| Author |
Message |
|---|
|
|
|
Discussion about PRPNet >= 3.2.4
From Mark's last post.
"You can now download the official release from here, http://home.roadrunner.com/~mrodenkirch/prpnet_3.2.5.zip
As far as I know this addresses the stability issues from 3.2.5
I have done our multicore archive here: http://uwin.mine.nu/PRPNet/
Lennart |
|
|
dh1sajVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 13 Jul 08
Posts: 49
ID: 25532
Credit: 3,632,273,106
RAC: 52,005
                            
|
|
Port 10k running dry?
[2009-11-10 17:22:17 GMT] PPSE10k: No active candidates found on server
|
|
|
|
|
Port 10k running dry?
[2009-11-10 17:22:17 GMT] PPSE10k: No active candidates found on server
Refilled. :)
Lennart
EDIT: All servers are updated to 2.4.5 now. |
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
 
|
|
Has anyone here built and run the 2.4.5 client on Ubuntu? |
|
|
|
|
|
If anyone else hasn't, I will be doing this either tomorrow or Thursday evening.
Edit: Are you specifically curious about 9.04 or 9.10? I'm currently running 9.04, but upgrading to 9.10 would be easy enough.
____________
 |
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
If anyone else hasn't, I will be doing this either tomorrow or Thursday evening.
Edit: Are you specifically curious about 9.04 or 9.10? I'm currently running 9.04, but upgrading to 9.10 would be easy enough.
I think he is running 9.04, but I really don't know for certain. |
|
|
vasm Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 6 Dec 08
Posts: 47
ID: 32604
Credit: 990,892
RAC: 0
               
|
|
I have an issue with the Windows 2.4.5 client.
When I try to enable 3 or more subprojects the client refuses to start claiming the percentage total is not 100 (though I'm pretty sure that it is). If I set only 2 or 1 subproject it works fine.
for example when the .ini file contains this
server=GCW13:60:1:prpnet.primegrid.com:12004
server=PRS:20:1:prpnet.primegrid.com:12008
server=FPS:20:1:prpnet.primegrid.com:12002 the client responds with
Total percent of servers does not equal 100. Exiting |
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
I have an issue with the Windows 2.4.5 client.
When I try to enable 3 or more subprojects the client refuses to start claiming the percentage total is not 100 (though I'm pretty sure that it is). If I set only 2 or 1 subproject it works fine.
for example when the .ini file contains this
server=GCW13:60:1:prpnet.primegrid.com:12004
server=PRS:20:1:prpnet.primegrid.com:12008
server=FPS:20:1:prpnet.primegrid.com:12002 the client responds with
Total percent of servers does not equal 100. Exiting
That is due to how the FPU rounds. I'll fix it in 2.4.6 by using converting to integer (internally). |
|
|
|
|
|
If you have downloaded the linux archive you need to download and replace prpclient.
You can download it on the same place the archives are.
The linux archive is updated now. http://pgllr.mine.nu/PRPNet/
Lennart |
|
|
|
|
|
I have been getting this since i started the 2.4.5 client whne trying ports 10k and 11k:
[2009-11-10 23:13:31 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:10000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:13:52 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:11000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:13 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:10000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:34 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:11000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:43 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:10000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:45 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:11000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:46 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:10000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:48 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:11000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:49 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:10000 connect to socket failed
After enough fails, it one unit from another port, then tries again. Do i have the wrong server or something?
____________
|
|
|
|
|
I have been getting this since i started the 2.4.5 client whne trying ports 10k and 11k:
[2009-11-10 23:13:31 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:10000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:13:52 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:11000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:13 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:10000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:34 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:11000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:43 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:10000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:45 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:11000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:46 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:10000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:48 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:11000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:49 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:10000 connect to socket failed
After enough fails, it one unit from another port, then tries again. Do i have the wrong server or something?
The servers are:
server for PPSE10k = uwin.mine.nu:10000
server for PPSE11K = uwin.mine.nu:11000
____________
Warped
  |
|
|
|
|
I have been getting this since i started the 2.4.5 client whne trying ports 10k and 11k:
[2009-11-10 23:13:31 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:10000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:13:52 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:11000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:13 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:10000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:34 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:11000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:43 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:10000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:45 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:11000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:46 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:10000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:48 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:11000 connect to socket failed
[2009-11-10 23:14:49 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:10000 connect to socket failed
After enough fails, it one unit from another port, then tries again. Do i have the wrong server or something?
Change pgllr to uwin
uwin.mine.nu:10000
Lennart
|
|
|
 valtercVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 30 May 07
Posts: 121
ID: 8810
Credit: 19,949,064,659
RAC: 6,524,575
                      
|
|
just randomly checking the code I found this
line 435 Socket.cpp:
*s_ReadBuffer == 0;
obvioulsy a typo.
|
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
just randomly checking the code I found this
line 435 Socket.cpp:
*s_ReadBuffer == 0;
obvioulsy a typo.
I found and fixed that for 2.4.6. It can lead to an infinite loop under certain conditions, which I have only seen on Linux at this. I'm still working with Lennart on the issues affecting Linux. I hope to get access to a box so I can debug. |
|
|
|
|
|
Oops, found that i had copied an older ini file into the 2.4.5 directory, that was my fault, thanks for the reminder.
____________
|
|
|
dh1sajVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 13 Jul 08
Posts: 49
ID: 25532
Credit: 3,632,273,106
RAC: 52,005
|
|
The server at uwin.mine.nu seems to be down.
Ports 10k and 11k don't get work.
On the positive end: 2.4.5 now ran two nights on a Q6600 with not any crash issue.
|
|
|
|
|
|
I have to report similar good things, rand for 18 hours on ports 10k and 11k and so far it has not stopped.
Only problem seems to be that we either keep running out of work or the server is down, as dh1saj suggested.
Great job on getting the bugs worked out.
____________
|
|
|
|
|
|
Port 10k seems to be down....
Edit(2 sec later) nevermind. :)
____________
|
|
|
Sysadm@NbgVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 08
Posts: 1216
ID: 18646
Credit: 858,366,191
RAC: 172,077
                      
|
|
SGS-Port seems down :(
prpclient_debug wrote: $ ./prpclient
[2009-11-22 14:04:39 GMT] SGS: Attempting to send previously completed work
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] sending on socket 4 [FROM x.y@z.com Phenom_1 SysadmAtNbg 2.4.3]
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] socket 4 (nothing received)
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] PRPNet Client application v2.4.3 started
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] User name SysadmAtNbg at email address is x.y@z.com
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] in FindNextServerForWork: total time for client=0 seconds
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] suffix: SGS, no work done yet, target pct work done=100
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] sending on socket 3 [FROM x.y@z.com Phenom_1 SysadmAtNbg 2.4.3]
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] socket 3 (nothing received)
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] in FindNextServerForWork: total time for client=0 seconds
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] suffix: SGS, no work done yet, target pct work done=100
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] sending on socket 3 [FROM x.y@z.com Phenom_1 SysadmAtNbg 2.4.3]
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] socket 3 (nothing received)
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] in FindNextServerForWork: total time for client=0 seconds
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] suffix: SGS, no work done yet, target pct work done=100
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] sending on socket 3 [FROM x.y@z.com Phenom_1 SysadmAtNbg 2.4.3]
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] socket 3 (nothing received)
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] in FindNextServerForWork: total time for client=0 seconds
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] suffix: SGS, no work done yet, target pct work done=100
[2009-11-22 14:04:40 GMT] sending on socket 3 [FROM x.y@z.com Phenom_1 SysadmAtNbg 2.4.3]
[2009-11-22 14:04:41 GMT] socket 3 (nothing received)
[2009-11-22 14:04:41 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2009-11-22 14:04:41 GMT] in FindNextServerForWork: total time for client=0 seconds
[2009-11-22 14:04:41 GMT] suffix: SGS, no work done yet, target pct work done=100
[2009-11-22 14:04:41 GMT] sending on socket 3 [FROM x.y@z.com Phenom_1 SysadmAtNbg 2.4.3]
[2009-11-22 14:04:41 GMT] socket 3 (nothing received)
[2009-11-22 14:04:41 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2009-11-22 14:04:41 GMT] sending on socket 3 [FROM x.y@z.com Phenom_1 SysadmAtNbg 2.4.3]
[2009-11-22 14:04:41 GMT] socket 3 (nothing received)
[2009-11-22 14:04:41 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2009-11-22 14:04:41 GMT] Could not connect to any servers and no work is pending. Pausing 3 minutes
^C
[2009-11-22 14:04:43 GMT] Accepted force quit. Waiting to close sockets before exiting
[2009-11-22 14:04:43 GMT] sending on socket 3 [FROM x.y@z.com Phenom_1 SysadmAtNbg 2.4.3]
[2009-11-22 14:04:43 GMT] socket 3 (nothing received)
[2009-11-22 14:04:43 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2009-11-22 14:04:43 GMT] Client shutdown complete
stats-page is not reachable, too (http://prpnet.primegrid.com:12000/user_stats.html)
____________
Sysadm@Nbg
my current lucky number: 113856050^65536 + 1
PSA-PRPNet-Stats-URL: http://u-g-f.de/PRPNet/
 |
|
|
pschoeferVolunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 05
Posts: 685
ID: 845
Credit: 2,886,413,454
RAC: 139,386
                  
|
|
uwin.mine.nu:10000 and 11000 have been down for some hours, too.
____________
  |
|
|
|
|
uwin.mine.nu:10000 and 11000 have been down for some hours, too.
I am sorry i did not inform you about the downtime the datacenter should have :(
EQUIPMENT: Core Network Environment
EVENT TYPE: Emergency Maintenance
PURPOSE: Ultrahosting is going to perform emergency network maintenance due to higher demand of network traffic.
Lennart |
|
|
VatoVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 2 Feb 08
Posts: 841
ID: 18447
Credit: 643,539,128
RAC: 559,599
           
|
|
12008 is still reporting version 2.4.5 in the banner - might be useful if a future version allowed the server admin to configure $VERSION or similar...
____________
 |
|
|
|
|
|
I can't find the new source (2.4.6) at http://pgllr.mine.nu/PRPNet/source/ Can you please make it available.
____________
 |
|
|
|
|
I can't find the new source (2.4.6) at http://pgllr.mine.nu/PRPNet/source/ Can you please make it available.
http://pgllr.mine.nu/PRPNet/
Uploaded
Lennart
|
|
|
|
|
|
Thanks
____________
|
|
|
|
|
|
Is there any way to tell how many manual tasks I have completed and (roughly) how much credit I can expect from them? |
|
|
HonzaVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 15 Aug 05
Posts: 1948
ID: 352
Credit: 6,007,066,820
RAC: 1,517,655
                           
|
|
There are stats than can tell exactly how many task were completed per each user (no total...yet).
See example here or PRPNet thread for (updated full) list.
Those stats shows Total Score. This makes comparation among users but doesn't tell much about BOINC credit. I've already suggested to show BOINC credit instead of Total Score in those stats...
____________
My stats |
|
|
|
|
|
Port 12002 still down? |
|
|
|
|
Port 12002 still down?
|
|
|
|
|
Port 12002 still down?
No .'
I have not seen it down.
Lennart
|
|
|
|
|
|
[2009-11-25 03:44:43 GMT] FPS: Attempting to send previously completed work
[2009-11-25 03:44:44 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> FROM unconnected99@mail.ru turk unconnected
[2009-11-25 03:44:44 GMT] FPS: Returning work to server prpnet.primegrid.com at port 12002
[2009-11-25 03:44:44 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> RETURNWORK 2.2.3
[2009-11-25 03:44:44 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> WorkUnit: 65098!-1 1258849779
[2009-11-25 03:44:55 GMT] socket 1892 (nothing received)
[2009-11-25 03:44:55 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> End of Message
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] socket 1892 (nothing received)
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> QUIT
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] closing socket 1892
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] PRPNet Client application v2.2.3 started
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] User name unconnected at email address is unconnected99@mail.ru
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> FROM unconnected99@mail.ru turk unconnected
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> GETGREETING
[2009-11-25 03:45:17 GMT] socket 1892 (nothing received)
[2009-11-25 03:45:17 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> QUIT
[2009-11-25 03:45:17 GMT] closing socket 1892
...
Also http://prpnet.primegrid.com:12002/user_stats.html is not accessible - shows white list. |
|
|
|
|
[2009-11-25 03:44:43 GMT] FPS: Attempting to send previously completed work
[2009-11-25 03:44:44 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> FROM unconnected99@mail.ru turk unconnected
[2009-11-25 03:44:44 GMT] FPS: Returning work to server prpnet.primegrid.com at port 12002
[2009-11-25 03:44:44 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> RETURNWORK 2.2.3
[2009-11-25 03:44:44 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> WorkUnit: 65098!-1 1258849779
[2009-11-25 03:44:55 GMT] socket 1892 (nothing received)
[2009-11-25 03:44:55 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> End of Message
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] socket 1892 (nothing received)
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> QUIT
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] closing socket 1892
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] PRPNet Client application v2.2.3 started
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] User name unconnected at email address is unconnected99@mail.ru
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> FROM unconnected99@mail.ru turk unconnected
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> GETGREETING
[2009-11-25 03:45:17 GMT] socket 1892 (nothing received)
[2009-11-25 03:45:17 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> QUIT
[2009-11-25 03:45:17 GMT] closing socket 1892
...
