| Author |
Message |
|---|
|
|
|
I have loaded some new SGS wu's on 1.29M
This is a test and if that turns out to work ok we will load more and let it stay live.
Lennart
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have one of my Win7 x64 hosts running these and they are working fine. I don't remember exact previous run times but these seem to be 20-30% longer which doesn't seem too bad with the number size increase.
____________
 |
|
|
|
|
I have one of my Win7 x64 hosts running these and they are working fine. I don't remember exact previous run times but these seem to be 20-30% longer which doesn't seem too bad with the number size increase.
I'm having an issue (not sure if it it related to SGS itself): all WUs run on "panic mode", although ETA shown (~15 minutes) is fairly close to real crunching time and far far away from deadline.
____________
676754^262144+1 is prime |
|
|
|
|
|
Just downloaded a few wu's since I only saw the post a few. So far they've started up ok and appear to be running fine.
____________
@AggieThePew
 |
|
|
ardo 
Send message
Joined: 12 Dec 10
Posts: 168
ID: 76659
Credit: 1,693,455,577
RAC: 0
                   
|
|
I noticed this is still using the 6.13 version of llr on 64-bit. Shouldn't this be switched to the latest 64-bit version of llr?
____________
Badge score: 2*5 + 8*7 + 3*8 + 3*9 + 1*10 + 1*11 + 1*13 = 151
 |
|
|
|
|
|
First unit completed successfully.. took my laptop about an hour. I noticed that I was running v6.14 but my system is 32 bit.
____________
@AggieThePew
|
|
|
 Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3208
ID: 50683
Credit: 135,132,479
RAC: 77,147
                        
|
First unit completed successfully.. took my laptop about an hour. I noticed that I was running v6.14 but my system is 32 bit.
Rick that is ok 6.14 is for 32 bit system
1.01 is for 64 bit system
I also try one WU and crunch with 64 bit APP ( 1.01)
Will finish about 800 seconds.
Tell me , will if I find SGS prime, will he be high enough to enter list of first 5000 prime ? ( how many digits? )
____________
92*10^1439761-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
|
|
These numbers have about 388,000 digits, which is around no. 730 in the top5000 list.
Cheers
- Iain
____________
Twitter: IainBethune
Proud member of team "Aggie The Pew". Go Aggie!
3073428256125*2^1290000-1 is Prime! |
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3208
ID: 50683
Credit: 135,132,479
RAC: 77,147
|
These numbers have about 388,000 digits, which is around no. 730 in the top5000 list.
Cheers
- Iain
In that case, I stop all PSA activity and run SGS again :)
That will be "big prime" if found it :))
Thanks for reply.
____________
92*10^1439761-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
|
|
Great.
That was some quick sieving.
The PSA version has now also run out, so the timing is perfect.
____________
Warped
  |
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3208
ID: 50683
Credit: 135,132,479
RAC: 77,147
|
|
DC - enabled or disable in this new SGS?
____________
92*10^1439761-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
|
DC - enabled or disable in this new SGS?
based on my few results it looks like dc is on... |
|
|
|
|
|
Good luck in finding the Twin that puts mine to the 2nd largest. |
|
|
|
|
DC - enabled or disable in this new SGS?
We are using AR.
Lennart
|
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3208
ID: 50683
Credit: 135,132,479
RAC: 77,147
|
|
AR is?
Update: I become validator for myself :) ( not for all WU but for some) :))
____________
92*10^1439761-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
Michael GoetzVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10
Posts: 13954
ID: 53948
Credit: 392,336,518
RAC: 171,309
                      
