03:26:51 CEST] Server: MEGA, Candidate: 95*2^3427373+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 280D5B10EFF65679 Time: 4554 seconds
[2012-11-24 04:44:01 CEST] Server: MEGA, Candidate: 73*2^3427700+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 7A0EE95442B2790F Time: 4627 seconds
[2012-11-28 09:45:51 CEST] Server: SR5, Candidate: 90056*5^803191+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 1575E3234ABD2A25. Time: 1820 seconds
[2012-11-28 10:16:20 CEST] Server: SR5, Candidate: 41738*5^803193+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 4DCD10D3F5F8DC58. Time: 1829 seconds
[2012-11-28 10:46:51 CEST] Server: SR5, Candidate: 84284*5^803199+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 250050B80F559428. Time: 1831 seconds
[2012-11-28 11:17:08 CEST] Server: SR5, Candidate: 55154*5^803201+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: FB64839CA727F696. Time: 1817 seconds
[2012-11-28 11:46:13 CEST] Server: SR5, Candidate: 83936*5^803357+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 6CE883EB678FB325. Time: 1739 seconds
[2012-11-28 12:15:21 CEST] Server: SR5, Candidate: 36412*5^803358+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 85DF52F2290AA1AD. Time: 1747 seconds
[2012-11-28 12:45:13 CEST] Server: SR5, Candidate: 31712*5^803359+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: BED19EA922FDF073. Time: 1792 seconds
[2012-11-28 13:14:49 CEST] Server: SR5, Candidate: 41738*5^803361+1 Program: llr.exe Residue: 898536EA1466662C. Time: 1776 seconds
Oh, running llr with SR5, Iam using pfgw, the short times could be the Riesel numbers loaded last time, these numbers are a little bit lower. |
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3250
ID: 50683
Credit: 152,646,050
RAC: 10,054
|
|
If I may ask why you use slower app in searching prime?
Faster app, more units processed, better chance to find prime :)
I try pfgw, and in any project didn't find that is faster then llr ( I even ask makers of pfgw, in what projects pfgw is faster then llr) and didn't not get clear answer
And since they all do same job, I use llr for all projects!
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
|
If I may ask why you use slower app in searching prime?
Faster app, more units processed, better chance to find prime :)
I try pfgw, and in any project didn't find that is faster then llr ( I even ask makers of pfgw, in what projects pfgw is faster then llr) and didn't not get clear answer
And since they all do same job, I use llr for all projects!
So I need to change the line ?
//SR5
//pfgwexe=pfgw64.exe
llrexe=llr.exe |
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3250
ID: 50683
Credit: 152,646,050
RAC: 10,054
|
If I may ask why you use slower app in searching prime?
Faster app, more units processed, better chance to find prime :)
I try pfgw, and in any project didn't find that is faster then llr ( I even ask makers of pfgw, in what projects pfgw is faster then llr) and didn't not get clear answer
And since they all do same job, I use llr for all projects!
So I need to change the line ?
//SR5
//pfgwexe=pfgw64.exe
llrexe=llr.exe
Yes, that right, and use latest 3.8.9 llr ( for 64 bit if you have 64 bit Win)
http://jpenne.free.fr/llr3/cllr389win64.zip
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
STDSend message
Joined: 27 May 07
Posts: 12
ID: 8713
Credit: 65,104,272
RAC: 42,024
                  
|
|
Which lines did you exactly edit in the master_prpclient.ini? |
|
|
|
|
Which lines did you exactly edit in the master_prpclient.ini?
//SR5
//pfgwexe=pfgw64.exe -->uncomment this one
llrexe=llr.exe -->add this line |
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3250
ID: 50683
Credit: 152,646,050
RAC: 10,054
|
|
But still there is no answer to my question :)
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
|
But still there is no answer to my question :)
Well, I have no answer to your question either :(
What I can say is that I remeber that before llr got the AVX implementation, pfgw was slightly faster than LLR running PPSElow (and probably faster on other subprojects too). It might still be faster on non AVX cpu's.
____________
676754^262144+1 is prime |
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3250
ID: 50683
Credit: 152,646,050
RAC: 10,054
|
But still there is no answer to my question :)
Well, I have no answer to your question either :(
What I can say is that I remeber that before llr got the AVX implementation, pfgw was slightly faster than LLR running PPSElow (and probably faster on other subprojects too). It might still be faster on non AVX cpu's.
But I didnot ask that :)
My question was
I sow that one MEGA WU gives aprox. 10.000 PSA credits, but one SR5 gives aprox 3.300 PSA credits.
Run time for MEGA WU is about 3200-4600 seconds but run time for SR5 is 1600-2400 seconds.
Is is obvious that run time for SR5 is near double shorter, but gives three time less PSA credits.
AVX doesnot have anything with this.
My computer finished SR5 WU in interval from 1600-2400 second and got nearly 1/3 of credits for one MEGA WU ( and need fot that 3200 - 4600 seconds) 3300 - compared to 10.125 for one MEGA WU
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3250
ID: 50683
Credit: 152,646,050
RAC: 10,054
|
|
And now challenge is over I sow something interesting.
With both of my CPU, I can get nearly 1.400.000 PSA points per day in PPSLow
but can only get about 780.000 when running SR5. ( so nearly double credits in same time)
Or equalize those points, or do something else , since PPSLow is small primes compared to SR5.
Before this PPSLow challenge for one WU you got around 130 PSA credits ,and in challenge you got 180. So credits can be raised!
Do it same for SR5
Thanks
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
|
But still there is no answer to my question :)
Well, I have no answer to your question either :(
What I can say is that I remeber that before llr got the AVX implementation, pfgw was slightly faster than LLR running PPSElow (and probably faster on other subprojects too). It might still be faster on non AVX cpu's.
But I didnot ask that :)
My question was
I sow that one MEGA WU gives aprox. 10.000 PSA credits, but one SR5 gives aprox 3.300 PSA credits.
Run time for MEGA WU is about 3200-4600 seconds but run time for SR5 is 1600-2400 seconds.
Is is obvious that run time for SR5 is near double shorter, but gives three time less PSA credits.
AVX doesnot have anything with this.
My computer finished SR5 WU in interval from 1600-2400 second and got nearly 1/3 of credits for one MEGA WU ( and need fot that 3200 - 4600 seconds) 3300 - compared to 10.125 for one MEGA WU
I shall look into that and see what happend.
Lennart
|
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3250
ID: 50683
Credit: 152,646,050
RAC: 10,054
|
|
Thanks Lennart
73
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3250
ID: 50683
Credit: 152,646,050
RAC: 10,054
|
|
Any news/progress?
____________
92*10^1585996-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
|
Which lines did you exactly edit in the master_prpclient.ini?
//SR5
//pfgwexe=pfgw64.exe -->uncomment this one
llrexe=llr.exe -->add this line
I'm completely lost there.
I don't have line like that in my master.ini file.
//SR5
OK I figured it out:)
____________
 |
|
|
|
|
|
My guess is the difference in credit is because the credit is computed assuming that it is base 2, when in reality it is base 5. But this is purely speculation.
____________
 |
|
|