Also http://prpnet.primegrid.com:12002/user_stats.html is not accessible - shows white list.
What OS do you run on.
I see you connect but it is rejected becuse there is no residue.
Lennart |
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
[2009-11-25 03:44:43 GMT] FPS: Attempting to send previously completed work
[2009-11-25 03:44:44 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> FROM unconnected99@mail.ru turk unconnected
[2009-11-25 03:44:44 GMT] FPS: Returning work to server prpnet.primegrid.com at port 12002
[2009-11-25 03:44:44 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> RETURNWORK 2.2.3
[2009-11-25 03:44:44 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> WorkUnit: 65098!-1 1258849779
[2009-11-25 03:44:55 GMT] socket 1892 (nothing received)
[2009-11-25 03:44:55 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> End of Message
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] socket 1892 (nothing received)
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> QUIT
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] closing socket 1892
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] PRPNet Client application v2.2.3 started
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] User name unconnected at email address is unconnected99@mail.ru
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> FROM unconnected99@mail.ru turk unconnected
[2009-11-25 03:45:06 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> GETGREETING
[2009-11-25 03:45:17 GMT] socket 1892 (nothing received)
[2009-11-25 03:45:17 GMT] socket 1892 >>>> QUIT
[2009-11-25 03:45:17 GMT] closing socket 1892
...
Also http://prpnet.primegrid.com:12002/user_stats.html is not accessible - shows white list.
Please upgrade to 2.4.6. You are running a really old release that is prone to various problems that have since been fixed. |
|
|
dh1sajVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 13 Jul 08
Posts: 49
ID: 25532
Credit: 3,632,273,106
RAC: 52,005
|
|
uwin.mine.nu:10000 seems to be down.
Also uwin.mine.nu:10000/user_stats.html shows blank screen but no HTML-Error.
Same issue with port 11k.
Prpnet on the PG server is up and running (at least for GCW13 and PPSE>450).
Client is 2.4.6 / WIN-XP32.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Port 12007 down also...
____________
 |
|
|
|
|
|
I have been getting this for several hours.
[2009-11-25 14:02:01 GMT] Could not verify connection to uwin.mine.nu. Will try again later.
Internet connection is fine, running 2.4.5
____________
|
|
|
Sysadm@NbgVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 08
Posts: 1216
ID: 18646
Credit: 858,366,191
RAC: 172,077
|
|
Port 12000 (SGS) is down!
[2009-11-25 16:11:06 GMT] Nothing was received, therefore the socket was cloed
[2009-11-25 16:11:06 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2009-11-25 16:11:06 GMT] Nothing was received, therefore the socket was cloed
[2009-11-25 16:11:06 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2009-11-25 16:11:06 GMT] Nothing was received, therefore the socket was cloed
[2009-11-25 16:11:06 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2009-11-25 16:11:06 GMT] Nothing was received, therefore the socket was cloed
[2009-11-25 16:11:06 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2009-11-25 16:11:06 GMT] Nothing was received, therefore the socket was cloed
[2009-11-25 16:11:06 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2009-11-25 16:11:07 GMT] Nothing was received, therefore the socket was cloed
[2009-11-25 16:11:07 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2009-11-25 16:11:07 GMT] Could not connect to any servers and no work is pending. Pausing 3 minutes
Website is offline, too
____________
Sysadm@Nbg
my current lucky number: 113856050^65536 + 1
PSA-PRPNet-Stats-URL: http://u-g-f.de/PRPNet/
|
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
|
I suspect the server is down. |
|
|
Sysadm@NbgVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 08
Posts: 1216
ID: 18646
Credit: 858,366,191
RAC: 172,077
|
Port 12000 (SGS) is down!
It is up again !
[2009-11-25 18:43:05 GMT] SGS: Returning work to server prpnet.primegrid.com at port 12000
[2009-11-25 18:43:05 GMT] SGS: INFO: Test for candidate 201668582115*2^666666-1 accepted
[2009-11-25 18:43:05 GMT] SGS: INFO: All 1 test results were accepted
[2009-11-25 18:43:05 GMT] SGS: Getting work from server prpnet.primegrid.com at port 12000
[2009-11-25 18:43:06 GMT] SGS: PRPNet server is version 2.4.6
Let´s do some work ...
____________
Sysadm@Nbg
my current lucky number: 113856050^65536 + 1
PSA-PRPNet-Stats-URL: http://u-g-f.de/PRPNet/
|
|
|
|
|
|
I've upgraded client to 2.4.6, now all is OK. Thanks! |
|
|
valtercVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 30 May 07
Posts: 121
ID: 8810
Credit: 19,949,064,659
RAC: 6,524,575
|
|
Hi all,
Does anyone know where I can cat the source code of the latest release of pfgw for unix/linux? (3.2.2?)
The binary i got dumps core (kernel too old) and..., no, I cannot upgrade it...
thanks all.
|
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
Hi all,
Does anyone know where I can cat the source code of the latest release of pfgw for unix/linux? (3.2.2?)
The binary i got dumps core (kernel too old) and..., no, I cannot upgrade it...
thanks all.
The latest is 3.2.3 and can be found here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openpfgw/.
You will need to get gwnum from ftp://mersenne.org/gimps/source2513.zip and build it.
You will also need to get GMP and build it.
PFGW can only be built as a 32-bit binary right now.
I maintain the source tree and distribution. e-mail me if you have further questions.
|
|
|
valtercVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 30 May 07
Posts: 121
ID: 8810
Credit: 19,949,064,659
RAC: 6,524,575
|
Hi all,
Does anyone know where I can cat the source code of the latest release of pfgw for unix/linux? (3.2.2?)
The binary i got dumps core (kernel too old) and..., no, I cannot upgrade it...
thanks all.
The latest is 3.2.3 and can be found here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openpfgw/.
You will need to get gwnum from ftp://mersenne.org/gimps/source2513.zip and build it.
You will also need to get GMP and build it.
PFGW can only be built as a 32-bit binary right now.
I maintain the source tree and distribution. e-mail me if you have further questions.
I was able to build pfgw... (it wasn't easy...) for the following arch:
Linux 2.4.21-47.ELsmp i686 i386
testing now on port 12002 (FPS)
pm me or post here if someone wants the exe or need info about the build |
|
|
|
|
|
Is there a set schedule for when manual credit down in PRPnet/the manual sieves will start to be added onto our PSA count? Or is there any place where we can find out when the next time manual credit will be imported? I know that the manual credit isn't added on immediately, and that it is added on as a fraction of our RAC, but it would be nice to know when we can expect to see manual credit to start being added each month. |
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
  
|
|
Receiving Credit
Manual BOINC cobblestones are earned while participating in both PRPNet and the manual sieves. They are awarded in batches and then averaged out based off your current RAC. This is done so your daily credit more reflects the type of work you're doing. One day spikes do not represent that. Daily distributions will continue to rise each day until most of your credit is distributed...then it will level off as steady work continues to come in.
The sieves
Once COMPLETE ranges are moved from the main reservation post to the Archive post, credit is calculated and applied. This process is done every 2-4 weeks depending on how active the sieves are and how many COMPLETE ranges are piling up. Right now, it's averaging about once a week.
PRPNet
Credit is calculated and applied once every 6-8 weeks. Right now, it's averaging about once every 3-4 weeks. The previous application occurred on 18 Nov.
____________
|
|
|
|
|
|
If 12005 is not responding, then 12003 may be of assistance!
Alternatively, the GCW13 Mini-Challenge may be of interest.
____________
Warped
|
|
|
|
|
If 12005 is not responding, then 12003 may be of assistance!
Alternatively, the GCW13 Mini-Challenge may be of interest.
There was no work on 12005 but now there is :)
Lennart |
|
|
|
|
|
I have noticed recently that I get the following message from time to time:
Continue test of file 'work_GFN1.in' at line 1.
Testing 2081002^32768+1...
The checkpoint version doesn't match current test. Current test will be restarted
The task is typically just about complete and then starts all over again.
What would be the cause?
____________
Warped
|
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
I have noticed recently that I get the following message from time to time:
Continue test of file 'work_GFN1.in' at line 1.
Testing 2081002^32768+1...
The checkpoint version doesn't match current test. Current test will be restarted
The task is typically just about complete and then starts all over again.
What would be the cause?
A checkpoint file is used so that if genefer is stopped and restarted that it can resume a PRP test from where it had stopped. If you have not stopped the client, this message doesn't make a lot of sense. If you can provide the screen around for context that would help greatly. |
|
|
|
|
I have noticed recently that I get the following message from time to time:
Continue test of file 'work_GFN1.in' at line 1.
Testing 2081002^32768+1...
The checkpoint version doesn't match current test. Current test will be restarted
The task is typically just about complete and then starts all over again.
What would be the cause?
A checkpoint file is used so that if genefer is stopped and restarted that it can resume a PRP test from where it had stopped. If you have not stopped the client, this message doesn't make a lot of sense. If you can provide the screen around for context that would help greatly.
Thanks Rogue
I do stop and start PRNet, but this seems to happen after it's been running for a while. Next time it happens, I'll post the entire screen content. |
|
|
|
|
|
OK, here goes - please see at the end (I stopped the task in order to get this screen dump):
It appears that the PRPNet client was aborted without completing
the assigned workunits. What do you want to do?
1 = Report completed and abort the rest
2 = Complete assigned workunits
Choose option: 2
[2009-12-08 18:29:28 GMT] PRPNet Client application v2.4.5 started
[2009-12-08 18:29:28 GMT] User name Warped at email address (edited)
Genefer 2.2.0 (x86 - 32-bit - 64-b X87) Copyright (C) 2001-2003, Yves Gallot
Copyright 2009, Mark Rodenkirch, David Underbakke
A program for finding large probable generalized Fermat primes.
Start test of file 'work_GFN1.in'.
Resuming 2087562^32768+1 from a checkpoint
2087562^32768+1 is a probable composite. (RES=49864bc6f9dae09a)
(207082 digits) (err = 0.4694) (time = 0:11:48) 20:33:59
[2009-12-08 18:33:59 GMT] GFN1: 2087562^32768+1 is not prime. Residue 49864bc6f
9dae09a
[2009-12-08 18:33:59 GMT] Total Time: 0:04:35 Total Tests: 1 Total PRPs Found
: 0
[2009-12-08 18:34:05 GMT] GFN1: Returning work to server prpnet.primegrid.com at
port 12005
[2009-12-08 18:34:06 GMT] GFN1: INFO: Test for candidate 2087562^32768+1 accepted
[2009-12-08 18:34:06 GMT] GFN1: INFO: All 1 test results were accepted
[2009-12-08 18:34:08 GMT] GFN2: Getting work from server prpnet.primegrid.com at port 12003
[2009-12-08 18:34:10 GMT] GFN2: PRPNet server is version 2.4.6
PRPNet Server version 2.4.6 GFN N=32768 2
Genefer 2.2.0 (x86 - 32-bit - 64-b X87) Copyright (C) 2001-2003, Yves Gallot
Copyright 2009, Mark Rodenkirch, David Underbakke
A program for finding large probable generalized Fermat primes.
Start test of file 'work_GFN2.in'.
928698^32768+1 is a probable composite. (RES=ff29e2d806514c08)
(195556 digits) (err = 0.0907) (time = 0:11:02) 20:45:13
[2009-12-08 18:45:13 GMT] GFN2: 928698^32768+1 is not prime. Residue ff29e2d806514c08
[2009-12-08 18:45:13 GMT] Total Time: 0:15:49 Total Tests: 2 Total PRPs Found
: 0
[2009-12-08 18:45:19 GMT] GFN2: Returning work to server prpnet.primegrid.com at
port 12003
[2009-12-08 18:45:20 GMT] GFN2: INFO: Test for candidate 928698^32768+1 accepted
[2009-12-08 18:45:20 GMT] GFN2: INFO: All 1 test results were accepted
[2009-12-08 18:45:22 GMT] GFN1: Getting work from server prpnet.primegrid.com at
port 12005
[2009-12-08 18:45:24 GMT] GFN1: PRPNet server is version 2.4.6
PRPNet Server version 2.4.6
GFN N=32768 1
Genefer 2.2.0 (x86 - 32-bit - 64-b X87) Copyright (C) 2001-2003, Yves Gallot
Copyright 2009, Mark Rodenkirch, David Underbakke
A program for finding large probable generalized Fermat primes.
Start test of file 'work_GFN1.in'.
Testing 2087634^32768+1... 577536 steps to go
maxErr exceeded for 2087634^32768+1, 0.4852 > 0.4700
Genefer80 2.2.0 (x86 - 32-bit - 80-b X87) Copyright (C) 2001-2003, Yves Gallot
Copyright 2009, Mark Rodenkirch, David Underbakke
A program for finding large probable generalized Fermat primes.
Continue test of file 'work_GFN1.in' at line 1.
Testing 2087634^32768+1...