|
AR is?
Update: I become validator for myself :) ( not for all WU but for some) :))
AR == Adaptive Replication.
That's when reliable hosts are permitted to do WUs with a quorum of 1 instead of the normal 2 and therefore don't need a wingman.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3208
ID: 50683
Credit: 135,132,479
RAC: 77,147
|
|
Great news, so I am in right way to became validator for myself :)
____________
92*10^1439761-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
|
|
Yes, if not a prime you may be a validator for yourself. You may also be called upon to be a validator for someone else so you will see yourself against others. AR also will check your machine every so often and ask a validator for you.
So do not fret if you see a wingperson on some of your units. |
|
|
Michael GoetzVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10
Posts: 13954
ID: 53948
Credit: 392,336,518
RAC: 171,309
|
Yes, if not a prime you may be a validator for yourself.
If you return a prime, regardless of the quorum, the number is checked on the PG server.
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3208
ID: 50683
Credit: 135,132,479
RAC: 77,147
|
|
I just sow on front PG page that Lennart find first SGS prime :)
After searching I found what WU is prime, and glad to see that computation time is double like a credits also ( like in "old" SGS")
But also found 15 or even more WU that have 52.91 credits, not 39.91...
Since SGS have fixed credits, and those WU was not primes, how that can be?
____________
92*10^1439761-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
|
I just sow on front PG page that Lennart find first SGS prime :)
After searching I found what WU is prime, and glad to see that computation time is double like a credits also ( like in "old" SGS")
But also found 15 or even more WU that have 52.91 credits, not 39.91...
Since SGS have fixed credits, and those WU was not primes, how that can be?
I think the first round of new SGS wus were not fixed credit.
____________
676754^262144+1 is prime |
|
|
|
|
|
I see over 41k workunits have been processed in this new range and only 1 prime found so far. At this rate we could be waiting a very long time before we ever find a new world record SG prime :-(
____________
 |
|
|
|
|
I see over 41k workunits have been processed in this new range and only 1 prime found so far. At this rate we could be waiting a very long time before we ever find a new world record SG prime :-(
3 Primes found :)
Lennart |
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3208
ID: 50683
Credit: 135,132,479
RAC: 77,147
|
|
Yes, second one appear on front page, :)
But still no third one :)
You have crystal ball :)
____________
92*10^1439761-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
|
|
Looking forward to this project.
Going to take a break on PPS and switch my 2 W7 x64 hosts over to this.
Getting good decent times on it, around 2165 seconds on my first 4 tasks (3,3ghz, quad core with HT on).
Will see how it is on the other host (3,8ghz, quad core HT off) later this day.
51k workunits done at the time of this post - with 3 primes found.
____________
|
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3208
ID: 50683
Credit: 135,132,479
RAC: 77,147
|
|
HT on LLR tasks only slow down process: i was asking this question long time ago: and that is why dont use Ht on LLR tasks. On sieve you can with HT got around 15-18% increase in speed
____________
92*10^1439761-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
|
|
|
It is my work computer that has HT on and I'm hesitant to fiddle with it since it isn't my own.
On the brighter side it is also the one who does my manual CUDA sieve.
____________
|
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3208
ID: 50683
Credit: 135,132,479
RAC: 77,147
|
|
Something is broken on front page
Newly reported primes
2862479727*2^1290000-1 (Ibemu@IYH@jisaku);
2862479727*2^1290000-1 (RedAndr);
Can two users find same number? :)
____________
92*10^1439761-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
LumiukkoVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 7 Jul 08
Posts: 165
ID: 25183
Credit: 870,396,721
RAC: 41,844
            
|
Something is broken on front page
Newly reported primes
2862479727*2^1290000-1 (Ibemu@IYH@jisaku);
2862479727*2^1290000-1 (RedAndr);
Can two users find same number? :)
I don't think it should be possible for both as initial finders.
But they are both listed as "Initial finder", which is strange:
http://www.primegrid.com/primes/?section=primelist&userid=94539
http://www.primegrid.com/primes/?section=primelist&userid=127055
I could only find the corresponding work unit for Ibemu@IYH@jisaku:
http://www.primegrid.com/workunit.php?wuid=289309365
The prime seems to be registered for "RedAndr" at The Prime Pages.
http://primes.utm.edu/bios/code.php?code=L3204
--
Lumiukko
|
|
|
Crun-chiVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 25 Nov 09
Posts: 3208
ID: 50683
Credit: 135,132,479
RAC: 77,147
|
|
This is link for "another user" :)
http://www.primegrid.com/workunit.php?wuid=289309365
User made only few SGS WU and fine one, what a lucky user!
____________
92*10^1439761-1 NEAR-REPDIGIT PRIME :) :) :)
4 * 650^498101-1 CRUS PRIME
2022202116^131072+1 GENERALIZED FERMAT
Proud member of team Aggie The Pew. Go Aggie! |
|
|
Michael GoetzVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10
Posts: 13954
ID: 53948
Credit: 392,336,518
RAC: 171,309
|
I could only find the corresponding work unit for Ibemu@IYH@jisaku:
http://www.primegrid.com/workunit.php?wuid=289309365
Yeah, something appears to be strange.
Here's the WU for RedAndr:
http://www.primegrid.com/workunit.php?wuid=289666643
That's not the same WU. It appears as if the work was generated twice.
Another new SGS prime also appears to have been done twice. I'll let Lennart know what's going on (if he isn't already on it.)
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
|
|
Did they accidentally reload work that was already loaded? This would explain the duplicates. |
|
|
|
|
|
This is very strange. Ibemu@IYH@jisaku found this prime first, however it was registered for me. Is it possible to change name of the person in the Top 5000? |
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a specific reason for testing only at 1,29M? |
|
|
|
|
Is there a specific reason for testing only at 1,29M?
No ! We will test more n's but not many. 1.29M was taken because 1.3M would use a higher FFT so it would take more time to test.
Lennart
|
|
|