The checkpoint version doesn't match current test. Current test will be restart
ed
Testing 2087634^32768+1... 679936 steps to go ^C[2009-12-08 18:47:34 GMT] GFN1:
2087634^32768+1 is not prime. Residue roundofferr
[2009-12-08 18:47:34 GMT] Total Time: 0:18:10 Total Tests: 3 Total PRPs Found
: 0
[2009-12-08 18:47:36 GMT] GFN1: Returning work to server prpnet.primegrid.com at
port 12005
[2009-12-08 18:47:37 GMT] GFN1: INFO: Test for candidate 2087634^32768+1 accepte
d
[2009-12-08 18:47:37 GMT] GFN1: INFO: All 1 test results were accepted
[2009-12-08 18:47:40 GMT] GFN2: Getting work from server prpnet.primegrid.com at
port 12003
[2009-12-08 18:47:42 GMT] GFN2: PRPNet server is version 2.4.6
PRPNet Server version 2.4.6
GFN N=32768 2
Genefer 2.2.0 (x86 - 32-bit - 64-b X87) Copyright (C) 2001-2003, Yves Gallot
Copyright 2009, Mark Rodenkirch, David Underbakke
A program for finding large probable generalized Fermat primes.
Start test of file 'work_GFN2.in'.
Testing 928742^32768+1...
The checkpoint version doesn't match current test. Current test will be restart
ed
Testing 928742^32768+1... 638976 steps to go ^C[2009-12-08 18:47:59 GMT] GFN2:
Could not open file [genefer.log] for reading. Assuming user stopped with ^C
What should the client do with current workunits?
1 = Report completed and abort the rest
2 = Report completed tests to server
3 = Nothing
Choose option: |
|
|
HonzaVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 15 Aug 05
Posts: 1948
ID: 352
Credit: 6,007,066,820
RAC: 1,517,655
|
|
Seeing this quite often lately...
Testing 2087792^32768+1... 208896 steps to go
maxErr exceeded for 2087792^32768+1, 0.4791 > 0.4700
____________
My stats |
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
|
You are getting a maxerr error. This occurs when the FFT encounters a rounding issue. The test is then redone with a version of genefer that is less likely to encounter the error. The second time it tries to perform the test it finds the checkpoint file and gives the message because the checkpoint file cannot be used.
David and I can modify genefer to delete the checkpoint file if maxerr occurs. That would eliminate the message, but doesn't eliminate maxerr. If lots and lots of workunits are failing due to maxerr, I suggest commenting genefx64 and genefer in the prpclient.ini file but not genefer80. |
|
|
HonzaVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 15 Aug 05
Posts: 1948
ID: 352
Credit: 6,007,066,820
RAC: 1,517,655
|
If lots and lots of workunits are failing due to maxerr, I suggest commenting genefx64 and genefer in the prpclient.ini file but not genefer80.
We are already way past limits Genefx64 for N=32768 (which is ~1,5M so we have past this limit pretty fast) but we are closing limit of Genefer ~2,085M. I believe this will past once we are pretty well deep beyond limit of Genefer so that PRPClient will switch to Genefer80 automagically.
Worth monitoring I guess so we may fine tune this for higher Ns; not easy to balacne performace vs. limits of each genefer version...
____________
My stats |
|
|
HonzaVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 15 Aug 05
Posts: 1948
ID: 352
Credit: 6,007,066,820
RAC: 1,517,655
|
If lots and lots of workunits are failing due to maxerr, I suggest commenting genefx64 and genefer in the prpclient.ini file but not genefer80.
It works for commenting genefx64 but doesn't for genefer.
If I leave only genefer80, client crashes (both on Win x86 and x64 OSes)...even when cache is empty and I download new tasks.
____________
My stats |
|
|
HonzaVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 15 Aug 05
Posts: 1948
ID: 352
Credit: 6,007,066,820
RAC: 1,517,655
|
|
Empty on GFN port 12005 for couple of hours...
____________
My stats |
|
|
HonzaVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 15 Aug 05
Posts: 1948
ID: 352
Credit: 6,007,066,820
RAC: 1,517,655
|
|
Looking into work_GFN1.save, dozens of instances shows similar:
WorkUnit=2181286^32768+1 1260887712 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2181320^32768+1 1260887712 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2181354^32768+1 1260887712 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2181360^32768+1 1260887712 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2181364^32768+1 1260887712 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2181370^32768+1 1260887712 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2181394^32768+1 1260887712 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2181400^32768+1 1260887712 genefer.exe roundofferr na
Another instance
WorkUnit=2181434^32768+1 1260888583 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2181452^32768+1 1260888583 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2181464^32768+1 1260888583 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2181490^32768+1 1260888583 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2181500^32768+1 1260888583 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2181540^32768+1 1260888583 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2181552^32768+1 1260888583 genefer.exe 1386afb9873a937a na
WorkUnit=2181558^32768+1 1260888583 genefer.exe roundofferr na
And another...
WorkUnit=2180222^32768+1 1260877922 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2180226^32768+1 1260877922 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2180256^32768+1 1260877922 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2180258^32768+1 1260877922 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2180260^32768+1 1260877922 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2180298^32768+1 1260877922 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2180324^32768+1 1260877922 genefer.exe roundofferr na
WorkUnit=2180328^32768+1 1260877922 genefer.exe roundofferr na
It is worth continuing on Port 12005?
____________
My stats |
|
|
|
|
|
Do the points I'm seeing at the "Users" area of each port translate to the same number of points as the BOINC client?
1 to 1 ?
2 to 1 ?
Inquiring minds would like to know.
____________
 |
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
Do the points I'm seeing at the "Users" area of each port translate to the same number of points as the BOINC client?
1 to 1 ?
2 to 1 ?
Inquiring minds would like to know.
Please see this thread: http://www.primegrid.com/forum_thread.php?id=1474
____________
|
|
|
|
|
|
How fast is the PS3 client? I might be willing to buy a PS3 just for PrimeGrid if it's fast enough. :)
____________
FUCK THIS PROJECT AND THEIR COMMIE BULLSHIT POLITICS |
|
|
|
|
|
Am I the only one who can't access http://pgllr.mine.nu/PRPNet/ ? I'm using v2.4.6, so it's not that important, but I'm curious. |
|
|
LexsVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 08
Posts: 61
ID: 20289
Credit: 49,033,000
RAC: 0
         
|
How fast is the PS3 client? I might be willing to buy a PS3 just for PrimeGrid if it's fast enough. :)
It's not worth buying a PS3 if you don't already have an old one, since the newer ones cannot run linux at all.
See: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PlayStation_3#Model_comparison
The speed is about 2.5 times slower than on x86.
The synergetic processing units are not used for "phrot", thus not using the full potential of the PS3.
I made a "genefer" build which is using the SPE's through FFTW, but its horribly slow.
____________
 |
|
|
LexsVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 08
Posts: 61
ID: 20289
Credit: 49,033,000
RAC: 0
|
|
:-( I lost 1 result. Why was it already removed from the server ?
[2010-01-14 16:03:25 GMT] GCW13: ERROR: Workunit 708768*13^708768+1 not found on server
[2010-01-14 16:03:25 GMT] GCW13: ERROR: ReceiveCompletedWork error. Message [Test Result: pfgw A8AB171FF0379548] cannot be parsed
[2010-01-14 16:03:25 GMT] GCW13: ERROR: ReceiveCompletedWork error. Message [End of WorkUnit] cannot be parsed
[2010-01-14 16:03:25 GMT] GCW13: INFO: 0 of 1 test results were accepted
____________
|
|
|
HonzaVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 15 Aug 05
Posts: 1948
ID: 352
Credit: 6,007,066,820
RAC: 1,517,655
|
Am I the only one who can't access http://pgllr.mine.nu/PRPNet/ ? I'm using v2.4.6, so it's not that important, but I'm curious.
Server is down, Lennart is working on it to bring it back alive.
____________
My stats |
|
|
warddrVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 7 Feb 08
Posts: 254
ID: 18735
Credit: 24,054,820
RAC: 0
    
|
|
I can host the sieve files and the programs on a VPS with 20Mbit connection if you like, Lennart.
____________
 |
|
|
|
|
I can host the sieve files and the programs on a VPS with 20Mbit connection if you like, Lennart.
I have servers to host it on but i need about 300G-500G HD to save it on .
My VPS only have 25G thats why i keep it at home.
Lennart |
|
|
warddrVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 7 Feb 08
Posts: 254
ID: 18735
Credit: 24,054,820
RAC: 0
|
|
That's lots of data..
____________
|
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
:-( I lost 1 result. Why was it already removed from the server ?
[2010-01-14 16:03:25 GMT] GCW13: ERROR: Workunit 708768*13^708768+1 not found on server
[2010-01-14 16:03:25 GMT] GCW13: ERROR: ReceiveCompletedWork error. Message [Test Result: pfgw A8AB171FF0379548] cannot be parsed
[2010-01-14 16:03:25 GMT] GCW13: ERROR: ReceiveCompletedWork error. Message [End of WorkUnit] cannot be parsed
[2010-01-14 16:03:25 GMT] GCW13: INFO: 0 of 1 test results were accepted
I suspect that some workunits are expiring too quickly. Lennart needs to bump up the time before workunits expire. When did you get the workunit? |
|
|
|
|
:-( I lost 1 result. Why was it already removed from the server ?
[2010-01-14 16:03:25 GMT] GCW13: ERROR: Workunit 708768*13^708768+1 not found on server
[2010-01-14 16:03:25 GMT] GCW13: ERROR: ReceiveCompletedWork error. Message [Test Result: pfgw A8AB171FF0379548] cannot be parsed
[2010-01-14 16:03:25 GMT] GCW13: ERROR: ReceiveCompletedWork error. Message [End of WorkUnit] cannot be parsed
[2010-01-14 16:03:25 GMT] GCW13: INFO: 0 of 1 test results were accepted
I suspect that some workunits are expiring too quickly. Lennart needs to bump up the time before workunits expire. When did you get the workunit?
Here is the delay.
delay=500000:1d:6d
delay=600000:1d:6d
delay=700000:1d:6d
delay=800000:1d:8d
delay=900000:1d:10d
delay=1000000:4d:16d
and Log.
[2010-01-14 14:32:29 GMT] 708768*13^708768+1 received by Email: axxxxx@xxx.xxx User: Lexs Client: xxxxxx Program: pfgw Residue: A8AB171FF0379548
Lennart |
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
|
What does your log say for when the workunit was assigned? Did it expire? Did the server not match the residue? Did the server possibly crash without saving the workunit? |
|
|
|
|
What does your log say for when the workunit was assigned? Did it expire? Did the server not match the residue? Did the server possibly crash without saving the workunit?
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] Message coming on socket 240
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] 38 bytes received
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] received on socket 240 [FROM axxxxx@xxx.xxx 110964 Lexs 2.4.7]
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] sending on socket 240 [Connected to server]
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] axxxxxx@xxx.xxx connecting from XX.217.11.67
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] 123 bytes received
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] received on socket 240 [RETURNWORK 2.4.7]
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] received on socket 240 [WorkUnit: 708768*13^708768+1 1263460433]
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] sending on socket 240 [Acknowledge: 708768*13^708768+1]
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] sending on socket 240 [ERROR: Workunit 708768*13^708768+1 not found on server]
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] received on socket 240 [Test Result: pfgw A8AB171FF0379548]
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] sending on socket 240 [ERROR: ReceiveCompletedWork error. Message [Test Result: pfgw A8AB171FF0379548] cannot be parsed]
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] received on socket 240 [End of WorkUnit]
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] sending on socket 240 [ERROR: ReceiveCompletedWork error. Message [End of WorkUnit] cannot be parsed]
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] received on socket 240 [End of Message]
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] sending on socket 240 [INFO: 0 of 1 test results were accepted]
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] sending on socket 240 [End of Message]
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] 21 bytes received
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] received on socket 240 [Client Disconnecting]
[2010-01-14 16:03:43 GMT] closing socket 240
[2010-01-14 14:31:48 GMT] closing socket 240
[2010-01-14 14:32:28 GMT] Message coming on socket 240
[2010-01-14 14:32:28 GMT] 38 bytes received
[2010-01-14 14:32:28 GMT] received on socket 240 [FROM axxxxxx@xxx.xxx 110964 Lexs 2.4.7]
[2010-01-14 14:32:28 GMT] sending on socket 240 [Connected to server]
[2010-01-14 14:32:28 GMT] axxxxx@xxx.xxx connecting from xx.217.11.67
[2010-01-14 14:32:29 GMT] 123 bytes received
[2010-01-14 14:32:29 GMT] received on socket 240 [RETURNWORK 2.4.7]
[2010-01-14 14:32:29 GMT] received on socket 240 [WorkUnit: 708768*13^708768+1 1263460433]
[2010-01-14 14:32:29 GMT] received on socket 240 [Test Result: pfgw A8AB171FF0379548]
[2010-01-14 14:32:29 GMT] received on socket 240 [End of WorkUnit]
[2010-01-14 14:32:29 GMT] sending on socket 240 [Acknowledge: 708768*13^708768+1]
[2010-01-14 14:32:29 GMT] sending on socket 240 [INFO: Test for candidate 708768*13^708768+1 accepted]
[2010-01-14 14:32:29 GMT] received on socket 240 [End of Message]
[2010-01-14 14:32:29 GMT] sending on socket 240 [INFO: All 1 test results were accepted]
[2010-01-14 14:32:29 GMT] sending on socket 240 [End of Message]
[2010-01-14 14:32:39 GMT] Nothing was received, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-14 14:32:39 GMT] closing socket 240
[2010-01-14 14:32:49 GMT] Message coming on socket 240
|
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
|
This implies that the client never got the acknowledgement that the server accepted the workunit when it sent it the first time. |
|
|
LexsVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 08
Posts: 61
ID: 20289
Credit: 49,033,000
RAC: 0
|
|
Resolved: I had trouble with my network switch at that time, other connections were broken too.
At least the server did get the result.
[2010-01-14 09:13:34 GMT] GCW13: PRPNet server is version 2.4.7
[2010-01-14 14:32:03 GMT] GCW13: 708768*13^708768+1 is not prime. Residue A8AB171FF0379548
[2010-01-14 14:32:03 GMT] Total Time: 28:43:03 Total Tests: 4 Total PRPs Found: 0
[2010-01-14 14:32:09 GMT] GCW13: Returning work to server prpnet.primegrid.com at port 12004
[2010-01-14 14:32:19 GMT] Nothing was received, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-14 14:32:29 GMT] Nothing was received, therefore the socket was closed
____________
|
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
|
It's good to hear that. Maybe I need to use a different message such as "Result already received/accepted" instead of an outright rejection. |
|
|
|
|
|
Just started PRN today. I am running a dual-core Wintel machine. One thing bothers me that I couldn't find an answer for:
Every time I start the clients up, I get an error saying that 'Genefx64.exe is not a valid Win32 application.' Life continues as normal after that. I had no plans to dabble in GFN anyway, but it's a rather annoying message.
Thanks! |
|
|
|
|
NOTE: 32 bit Windows clients should comment out the line "geneferexe=genefX64.exe" in the master_prpclient.ini file if participating in the GFN Prime Search.
from here http://www.primegrid.com/forum_thread.php?id=1215
Will stop that error message. |
|
|
pschoeferVolunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 05
Posts: 685
ID: 845
Credit: 2,886,413,454
RAC: 139,386
|
Every time I start the clients up, I get an error saying that 'Genefx64.exe is not a valid Win32 application.' Life continues as normal after that. I had no plans to dabble in GFN anyway, but it's a rather annoying message.
Genefx64 is a 64bit application, so it can't be run on Win32 (you would have to use genefer/genefer80, if you wanted to do GFN tests). To get rid of that message, open your master_prpclient.ini file, comment out the line geneferexe=genefX64.exe (i.e. insert two slashes in front of it) and run update-prpclient-ini.bat.
____________
|
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
Just started PRN today. I am running a dual-core Wintel machine. One thing bothers me that I couldn't find an answer for:
Every time I start the clients up, I get an error saying that 'Genefx64.exe is not a valid Win32 application.' Life continues as normal after that. I had no plans to dabble in GFN anyway, but it's a rather annoying message.
Located in this post is:
NOTE: 32 bit Windows clients should comment out the line "geneferexe=genefX64.exe" in the master_prpclient.ini file if participating in the GFN Prime Search.
It was missing in the main PRPNet post. I have added it now. It is also missing in the prpclient.ini file so in the next release, a note will be added to the GFN section. :)
EDIT: Now we give answers in triplicate. :D Thanks for the info pschoefer and endless mike
____________
|
|
|
|
|
|
Oops, thanks. I was aware that this app was 64 bit, which is why I didn't want to be involved. I missed that note and didn't comment any apps out, expecting the app's existence was hard-coded or something. |
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
Oops, thanks. I was aware that this app was 64 bit, which is why I didn't want to be involved. I missed that note and didn't comment any apps out, expecting the app's existence was hard-coded or something.
Only genefX64.exe is 64 bit. The others are 32 bit so you can still participate in GFN ports if you wish. All you have to do is comment out the first line:
//geneferexe=genefX64.exe
geneferexe=genefer.exe
geneferexe=genefer80.exe
____________
|
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
|
Also note that the upper bound for b with genefer64 is lower than the other versions. |
|
|
Sysadm@NbgVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 08
Posts: 1216
ID: 18646
Credit: 858,366,191
RAC: 172,077
|
|
got "Beta testing PRPNet 3.1.4"-zip for Linux
after unziping and installing I tried to start:
$ ./prpclient
No servers are configured.
reason: in your (master-)prpclient.ini is a space in front of the (test-)server
|// server=27121:0:1:prpnet.primegrid.com:12006
| server=PPSE:100:1:prpnet.primegrid.com:12007
|// server=PRS:0:1:prpnet.primegrid.com:12008
"|" is only to demonstrate (code-tag delets leading spaces)
deleting the space, it works:
$ ./prpclient
[2010-01-24 09:25:14 GMT] PRPNet Client application v3.1.4 started
[2010-01-24 09:25:14 GMT] User name SysadmAtNbg at email address is x.y@z.com
[2010-01-24 09:25:15 GMT] PPSE: Getting work from server prpnet.primegrid.com at port 12007
[2010-01-24 09:25:16 GMT] PPSE: PRPNet server is version 3.1.4
____________
Sysadm@Nbg
my current lucky number: 113856050^65536 + 1
PSA-PRPNet-Stats-URL: http://u-g-f.de/PRPNet/
|
|
|
vasmVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 6 Dec 08
Posts: 47
ID: 32604
Credit: 990,892
RAC: 0
|
|
I set a 2.4.7 windows client for some GFN work and I got this:
[2010-01-28 11:09:53 GMT] PRPNet Client application v2.4.7 started
[2010-01-28 11:09:53 GMT] User name vasm at email address is ...
[2010-01-28 11:09:57 GMT] GFN1: Getting work from server prpnet.primegrid.com at port 12005
[2010-01-28 11:09:57 GMT] GFN1: PRPNet server is version 2.4.7
PRPNet Server version 2.4.6
GFN N=32768 1
GenefX64 2.2.0 (x86 - 64-bit - SSE3) Copyright (C) 2001-2003, Yves Gallot
Copyright 2009, Mark Rodenkirch, David Underbakke
A program for finding large probable generalized Fermat primes.
Start test of file 'work_GFN1.in' - 11:09:58
Testing 3092632^32768+1... 704512 steps to go
maxErr exceeded for 3092632^32768+1, 0.5000 > 0.4500
Genefer 2.2.0 (x86 - 32-bit - 64-b X87) Copyright (C) 2001-2003, Yves Gallot
Copyright 2009, Mark Rodenkirch, David Underbakke
A program for finding large probable generalized Fermat primes.
Continue test of file 'work_GFN1.in' at line 1.
Testing 3092632^32768+1... 704512 steps to go
maxErr exceeded for 3092632^32768+1, 0.5000 > 0.4700
Genefer80 2.2.0 (x86 - 32-bit - 80-b X87) Copyright (C) 2001-2003, Yves Gallot
Copyright 2009, Mark Rodenkirch, David Underbakke
A program for finding large probable generalized Fermat primes.
Continue test of file 'work_GFN1.in' at line 1.
3092632^32768+1 is a probable composite. (RES=24e8b32a67d1cf63)
(212676 digits) (err = 0.0013) (time = 0:24:49) 11:34:52
Recognized ABC Sieve file:
ABC File
1*3092632^32768+1 is composite: RES64: [BBF8CF0AD3E2CC48] (3480.6513s+0.0194s)
[2010-01-28 12:32:53 GMT] GFN1: 3092632^32768+1 is not prime. Residue BBF8CF0AD3E2CC48
[2010-01-28 12:32:53 GMT] Total Time: 1:23:01 Total Tests: 1 Total PRPs Found: 0
[2010-01-28 12:32:55 GMT] GFN1: Returning work to server prpnet.primegrid.com at port 12005
[2010-01-28 12:32:55 GMT] GFN1: INFO: Test for candidate 3092632^32768+1 accepted
[2010-01-28 12:32:55 GMT] GFN1: INFO: All 1 test results were accepted
If I read it correctly GenfX64 and Genefer exceed maxErr so the number goes to Genefer80 that completes the test. Then it looks like pfgw picks up the number and completes the same test again. Why is that?
Based on the timings it took about an extra hour for processing something that doesn't seem necessary.
This happens repeatedly on port 12005 but not on 12003 were tests are completed by GenefX64 and returned as normal. |
|
|
|
|
|
I seem to be seeing an occasional problem with 3.1.4 (on Windows XP) that I didn't see on the previous version I was using.
I have it configured to run five tasks and then report. Three time now (in 3 or 4 days) I've seen something like ...
------------------------
[2010-01-28 05:29:06 GMT] PPSE: PRPNet server is version 3.1.5
[2010-01-28 06:06:21 GMT] PPSE: 9813*2^700412+1 is not prime. Residue D3600AC5C0E68D32
[2010-01-28 06:43:42 GMT] PPSE: 9821*2^700411+1 is not prime. Residue FC03F70B17B3F0B5
[2010-01-28 07:18:52 GMT] PPSE: 9873*2^700412+1 is not prime. Residue F84090156BDA0B97
[2010-01-28 07:51:56 GMT] PPSE: 9925*2^700412+1 is not prime. Residue 499AAF983DB340A4
[2010-01-28 08:17:05 GMT] PPSE: 1209*2^700417+1 is not prime. Residue 06865DC59D3887F5
[2010-01-28 08:17:05 GMT] Total Time: 13:13:47 Total Tests: 25 Total PRPs Found: 0
[2010-01-28 08:17:06 GMT] PPSE: Returning work to server prpnet.primegrid.com at port 12007
[2010-01-28 08:17:07 GMT] PPSE: INFO: Test for 9813*2^700412+1 was accepted
[2010-01-28 08:17:16 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 1972, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-28 08:17:26 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 1916, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-28 08:17:26 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2010-01-28 08:17:26 GMT] Could not connect to any servers and no work is pending. Pausing 3 minutes
[2010-01-28 08:20:37 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 1920, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-28 08:20:37 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2010-01-28 08:20:47 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 1972, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-28 08:20:47 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2010-01-28 08:20:47 GMT] Could not connect to any servers and no work is pending. Pausing 3 minutes
[2010-01-28 08:23:58 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 1916, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-28 08:23:58 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2010-01-28 08:24:08 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 1920, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-28 08:24:08 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2010-01-28 08:24:08 GMT] Could not connect to any servers and no work is pending. Pausing 3 minutes
[2010-01-28 08:27:19 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 1972, therefore the socket was closed
&etc
-------------------------------------
It seems to return the first result correctly, fails on the next, and then continuously sits there trying to connect/pausing 3 minutes. When I finally notice the problem a ^C and restart immediately gets it working again.
Ian
____________
 |
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
If I read it correctly GenfX64 and Genefer exceed maxErr so the number goes to Genefer80 that completes the test. Then it looks like pfgw picks up the number and completes the same test again. Why is that?
Based on the timings it took about an extra hour for processing something that doesn't seem necessary.
This happens repeatedly on port 12005 but not on 12003 were tests are completed by GenefX64 and returned as normal.
I see the problem. The client is not deleting the genefer.log file after it discovers that it failed. I'll work with John/Lennart to get a patch out.
A temporary fix will be to comment the lines for genefx86 and genefer (but not genefer80) in the prpclient.ini file. |
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
I seem to be seeing an occasional problem with 3.1.4 (on Windows XP) that I didn't see on the previous version I was using.
I have it configured to run five tasks and then report. Three time now (in 3 or 4 days) I've seen something like ...
------------------------
[2010-01-28 05:29:06 GMT] PPSE: PRPNet server is version 3.1.5
[2010-01-28 06:06:21 GMT] PPSE: 9813*2^700412+1 is not prime. Residue D3600AC5C0E68D32
[2010-01-28 06:43:42 GMT] PPSE: 9821*2^700411+1 is not prime. Residue FC03F70B17B3F0B5
[2010-01-28 07:18:52 GMT] PPSE: 9873*2^700412+1 is not prime. Residue F84090156BDA0B97
[2010-01-28 07:51:56 GMT] PPSE: 9925*2^700412+1 is not prime. Residue 499AAF983DB340A4
[2010-01-28 08:17:05 GMT] PPSE: 1209*2^700417+1 is not prime. Residue 06865DC59D3887F5
[2010-01-28 08:17:05 GMT] Total Time: 13:13:47 Total Tests: 25 Total PRPs Found: 0
[2010-01-28 08:17:06 GMT] PPSE: Returning work to server prpnet.primegrid.com at port 12007
[2010-01-28 08:17:07 GMT] PPSE: INFO: Test for 9813*2^700412+1 was accepted
[2010-01-28 08:17:16 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 1972, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-28 08:17:26 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 1916, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-28 08:17:26 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2010-01-28 08:17:26 GMT] Could not connect to any servers and no work is pending. Pausing 3 minutes
[2010-01-28 08:20:37 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 1920, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-28 08:20:37 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2010-01-28 08:20:47 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 1972, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-28 08:20:47 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2010-01-28 08:20:47 GMT] Could not connect to any servers and no work is pending. Pausing 3 minutes
[2010-01-28 08:23:58 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 1916, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-28 08:23:58 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2010-01-28 08:24:08 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 1920, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-28 08:24:08 GMT] Could not verify connection to prpnet.primegrid.com. Will try again later.
[2010-01-28 08:24:08 GMT] Could not connect to any servers and no work is pending. Pausing 3 minutes
[2010-01-28 08:27:19 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 1972, therefore the socket was closed
&etc
-------------------------------------
It seems to return the first result correctly, fails on the next, and then continuously sits there trying to connect/pausing 3 minutes. When I finally notice the problem a ^C and restart immediately gets it working again.
Ian
I would need to see the server log to know what is going on. |
|
|
HonzaVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 15 Aug 05
Posts: 1948
ID: 352
Credit: 6,007,066,820
RAC: 1,517,655
|
A temporary fix will be to comment the lines for genefx86 and genefer (but not genefer80) in the prpclient.ini file.
This is an old issue...at least for me since this work-around doesn't work - see my post back on Dec 12.
I checked again with 3.1.5 and still no luck - PrpClient crashes when both genefX64.exe and genefer.exe and comment-out and I leave only genefer80 available.
____________
My stats |
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
A temporary fix will be to comment the lines for genefx86 and genefer (but not genefer80) in the prpclient.ini file.
This is an old issue...at least for me since this work-around doesn't work - see my post back on Dec 12.
I checked again with 3.1.5 and still no luck - PrpClient crashes when both genefX64.exe and genefer.exe and comment-out and I leave only genefer80 available.
That is another bug for me to fix. |
|
|
Sysadm@NbgVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 08
Posts: 1216
ID: 18646
Credit: 858,366,191
RAC: 172,077
|
|
perhaps i made a mistake or some missunderstanding ...
I tried to run the new client with an old port (SGS/12000)
I get work, I crunched em down, but i cannot report ...
$ ./prpclient
[2010-01-29 16:32:09 GMT] SGS: Attempting to send previously completed work
[2010-01-29 16:32:09 GMT] sending on socket 4 [FROM x.y@z.com Phenom_beta314 SysadmAtNbg 3.1.4]
[2010-01-29 16:32:13 GMT] received on socket 4 [Connected to server]
[2010-01-29 16:32:13 GMT] SGS: Returning work to server prpnet.primegrid.com at port 12000
[2010-01-29 16:32:13 GMT] sending on socket 4 [RETURNWORK 3.1.4]
[2010-01-29 16:32:13 GMT] sending on socket 4 [WorkUnit: 20451693859905*2^666667-1 1264525134]
[2010-01-29 16:32:13 GMT] sending on socket 4 [Test Result: llr AA72CF4D6340452F]
[2010-01-29 16:32:13 GMT] sending on socket 4 [Seconds: 1003.898000]
[2010-01-29 16:32:13 GMT] sending on socket 4 [End of WorkUnit: 20451693859905*2^666667-1 1264525134]
[2010-01-29 16:32:23 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 4, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-29 16:32:23 GMT] closing socket 4
[2010-01-29 16:32:23 GMT] PRPNet Client application v3.1.4 started
[2010-01-29 16:32:23 GMT] User name SysadmAtNbg at email address is x.y@z.com
[2010-01-29 16:32:23 GMT] sending on socket 3 [FROM x.y@z.com Phenom_beta314 SysadmAtNbg 3.1.4]
[2010-01-29 16:32:28 GMT] received on socket 3 [Connected to server]
[2010-01-29 16:32:29 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 3, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-29 16:32:29 GMT] closing socket 3
[2010-01-29 16:32:29 GMT] Total Time: 0:00:20 Total Tests: 0 Total PRPs Found: 0
[2010-01-29 16:32:29 GMT] sending on socket 3 [FROM x.y@z.com Phenom_beta314 SysadmAtNbg 3.1.4]
[2010-01-29 16:32:34 GMT] received on socket 3 [Connected to server]
[2010-01-29 16:32:34 GMT] SGS: Returning work to server prpnet.primegrid.com at port 12000
[2010-01-29 16:32:34 GMT] sending on socket 3 [RETURNWORK 3.1.4]
[2010-01-29 16:32:34 GMT] sending on socket 3 [WorkUnit: 20451693859905*2^666667-1 1264525134]
[2010-01-29 16:32:34 GMT] sending on socket 3 [Test Result: llr AA72CF4D6340452F]
[2010-01-29 16:32:34 GMT] sending on socket 3 [Seconds: 1003.898000]
[2010-01-29 16:32:34 GMT] sending on socket 3 [End of WorkUnit: 20451693859905*2^666667-1 1264525134]
[2010-01-29 16:32:44 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 3, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-29 16:32:44 GMT] closing socket 3
[2010-01-29 16:32:44 GMT] sending on socket 3 [FROM x.y@z.com Phenom_beta314 SysadmAtNbg 3.1.4]
^C[2010-01-29 16:32:47 GMT] Accepted force quit. Waiting to close sockets before exiting
____________
Sysadm@Nbg
my current lucky number: 113856050^65536 + 1
PSA-PRPNet-Stats-URL: http://u-g-f.de/PRPNet/
|
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
perhaps i made a mistake or some missunderstanding ...
I tried to run the new client with an old port (SGS/12000)
I get work, I crunched em down, but i cannot report ...
$ ./prpclient
[2010-01-29 16:32:09 GMT] SGS: Attempting to send previously completed work
[2010-01-29 16:32:09 GMT] sending on socket 4 [FROM x.y@z.com Phenom_beta314 SysadmAtNbg 3.1.4]
[2010-01-29 16:32:13 GMT] received on socket 4 [Connected to server]
[2010-01-29 16:32:13 GMT] SGS: Returning work to server prpnet.primegrid.com at port 12000
[2010-01-29 16:32:13 GMT] sending on socket 4 [RETURNWORK 3.1.4]
[2010-01-29 16:32:13 GMT] sending on socket 4 [WorkUnit: 20451693859905*2^666667-1 1264525134]
[2010-01-29 16:32:13 GMT] sending on socket 4 [Test Result: llr AA72CF4D6340452F]
[2010-01-29 16:32:13 GMT] sending on socket 4 [Seconds: 1003.898000]
[2010-01-29 16:32:13 GMT] sending on socket 4 [End of WorkUnit: 20451693859905*2^666667-1 1264525134]
[2010-01-29 16:32:23 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 4, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-29 16:32:23 GMT] closing socket 4
[2010-01-29 16:32:23 GMT] PRPNet Client application v3.1.4 started
[2010-01-29 16:32:23 GMT] User name SysadmAtNbg at email address is x.y@z.com
[2010-01-29 16:32:23 GMT] sending on socket 3 [FROM x.y@z.com Phenom_beta314 SysadmAtNbg 3.1.4]
[2010-01-29 16:32:28 GMT] received on socket 3 [Connected to server]
[2010-01-29 16:32:29 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 3, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-29 16:32:29 GMT] closing socket 3
[2010-01-29 16:32:29 GMT] Total Time: 0:00:20 Total Tests: 0 Total PRPs Found: 0
[2010-01-29 16:32:29 GMT] sending on socket 3 [FROM x.y@z.com Phenom_beta314 SysadmAtNbg 3.1.4]
[2010-01-29 16:32:34 GMT] received on socket 3 [Connected to server]
[2010-01-29 16:32:34 GMT] SGS: Returning work to server prpnet.primegrid.com at port 12000
[2010-01-29 16:32:34 GMT] sending on socket 3 [RETURNWORK 3.1.4]
[2010-01-29 16:32:34 GMT] sending on socket 3 [WorkUnit: 20451693859905*2^666667-1 1264525134]
[2010-01-29 16:32:34 GMT] sending on socket 3 [Test Result: llr AA72CF4D6340452F]
[2010-01-29 16:32:34 GMT] sending on socket 3 [Seconds: 1003.898000]
[2010-01-29 16:32:34 GMT] sending on socket 3 [End of WorkUnit: 20451693859905*2^666667-1 1264525134]
[2010-01-29 16:32:44 GMT] Nothing was received on socket 3, therefore the socket was closed
[2010-01-29 16:32:44 GMT] closing socket 3
[2010-01-29 16:32:44 GMT] sending on socket 3 [FROM x.y@z.com Phenom_beta314 SysadmAtNbg 3.1.4]
^C[2010-01-29 16:32:47 GMT] Accepted force quit. Waiting to close sockets before exiting
I'm sorry, but the 3.1.x client will not work with a 2.4.x server. I think that you can swap in the old client and it will report the workunits to the server. If not, let me know and I'll find a work-around for you. |
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
perhaps i made a mistake or some misunderstanding ...
Sorry, beta clients are only meant to connect to port 12007 which is running the beta server. I'll add a Note to the beta post.
John
p.s. I hope Mark's suggestion works.
____________
|
|
|
Sysadm@NbgVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 08
Posts: 1216
ID: 18646
Credit: 858,366,191
RAC: 172,077
|
I'm sorry, but the 3.1.x client will not work with a 2.4.x server. I think that you can swap in the old client and it will report the workunits to the server. If not, let me know and I'll find a work-around for you.
I will try, rogue ...
hi John
Don´t worry about this one (it was only ONE) or do you think i test a beta client with thousands of workunits without a sucessfully reply from the server ???
It was only one and if it gone to walhall then say a prayer and forgot em ...
Have a nice weekend!
EDIT:
@rogue: good idea but workunit seems to be deleted by the server meanwhile:
[2010-01-29 17:55:38 GMT] SGS: Attempting to send previously completed work
[2010-01-29 17:55:39 GMT] SGS: Returning work to server prpnet.primegrid.com at port 12000
[2010-01-29 17:55:40 GMT] SGS: ERROR: Workunit 20451693859905*2^666667-1 not found on server
[2010-01-29 17:55:40 GMT] SGS: ERROR: ReceiveCompletedWork error. Message [Test Result: llr AA72CF4D6340452F] cannot be parsed
[2010-01-29 17:55:40 GMT] SGS: ERROR: ReceiveCompletedWork error. Message [End of WorkUnit] cannot be parsed
[2010-01-29 17:55:40 GMT] SGS: INFO: 0 of 1 test results were accepted
____________
Sysadm@Nbg
my current lucky number: 113856050^65536 + 1
PSA-PRPNet-Stats-URL: http://u-g-f.de/PRPNet/
|
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
A temporary fix will be to comment the lines for genefx86 and genefer (but not genefer80) in the prpclient.ini file.
This is an old issue...at least for me since this work-around doesn't work - see my post back on Dec 12.
I checked again with 3.1.5 and still no luck - PrpClient crashes when both genefX64.exe and genefer.exe and comment-out and I leave only genefer80 available.
That is another bug for me to fix.
I found the problem. It will be fixed in 3.1.6. I can post a 2.4.8 update with this patched if strongly desired. |
|
|
HonzaVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 15 Aug 05
Posts: 1948
ID: 352
Credit: 6,007,066,820
RAC: 1,517,655
|
I found the problem. It will be fixed in 3.1.6. I can post a 2.4.8 update with this patched if strongly desired.
Great.
My point is - if 3.x would be soon recommended version, let's put it in 3.1.6, test thoroughly. We would need to upgrade GFN ports to support 3.x clients of course...
____________
My stats |
|
|
vmcSend message
Joined: 5 Aug 09
Posts: 9
ID: 44537
Credit: 17,515,448
RAC: 4,451
          
|
|
Hi,
got some ugly assertion-error today with 3.1.5 on a Gentoo 64-bit system.
PRPNet 3.1.5 PPSE
Starting Proth prime test of 9465*2^700596+1
Using FFT length 64K, a = 11
9465*2^700596+1 is not prime. Proth RES64: 388EFD5FFBA4AC62 Time : 1650.680 sec.
prpclient: tpp.c:63: __pthread_tpp_change_priority: Assertion `new_prio == -1 || (new_prio >= __sched_fifo_min_prio && new_prio <= __sched_fifo_max_prio)' failed.
Aborted
After restarting prpclient, it computed 9465*2^700596+1 again and ended without an error.
Just wanted to post it, maybe it helps the developer :) |
|
|
|
|
|
Hi!
I still can't get work from uwin.mine.nu:10000, says nothing was received. I see some reserved work on the pending tests page, but that never arrives. It's the only project uncommented, given 100 percent, requesting 20 workunits. prpnet.primegrid.com:12007 works fine with similar settings, but only one workunit.
Also, in master_prpclient.ini of the current Windows version (v3.1.5), there is a special character at the end of the PPSE11K line and some missing letters in the GFN32768 line. |
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
Hi,
got some ugly assertion-error today with 3.1.5 on a Gentoo 64-bit system.
PRPNet 3.1.5 PPSE
Starting Proth prime test of 9465*2^700596+1
Using FFT length 64K, a = 11
9465*2^700596+1 is not prime. Proth RES64: 388EFD5FFBA4AC62 Time : 1650.680 sec.
prpclient: tpp.c:63: __pthread_tpp_change_priority: Assertion `new_prio == -1 || (new_prio >= __sched_fifo_min_prio && new_prio <= __sched_fifo_max_prio)' failed.
Aborted
After restarting prpclient, it computed 9465*2^700596+1 again and ended without an error.
Just wanted to post it, maybe it helps the developer :)
This issue has been reported, but I don't know what would be causing it. The client has no code to alter its own priority. I have not been able to produce this error. I need someone to run the client through gdb and provide me a stacktrace so I can understand what would be causing this. |
|
|
vmcSend message
Joined: 5 Aug 09
Posts: 9
ID: 44537
Credit: 17,515,448
RAC: 4,451
|
|
I'll take a look at the code today evening :)
Running on GDB without triggering the error is not a solution :/ |
|
|
LexsVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 08
Posts: 61
ID: 20289
Credit: 49,033,000
RAC: 0
|
|
An uninitialized mutex attr might cause the problem.
try to change in SharedMemoryItem.cpp
#ifdef WIN32
ih_Mutex = CreateMutex(0, false, itemName);
#else
pthread_mutexattr_init(&ih_PthreadMutexAttr); // <-- THIS
pthread_mutexattr_settype(&ih_PthreadMutexAttr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK);
pthread_mutex_init(&ih_PthreadMutex, &ih_PthreadMutexAttr);
#endif
}
____________
|
|
|
vmcSend message
Joined: 5 Aug 09
Posts: 9
ID: 44537
Credit: 17,515,448
RAC: 4,451
|
|
I've seen this bug and fixed it for my 32bit version (Since the prp-zipbal does NOT include any prpclient for 32bit, although it's posted to do so ... !) .
Also I don't see a coherence between priority and threads. But not yet checked the code.
|
|
|
LexsVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 08
Posts: 61
ID: 20289
Credit: 49,033,000
RAC: 0
|
|
This pthread assertion tpp.c line 63 is well known when you google it:
see: http://sourceware.org/ml/libc-help/2008-05/msg00072.html
It was simply fixed there by initializing the mutexattr properly.
____________
|
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
An uninitialized mutex attr might cause the problem.
try to change in SharedMemoryItem.cpp
#ifdef WIN32
ih_Mutex = CreateMutex(0, false, itemName);
#else
pthread_mutexattr_init(&ih_PthreadMutexAttr); // <-- THIS
pthread_mutexattr_settype(&ih_PthreadMutexAttr, PTHREAD_MUTEX_ERRORCHECK);
pthread_mutex_init(&ih_PthreadMutex, &ih_PthreadMutexAttr);
#endif
}
Thank you! I'll apply that for the next release. |
|
|
vmcSend message
Joined: 5 Aug 09
Posts: 9
ID: 44537
Credit: 17,515,448
RAC: 4,451
|
|
You might want to add some error checking.
The POSIX thread-calls always set errno ... |
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
You might want to add some error checking.
The POSIX thread-calls always set errno ...
I know. I was somewhat lazy when I wrote the code. If problems start cropping up because the code is not handling errors, then I need to know. |
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
|
I have release PRPNet 3.2.0. You can get the source and exes here:
http://home.roadrunner.com/~mrodenkirch/prpnet_3.2.0.zip
I'm recommending 3.2.0 to those who participate in the GFN search as it will take care of that issue with the client crashing when only one version of genefer is configured in the ini file.
BTW, if you use phrot on the GFN search, then I suggest you upgrade to phrot 0.72. It has been out for a few weeks, but apparently wasn't mentioned here. phrot/pfgw is only used by the GFN search when genefer/genefer80 encounter a roundoff error.
With this release Lennart should be able to upgrade all servers to 3.2.0. The best change for the participants in the project is a new user_primes.html webpage. |
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
|
Attention!!! Hold off on updating as we investigate an anomaly.
LLR 3.8.0 upgrade
LLR 3.8.0 has officially been released. After a brief testing period, we'll update the PRPNet packages with it. If you wish to test ahead of time, you can download updates here:
http://pgllr.mine.nu/software/LLR/
llr380.zip - Windows GUI and command line
llr380linux.zip - Linux dynamic
llr380macintel.zip - MacIntel
llr380slinux.zip - Linux static
llr380src.zip - source
Just replace LLR in your PRPClient/programs folder.
We'll test PRPNet 3.2.0 and hopefully release soon if all goes well. Note: phrot 0.72 has been in PRPNet packages starting with 3.1.4.
____________
|
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
Attention!!! Hold off on updating as we investigate an anomaly.
LLR 3.8.0 upgrade
LLR 3.8.0 has officially been released. After a brief testing period, we'll update the PRPNet packages with it. If you wish to test ahead of time, you can download updates here:
http://pgllr.mine.nu/software/LLR/
llr380.zip - Windows GUI and command line
llr380linux.zip - Linux dynamic
llr380macintel.zip - MacIntel
llr380slinux.zip - Linux static
llr380src.zip - source
Just replace LLR in your PRPClient/programs folder.
We'll test PRPNet 3.2.0 and hopefully release soon if all goes well. Note: phrot 0.72 has been in PRPNet packages starting with 3.1.4.
You might want to hold off on LLR 3.8.0 until Jean has the opportunity to investigate some issues. See http://www.mersenneforum.org/showthread.php?t=13073 for more details. |
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
|
PRPNet v3.2.3 ALPHA
Initial feedback on the new release has been positive. Please consider giving this a test and posting your experience with it here. Some of the improvements are:
- prpclient v3.2.3 alpha
- LLR v3.8.0 dev (MacIntel remains at v3.8.0)
- pfgw v3.3.3
Why the update from 3.8.0 to 3.8.0 dev? The development version has improved error recovery.
NOTE: The SGS server stats page is experiencing problems handling the large k. Therefore, it is not displaying the correct information. However, this has no impact on the client.
Application builds are available for the following:
3.2.3alpha archives
- prpclient-3.2.3alpha-linux (32 bit - will run on 64 bit)
- prpclient-3.2.3alpha-windows (32 bit - will run on 64 bit)
- prpclient-3.2.3alpha-macintel
- prpclient-3.2.3alpha-macppc
- prpclient-3.2.3alpha-ps3
- prpclient-3.2.3alpha-ultrasparc32
- prpclient-3.2.3alpha-ultrasparc64
We have a growing confidence in this alpha version. :) For more information and to download the new builds, please see the PRPNet thread.
Thank you in advance for your feedback.
____________
|
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
|
The port descriptions for PPSE are incorrect in the PPSE thread. BTW, is port 11000 supposed to be active? |
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
|
GFN ports are now available:
server=GFN32768:0:1:prpnet.primegrid.com:12005
server=GFN65536:0:1:prpnet.primegrid.com:12003
NOTE: 64 bit Windows clients should UNcomment the line "geneferexe=genefX64.exe" in the master_prpclient.ini file if participating in the GFN Prime Search.
The only one that remains offline is:
//server=PPSElow:0:10:uwin.mine.nu:11000
We hope to have this up as soon as possible.
____________
|
|
|
Sysadm@NbgVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 08
Posts: 1216
ID: 18646
Credit: 858,366,191
RAC: 172,077
|
The only one that remains offline is:
//server=PPSElow:0:10:uwin.mine.nu:11000
We hope to have this up as soon as possible.
Yeah!
It have not been seen before by me: all ports green (except 11K)
Have a look >>here<<
____________
Sysadm@Nbg
my current lucky number: 113856050^65536 + 1
PSA-PRPNet-Stats-URL: http://u-g-f.de/PRPNet/
|
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
|
PRPNet v3.2.3 ALPHA - Update
10 ports, 3 days of up time, 36 client downloads, and no major issues so far. I'd say that's EXCELLENT for an alpha release. It's safe to say that we now have a stable client. Kudo's to Mark...the potential of PRPNet is finally starting to shine. :)
There are still a few cosmetic updates (SGS server stats) that need to be done along with some minor server issues. The BETA release will probably be around the corner. However, we suspect this will only affect the server side.
If you still haven't updated, please consider doing that now. Application builds are available for the following:
3.2.3alpha archives
- prpclient-3.2.3alpha-linux (32 bit - will run on 64 bit)
- prpclient-3.2.3alpha-windows (32 bit - will run on 64 bit)
- prpclient-3.2.3alpha-macintel
- prpclient-3.2.3alpha-macppc
- prpclient-3.2.3alpha-ps3
- prpclient-3.2.3alpha-ultrasparc32
- prpclient-3.2.3alpha-ultrasparc64
For more information and to download the new builds, please see the PRPNet thread.
Please post any issues you have with PRPNet in this thread.
____________
|
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
|
That is excellent news. How about a PRPNet mini-challenge to really stress it out? |
|
|
Sysadm@NbgVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 08
Posts: 1216
ID: 18646
Credit: 858,366,191
RAC: 172,077
|
|
today 5.565 tests are done (1.317 on PPSE and 3.027 on ESP)
perhaps this is stressing enough (on this two ports) ?
maybe lets stress other ports (GCW13 ...)
____________
Sysadm@Nbg
my current lucky number: 113856050^65536 + 1
PSA-PRPNet-Stats-URL: http://u-g-f.de/PRPNet/
|
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
|
rogue wrote: That is excellent news. How about a PRPNet mini-challenge to really stress it out?
We are working on a Mini Challenge that will accomplish two goals; 1) stress PRPNet for an extended period of time; and 2) help the PPSE project reach 500K sooner.
However, none of the projects currently available at PrimeGrid can stress PRPNet more than our own internal testing. We were able to max out at 15 tests/second for about 2 hours. That equates to 54K tests an hour. The fastest project in PrimeGrid's PSA currently has tests that last at least 6-10 minutes each. In order to reach 15 tests/sec at 6 minutes a test would require 5400 cores connected to PRPNet. :D As you can see, there's plenty of room for growth.
We are looking at a primary stress date of 2 April 2010 18:00 UTC for 24 hours. If all goes well, there will be an extended stress that will last until 9 April 2010 18:00 UTC.
More details to come soon. PRPNet's Fool's Day Mini Challenge 1 April is April Fool's Day. 1 is not a prime number...however, 2 is. ;)
Sysadm@Nbg wrote: maybe lets stress other ports (GCW13 ...)
The GCW13 Mini Challenge has been reinstated. The next occurrence is 12-14 April 2010.
____________
|
|
|
pschoeferVolunteer developer
Volunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 20 Sep 05
Posts: 685
ID: 845
Credit: 2,886,413,454
RAC: 139,386
|
|
There might be a minor issue with v3.2.3 in case a proth prime is found.
The email I got after I found a prime states that the client did not run a test to search for GFN divisors. But PFGW is not commented out, there is a new file pfgw.log (containing only the prime) and the log says that the test ran much longer than normal:
[2010-04-03 05:46:22 GMT] PFDMC: 5513*2^495797+1 is not prime. Residue E5900708502970AB
[2010-04-03 05:52:04 GMT] PFDMC: 5515*2^495796+1 is not prime. Residue 332813AF5A9E0C8A
[2010-04-03 06:43:30 GMT] PFDMC: 5527*2^495796+1 is Prime!
So I guess that the client actually did the GFN test, but the prime is no GFN divisor and that negative result was not sent to the server.
____________
|
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
There might be a minor issue with v3.2.3 in case a proth prime is found.
The email I got after I found a prime states that the client did not run a test to search for GFN divisors. But PFGW is not commented out, there is a new file pfgw.log (containing only the prime) and the log says that the test ran much longer than normal:
[2010-04-03 05:46:22 GMT] PFDMC: 5513*2^495797+1 is not prime. Residue E5900708502970AB
[2010-04-03 05:52:04 GMT] PFDMC: 5515*2^495796+1 is not prime. Residue 332813AF5A9E0C8A
[2010-04-03 06:43:30 GMT] PFDMC: 5527*2^495796+1 is Prime!
So I guess that the client actually did the GFN test, but the prime is no GFN divisor and that negative result was not sent to the server.
I am aware of the problem, but haven't been able to work on it.
BTW, make sure you are running PFGW 3.3.3. You can get it from here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openpfgw/files/ |
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
So I guess that the client actually did the GFN test, but the prime is no GFN divisor and that negative result was not sent to the server.
I am aware of the problem, but haven't been able to work on it.
BTW, make sure you are running PFGW 3.3.3. You can get it from here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openpfgw/files/
FYI...as Lennart mentions, the candidate was marked as GFN tested in the database so the client did return that information.
Also, all our v3.2.3alpha packages contain the latest updates. For more details, please see PRPNet.
____________
|
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
So I guess that the client actually did the GFN test, but the prime is no GFN divisor and that negative result was not sent to the server.
I am aware of the problem, but haven't been able to work on it.
BTW, make sure you are running PFGW 3.3.3. You can get it from here: http://sourceforge.net/projects/openpfgw/files/
FYI...as Lennart mentions, the candidate was marked as GFN tested in the database so the client did return that information.
Also, all our v3.2.3alpha packages contain the latest updates. For more details, please see PRPNet.
The problem is that the e-mail says that the number has not been tested for GFN divisibility even though it has. |
|
|
|
|
|
I have a problem with running prpclient-3.2.3alpha-linux on this box:
http://www.primegrid.com/show_host_detail.php?hostid=139521
It is running OS: Ubuntu 9.10 w/ gnome
It's a 32 bit Intel(R) Xeon(TM) CPU 1700MHz (pair)
1 Gig of RAM
When I start prp it flashes xterm then gone.
This is my only 32bit box running now.
So I have moved back to prpclient-3.2.1beta-linux for PRPNet's Fool's Day mini Challenge.
If you need more info or want me to try something, just ask
btw / PS3
seems to run phrot only Is this right?
llrexe=
phrotexe=./phrot
pfgwexe=
geneferexe=
Thanks, Steve Martin
____________
From the High Desert in New Mexico
 |
|
|
LexsVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 08
Posts: 61
ID: 20289
Credit: 49,033,000
RAC: 0
|
I have a problem with running prpclient-3.2.3alpha-linux
When I start prp it flashes xterm then gone.
I guess you haven't called the install script before, so maybe the directories which are called by the start script are missing ?
If the problem still exist, you can just copy all the binaries and the prpclient.ini by hand into a seperate directory and start prpclient there, and leave that window alone.
Repeat for each additional cpu core (another seperate directory is required for each instance.)
btw / PS3
seems to run phrot only Is this right?
llrexe=
phrotexe=./phrot
pfgwexe=
geneferexe=
That is correct, the PS3 is a powerpc platform, like MacPPC, and LLR+PFGW is using x86-assembly code (gwnum-lib) which has not been ported to powerpc yet.
Genefer exists for powerpc but is horribly slow, a PS3 version of genefer using the 6 SPU processors also exists but is a little bit unstable, therefore it is not included in the prpclient bundle.
____________
|
|
|
|
|
|
http://pgllr.mine.nu/PRPNet/ seems to be empty. Can't find the files. Are the servers down?
____________
 |
|
|
LexsVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 16 Mar 08
Posts: 61
ID: 20289
Credit: 49,033,000
RAC: 0
|
http://pgllr.mine.nu/PRPNet/ seems to be empty. Can't find the files. Are the servers down?
server is available here, maybe a blocked ip, we already had something like that some time ago.
can you try from a different ip ? redial your provider to get a different ip maybe? |
|
|
Sysadm@NbgVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 08
Posts: 1216
ID: 18646
Credit: 858,366,191
RAC: 172,077
|
|
maybe a reboot
HttpFileServer 2.3 beta
Servertime: 4/6/2010 8:54:52 PM
Uptime: 00:40:50
40 minutes ago match your try ...
____________
Sysadm@Nbg
my current lucky number: 113856050^65536 + 1
PSA-PRPNet-Stats-URL: http://u-g-f.de/PRPNet/
|
|
|
Sysadm@NbgVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 08
Posts: 1216
ID: 18646
Credit: 858,366,191
RAC: 172,077
|
|
just downloaded 3.2.5alpha_linux64
a little bit confusing is the message at start of prpclient:
[09.04.2010 16:53:43][sysadm@ubuntu-quad:~/prpclient-3.2.5alpha-linux_64/prpclient-1]
$ ./prpclient
[2010-04-09 14:53:59 GMT] PRPNet Client application v3.2.4 started
Why there is wrong version ???
I hope it was not a packing failure ...
____________
Sysadm@Nbg
my current lucky number: 113856050^65536 + 1
PSA-PRPNet-Stats-URL: http://u-g-f.de/PRPNet/
|
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
just downloaded 3.2.5alpha_linux64
a little bit confusing is the message at start of prpclient:
[09.04.2010 16:53:43][sysadm@ubuntu-quad:~/prpclient-3.2.5alpha-linux_64/prpclient-1]
$ ./prpclient
[2010-04-09 14:53:59 GMT] PRPNet Client application v3.2.4 started
Why there is wrong version ???
I hope it was not a packing failure ...
It has been corrected now. Thanks for the catch!
____________
|
|
|
Sysadm@NbgVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 08
Posts: 1216
ID: 18646
Credit: 858,366,191
RAC: 172,077
|
|
port 12005 / GFN32768
nothing to do!
http://prpnet.primegrid.com:12005/server_stats.html
nothing pending!
http://prpnet.primegrid.com:12005/pending_tests.html
very low progress (2 tests!) since 04/15/2010
PRPNet-Stats
will there be work again after the challenge ??
by the way: is PRPNet up during challenge or down or only a few ports up ??
____________
Sysadm@Nbg
my current lucky number: 113856050^65536 + 1
PSA-PRPNet-Stats-URL: http://u-g-f.de/PRPNet/
|
|
|
|
|
port 12005 / GFN32768
nothing to do!
http://prpnet.primegrid.com:12005/server_stats.html
nothing pending!
http://prpnet.primegrid.com:12005/pending_tests.html
very low progress (2 tests!) since 04/15/2010
PRPNet-Stats
will there be work again after the challenge ??
by the way: is PRPNet up during challenge or down or only a few ports up ??
We will try keep them up.
I shall try load them again but not before the challenge has started.
Lennart
|
|
|
|
|
|
How much work is left for PPSE low until it catches up with the rest of the effort?
____________
|
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
How much work is left for PPSE low until it catches up with the rest of the effort?
Years. Basically the entire range from 125K-450K needs to be completed. A few blocks have been completed in there but it's still a lot of work.
____________
|
|
|
|
|
|
For Port 12005; Generalized Fermat Number Prime Search (b^2^n+1) this listing for tasks not yet added it says :
"Candidate User Client Date Assigned Age (hh:mm)
3149872^32768+1 endlessmike P4C_2800c 04/27/10 17:20:02 210:20
3149976^32768+1 Pilgrim PilgrimDS1 04/29/10 01:30:53 178:09
3149998^32768+1 endlessmike P4C_2800c 04/29/10 02:22:41 177:18
3150366^32768+1 DoctorNow QuantumTechbase 04/30/10 09:03:03 146:37
3150414^32768+1 DoctorNow QuantumTechbase 04/30/10 13:35:26 142:05
3150416^32768+1 DoctorNow QuantumTechbase 04/30/10 13:36:35 142:04
3153376^32768+1 10876 clientID 05/06/10 06:03:11 5:37
3153370^32768+1 10876 clientID 05/06/10 06:03:11 5:37
3153356^32768+1 10876 clientID 05/06/10 06:03:11 5:37
3153352^32768+1 10876 clientID 05/06/10 06:03:11 5:37
3153344^32768+1 10876 clientID 05/06/10 06:03:11 5:37
3153440^32768+1 10876 clientID 05/06/10 07:11:19 4:29
3153438^32768+1 10876 clientID 05/06/10 07:11:19 4:29
3153430^32768+1 10876 clientID 05/06/10 07:11:19 4:29
3153428^32768+1 10876 clientID 05/06/10 07:11:19 4:29
3153424^32768+1 10876 clientID 05/06/10 07:11:19 4:29
3153418^32768+1 10876 clientID 05/06/10 07:11:19 4:29
3153556^32768+1 JohnMJohnson clientID 05/06/10 09:55:02 1:45
3153558^32768+1 JohnMJohnson clientID 05/06/10 09:55:02 1:45
3153562^32768+1 SysadmAtNbg ubuntu_quad 05/06/10 11:09:56 0:30"
10876 is my ID but I made the mistake of not putting it on the ClientID so now it shows that I might not get credit for 11 or 13 so now that I've changed it I think so it will show me instead of just 10876 and ClientID But I need someone to make sure that I get credit and for tasks completed as well as credit. This was my error but please help me fix it by helping me out here. Thanks John, Rytis, Lennart, and Everyone else that could help this situation out :) Much appreciated guys!
____________
John M. Johnson "Novex" |
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
10876 is my ID but I made the mistake of not putting it on the ClientID so now it shows that I might not get credit for 11 or 13 so now that I've changed it I think so it will show me instead of just 10876 and ClientID
User names are converted to User ID's before credit (cobblestones) is applied. So, either way, User ID 10876 will get the credit. Client ID is not used to apply credit (cobblestones).
____________
|
|
|
JayVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 28 Apr 10
Posts: 82
ID: 59636
Credit: 10,419,429
RAC: 0
       
|
|
Hi, I've been recently using PRPNet to run PPSE. I found two primes, but I didn't get an email for either of them. I've checked that my settings are correct in the config file, and I've checked that they didn't get caught in a spam filter. Any tips?
Also, (sorry, newbie question coming) is there a "standard" database to check if these primes have been found before? And does PRPNet handle reporting the primes I found to this database, if there is one? |
|
|
Sysadm@NbgVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 08
Posts: 1216
ID: 18646
Credit: 858,366,191
RAC: 172,077
|
Hi, I've been recently using PRPNet to run PPSE. I found two primes, but I didn't get an email for either of them. ...
Hej Jay
Congratulations to your founds!
According to my stats page you found primes on port "PPSE11K" aka "http://uwin.mine.nu:11000/". Unfortunately the primes found on this port are to small to make it into the TOP5000-Prime-Pages.
So there isnt any need to inform you via eMail :(
But dont give up! Perhaps your next prime found will be large enough, to make it into top 5000 ...
____________
Sysadm@Nbg
my current lucky number: 113856050^65536 + 1
PSA-PRPNet-Stats-URL: http://u-g-f.de/PRPNet/
|
|
|
JayVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 28 Apr 10
Posts: 82
ID: 59636
Credit: 10,419,429
RAC: 0
|
Hi, I've been recently using PRPNet to run PPSE. I found two primes, but I didn't get an email for either of them. ...
Hej Jay
Congratulations to your founds!
According to my stats page you found primes on port "PPSE11K" aka "http://uwin.mine.nu:11000/". Unfortunately the primes found on this port are to small to make it into the TOP5000-Prime-Pages.
So there isnt any need to inform you via eMail :(
But dont give up! Perhaps your next prime found will be large enough, to make it into top 5000 ...
Thanks for the information! |
|
|
|
|
Hi, I've been recently using PRPNet to run PPSE. I found two primes, but I didn't get an email for either of them. ...
Hej Jay
Congratulations to your founds!
According to my stats page you found primes on port "PPSE11K" aka "http://uwin.mine.nu:11000/". Unfortunately the primes found on this port are to small to make it into the TOP5000-Prime-Pages.
So there isnt any need to inform you via eMail :(
But dont give up! Perhaps your next prime found will be large enough, to make it into top 5000 ...
Thanks for the information!
Congrats on finding the primes!!!! Stick with it and you will get a top 5000 prime!! trust me I stuck with it and got a few :)
____________
John M. Johnson "Novex" |
|
|
|
|
10876 is my ID but I made the mistake of not putting it on the ClientID so now it shows that I might not get credit for 11 or 13 so now that I've changed it I think so it will show me instead of just 10876 and ClientID
User names are converted to User ID's before credit (cobblestones) is applied. So, either way, User ID 10876 will get the credit. Client ID is not used to apply credit (cobblestones).
Ok got a problem here then, I just noticed as I've been keeping track of my progress on GFN32768 port 12005 and as you already know my ID number issue was 10876. Well I know that I had a lot more tests then what is showing under what should be JohnMJohnson so I looked closely and this is what it shows:
NAME-------------SCORE---TESTS COMPLETED---------PRIMES FOUND
JohnMJohnson--80130----207 ---------------------------0 0
10876------------ 82991---183 ---------------------------0 0
So if you can delete the 10876 and add the 82991 to my JohnMJohnson score along with the tests completed and then make sure that anymore that come threw go to JohnMJohnson and not the ID number of mine that would be awesome. I dunno how this happened other then my original post that you said it didn't work that way but somehow it is. I would appreciate any assistance possible because I know I should have over 300 tests completed so that should = those two together. Sorry again for the inconvenience. Bugs/issues do arise in PRPNET and thats understandable thank god we found this one before it really caused more then 1 person a problem :) Thanks John / Lennart / Rytis / Everyone else that could or can help.
____________
John M. Johnson "Novex" |
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
Bugs/issues do arise in PRPNET and thats understandable thank god we found this one before it really caused more then 1 person a problem :)
This is not a bug.
As long as hosts return work with two different UserID's, their scores will remain different. "JohnMJohnson" and "10876" are treated as two different UserID's. The PRPNet DB can be manually edited to move the tests and score. However, as long as UserID "10876" returns work, all new work will go back to that UserID. There's no "fix" to this other than to use the same UserID for all your hosts.
The scores you see are PRPNet scores...they are not BOINC credit (cobblestones). However, the PRPNet scores are used to determine BOINC credit. During this process, the two different UserID's will get converted into your PrimeGrid UserID 10876 and cobblestones will be applied to that single account.
____________
|
|
|
|
|
Bugs/issues do arise in PRPNET and thats understandable thank god we found this one before it really caused more then 1 person a problem :)
This is not a bug.
As long as hosts return work with two different UserID's, their scores will remain different. "JohnMJohnson" and "10876" are treated as two different UserID's. The PRPNet DB can be manually edited to move the tests and score. However, as long as UserID "10876" returns work, all new work will go back to that UserID. There's no "fix" to this other than to use the same UserID for all your hosts.
The scores you see are PRPNet scores...they are not BOINC credit (cobblestones). However, the PRPNet scores are used to determine BOINC credit. During this process, the two different UserID's will get converted into your PrimeGrid UserID 10876 and cobblestones will be applied to that single account.
Ok I fixed it on my end, dunno how I messed up switched the two but somehow on my laptop dual core it was switched. So they can be put together to JohnMJohnson when Rytis or Lennart get a chance? That would be awesome if that could be done. Thanks John
____________
John M. Johnson "Novex" |
|
|
JayVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 28 Apr 10
Posts: 82
ID: 59636
Credit: 10,419,429
RAC: 0
|
|
It seems that port 10000 (PPSEhigh) is empty. Does this mean the work is done, or that it needs to be refilled? |
|
|
|
|
|
I tend to get better results from people that don't flip on my every second comment to release my portrayal. they get. So I would try Rytis or Lennart my friend. Oh also Try Tim he can help too :) if not PM me and let me know how it goes kind sir and I'll see what I can do for you :)
Best of Luck
____________
John M. Johnson "Novex" |
|
|
|
|
It seems that port 10000 (PPSEhigh) is empty. Does this mean the work is done, or that it needs to be refilled?
I have cleaned it up and are now loading 330k more.
will take about 20 min.
Lennart
____________
 |
|
|
JayVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 28 Apr 10
Posts: 82
ID: 59636
Credit: 10,419,429
RAC: 0
|
|
Thanks! I wasn't quite sure how the process worked. |
|
|
|
|
|
All is well.
PRPNET scores are just bragging rights and the important thing
is your score on PRIME GRID...which should be correct once the manual labor is done because it will get combined into your ONE id 10876.
I have gone weeks running up PRPNET points not realizing i used different
names......but they all got combined into my one unique prime grid account
Cheers |
|
|
Michael GoetzVolunteer moderator
Project administrator
Send message
Joined: 21 Jan 10
Posts: 13951
ID: 53948
Credit: 391,788,067
RAC: 149,919
           
|
|
The ESP server status pages, such as http://pgllr.mine.nu:9000/server_stats.html, are not responding.
Does that mean someone found another prime?
____________
My lucky number is 75898524288+1 |
|
|
|
|
The ESP server status pages, such as http://pgllr.mine.nu:9000/server_stats.html, are not responding.
Does that mean someone found another prime?
seems to be a DNS error. Should work now.
Lennart
____________
|
|
|
|
|
|
Say Lennart! Glad I could catch you while I had a question on my mind lately. As of these PRPNET Options, Not including the rare test only server ones and the such of coarse:
Basic Stats:
Detailed daily user stats courtesy of Sysadm@Nbg
Today's Prime Finders courtesy of Sysadm@Nbg
port 9000: ESP Server : User : Pending Tests
port 10000: PPSE n>500K Server : User : Pending Tests
port 11000: PPSE n<500K Server :User : Pending Tests
port 12000: SGS Server : User : Pending Tests
port 12002: FPS Server : User : Pending Tests
port 12003: GFN65536 Server : User : Pending Tests
port 12004: GCW13 Server : User : Pending Tests
port 12005: GFN32768 Server : User : Pending Tests
port 12006: 27121 Server : User : Pending Tests
port 12008: PRS Server : User : Pending Tests
Retired Ports
port 9000: PPSE n>500K User
port 12007: PPSE n>500K User
So my question is because I've been doing the port 12005 a lot lately and now I have 1 of my computers doing two different projects, the 12005 and 50% and 12008 at 50% and I noticed as I should that the Primordial would take a lot longer which in fact they do :) but then who exactly figures out how much to award and give for cobblestones then at the end of the day sir? Thats the mystery thats been bugging me so much since I Really want my first Gold badge to be of PSA since I love alpha and beta testing so much and enjoy this website and community like they were a part of my family. A huge, lol but nice and wonderfully brilliant people here :)
____________
John M. Johnson "Novex" |
|
|
BenvaVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 5 May 08
Posts: 73
ID: 22332
Credit: 2,715,050
RAC: 0
|
|
Problems on port 9000:
[2010-05-10 16:13:14 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:9000 connect to socket failed with error 10061
Are you aware of this?
Thanks
Benva
____________
|
|
|
|
|
Problems on port 9000:
[2010-05-10 16:13:14 GMT] pgllr.mine.nu:9000 connect to socket failed with error 10061
Are you aware of this?
Thanks
Benva
Yes. I hope it works now.There was a DNS error.
Lennartt
|
|
|
JayVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 28 Apr 10
Posts: 82
ID: 59636
Credit: 10,419,429
RAC: 0
|
|
I'm unable to connect to ports 10000 and 11000 (both through a browser the client).
Edit: Never mind, it's back up. :) |
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
|
PRPNet v3.2.5alpha
We continue to offer v3.2.5alpha as the latest build. Contrary to its alpha status, it has proven itself to be very stable. If you haven't done so already, please update to this release.
You can download the archives here: http://pgllr.mine.nu/PRPNet/
3.2.5alpha archives
- prpclient-3.2.5alpha-linux (32 bit)
- prpclient-3.2.5alpha-linux_64 (64 bit)
- prpclient-3.2.5alpha-windows (32 bit - will run on 64 bit)
- prpclient-3.2.5alpha-macintel
- prpclient-3.2.5alpha-macppc
- prpclient-3.2.5alpha-ps3
- prpclient-3.2.5alpha-ultrasparc32
- prpclient-3.2.5alpha-ultrasparc64
Mac, PS3 and UltraSPARC builds courtesy of Andreas Kobara. Thanks!!!
NOTE: The above archives contain the following:
prpclient - Version 3.2.5alpha
llr - Version 3.8.0 (Linux, Windows, MacIntel)
pfgw - Version 3.3.4 (Linux, Windows, MacIntel)
phrot - Version 0.72 (MacIntel, MacPPC, ultrasparc32, ultrasparc64, PS3)
Genefer - Version 2.2.0 (Linux, Windows, MacIntel, MacPPC)
Genefer80 - Version 2.2.0 (Windows only)
GenefX64 - Version 2.2.0 (Windows 64 bit only)
llr version 3.8.1 dev is currently being tested. It will be announced when it is ready for inclusion.
____________
|
|
|
JayVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 28 Apr 10
Posts: 82
ID: 59636
Credit: 10,419,429
RAC: 0
|
|
[2010-05-16 15:04:57 GMT] uwin.mine.nu:11000 connect to socket failed with error 111
[2010-05-16 15:04:57 GMT] uwin.mine.nu:10000 connect to socket failed with error 111
Is this just me?
____________
 |
|
|
warddrVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 7 Feb 08
Posts: 254
ID: 18735
Credit: 24,054,820
RAC: 0
|
[2010-05-16 15:04:57 GMT] uwin.mine.nu:11000 connect to socket failed with error 111
[2010-05-16 15:04:57 GMT] uwin.mine.nu:10000 connect to socket failed with error 111
Is this just me?
No, it's not just you.
____________
|
|
|
JayVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 28 Apr 10
Posts: 82
ID: 59636
Credit: 10,419,429
RAC: 0
|
|
It's back, thanks!
____________
|
|
|
JayVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 28 Apr 10
Posts: 82
ID: 59636
Credit: 10,419,429
RAC: 0
|
|
Ports 10000 and 11000 are both empty.
____________
|
|
|
JayVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 28 Apr 10
Posts: 82
ID: 59636
Credit: 10,419,429
RAC: 0
|
|
Why are PRPNet credits added manually? Is there a reason that an automated script run daily wouldn't work?
____________
|
|
|
warddrVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 7 Feb 08
Posts: 254
ID: 18735
Credit: 24,054,820
RAC: 0
|
|
Maybe you can change the linux prpnet start scripts a litle bit, it would be better if the name prpclient is showed, and not the name ./startx.sh
It can be done this way:
for x in prpclient-{1..2}; do pushd $x; xterm -T $x -e ./startx.sh & popd; done
I didn't know that when I wrote the first version of the linux shell files.
____________
|
|
|
|
|
|
that only works is you use xterm's of course.. if you are only console based it probably will not work. |
|
|
warddrVolunteer tester
Send message
Joined: 7 Feb 08
Posts: 254
ID: 18735
Credit: 24,054,820
RAC: 0
|
that only works is you use xterm's of course.. if you are only console based it probably will not work.
The only thing I added is -T $x , xterm is already used in the current version as well.
Command line users should just go to the prpclient-1 and prpclient-2 and ... directory and run there
./startx.sh &
But that way the output will be mixed.
____________
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This sets the CPU affinity for LLR on multi-CPU machines.
affinity=
What does this mean and what are the setting?
Which ports can this be used on?
Thanks
Steve
____________
From the High Desert in New Mexico
|
|
|
rogueVolunteer developer
Send message
Joined: 8 Sep 07
Posts: 1255
ID: 12001
Credit: 18,565,548
RAC: 0
|
// This sets the CPU affinity for LLR on multi-CPU machines.
affinity=
What does this mean and what are the setting?
Which ports can this be used on?
Any. This is a client only setting and only affects LLR. I don't think it is particularly useful as the OS should choose the CPU that is being used the least. |
|
|
|
|
|
Port 11k server=PPSE11K:50:20:pgllr.mine.nu:11000
Is moved to server=PPSE11K:50:20:prime2u.com:11000
Lennart |
|
|
|
|
Port 11k server=PPSE11K:50:20:pgllr.mine.nu:11000
Is moved to server=PPSE11K:50:20:prime2u.com:11000
Lennart
Port 11k is upgraded to PRPServer 3.3.0
Lennart |
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
|
Seeking testers
PRPNet v3.3.0alpha is now available for testing. There are a lot of changes so please proceed with caution. Port 11000 is the designated test server. Only connect to this server for testing.
server=PPSE11K:0:10:prime2u.com:11000
Be sure to uncomment this port and set share to 100. Additionally, LLR has been updated to v3.8.1.
Please report back any issues that you encounter. Thank you! :)
NOTE: v3.2.5alpha should still be used for all other servers.
You can download the archives here: http://pgllr.mine.nu/PRPNet/test/
3.3.0alpha archives
- prpclient-3.3.0alpha-linux (32 bit)
- prpclient-3.3.0alpha-linux_64 (64 bit)
- prpclient-3.3.0alpha-windows (32 bit - will run on 64 bit)
- prpclient-3.3.0alpha-macintel
- prpclient-3.3.0alpha-macppc
- prpclient-3.3.0alpha-ps3
- prpclient-3.3.0alpha-ultrasparc32
- prpclient-3.3.0alpha-ultrasparc64
Mac, PS3 and UltraSPARC builds courtesy of Andreas Kobara. Thanks!!!
NOTE: The above archives contain the following:
prpclient - Version 3.3.0alpha
llr - Version 3.8.1 (Linux, Windows, MacIntel)
pfgw - Version 3.3.4 (Linux, Windows, MacIntel)
phrot - Version 0.72 (MacIntel, MacPPC, ultrasparc32, ultrasparc64, PS3)
Genefer - Version 2.2.0 (Linux, Windows, MacIntel, MacPPC)
Genefer80 - Version 2.2.0 (Windows only)
GenefX64 - Version 2.2.0 (Windows 64 bit only)
Version 3.3.0: May 2010 - New Release
all: Code infrastructure changes WRT sockets. The Socket class was
cumbersome. I changed it so that Socket is an ancestor class and
that specific server/client/mail functionality would be in descendent
classes.
Buffer no more than 4000 bytes at a time before sending data across
the socket. This should improve performance on large data transfers.
Use a static buffer for receiving data from a socket.
Use a static buffer when logging messages.
prpclient; Fixed an issue when testing for twin primes.
When the startoption is to report and abort, shut down the client
immediately after communicating with the server.
prpserver: Added maxclients= to prpserver.ini to limit how many concurrent
clients the server will handle.
Removed -u option for upgrading from version 2.x.
Removed behavior to insert into UserPrimes at startup since
nobody (that I know of) is using a version of 3.x that is pre-3.2.
Renamed ClientThread.cpp to HelperThread.cpp.
Changed threading architecture to address memory allocation issue.
Do not set LastUpdateTime when a test is sent to a client.
When sorting by LastUpdateTime, include DecimalLength as an
additional criteria in case multiple rows have the same LastUpdateTime.
Moved logic from ClientHandler.cpp to HelperThread.cpp.
Added CompletedThru to group stats.
Added CountInProgress to group stats.
Added summary line to group stats.
Added a new index to Candidate to improve performance.
Fixed an issue with BIGINT datatypes. With this change a number
of columns have been changed from varchar(20) to bigint.
____________
|
|
|
Sysadm@NbgVolunteer moderator
Volunteer tester
Project scientist
Send message
Joined: 5 Feb 08
Posts: 1216
ID: 18646
Credit: 858,366,191
RAC: 172,077
|
|
just download alpha-zip for Linux-64bit
make installation as usual, configure prpclient.ini
start prpclient
then this:
[2010-05-30 14:04:30 GMT] PPSElow11: PRPNet server is version 3.3.0
[2010-05-30 14:04:30 GMT] 3: received [Start Greeting]
[2010-05-30 14:04:30 GMT] 3: received [PPSE 11k]
PPSE 11k
[2010-05-30 14:04:30 GMT] 3: received [End Greeting]
[2010-05-30 14:04:30 GMT] 3: closing socket
sh: ./llr: Permission denied
[2010-05-30 14:04:30 GMT] PPSElow11: Could not open file [lresults.txt] for reading. Assuming user stopped with ^C
[2010-05-30 14:04:30 GMT] Accepted force quit. Waiting to close sockets before exiting
the cause was found very quick: llr isn´t executable, a little "chmod +x ./llr" will fix this ...
____________
Sysadm@Nbg
my current lucky number: 113856050^65536 + 1
PSA-PRPNet-Stats-URL: http://u-g-f.de/PRPNet/
|
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
the cause was found very quick: llr isn´t executable, a little "chmod +x ./llr" will fix this ...
Builds updated. Thanks for the quick catch.
____________
|
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
|
PRPNet port 12001: 121 Search
Several people testing the new PRPNet v3.3.0 have noticed a new port in the master_prpclient.ini server list. Port 12001 has been added and is testing k=121 +1/-1 starting at n=3.7M.
Port 12006 which is currently 27121 will continue up to n=2.5M. Once that's complete, it will switch to 27 +1/-1 only and will start at 3.7M. 2.5M to 2.9M is already complete. 2.9M to 3.7M is currently being completed externally by puzzle_peter.
Best of luck!
____________
|
|
|
|
|
|
You may want to update port 10k and 11k on the main PRPNet post, the links dont work there for server info/user stats.
____________
|
|
|
JohnHonorary cruncher
Send message
Joined: 21 Feb 06
Posts: 2875
ID: 2449
Credit: 2,681,934
RAC: 0
|
